glee

Wednesday night marked the season debut of Glee on Fox, the new one-hour comedy series that is currently as well known for its experimental, tireless marketing campaign as for its potential to be the season’s largest breakout hit. On the ratings front, the episode pulled in 7.3 million viewers and was tops in the 18-49 demo; but that didn’t match the 10 million-plus it scored in May, when Fox teased the pilot directly following its inexplicably popular show, the one that features highly emotive people singing. When the friggin’ Vampire Diaries is racking up nearly 5 million viewers on the CW, is that cause for concern? Should Fox add fangs and immortal lovin’? I’m guessing that the majority of our interested readers are now caught up with Glee via DVR. So, what did you think of the ep, the song choices, and the show in general? Some of my thoughts after the jump…

Wednesday marked the first time I’ve watched Glee. I became aware of it—and the buzz—when comedian/co-star Jane Lynch (Best in Show) noticeably left the first season of Party Down on Starz due to her commitment. After the switcheroo occurred, I began to hear from friends just how funny and vital Lynch was on Glee, and while her scenes this week fit that description, I feel the cast of Party Down (Martin Starr, Adam Scott) is a hipper, more talented, and uncensored springboard for Lynch’s zingers. But, obviously, PD is a less visible and less profitable program, so the decision was in Lynch’s best interest, for now.

Overall, my sentiments are not dissimilar to those of TV critic Alan Sepinwall. Clearly, this is not a show that is going to appeal to a lot of straight dudes; the flamboyance allowed by the premise (a YouTube-friendly, co-ed high school choir) and the romantic, soapy subplots are poised to receive a “gay” verdict, which is not lost on the show makers. The word “gay” is uttered twice to comedic effect in this ep alone.

I think it says much that after one ep, the TV shows Glee most reminded me of were—to some surprise—Freaks and Geeks (nice production values, school setting, fair character depictions) and—to my never-ending eye roll—countless uber-broad, cornfed talent shows. Per Geeks, I’m not directly comparing them in terms of “classic” and quality; I’m sane. Regarding the latter, it’s novel how the show’s musical numbers, choreographed to be both believable and “fierce,” are placed throughout like crack.

It’s a smart strategy to have the song numbers diced up (and often debated in-show) so as to offer fresh takes on ’00s hits (Kayne West’s “Golddigger”), ‘rents-charming throwbacks (Dionne Warwick’s “I Say a Little Prayer”), and ole’ MTV fuck jams (”Salt-n-Pepa’s “Push It”). The equation makes Glee seem welcomely original for a Big 4 Network, but it also has the potential to become an unwelcome harbinger; the musical numbers work so well as to have lightbulbs going off in the brains of many a TV-exec. And I think that no matter the show’s ratings trajectory, its influence will be felt with numerous copycats. (Not unlike the speculated impact of in-show ads during Jay Leno’s “revolutionary” new show on NBC). Glee’s musical numbers are not as disagreeable as in-shows ads (re: both a throw back to TV of yesteryear), but they serve as colorful intermissions designed to satiate attention spans. And for one-hour programming with commerical breaks, that’s worry for concern.

As far as the show’s characters, I didn’t really buy the guy who’s in a token wheelchair. And I guess, for plotlines involving cheerleaders (nicknamed “Cheerios” here), they weren’t overtly stereotypical or tres vapid. The one decision I felt was a sizable misstep as a first-time viewer was the rushed quasi-infidelity of the choir teacher, Will (actor Matthew Morrison); the ep seemed focused on making him a stand-up if imperfect married dude (as well as an expecting dad), but then he nearly falls into a porno-sex scenario with a fellow teacher and crush. He’s wearing a janitor uniform for chrissakes. Laughable.

Glee is set up to make Morrison a sex symbol, but I don’t understand how making him a Don Draper-like Mad Men player with a heart appeals to chicks, no matter how many baths the guy takes with his wife. But maybe girls have a different take on this. All I know is that Don Draper would never take a bath or watch Glee (unless Bets made him). And while Fox could do a lot worse, I doubt I’ll be checking in either. Maybe if the choir covers the Clash, the Black Lips, the Fat Boys, Yacht, or Eddie Money’s “Shakin’.” What’s your request?

Glee Question: Fan or Pan?

Hunter Stephenson can be reached at h.attila: gmail and on twitter.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

  • Pan.

    There are three interesting characters and only one of them is a student.

    Besides, that it's just

    High School Musical : The Series

    with a couple of twists, turns, and changes, so it's no entirely the same as the above-listed movie. I'll give it the benefit of the doubt and keep watching for a bit, but so far that benefit is all that keeps me from never tuning in again.
  • presto117
    I just graduated from my HS this year, and I was a member of our school's top showchoir (we were 20-something in the nation and 3rd in our state), and I love this show. It's not very accurate (the wheelchair kid would never make a group if that group intended on trying to place in the top 5 and showchoir sets are about 15 minutes long with multiple songs and medleys, unlike just the one song in the first episode), but I think it's good for showchoir. It's completely underrated, but if you saw what some of these groups could do, you'd be blown away (the "showchoir" in the first episode with the sets and costumes is NOTHING compared to some of the schools in our area). I'm just glad that a show like this can succeed.
  • Aaron
    The pilot was better than the season premiere, but it's still a fun (and fresh?) show that I will watch until they fall into the formulaic romance teetering (see: "Friends").
  • Chris
    Please tell me this site, of all sites, saw how terribly and blatantly the Glee pilot from a few months ago ripped off the Alexander Payne film "Election".

    Please. Please. Please. The mediocre ratings are pure karma.
  • Wasn't sold after the first half of the pilot, but I've been in love with the show ever since and I'm a straight bloke.
  • OK So I watched this with both my girlfriend and her friend(who was looking forward to it) and we all hated it.....all forced...bad writing...all the singing numbers were not live(meaning recorded live on set) which made it unintresting and lame.....I am old enought to rember a show called Cop Rock by Stephen Bachco.....that was 10 times better that this and I thought that show sucked.
  • Glee is off to a decent start. I recall enjoying the first episode more than the second, and it may not be something I follow, but I can see this accruing a following.

    My view may be slightly skewed positive now that Glee's Dianna Agron is my favorite girl on tv.
  • AGirlFan
    Matthew Morrison is unbelievable hot. He was just so darn hot when he was singing/rapping "Golddigger" and dancing.
  • Pete (original)
    GLEE was just alright for me, dawg. Although it entertained me enough, and Jane Lynch was hilarious and the highlight of the show, I don't see why the levels of hype rose to what they did. I heard a lot about this show and Wednesday was my first viewing. I like it enough to watch the next episode so it did something right.
  • dudeical
    Actually, that is a fuck jam if their ever was one. Also, as non straight as declairing ones self as uberstraight is, I love both women and this show.
  • wazzat
    Wasn't a fan of the show. The only scenes I found funny were the ones with Jane Lynch but she's always funny. I didn't think the music numbers worked and I thought the writing was entirely too forced. There were a few good lines but they felt so contrived they lost much of their punch.

    It essentially played like "High School Musical" for young adults.

    Won't be watching another one that's for sure.
  • Swarley
    I actually love how over the top and obviously stereotyped all of the characters are. For the sake of comedy, I think characters being relatively two-dimensional helps with the humor of each character. That way, when their individual story lines start to develop over the season, you're already willing to watch it happen because you know, even if the characters have really stupid story lines, that you can still appreciate the humor of their basic stereotypical makeups.
  • Maracle2
    i like the music on the show the i think some of the editing for it is terrible. you can hear when it goes from boom mike on set to studio audio-lip syncing, especially during gold digger. Even in the premier you could hear the Audio Tune in the voice of the lead when they were doing Midnight Train.

    seems for the show the cares so heavily on music they would make it a little smoother.
  • enzomoran
    I still like the show but I don't like the direction that it seems to being going.
  • MickJ
    Oh and by the way. These "ratings" are a stone's throw away from being "more or less 100% inaccurate." Someone more dedicated than myself really needs to come up with a better system.

    (This concludes my daily rant against the Nielsen ratings determining the fate of good shows because they think 25,000 people is a good sample size.)
  • MickJ
    "ole’ MTV fuck jams (”Salt-n-Pepa’s “Push It”)"

    I'm pretty sure you meant "funk." I can understand typos and I certainly don't want to give grief. But c'mon.
  • We checked with Salt-n-Pepa and they said they're cool like that.

    Agreed, the Nielsens are not entirely accurate but remain the standard. Many in the industry want to change this, as they have for years.
  • who is that sexy asian girl on the left
  • Glee, like Gossip Girl, might be most interesting to me as a show that allows its characters to rocket through as many plots as possible in a short multi-episode span. GG on CW has done all the stereotypical Soap Opera storylines (save comas) already and Glee's pilot rocketed through the development of their stereotypical characters right quick.

    It'll be fun when they run out of Fame-like plotlines to ape and start exploring where these characters go after they've come out, dated the guy/gal they socially weren't supposed to, worried about a date to the dance, stepped up to the streets, etc.
  • Zroggle
    It felt too contrived. Every character is a stereotype, jokes were heavy handed, and the characters basically grovled for empathy. My wife and I just watched through Freaks and Geeks, and it's obviously trying to pay homage (McKinley High anyone?) but it was just so heavy handed.

    Here's are lead attractive jock, and his potential girlfriend who's really pretty and talented but we're supposed to believe is an outcast cause we're told to even though all other evidence would suggest the opposite.

    And joining them is one token African American, Asian, gay person, and disabled person. One for each demo behaving exactly our stereotypes would expect them to behave.

    And the teacher is amazingly perfect in everyway and his wife is amazingly awful in everyway. And even though the characters are written two dimensionally, we are supposed to believe they are in fact three dimensional characters.

    Cheer coach and guidance counselor (pamphlets? another F&G shout out) are by far the most interesting to watch, even if cheer coach seems, well, pointlessly bitter.
  • Nice comment. Glee isn't trying to be as realistic as Freaks and Geeks, and therefore draws some of its humor from overly familiar stereotypes. On good faith, I take it that these characters will grow more complex---if only slightly---after this episode. And as I mentioned, the wheel chair guy is a token wheel chair poseur and needs to be killed off quickly, preferably by a short bus.
  • Zroggle
    Thanks! I suppose you're right, and want to give the show the benefit of the doubt. I WANT to like it. It's just felt like parroting stereotypes instead of satyrizing them, at least in the first two outings. Also, I sang in a choir in high school that had a guy in a wheel chair. He had a very dry wit and I know he would want this guy killed off in the same manner. Perhaps a tragic wheelchair lift accident on the short bus.
  • FAN!
    Loved the show, I liked the second episode better than the pilot actually. I'm looking forward to the next episode. I get what you're saying about the "porno" scene, but I have to admit I found that scene very sexy. Morrison's got charm, and with the combination of his wife being a hilarious shrew, the whole scene didn't seem as sleezy as it could have been.
  • Billy Shears
    The first episode was great but I agree with what you said about the plots being too rushed. The quasi-infedelity and the musical chick-jock kiss was WAY too soon for the second episode of a series. I also really want to see the supporting character's expounded upon. The other members of Glee club all show a lot of potential for exploration but the show hasn't even touched on it yet. Then again, this IS only the second episode so any statements like "this is the best show!" or "this is too cliche!" are a little premature. I have faith that it'll get better with time
  • Isn't the master thespian Stephen Toblowsky supposed to be in this? why isn't he in the cast picture?
  • matthewjldrice
    That's because Fox pulled a "Firefly" once again and didn't run the actual Pilot as the Season opener, like they probably should have for all the first-time viewers our there wondering what the hub-bub is. I give massive kudos for airing the Pilot in May to generate interest... but run the damn thing again, will ya, Fox? Not only is it good enough to endure (multiple times), but this Season-opener really felt like a second episode, and not the much-needed character introduction piece of which the Pilot very brilliantly is.

    I'm happy that the ratings are still pretty decent, but I'm worried about the drop-off we will see next week because of this lack of regard for first-time viewers. And yes, the Pilot is available on Hulu to watch (GO WATCH IT PEOPLE! NOW!) but this reeks of blunder in my opinion.

    By the way, I'm a 31-year-old male, I am NOT gay, and I LOVE "Glee". The "Freaks and Geeks" comparison is quite valid as well.
  • brian
    Fox aired the pilot multiple times last week. The aired it in the Wednesday slot that it will air in and they advertised it as the pilot. They replayed it Friday night and, I think, Sunday night. They did the same thing with the next episode. I don't see a blunder here.
  • TokyoSteve
    As a non-viewer of what I'm sure was stellar summer programming on Fox, both my Tivo and I missed the pilot episode being aired last week. I wouldn't be surprised if many others did also. Considering this week was the date Fox promoted, that it followed the season premiere of So You Think You Can Dance and that we are still very early in the fall season (many shows don't debut until next week or later). Half a blunder for Fox for not re-promoting the pilot.
  • miguelcarbon
    They aired the pilot again last Wednesday in the same time slot as the second episode, it just wasn't advertised very well.
  • matthewjldrice
    Definitely not!

    (Retracts foot from mouth.)
blog comments powered by Disqus