paranormal-activity-demand-it

Paramount is currently gearing up to release the low-budget horror film Paranormal Activity on Sept. 25th in a few select cities. In addition to the typical marketing campaign, they’re also doing something quite innovative to figure out where to open the film next: They’re asking fans. They’ve started an Eventful page for the film, and are asking fans to demand screenings in their area. The areas with the most demands will be the first to get future screenings.

There were some obvious gaps in their initial release, so it’s no surprise to see Los Angeles and New York currently topping the Demand list. Still, it’s an interesting method to figure out where to roll out the film in smaller markets. There aren’t any clear rules as to how they’re going to choose the future screening locations, but I’m sure if they ignore any markets in the top ten there will probably be some sort of outcry.

It’s worth considering what this means for future small film releases. Paranormal Activity was famously made for $11,000, so Paramount can’t exactly screw up the film’s release. For other films, the balance of release location versus potential viewers can mean all the difference between theatrical failure or success. While it’s not a perfectly accurate metric, measuring viewer interest directly could potentially be more informative than market research and other standards studios use to judge release dates and locations.

Consider the case of Trick ‘r Treat—a universally praised film that was initially set for a Halloween ‘07 release, but it ended up being pushed back to the point where the only release we’re getting is a DVD this October. Word was that Warner Brothers couldn’t figure out when exactly to release the film, and that they were clueless how to market it. While there was probably some other studio politics involved with that film, it certainly wouldn’t have hurt to ask fans how interested they were in seeing it—especially after the buzz it quickly built up.

I suppose with Trick ‘r Treat, it’s clear that the studio just didn’t want to put in any effort towards figuring out a release strategy. If they did, polling fans would have certainly made things easier for them.

As we’ve learned over the past few years with the rise of viral marketing campaigns, as well as an increased focus on making things more social and collaborative online, getting your audience involved often leads to a more dedicated and vocal group of fans. With viral marketing, studios learned to use audiences to help promote their films. But if given the chance, perhaps there’s more studios can learn from fans.

  • it is bullshit. the studios know where a movie will do well. they are not going to get any surprising results from this.. as if some random hick ass town is demanding the shit out of getting a paranormal activity screening.. it's the major cities that get the most votes... they've already skipped la, nyc, and chicago.. and like you said, obviously these are the biggest markets. this is just a twisted marketing scheme to get people talking about the movie. has nothing to do with discovering niche demographics for this film. im sure they know exactly which cities this film will eventually get to and when.
  • I agree. Paramount is trying to create viral awareness of the film using this new technology.... but imagine it's usefulness for an indie film like Mystery Team. Not only do you find out the areas that want to screen the movie, but you have access to email those who signed up in those areas when the film screens. Something like this is one piece in the puzzle that will make self/indie distribution possible in the future.
  • yes i agree with your post too, peter. especially once digital distribution becomes more common, i could see major theater chains reserving a single screen to showcase independent works - the movies playing could be determined by some kind of voting system. in that sense, this whole 'demand' thing could be very important in the near future.

    all this said - in relation to paranormal activity.. my main problem with paramount doing this is because - it's paramount. i think we all know a fairly wide release is inevitable. it makes sense to roll this movie out slowly.. they know word of mouth will do the adverting for them, and i dont blame them for that.. but i just don't like them acting as if the fanbase has a say in where it goes and asking for participation, because i don't believe it will have any impact at all to them.
  • I think this is a genius idea, more so for indie films than studio films. AMC or cinemark needs to create a website that would streamline this process for indie filmmakers with digital prints -- if there is enough demand, the exhibitors might screen the film on a digital screen for a few showtimes.
  • This is the exact same tactic the movie "Four-eyed Monsters" took for their theatrical release, they pre-booked audiences by zip-code and then rented a theater when they got enough people to cover the costs. I'm sure other movies have done the same since then.
  • TheGreenMalice
    I can get behind this kind of "marketing". I am still up in arms on whether I will watch it though. I like my sleep, and this film makes me think I might have trouble doing so afterwards.
  • it's good, but it isn't in the same respect. For larger cities that normally host smaller indie flicks, but don't get all of them, it's good, a lot of people can demand it and it may just go there. But for someone like me, I live right outside of Harrisburg, PA. Sure, it's the capitol, but it isn't a huge place for indie films. So even though I want to see this movie a lot, it probably won't come near here, because there isn't enough response. So far on the demand it, there are 19 people for Harrisburg.
  • cablebfg
    very interesting. I think this could be huge for small-budget films. I know iTunes has a feature where you can ask for a band and Amazon Kindle has a feature where you can vote for a book/author to be released digitally as well. This was a logical next step in that line of thinking, and it is pure genius. If i could go to my local theater and demand a certain feature, and all they had to do was screen it at, say, 9pm on a Friday or some odd day at night, id be THERE.
  • SAMMY
    I saw this movie earlier this year and it scared me so much that I needed to go home, put a comedy on, along with the lights, before I went to bed.
    This is one of the BEST "horror" movies I've ever seen. It deserves to be seen (and heard!) in the theater!
  • thorofthunder
    As innovative as this might seem, all in all I'm still shocked at the lack of creativity and ingenuity that ad campaign creators are plagued by.

    The last interesting semi-advertising thing I've seen a film do was for Blair Witch Project when they made IMDB list the main actors as deceased.

    Cloverfield had some neat ideas but I think they didn't want JJ going overboard.

    I don't know about you guys but if I were to see a commercial that just flashed a specific date for 5 seconds then I'd be intrigued. If I saw it enough, I'd look it up online. How come advertising companies don't do things like this? I'm tired of trailers that give away too much. Films are already predictable enough as it is.
  • It's always too much of a cable to step outside of the 'standard' advertising practices which have proven results. Which is why all the trailers tend to be cut and paced the same and we get floating head posters. I agree with you, it's a shame. I prefer unique, artistic ideas. Which is why, as Peter suggests, it might be a powerful tool for independent film.
  • gamingwithbaby
    Yeah, this is kind of misplaced in my view. Instead of creating artificial, and largely unneeded, buzz, why not do this kind of thing for those films that don't have a shot at getting released. Like, oh, I don't know, "Creation?"
  • claire_darko
    How could Warner NOT know when/how to market TrT? Why does it always seem impossible for studios to figure out that if you make a horror movie, and it is set during Halloween, then *maybe* a good time to release said-film would be...uh, Halloween?

    Did I just solve the Da Vinci code?
  • RainMan
    Couldn't figure out when to release it. I think it's pretty obvious that you release it when they do the other Halloween centered films. In fucking August. Dumb shits.
  • I would like to see this and so dose my family so I Demand it
  • I think this is a perfect idea. It could be more well executed. Even if it is just a ploy to get people talking about the film, it worked didn't it? The movie only cost $11,000 so anything they make after that they are set. Besides fee's of course. If you are talking about the film chances are your going to want to see it, there's nothing more to it. If people are talking aboput a low budget indie film, more power to them, they are getting where they need to be.
blog comments powered by Disqus