The Creators of The Luxo Lamp Are Suing Pixar

luxo_still

The manufacturers of the Luxo lamp, model for Pixar’s mascot, have ended over two decades of happy cooperation by the two companies by this week filing a lawsuit against the animation studio. While they have been more than happy for Pixar to use the likeness of their product on screen, the lawsuit seems to have been brought about by both the new Luxo Jr. replica lamps that Disney will be packaging in the Premium Combo Pack release of the Up Blu-Ray, and a nifty looking animatronic 6ft-tall Luxo Jr. that has been making an appearance at Walt Disney World (and who you can see in action after the break).

luxosetAccording to a Bloomberg report on the suit (via The Pixar Blog), Pixar haven’t used the Luxo brand name before now, which doesn’t add up to me because the short is called Luxo Jr. and is named on at least one DVD and one Blu-Ray already in my collection. All the same, they haven’t been selling their own lamps, I know that much. I love you Pixar, but surely somebody in your merchandising department should have officially licensed this?

Is Pixar’s mistake here really that different to me making a cartoon about Coca-Cola then launching my own version of the drink as a tie-in? It seems to be a stunningly clear breach of somebody else’s design copyright to me.

For the last 20-some years, and particularly since Toy Story, I’m sure that the use of a Luxo lamp in all of Pixar’s branding and logotypes has been a great asset to the Norwegian lighting manufacturers. I can’t imagine how many extra lamps this sold to fans, and by extension, how many sales are going to be lost through Disney Pixar releasing their unlicensed knock-off.

Hopefully a last minute agreement can be struck by which Luxo are paid a licensing fee on each Premium Combo Pack sold? And going onwards, how about Luxo manufacturing official Pixar merch?

The LA Times have related a ‘no comment’ in behalf of Disney.

Here’s a look at the animatronic Luxo Jr. in action.

  • Jeff_Glass
    I think you're correct in calling this a pretty clear case of copyright infringement. There's no real doubt that the design is a virtual duplicate of Luxo's own model, and going so far as to use Luxo's brand name on the product is the height of ineptitude. The only way Pixar could avoid infringing the copyright would be to invoke the affirmative defense of "fair use." Since Pixar has appropriated the design in its entirety, and is selling a product that competes directly with the Luxo lamp, it's highly unlikely that the court would find fair use.
  • dagreenman18
    Aww, thats a shame. I was looking foward to this pack, even if it is 120 bucks. wonder if this will effect the preorders?
  • you would pay $120 for that?!?

    damn, Up wasn't even that good
  • How can you say that? Up was a nice, but sad Movie.
  • Egger_Buckland
    I guess Disney won't see a problem with me selling Mickey Mouse dolls on E-bay then.

    [YOU BETTER FUCKING BET THEY WOULD.]
  • Name
    Luxo people.... you people are idiots.
  • blindviewer
    So it would be okay for Luxo to sell pirated copies of Disney movies?
  • capawesome
    You're calling the wrong company "idiots"
  • lux
    LUXO's right..
  • Loxley
    /Pixar Fanboy

    These things aren't even on the market yet, which is leading me to believe that instead of maybe sending some sort of cease and desist letter to Disney to keep these from coming out until some form of proper compensation could be reached, it sounds likw these guys jumped directly into lawsuit territory. This whole modern-day "sue first, ask questions later" policy that everyone has is really obnoxious.

    It was a short-sighted move on Disney's part, no argument there, but I really think that suing Pixar over this is sort of a douchey knee-jerk move. Especially depending on exactly how much Luxo is suing for.
  • BrendonConnelly
    We don't know what actions may have preceded this suit.
  • Maracle2
    if that were true wouldn't Luxo wait till they sold a ton of copys of the dvd and then cash in?
    i love Pixar to but Luxo seems to be in the right
  • thorofthunder
    ....
  • Adrianne
    didn't disney force a nursery school to take down wall art one time?

    Q: If you have a stable of lawyers you're allowed to do that?

    A: Yes.
  • capawesome
    How do mega-corps like Pixar and Disney think they could do this without any legalities? Are they that arrogant or stupid?

    The analogy with the Coke bottle was spot on. If this was anyone else. People would be calling for blood.
  • So why doesn't Disney/Pixar just buy the Norwegian company? I'm sure they're not as much as Marvel.
  • That's a great idea... Disney should stop obtaining licenses and simply buy every copyright owners out for everything they need to do. That'll show them whose boss.

    But only if it costs less than Marvel, right?
  • It's really not a bad idea. Why not just buy the company? I'm sure before Pixar started using the lamp, they weren't selling anything compared to now. Maybe they should have bought the company back when Pixar officially became a part of Disney.
  • thorsteinklingenberg
    Luxo was founded in 1934 and the actual lamp used by Pixar is the model L1, first released in 1937. Since then they have sold over 25 million. They've sold tons of lamps in a wide variety of models since long before Pixar was even possible. Today they are market leaders in professional lighting systems for a wide variety of applications, mainly in health care and specialist solutions.

    They don't sell much in retail and thus haven't had any noticable sales-boost by Pixars success. An hospital doesn't give a rats ass if the lights in their operating room gave inspiration to a cartoon...
  • capawesome
    It's the American way. Why go through legal procedures when you can just buy them up!
  • Tom
    I was just saying this to a friend of mine. The lamp was chosen for its generic quality, and I can get one in town here at a flea market for 5 bucks. I think the Up package is an arrogant misstep for Disney/Pixar. It would be funny if the little lamp company sues, wins and takes over control of Pixar/Disney/Marvel. In fact, that's probably what's going to happen, I'm sure.
  • mbellerbrock
    Yep, for sure, that will totally happen.
  • TJ
    Wait wait wait. I'm a bit confused here. Looking at the "Luxo Jr." and the "Luxo" they aren't the same. You might say that the Luxo Jr. is inspired by the Luxo but I thought that Luxo Jr. design didn't exist until Pixar created it?
  • greggorybasore
    No matter how different the Luxo jr. design is from the Luxo companies lamp design it's absurd to argue that the design isn't derived from Luxo. That being the case Pixar is making a derivative work off of a copy righted/trademarked design. That still counts as infringement.
  • BrendonConnelly
    Exactly.
  • petrapan
    They look quite similar to me...http://www.testequipmentdepot.com/luxo/lights/ls-series.htm
  • goobity
    All Pixar has to do is create a new short film in which Luxo, Jr. sparks up, catches fire and sets a hospital full of orphans and elderly folks ablaze.
    Then Buzz Lightyear, Wall-E, and Mater from Cars put a stop to it.

    End of lawsuit.
  • Someone's getting fired.
  • charlesjwells
    lol like disney/pixar/marvel/soon-to-be-owner-of-the-world doesn't have enough money or for that matter lawyers to handle it. i'm sure they aren't too worried about it rofl
  • Guest
    Jeff and Brendon are completely correct. There is no possible way for Disney to win this suit.

    In fact, the only executive I can think of who would act so audaciously and obnoxiously would be Steve Jobs. While I doubt he's in anyway involved, it's kind of funny that he's the CEO of Pixar and on Disney's board of directors. In short, Steve's corporate philosophy is "We do whatever we want, period, and if you don't like it, sue us. Also, we will be incredibly aggressive in protecting our brands to a point of obnoxiousness."

    In other words, sadly, Luxo's kind cooperation with Pixar was wasted. No Steve Jobs company would ever act so generously.
  • LeFredLe
    IMHO, Luxo's attitude is incorrect as regarding its timeframe. If they should have done something, it should have be done 20 years ago, not now. Do they seriously think this collector set can affect their sales or what ?
    And honnestly, I did not know 'Luxo' was a real brand until now...These kind of lamps are very commonplace. So I don't see the point unless it's just a matter of ripping dollars off Pixar.
  • blindviewer
    Take a step back and you'll see Luxo had no reason to sue before. Pixar was a form of advertisement.

    Lets say they only lose quarter of a million. You really think this is the only time Disney will try to make a profit?

    You can get away with a lot when people don't know history of something, like that of a white lion.
  • LeFredLe
    ...or a small fish called Pierrot.
  • If Pixar is Pixar, they aren't going to go about it being selfish. They are too good natured of people to have something like this continue to happen. Hopefully they are not all about money, that does not seem like Pixar to me.
blog comments powered by Disqus