Remake of The Fly to Be Directed By… David Cronenberg

hunter

Note: With The Matarese Circle, once a potential vehicle for Tom Cruise, seemingly on the back burner, might this be David Cronenberg’s next film? The director also has the previously announced Don DeLillo adaptation and “limo drama,” Cosmopolis, in development.

Predictable news this evening with a double-take twist. David Cronenberg is said to be developing a remake of his 1986 sci-fi horror classic The Fly as a potential vehicle for him to write and direct. Risky Business reports that technological leaps are the main factor in Cronenberg’s decision to remake the material, which is a common excuse—what, no 3D catch?—but in this case, justifiable. Cronenberg’s The Fly was itself a heightened and gory creature feature remake of the 1958 film of the same name starring Vincent Price. Last year, Cronenberg was involved in an opera production of the film for the stage with Fly composer Howard Shore. Common sense says the opera was the decision’s spark.

However, in the past Cronenberg has been rather vocal as a detractor to any proposed remake by 20th Century Fox, where the project remains parked and started buzzing on-and-off a few years ago. There’s yet no word on when the remake would begin filming. Cronenberg remains set to direct The Matarese Circle with Denzel Washington and Tom Cruise, based on his scripted adaptation of the global-conspiracy action novel by Robert Ludlum. In fact, back in April he was quoted as saying the following…

I think when you get too comfortable, you need to scare yourself by trying something you’ve never done before. It comes from the same place as wanting to direct an opera, or write a novel, or curate an Andy Warhol art exhibit.

The budget for Circle would certainly be Cronenberg’s largest and undoubtedly make for his biggest mainstream effort; and based on early word his Fly remake would be similarly epic in scope. The guy has been in the Canadian trenches creating perverse classics like Dead Ringers, Scanners, and Videodrome for years, so I don’t have a problem with this creative path. Also of note: the latter two films mentioned in the previous sentence are both up for remakes, with Universal having announced a Videodrome reboot (ack!) in April as well.

Synopsis of Cronenberg’s The Fly: “Seth Brundle (Jeff Goldblum) is a research scientist, employed by Bartok Sciences, who has invented ‘Telepods’ two matter transmission pods that teleports any object through space from one ‘Telepod’ to the other ‘Telepod.’ But, it is until Seth meets journalist Veronica Quaife (Geena Davis) who inspires Seth to correct the system, that Seth achieves successful teleportation. But something goes horribly wrong, when Seth uses himself as a guinea-pig in a matter transmission experiment, as he teleports himself, unaware his genes have been fused with a house fly that was trapped in the telepod with him. Seth, now finds himself slowly transforming into a terrifying mutant creature known as ‘Brundlefly’ as he finds himself in a fierce battle as his mutated genes begins to take over.

The Fly is probably my fourth favorite Cronenberg movie, following top-to-bottom: The Brood, Videodrome, and A History of Violence. The project spawned a fun if critically and fanboy decried sequel in 1989 starring…yep, Eric Stoltz! It’s disheartening when visionary directors decide to revisit superlative material—Ridley Scott’s Alien prequel comes to mind—and The Fly is just that. This is a time when cinema needs directors like Cronenberg to speak out against the studio recycle bins, but maybe he’d rather get his hands dirty than see it remade by Brett Ratner.

Shake an antenna-sized fist in the comments.

  • Gajonka
    IT IS REALLY DISTURBING. THIS SHOULD NOT BE HAPPENING. H-WOOD HAS NO IDEAS, AND THAY ARE REMAKE EVERYTHING, THEN REMAKE IT AGIAN. I AM DISGUSTED, THERE SHOULD BE A NAITONWIDE COMPETION, LIKE AMERICAN IDOL, TO GENERATE NEW IDEAS. FRESH ENDINGS. I LOVE CROINENBERG, I LOVE THE FLY - BOTH OF THEM. BUT WE CANNOT GO DOWN THIS ROAD. WE NEED TO DO SOMTHING. PLEASE.

    tHE g
  • capawesome
    Turn the caps lock off you spaz.
  • starscream9289
    STOP SCREAMING!
  • Rockie
    Brundle Brundle why ya buggin
  • GregoryV
    If I had a nickle for every time someone complains about an remake and adaptation....
  • A Fly.
    Fuck you Hollywood, fuck you.
  • The 86 version freaked me out when i saw it as a kid. I would hate to see this remade.
  • Redundant remake is redundant.
    Redundant remake is redundant.
    Redundant re...

    lolwut.
  • RJBlakeAAU
    This is so weird. It really makes no sense that this is happening. It happens every once in a while, but it is usually when a director doesn't think too highly of his original. However, when they are remaking some of their best and most famous films, it doesn't make sense.
  • I've got 20 bucks down on this film featuring underhanded satire of hollywood remakes, because that could be great.
  • nemon
    There is absolutely nothing campy about the 1958 Fly.
  • starscream9289
    That mutant dog from the Fly 2 still haunts me to this day.
  • camkevbell
    The Fly is such a good movie. Jeff Goldblum and Geena Davis put in great performances, and I doubt a remake could recapture their chemistry. The Blu-Ray release is crammed with tons and tons of extras, and remastered decently. A CG-filled remake is truly redundant.
  • Jeremy
    YOU BASTARDS!!! I kept myself from seeing that creature for 5 YEARS!!! and what do you do?? post a pic of that hideous creature no the main page!! ahhhhh!!
  • el_benzo
    couldn't agree more, man. i just got a major dose of the willies. then the shivers. so i guess, the shillies.

    on a serious note, i'm guessing this wont happen. i'm a Cronen-lover, and a remake doesn't make a bit of sense. the special effects hold up really well, the chemistry between the leads is perfect (they were a-bonin' at the time), and it might just be D.C.'s masterpiece.

    in conclusion, thanks for sabotaging me with BrundleFly, Hunter. this means war.
  • Ashitaka
    LOL, I kept myself from seeing that picture for 10 years! Damn you /film!
  • FreDre
    I remember when David Cronenberg presented the movie last year in Paris (to promote the Opera adaptation) he said that he didn't saw the movie since its release, so I think it's a little strange that he is willing to work on a remake of a remake, but well, let's wait and see.
  • zamarov
    Is Fox producing this? Fox seem to be taking a different approach to movies these days.
    When you consider this project and Scott's Alien prequel, it seems Fox are taking a less hands on approach and giving the talent more artistic freedom.
    It's just a pity Fox aren't giving them the freedom to make original movies. Still, it's better than handing over these brands to the likes Ratner, Anderson and McG.
  • Flangle
    Hunter does not understand the meaning of the word "Camp".
  • I'm shocked at this information. Hey how about a remake of Fame... oh wait. Footlose... oh wait. Red Dawn, wait. Highlander, wait. Nightmare on Elm Street, wait. Ok, I am not shocked anymore. Proceed.
  • I'm kind of amused at this news because it means that composer Howard Shore will be going back to "The Fly" for a third time now, having first composed the incredible score to the 1986 film as well as the opera based on it two years ago. I cannot wait.
  • Dangeresquetoo
    Is this what we are reduced to? Visionary directors revisiting their best works to keep hacks like Ratner , McG , and Bay off their material? F it! Let's just take "The Fly" opera,turn THAT into a major studio release, get Hype Williams to direct and call it a day.
  • Hype Williams? Haha, good call. Call it Fly Girl, shoot it with a "Fly-Eye" lens. Etc.
  • Guest
    so its a remake of a remake of a remake. god you got to love Hollywood
  • uhhuh-uhhuh
    It's not that uncommon for Hollywood to produce remakes. In fact they do that all the time. I read somewhere that they produce a remake from one particular film.
    The saying goes, if nothing is broken they would break it.

    Sure some hacks like mush others' work.

    If I ever wrote a screenplay and found some hack direct it, I would shove his nut sack all the way up in his butt crack with a hot poker, after flattening his nut sack.
    Somewhere in the back of mind, I would hear a voice telling, "I told you so . . ."
  • uhhuh-uhhuh
    I am fan of David Cronenberg.
    It would be interesting to see how David Cronenberg revisits his work. if he chooses to revisit, then it would be surprising indeed.

    I once read that he stated that working on the scanners film was a nightmare. Considering that he had write the rest, well most of the script. while shooting it
  • clarencesomerset
    I don't mind a remake with a great team. Its only the blatant cash-ins that suck. Look at 3:10 to Yuma. Was it necessary? Debatable. But they made a damn good film with two of the finest actors in the business today.

    That said, I'd rather see a Matarese Circle with Viggo Mortensen as the Russian.
  • Kyle C.
    Anyone hating on this is retarded! The Fly is Cronenberg's best film by far, followed by A History of Violence, and then Eastern Promises. A director remaking a remake that he himself made is genius, but only with someone like Cronenburg at the helm. If it helps, just think of it as a sequel that never aknowledges the '86 one.
    I would love to see what the Cronenberg of today would do with a story about a man who slowly becomes a monster. I love the original but it is very dated, F/X-wise and story-wise. It's a classic idea and anyone who doubts Cronenberg for a second is not a true fan.
    "I was a fly who dreamed he was a man, and now that dream is over." - -Brundlefly
  • TMan
    Exactly what Kyle said! This is such an awesome idea... The Fly is his best film and remaking it with the latest advances in FXs would be even more awesome.

    And to add on to what Kyle said - All those hating on remakes in general are seriously retarded because remakes have been happening since the beginning of cinema. Where was all the outcry and Hollywood bashing in 1986 when Cronenberg remade the 1958 version by Kurt Neumann??? Oh yeah, you fools probably didn't even know about it.
  • Flyfan
    Dude, for that comment alone....I don't wanna sound like a queer or nothin';..but I think I wanna make love with you...

    :P
  • Kyle C.
    I also have to add, if you think about it, in the '86 one you only see "The Fly" for like 30 sec. before (spoiler) he merges with the pod and then another 30 sec. before(spoiler) he gets his head blown off, so I imagine that we will be seeing alot more crazy horror action once he completely turns--hopefully. Today, Cronenberg with have a much bigger budget and much better F/X. I think this could be one of the better remakes.
  • South_Texas_Terror
    just wait til they remake short circuit with a iphone
  • Skavinger
    "It’s disheartening when visionary directors decide to revisit superlative material ..." I couldn't disagree with you more. The operative difference in this "remake" (I prefer to think of it as a "revision") is that CRONENBERG is directing. It's a reprise. He is a brilliant filmmaker and shouldn't be given any hasty or misguided flak to challenge himself as a creative on a piece he feels he can improve upon--whether or not the venture is successful is TBD. Notwithstanding, he's an artist ... artists revisit their work. This is a positive thing. The guy has balls ... I mean he even adapted William Burroughs' Naked Lunch ... that's an uber-risque endeavor bound to illicit the harumphs of all kinds of contemporary literary snobs. Let the man revisit his Kafkian masterpiece in peace .... And you're right, it's better him than Brett Ratner (I think it just tasted some vomit in my mouth).
  • Justin
    My four.

    Videodrome.
    Scanners.
    History of Violence.
    The Fly.

    Probably. But yes, The Brood is the shit, as is Shivers. And Dead Zone. And Dead Ringers. And Rabid. And Spider. And everything else he's done.

    Videodrome is always a huge number one, though.

    Most underrated director of all time.
  • Justin
    Oh, fuckin Easter Promises too. How'd I gloss over that one. That would be number five for me, maybe. I don't know. It's incredible though.
  • Justin
    Oh, and ALSO, I finally saw the Fly 2 for the first time. Holy shit it's bad.

    Wait, it's actually KIND OF, sort of good, for the first half, but once he becomes the Fly, maaaan.

    I mean, what the hell is that thing? It looks like a Magic: The Gathering demon. There is absolutely nothing fly-like about it. I hate it. And they don't even bother to shroud it in darkness, to cover up the shitty creature design. It's straight up running around in brightly-lit laboratories and shit.

    And the Bartok CEO or whatever telling him to remember a magic word at the beginning, and then having that come back to bite him in the ass later. Did a high school kid write that thing? What the hell? Didn't my man Darabont come in to iron out those wrinkles?

    Seriously, that movie sucks. Well, half sucks. The first half is okay.
  • Flyfan
    Indeed. All that suspense and you get something that looks like a monster rather than a fly. Just takes you away from that mindset. Only thing good about that movie was a couple of nasty parts and that's it
  • yay
    YAY
  • Fir3Wolf
    I really like The Fly and a remake by Cronenberg means it can only be a lot better then his first one right. I'll see it, if in fact it does end up happening.
  • frelling_cute
    CGI'ed Fly. Oh fuck.
  • saeseetom
    Why remake something so utterly good? And with the same director?

    It wasn't made that long ago, and the practical effects are unparalleled. Also, I think Jeff deserved an Oscar for it (watch it again, today, and you'll agree) Anything they do now will be nowhere near as good.
blog comments powered by Disqus