hplovecraft

We’ve known for some time now that Ron Howard’s first comic book adaptation will be a film version of the Image Comics series, The Strange Adventures of H.P. Lovecraft. The comic is a fictionalized story featuring a young Lovecraft who goes from a wimpy writer to an ass-kicker of the supernatural.

Speaking to the LA Times Hero Complex blog, Howard shared his excitement for the material—a project he will most likely direct:

Look, it’s challenging, but if we get it right, it could be really original and psychologically interesting and scary in a great way. And it’s a graphic novel, this is new territory for me.

I haven’t yet read the comic, but apparently it’s been well-received as pulpy horror fun. The concept does remind me somewhat of the ill-fated Terry Gilliam vehicle, The Brother’s Grimm, so I’m hoping Howard’s adaptation at least ends up besting that.

As someone who considers Apollo 13 the last truly great Ron Howard film (or at least, the last one where he actually attempted to push himself to new heights), I’m intrigued that he’s so gung-ho about tackling something completely different. Howard’s a talented director that has been playing it safe for some time, so I welcome him taking on a new challenge.

He’s still unsure if he can direct the adaptation, but it seems likely. Lovecraft is apparently one of many projects Howard started to flesh out over the past few years (while he was busy with his Dan Brown adaptations, and Frost/Nixon), but didn’t have time to complete. He elaborates:

So I’ve got literally half-a-dozen projects where essentially I’m waiting for drafts to come in, and there’s something I love about all of these ideas. We’ll just have to wait to see what comes to fruition. I sort of can’t bear the thought of letting any of them go. So maybe I’ve got the next five years spoken for.

Discuss: Do you think Ron Howard can deliver a fun and pulpy Lovecraft film?

Related Posts with Thumbnails

  • rb
    This could be very very cool...as long it is NOT ''fun" (read: campy and cheesy). HP Lovecraft was not a "fun'' guy and didn't write ''fun'' literature so let's hope Howard keeps that in mind.
  • bunyan 10
    ---Hey Howard! -You're balking what's REALLY going on --and boring
    us to boot. Go out right now ---somewhere far beyond your comfort-zone
    ---and BUY A CLUE.
  • With his current attitude I think he can, however a lot will also depend on the gathered ensemble for the project and [certainly] the manner in which he adapts the graphic novel.

    (I haven't read it by the way, but this movie might determine whether I decide to or don't ever)
  • Elron Howard
  • The Great Cambino
    The premise is pretty dumb (Lovecraft fighting monsters? Seriously?) but if it's successful it might help put ATMOM on the fast track.
  • freemachine
    Pulpy Lovecraft? *barfs* Before anyone tries some experimental take on Lovecraft, I'd like to see a faithful adaptation of one of his stories, which is next to impossible because they are so damn short. Camp? We've already seen Re-Animator.

    ---> AT THE MOUNTAINS OF MADNESS <--- C'mon, let's finally get this film made. I was so crushed when del Toro dropped out and the listing vanished from the IMDb. Crushed.

    As for Ron Howard's hope that he gets it right and that it turns out to be psychologically interesting and scary, blah, blah, ...Good luck pal. I'll believe it when I see it. It's like trying to find the Holy Grail. Ron, you'll know you succeeded when audience experiences such horrors that they lose their sanity by the film's end, develop PTSD, and ultimately end up a drooling mess in Arkham Asylum. If you can achieve that...you've finally done Lovecraft justice (and probably summoned forth the Great Old Ones in the process).
  • debunker
    I dunno, I think people forget In The Mouth of Madness by John Carpenter, which, in my opinion, is very Lovecraftian and was pretty creepy...
    If it is anything like that movie then it will be interesting...(minus the sometimes campy dialogue-Hey its a Carpenter film)
    If you have not seen it, I would recommend renting it and watching it, with the lights turned off.. at 3 am... in a creaky house.....
  • Lance_HBomb
    I don't know how they would show Cthulhu. He's described as force of nature, not much as a character (Like the personification of Death).
  • ender
    I'm a fan of when directors stray out of their comfort zones. I'm for it.
  • mchops
    could be a new take on comic book movies.
  • jasonb26
    i thought a beautiful mind was excellent.
  • Fredo
    Well, supposedly Del Toro has an epic "Mountains of Madness" script stashed in his back pocket for the day after he's done with Middle Earth. I'd rather he do that.

    As for Howard and this...why not? This sounds pulpy and fun. Howard can do interesting things with his camera but he hasn't pushed himself forward. If this can get him out of his comfort zone, then cool.
  • existenz
    I've read that script. It's okay, but feels much more like a watered-down remake of The Thing than a really great Lovecraft story.

    As far as Ron Howard doing Lovecraft, I think that's a very bad idea. Anyone remember The Grinch Who Stole Christmas?
  • I still want to see a proper Cthulhu adaptation up on the big screen.

    A good one.
  • jrs7180
    H.P. Lovecraft is sacred territory. No sure Richie Cunningham is a good idea. Would love to see what Guillermo Del Toro could do with it...oh well.
  • bonchampion
    Yea del Toro would be perfect for this. Too bad he's booked for the next half a century.

    I'd also like to see del Toro apply himself in non-monster territory, cause he has some serious skills outside of creature design.
blog comments powered by Disqus