airman_1

ImageMovers, the Robert Zemeckis motion-capture animation studio behind Beowulf and A Christmas Carol, has a new project. Ann Peacock, who wrote the adaptation of The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, is penning an adaptation of the Eoin Colfer novel Airman, which sounds a bit like a combination of The Rocketeer and the mid-period movies by Miyazaki. Could this be the mo-cap project to convince non-believers like myself?

Variety reports that Gil Kenan, who last helmed City of Ember, is directing. I loved the production design and some of the world-building in City of Ember, but thought it was full of contrivances and uninteresting characters. So that could be a problem.

The trade reports that the story is about Connor, “a boy who lives on an island off the coast of Ireland, where his father is the king’s bodyguard. When the king is murdered, Conor is blamed for the crime and thrown into prison where he passes the solitary months designing a flying machine that he will use to save his family.” Amazon gives us this: “Born in the basket of a hot-air balloon at the end of the nineteenth century, Conor Broekhart is intrigued with flying. At age 14, after witnessing the murder of his tutor, Conor is sent to prison. He hopes to escape by means of a flying machine.” And Wikipedia says that further down the line, “Conor constructs a hang-glider and adopts the persona of the Airman, a flying French swordsman.”

All of which, rendered in the Zemeckis motion-capture style, could actually be pretty cool. Just the other day I was relating that I was impressed by how far some of the animation had come in A Christmas Carol. If the same technique was applied to a story that is both new and adventurous in spirit, I’d be a lot more willing to play along than I am in the case of a too-familiar tale like A Christmas Carol.

  • Damnit. I saw Eoin Colfer and assumed that the Artemis Fowl movie was finally being made.
  • shadow
    I hope this leads to it's development. I actually wouldn't mind it in Zemeckises style, as I don't want to see it as a kids film (that would make me cry) but think it would be insanely costly as a proper live action adaptation.

    Holly Short needs to kick some ass on the big screen.
  • fanboy_d
    i thought it was artemis fowl too, so weird that this would get made first...

    i really wish zemeckis would give up on this mo-cap obsession
  • Julius
    The thing is, you never see 100% of the mo-cap on screen. It gets edited and re-animated by actual people before it hits the screen, so you're never seeing just the raw information. People don't seem to get that. Also, it's so a director can use the actors they want and get their actual performance - like A Christmas Carol for example - you get Jim Carrey's voice and his acting all in one. Admittedly, the results sometimes don't look the best but the technology is changing.
  • fanboy_d
    i get why it's attractive - it's exciting, especially for filmmakers that have been in the business a long time. but really. "Jim Carrey's voice and his acting all in one", you get that with a regular camera. Animate or don't.
  • Tetsuo_Man
    The animation, or whatever you call his weird dingy cellshaded look he's been slapping on his films, just looks bad. Sorry, but I'd MUCH rather they just shoot it regular style. In other news, Steampunk fans rejoice, this sounds like your kinda cup o' tea!
  • Colonel_Kurtz
    I haven't read the book, but the story sounds pretty interesting. I really don't like motion capture though. That's a major turn-off for me.
  • Octoberist
    I don't like motion capture either, though I do like CGI animation ala Pixar. I think motion capture just looks very off putting. I have to see what Avatar can bring to the table..
  • Ben
    I'm almost mad that this article doesn't mention Monster House. Gil Kenan directed that film which was also motion capture and its one of my favorite animated movies. Check it out, its great.
  • Bob
    I'll second that.
  • Reese
    Thirded. The only mo-capped movie that is great in my opinion. It's the sole reason I still have hope for the technology.
  • RussFischer
    Yeah, total oversight on my part to not mention it. It's a solid movie, far better than City of Ember.
  • existenz
    I actually read this book and thought it was fairly mediocre. Needs a lot of work to become a good motion picture. We'll see.
  • freemachine
    That glider looks weak as hell. You shoot that thing out of the air with a BB-gun. I hope they change the design.
blog comments powered by Disqus