Some rather surprising news has come on down today from a Deauville, France conference for cinema exhibitors. Jerome Seydoux, the chairmen of Pathe, announced that Roman Polanski’s political thriller The Ghost, which they will be distributing in France, will be finished and released to cinemas whether or not the director is extradited to the US or even incarcerated. Does Polanski know this decision has been made? Has the director been given any say in this matter? Are we seeing the first admission that his film will be taken away from him and completed without his input to serve the distributor’s wishes?

Two French sites raced to post the news first. Here’s a roughly translated quote from Premiere’s ‘exclusive’:

Jerome Seydoux, co-chairman of Pathe and Gaumont cinemas confirmed at the exhibitor’s conference in Deauville that The Ghost will reach French screens in March 2010 . If the director is still detained until that time it seems like other members of his team will take care of sound and music for his film.

And, the ‘first announcement’ from Tout Le Cine, again in rough translation:

Scheduled to be on screens in 2010, The Ghost will be released as planned, imprisoned director or not. This is the first site to make the announcement after receiving the information from the lips of the President of Pathe, Jerome Seydoux. Arriving in Deauville to attend the annual conference of exhibitors, the brother of Nicolas said that the timetable would not move, whatever the circumstances.

The assumption so far seemed to be that the film would most likely be frozen in light of Polanski’s situation. What we don’t know yet is if Polanski has given the go ahead for the sound on the film to be finished without his direct input or if, in effect, the film has been taken away from him.

Pathe are not only distributing the film in France but also own a chain of cinemas there where, of course, they’d be sure to block book it. Their interest in having this film see the light of day is hardly mysterious.

  • Meman
    Nice, then we will have a director's cut in 2020 or so
  • yomiko
    It's not that rare for a film to be completed against or without the Director's wishes. The producers and distributors, whose money paid for the production, are the ones who need to get their investment back and so they're the ones who get the final call on what happens, this is the way of Hollywood and I imagine most film industries around the world.

    I wouldn't say that Polanski's movie is being "taken away." The man has been making movies for decades with the knowledge that he was a fugitive and could be arrested. He made a mistake, here's a consequence. Are we meant to feel sorry for him? I certainly don't. I feel sorry for the people who invested their money in a project that could falter and die for the director's indiscretions.
  • Itri12
    Don't feel sorry for them, I'm sure they knew the consequences and were thrilled to work with such an accomplished director, personal history aside.
  • EbonPinion
    Agreed. Regardless of his horrible past, both as a victim and a perpetrator, Polanski was and is a visionary director. The people who agreed to work with him knew he could be arrested at any time. What's more, all his arrest has done for The Ghost is extra press. It worked out GREAT for everyone involved. Well, except Roman...
  • Itri12
    Good.
  • Pathe should wait it out to see what happens; if Polanski's extradited and has to go back to court it'll be the best publicity money can't by.

    By the way, our take on the Polanski story is here:

    http://www.boxofficepsychics.com/2009/09/29/a-p...
  • JUAN
    just to be slightly polite....DON'T TAKE IT AWAY FROM HIM, REGARDLESS OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES, A ROTTEN WORLD WHEN ART IS TAKEN FOR GRANTED, OR FOR MONEY
blog comments powered by Disqus