trashhumpers_031

Update: Variety just posted another positive review: “[The film is] riveting beyond all rationality, is something like Jackass, except that here the stunts are dangerous only to standards of good taste — which, of course, is precisely the point. …perverse beauty. …Across the board, tech credits are appalling — in a good way.”

One movie we’re surprised and stoked to see readers curious about is Trash Humpers, the new Harmony Korine “VHS-horror” flick. Part of the appeal thus far is the bizarre dubiousness resulting from only a handful of stills (like the one above) released online and then followed by a rickety, creepy teaser trailer. Rather than be snagged in another tired viral campaign for a film “found in a mad scientist’s dilapidated laboratory” or some lame Hollywood shit like that, Korine is genuinely a lil’ nuts IRL. And more so in his (word) salad days. So how far into crazy town did the director behind Gummo and the more subdued Mister Lonely go with Humpers? Early reviews from the Toronto International Film Festival seem to say: none more crazy. The title is literal. And we’re a lil’ relieved to hear the movie has a plot.

Until now, we wondered like everyone else whether Humpers would add-up to nothing more than a schizophrenic assault of disconnected John Waters-like sleaze dressed in the semi-Dogme 95 mental disturbance of Korine’s Julien Donkey-Boy. But the released photos of men and women do indeed belong to a not-so-abstract feature about derelict outcasts. By far, the best early review is by Eric Kohn at IndieWire, who compares it to a first-person, more scatter-shot version of Rob Zombie’s The Devil’s Rejects

A psychotic family with shriveled mugs resembling Freddy Kruger live together in an undisclosed suburban setting, mulling about their deranged existence while engaging in eerie behaviors and the occasional murder. Unquestionably Korine’s most experimental production, it cycles through scenes as if assembled from found footage. But there’s an engaging connectivity to this vision of savage outsiders, both within the context of its fleeting 78 minutes and when considered in relation to the larger framework of the director’s consistently provocative career. …”Trash Humpers” not only sympathizes with socially ostracized misanthropes—it adopts their perspective.

Well said. I’m there. The review goes on to describe a number of sexual acts performed by “the Humpers” and their friends, including all-out tree-sex, and says that the acts are performed in the name of nihilistic expression. And cheap thrills, no doubt. One character delivers a speech on why the world would be better if people didn’t have heads, and why dinner would improve as a result. The gritty, affected retro camcorder style of the film is cited as being “mesmerizing” and for “unsuspecting beauty.” Reading the entire review, you get the sense that Kohn is not a diehard Korine fan, but he seems impressed when placing it next to his filmography.

Another review comes from The Playlist, and while it’s a bit light on specifics for my taste—none of these reviews explain the mask-not-a-mask question—it’s equally in favor of the picture…

The characters that inhabit this film have to be Korine’s strangest and in a way, his most alive and unsympathetic. While “Mister Lonely” was full of loveable outcasts who dressed as their favorite celebrities, this is full of some of the most vile people on the planet and yet…by the end of it Korine will have you considering accepting who they are.

One concern was that the film might be rushed—a weird, cheap-o quickie that shitted on narrative—especially when considering that no one in the online film community knew that Korine was working on the movie until its premiere/completion were announced a few weeks ago for TIFF. According to the second review, these worries are for naught:  ”The film looks messy but every moment is very much thought-out by Korine and his team. …Aesthetically speaking, Korine’s choice of VHS blown up to 35mm works for the film fantastically. We get truly beautiful images through the grain and blur.” In summation, the reviewer feels that Korine is at his best here.

Over at IMDB, one person on the messageboards called it: ”almost like a horror film made by the psycopath(s) that was never intended for an audience.”  The mini-review went on to share Korine’s thoughts on the film at TIFF during a Q&A: “The director said as much. He wanted the film to be like an artifact or a found object. He even said it wasn’t really a film at all and suggested those who are prone to walking out of movies should probably just leave before it starts.”

Another messageboarder made a stupid-funny (enlightening?) comparison to Gummo, which a few people stated wasn’t nearly as funny (in an inappropriate way, of course) compared to Humpers:  ”I found that there were a lot of dogs in the film, and it seemed interesting to me, almost like the flip to Gummo which had a lot to do with cats. I wanted to ask if the prominence of dogs within the film had anything to do with the fact that they hump things. I don’t know about you, but when I think of humping, I think of dogs… ”

There you have it: Trash Humpers is the fun dog to Gummo’s darker cat; it’s already drawing comparisons to Freaks and The Idiots; and Harmony Korine, still crazy after all these years.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

  • Pat
    I saw this at TIFF and it's so bizarre, in a good way. Harmony was so nice in person and the Q&A made me really appreciate the film.
  • greenaroo
    Guys I saw this at TIFF and although I loved it, I have to correct Hunter's piece, there is no, I repeat, no narrative to this.
    It is the most non narrative of all his films and that's saying something.

    It is meant to be viewed as found footage, just different clips of these freaks humping stuff and breaking shit. If you liked Gumo and Donkey Boy you will like this, if not, you will hate it.
  • peter
    Fuck this guy and his shitty pretentious movies
  • zebrat
    peter peter pumpkin eater had a wife but couldn't eat her
  • zebrat
    mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
    trash humpers is gonna be tasty.
  • Kormine is a white trash version of Todd Solondz(not that he is white trash but the films are). Shock for the sake of shock.
  • y
    i watched gummo this winter and i didnt like it at all, just a weirdo movie filled with weirdoes, which is what he was going for i guess. Maybe its just me not "getting it" but i think movies like this that are just.. i cant even put it into words right now, shocking? yes. disturbing? a little but the word that is forefront in my mind was BOREDOM, if i wanted to see a bunch of nutjobs id just go walk around downtown lol.

    Anyways to those who like this type of movie i hope you guys like it as much as you seem to like his previous work, power to the ppl.
  • Reese
    It should be noted that AV Club gave it a 'D'. Not a Korine fan but still sounds interesting.
  • jasonb26
    Hunter,

    does this pisture above remind you of the promo shots for 'the strangers' at all? if so, is this korine's version of something like that, or even funny games?

    those were definitly examples of terrible modern horror, and then that brings up the question, "what if korine set out to truly show us what horror is?" a few years back, jonze & kaufman tried to make just that film, and we ended up with 'synechdoche, NY'.

    how korine will make us sympathize with people like this - i have no idea - and i'm doubtful i will, even though korine will always get my ticket money, regardless of the end result. i despise the way zombie treats women in his films, and i hope that this isn't korines version of TDR, but the two are very different filmmakers, and i am happy to hear that there is a narrative.

    (dunno if any of my post made sense, but do you kinda see what i'm angling at?)
  • According to the review above, you're not sympathizing with them, you only "accept who their are." Entirely different.
  • monkeymafia
    Jasonb,

    Have you ever seen a Korine film before? If not defintely check Gummo out, it's one I haven't ever re-watched but there are moments and images that have stayed with me since that single viewing. I wouldn't expect any type of mainstream horror at any level like the films you mentioned (think more Eraserhead than Pinhead). Instead, I'd think demented visuals accompanied by lo-fi conversations that form a narrative, but probably not a story arch. Very interesting filmmaker to watch, rides that maniac-genius line very well.

    And while I'm at it I have to stick up for The Strangers only because home invasion is so terrifying for me, but in all fairness that plays on a personal feel - it doesn't really make it a great film
  • jasonb26
    monkeymafia,

    thanks for the heads up! i own gummo, and naturally i've seen kids (which i know he didn't shoot) but after that - i am a korine newbie. how could you tell?! i was hoping hunter would explain what the allure is, but you have a little, and feel free to elaborate. like you, i watched gummo once, but haven't gone back. i can't say i really understood what i was watching, but that's not a bad thing.

    and you know, now that i think about it, i guess the strangers wasn't half bad, you are right about home invasion being terrifying, and i guess i just was expecting something different than what i saw. but as far as funny games goes - both translations - i cannot defend or accept that film at all. did the filmmakers then succeed in making characters that i absolutely loathed? maybe. but both films got under my skin in a bad way.

    do you recommend going through the korine library in order? is there anything i should have in mind when watching his films? thanks!
  • Name
    Hope this comes to Chicago!
blog comments powered by Disqus