TIFF Review: The Coen Brothers’ A Serious Man

zz1af8fc39

The Coen BrothersA Serious Man is very comparable to Alexander Payne’s masterwork Election, which just happens to be one of my favorite films of all time. Both films are brilliant dark comedies about teachers who are trying to do their best, trying to do the right thing, and somewhere along the way, make one small bad decision which spirals out of control into the biggest mess you’ve ever seen.

A Serious Man is set in 1967, and centers on Larry Gopnick (Michael Stuhlbarg) a midwestern professor who is faced with divorce, and all the consequences that may bring to his Jewish family, which includes a son prepping for Bar Mitzvah while evading bullies at school, a daughter, and his crazy gambling brother who keeps getting into more trouble. Larry seeks answers from three local rabbi, none of which are able to give him any advice he believes to be of value. And things only get worse, because they certainly aren’t getting any better.

A Serious Man is my favorite Coen Brothers film produced in the last decade, the exact period of time since Ethan and Joel created the comedy cult classic The Big Lewbowski. It is not only a brilliant dark comedy which will have you laughing out loud, but a masterful character study filled with great performances, of a family in crisis, the moral decisions they face, and the horribly funny consequences that result. The ending will have you talking about the movie well after leaving the theater, which to me is one of the definitions of great cinema.

/Film Rating: 9 out of 10

About the Author

Peter Sciretta is a film geek and popcultured fanboy living in Los Angeles. He created /Film in 2005.

  • Itri12
    Better than No Country for Old Men?! Awesome!
  • I'm sure some will disagree, but I like the Coens when they get comical, and yes, I liked this movie more than No Country. Does that mean this movie will get more award nominations or critical praise? Probably not.
  • Better than Burn After Reading?! Awesome!
  • dag_yo
    Well, that's not hard at all.
  • You must not have seen Burn After Reading. It's incredible.
  • dag_yo
    Yeah, I saw it. Yes, I thought it was one of the worst movies I have ever has the displeasure of seeing.
  • Burn After Reading wasn't special.
  • lol
    burn after reading blew ass
  • Bull
    Burn After Reading rocked. Some might not find it funny, but those people likely suck anyways.
  • thrillhouse
    Burn After Reading was bad. Most of the funny stuff was ruined by the Red Band trailer. The movie was tonally inconsistent. The dark moments had absolutely no weight to them. If that was the point, then it succeeded, but that doesn't make an interesting movie.

    Because the Coen Brothers great films toe the line between humor and darkness so well, BAR felt like a huge misstep.
  • Name
    I think the point of the movie and the source of the humor in it flew right over most peoples heads. Giving weight and tension to such inconsequential people leading inconsequential lives was pretty damn funny IMO. To each his own I guess.
  • thrillhouse
    Well, I felt that there wasn't enough serious weight. It rang pretty false to me. I saw what they were going for - I just thought it fell flat. That's just my opinion though - I can certainly see why some people would like it. That's what is so great about film. What fell flat for me, could hit the spot, for you.
  • Name
    @ thrillhouse

    That is a tough balance. Give the "problems" to much credence and it lessons the inconsequential aspect as well. I definitely agree with your approach though.
  • Burn After Reading is one of the worst films you've ever seen? Dude, you need to see some more movies.
  • This is a great review. I'm starting to like what the Coens do. I've liked their movies for awhile but it seems like they're getting better. I really liked No Country for Old Men and Burn After Reading which are two completely different films.
  • What do you think about The Man Who Wasn't There Peter? I prefer that to No Country for Old Men.
  • tom
    TMWWT is great until the end, which feels disjointed, unnecessary and just generally enrages me. It's the only Coen Bros. movie I've only seen once.
  • jasonb26
    peter, in this 'talked about ending', does it at all feel contrived? by that i mean, is it just odd and risky to be odd & risky, or is it used to make the film better? sometimes i find the coen's antics to be beyond forced, and i'm hoping this isn't the case because the ASM trailer has me curious.
  • papaalkhiughk
    I read the script and the ending is sure to polarize people just like NCFOM. What did you think of the ending?
  • Glad to hear it's getting some positive feedback, of the "best in a decade" type. It's already generating a fair amount of negative buzz, but who knows how much of that is reactionary and (likely) only based on a single viewing. As Landfill says, they produce such an incredible variety of styles/genres of film, it's pretty natural for many reviewers to only see current work in terms of Past Blockbuster Successes. Personally I find it hard to compare things like NCFOM, BAR, TBL, and Fargo, simply because they have such wildly different intentions. Way to have an open mind, Peter ;-)

    I do love how they introduce seemingly insignificant errors in judgement and watch the consequences spiral "out of control into the biggest mess you’ve ever seen" ala Fargo, Burn After Reading, etc. These guys are masters of the tension-building-into-a-thriller comedy. Can't wait!
  • PalmliX
    As far as I'm concerned the Coen's can do no wrong, I thought Burn After Reading was hilarious!
  • papasanchez
    Didn't like burn after reading but the coens are really good with dark humour. I pissed myself when big bad john goodman fucked up the scattering of the ashes in the big lebowski! Genius. Will definetly be checking this one out. Sounds good.
  • vader182
    Peter what first attracted me to slashfilm is our similar taste in film and how I do agree with you a good portion of the time. But honestly, and I feel sort of alone here, I dislike the coens a decent amount. I like them more when they're comical but I really didn't like No Country. I find them pretentious.
  • Glenn Beck
    Often, when someone calls an award winning, beloved artist "pretentious", it means that they are themselves unable to understand and enjoy the subtle underpinnings, clever wit and the acknowledged sophistication of the work. I'm not saying this is the case here; I'm just afraid it might be.

    -
  • Bullio
    I agree with you 100%. "Pretentious" is mostly just a word used by people who can't comprehend a movie. It is sadly overused and mistaken to be intellectual.
  • Similar to how some people use the word "intellectual" as an insult. Since when did being smart become bad?
  • NCFOMCAPCOMSPACEMAN
    No Country For Old Men was beyond pretentious. Seriously. Yes, I comprehended the movie. I understood it all, I even saw it twice in the theater (!) and I still thought it was pretentious. I mean, maybe some people just don't buy into the self-importance of some movies, some people do. Also, I can't help but disagree with you anyway because your name is Glenn Beck.
  • Glenn Beck
    I used that name as a joke when I found myself inadvertantly quoting his asshole call out on Obama's birth certificate. It was intended as a bit of self mockery. If you read the reports about Beck's chicanery, you might have encountered that line used to distance himself from the birthers while embracing them.

    As for NCFOM, look to the comments above for a read on others' take on the word "pretentious". I know you're speaking from your heart on this, but really- do you actually think they overreached just because it didn't grab you? I find that to be a little pretentious myself.
  • ann
    Where is the inspiration come from?
    beautiful woman her combat index to 3200.. is she still stay with her husband.. someone posted on yahoo answers that she has an profile on an online site you know it is a bad site……Sugarloves.Com …… for rich men to seek sexy girls.!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • terminals
    short and sweet reviews like this are so much better than the longer, rambling ones like dr parnassus.
  • You are.
  • The Iron Avenger
    I'm very much looking forward to this. The Bros graduated from my high school (I'm a freshman at college now) and this was shot in my city. A few people from my school are in it.
  • Name
    Do you know how the beginning scene related to the rest of the movie by any chance? I don't have a clue. But otherwise I agree. Great movie.
  • Yeah, I saw this movie. Yes, I thought it was one of the worst movies. Still it was better than No Country for Old Men. Movie was average type.
  • mytwobits
  • mytwobits
    I thought it was contrived ... made you wince ... I was disappointed. I love the Coeh Brothers and of course thought the acting was great and I see the love the brothers tried for with the nicely directed & produced scenes - but the characters (which they are always great at developing) were not surprising nor were they at all interesting ... just rather ugly ... a few clever moments of banter here and there, but not enough to love. Not enough to recommend. The lead did do a great job in his role though. That's my two bits ...
blog comments powered by Disqus