Movie Review: Jason Reitman’s Up in the Air

Up in the Air

Jason Reitman’s Up in the Air was one of the sneak preview premieres at this year’s Telluride Film Festival. You might recall that Reitman’s last film Juno also surprised at Telluride, and Reitman was again hoping to start the buzz in this small mountain town. So did he? My thoughts after the jump.

First of all, let me say that while I have titled this a “movie review”, this is more of a reaction piece. I plan to see this film again in Toronto.

George Clooney stars as Ryan Bingham, a corporate downsizing expert whose life goal is to rack up ten million frequent fly miles to earn him lifetime platinum member status. But Ryan’s single serving on the road lifestyle is threatened when a recent college graduate named Natalie Keener (Anna Kendrick) devises a system to fire people through internet teleconferencing, rendering his travels as an unneeded expense. Bingham is assigned to take Natalie on the road to introduce her to the real-life conditions of the job, which Bingham argues would be lost in the cost-cutting transition.

The subplot of the film follows Bingham’s casual sexual relationship with another business traveler he met on the road, a woman named Alex (Vera Farmiga). I’m sure Paramount will try to market this film as a romantic comedy based on this storyline, but the film is much much deeper and stronger story than that. It’s about a middle aged man who thinks he has everything figured out, and is forced to reevaluate the meaning of life as he knows it.

Up in the Air is loosely adapted from Walter Kim’s novel, which I’ve learned is very different than Reitman’s adaptation. Neither woman characters, nor the inciting incident of internet video conferencing are featured in the book. Actually, from what I can gather, the book version of Bingham pops pills, spends lots of time with women in Las Vegas, and is divorced.

I’m a frequent traveler/flier who spends over 90 days a year away from my apartment on trips, mostly business related. Heck, I’m currently 3 days into a 28 day three film festival adventure, in which I’ll fly on eight different planes, and make three different cities in two countries my temporary home. I can certainly relate to the main character of Ryan Bingham, who has turned traveling into a science. Why buy anything if it won’t result in more frequent flier miles? Okay, I’m not nearly as nuts as Bingham, especially when it comes to premium travel benefits. There is an awesome scene which rivals the infamous business card meeting in American Psycho. I certainly see the appeal of the life of a traveler, and the mindset that can bring. The details in the airport and hotel sequences are so perfect, but I’m not sure to credit the production designer or Reitman, who admits to personally racking up 100,000 flier miles a year himself.

The dialogue is incredibly witty, but not over-the-top stylistically, ala Diablo Cody. Up in the Air is more Thank You For Smoking than it is Juno in almost every way. The comedy is dark and sometimes blunt, and the characters are more realistic/authentic than quirky. Clooney’s performance is subtle, yet layered. If the character feels perfectly suited for Clooney, it might be because Reitman wrote the part for him (even though he didn’t believe Clooney would be interested).

The true gem of this film is Anna Kendrick, a young actress I’ve been following since seeing her in the 2007 Sundance indie Rocket Science (If you haven’t seen it yet, you need to add the film to your rental queue). At the time I said she delivered a “career-making performance”. While most people probably haven’t heard of the film, nevermind seen it, Kendrick’s performance catapulted her into a regular spot in the Twilight series, and a role in Edgar Wright’s Scott Pilgrim vs. The World. Kendrick again plays a calculating fast-talker with spunk, a character that she could easily become typecast into repeating for years to come.

I was rewatching Thank You For Smoking while on a plane to Colorado, and one of the things that shocked me (as I havent seen it in a couple years) is just how many great actors and actresses Reitman was able to fit into one movie, sometimes occupying the smallest of roles. Up in the Air is no different. Juno stars Jason Bateman and JK Simmons return, Danny McBride gives his least comedic performance to date, and Thank You For Smoking star Sam Elliott also returns. Simmons and Zach Galifianakis appear only shortly, mixed within footage of real people who have recently lost their job.

The cut that was screened at Telluride was finished only two days prior, and Reitman has admitted that he rushed to complete post production three months ahead of schedule to make the Toronto International Film Festival premiere. That said, the film doesn’t feel rushed or unfinished at all. Actually, it feels like Reitman’s slickest film to date.

The opening credit sequence by Shadowplay Studios (who has done work on Reitman’s previous films) features some of the most incredible aerial photography I’ve seen on the big screen (I actually thought they might have created some of the imagery in a computer, but not so). Reitman continues to evolve his visual style, creating neat, organized visually balanced cinematography that compliment’s Clooney’s Airworld. Another example would be a great hip-hop montage sequence showing Clooney passing through airport security, which utilizes sound effects as a Stomp-like percussion score.

While watching the film, it was hard for me not to compare the movie to Reitman’s two previous feature film efforts: Thank You For Smoking and Juno. And yes, Up in the Air might be his best film yet. For me, the film is a third part of a thematic trilogy. All three of Jason’s features follow characters who have trouble dealing with the responsibilities created with the family dynamic. In Thank You For Smoking, Aaron Eckhart plays Nick Naylor, a tobacco spokesman who much like Bingham, has the gift of spin, knows how to say all the right things, and can turn the worst possible situation into an opportunity. Naylor, a divorced father, tries to balance his career while trying to remain a role model for his uninterested and embarrassed 12-year-old son. In Juno, Ellen Page plays a teenager who isn’t ready for the responsibilities of motherhood. When faced with an unplanned pregnancy, Juno decides to give the baby away to a young couple (one member of whom isn’t sure he’s ready/old enough to start a family himself). Juno also must come to terms with her unwanted step mother. In Up in the Air, Bingham is a man who wants no ties, connections or responsibilities outside of his job. He wants no girlfriend, wife, kids or family.

Reitman said after the screening that this film is his most personal film to date, and possibly the most personal film he will ever make. He’s been working on the script for six years, and premiered the film on the fifth anniversary of his marriage (his wife was in attendance). And when a 12-year-old girl in the audience asked Reitman, during the Question and answer session, about his philosophies on life, one of his responses involved how much having kids has enriched his life.

In a recent USA Today interview, Reitman admitted that “Movies are kind of my way of dealing with my inner questions,” and that Kirn’s book affected him because of the self-imposed isolation of the main character. “Are we an island or not? That’s the simple, classic version of it. More than the value of being connected to the world, what is your responsibility to be connected to the rest of the world?”

The film isn’t flawless: the transition into the third act is likely to get the most abuse. The laughs slow down, new characters who were only previously hinted at, get introduced, and the story takes a bit of curve.

Up in the Air is charming, funny, moving, and timely. It makes you ask questions of yourself. Is your backpack too heavy? Is that a bad or good thing? All of the characters in the film represent a different philosophy on relationships, each one easily relatable in their own way. And while all of the characters come to their own conclusions, Reitman doesnt force feed you a message (although he does provide a couple) or provide judgements on these characters, and his film doesn’t end tied with a shinny red ribbon.

/Film Rating: 9 out of 10

About the Author

Peter Sciretta is a film geek and popcultured fanboy living in Los Angeles. He created /Film in 2005.

  • I want to see this, but the only thing holding it back, for me, is that was directed by the guy that did Juno--possibly one of the worst movies I've ever seen.
  • son_of_el_topo
    What a ridiculous statement. If Juno is one of the worst movies you have ever seen, then you haven't watched enough movies. I'm not an avid Juno defender, as I thought it was simply ok, but by no stretch of the imagination is it to be considered "one of the worst".
  • Octoberist
    Come on. You have not liked Juno but it's not like the worst movie ever made. Despite its swarmy nature, it's just a small kinda cute movie. I'm thinking that it's getting too much hate now.
  • MickJ
    "I'm thinking that it's getting too much hate now."

    I'm surprised backlash still even exists. It came out two years ago for crying out loud. It was overhyped to some extent but it's still a good film. People need to chill out.
  • muffin7
    You need to be more specific here, Juno was a solid film in almost every respect, except for the writing and especially the dialogue. Blame Diablo Cody, don't blame Reitman. The directing was fantastic despite the horribly contrived dialogue.
  • asianrage
    I like George Clooney's previous movies, so I know I'll like this one. Reitman's previous films were good, with "Thank You for Smoking" being the better one of two, so I'm pretty interested in seeing this film.
  • carsonreeves1
    Nice review. I liked the script quite a bit.

    Jason, I wouldn't worry about Reitman being the director of Juno. As we all know, that movie was Diablo Cody and what's her name. Reitman just turned on the cameras. This is much better.
  • rapistwerewolves
    Jason did more on Juno than everyone seems to think. Ellen and Diablo got all the credit, and they deserved all the praise they got, but Jason Reitman was a massive part of what made that movie work.
  • carsonreeves1
    I think the problem is, some people think that's an insult and some people think it's a compliment.
  • rapistwerewolves
    Juno was one of the best reviewed films of 2007, it is a compliment in every way possible. It is only a vocal minority that doesn't like Juno...and Ellen Page and Diablo Cody for that matter.
  • annonymous14
    I am not a big George Clooney fan. I guess I just had hoped his acting might be different in this one. He's just a one type of character actor and in my opinion. He and Brad Pitt are right up there together in my book. One dimensional. I was just hoping he might have changed his style for the better. His last few movies have all been acted the same way.Same type of character basically. There's more than just having charisma to being a great actor. He truly needs to start changing it up and change the personality of his characters. So, I guess I'm not interested until his acting gets better or at least not so one sided. I so admire actors like Johnny Depp and Robert Downey Jr who can go from any medium and change into whatever character they play. I truly believe that type of actor will make it longer in Hollywood-because their appeal will never die. It's always changing. I would love to see George be more of a character actor like that. He could be so fantastic at it! Actors like Brad Pitt and Tom Cruise. I don't think can change from Dramatic. Their careers will eventually die off. I have high Hopes still for George.
  • Weyland_Yutani
    You really haven't been paying much attention to Brad Pitt's career, have you? Your comment is invalidated by his inclusion. 12 Monkeys and Burn Before Reading are obvious, but it's difficult to argue the nuance that he has brought to a variety of his dramatic roles. DiCaprio rubs people the same way. I'm not sure I understand why.

    As for Clooney, like his acting or not, he's not likely to disappear any time soon. His career will likely thrive until he quits or dies. Doesn't hurt that he's been shown to be a competent director as well.
  • annonymous14
    Yes I have paid attention to Brad Pitts' career. That still does not mean I personally believe he is a good actor. He is not. I understand that you do not share my opinion and that is alright, but alot of other people do. 12 Monkeys was a terrible Sci-Fiction flick by Terry Gilliam. Brad Pitt might have gotten an Oscar nom for it, however that does not make his performance any less flawed or two dimensional. In Burn After Reading, John Malkowich was the best actor in the movie. Brad Pitt is not geared for comedy. His performance was ludicrous at best and it got old really fast. As for George Clooney, I said that I felt he would be fantastic if he could just switch his acting up a little bit more and be more versatile. I believe I said I still had high hopes that he would still exhibit that. I have not seen "Men Who Stare At Goats" and that is George Clooney in a comedy. I hope he does a brilliant performance in it. It is a comedy, so he will be doing something different. However, saying I have not kept up with someones' career because you like them, does not mean I have not nor will it change my opinion about their acting style. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
  • Weyland_Yutani
    You mean Clooney will be doing something different than Burn After Reading or O Brother, Where Art Thou? Okay.

    Listen, I'm only pointing out that your opinion here is an outlier, and not some sort of fact thrown down from Mt. Anonymous. I'm sure you will agree.
  • billybo
    sorry, but George Clooney's performances in Burn after reading, Michael Clayton, Solaris, Out of sight, Three Kings, Syriana, Good night, and good luck and on many others films are VERY different. And shown plainly that he is a more versatile actor that you credit him...
  • Name
    How odd to use Robert Downey jnr as an example of a versatile actor when it's always seemed to me that he plays Robert Downey Jnr in nearly all his films. He does it brilliantly and I love him for it but Brad Pitt and George Clooney (and DiCaprio - and you're right about Johnny Depp) are some of the most versatile actors working regularly today.
  • johandofgod
    Really interesting thoughts on the movie. I just hope it does not turn out to be a let down like Juno.
  • maui san
    I was at the screening and following Q&A, and agree with Peter's review. But a key fact is that he is chasing the coveted 10 MILLION mile mark, not 1 million. He says in the movie there are only a handful of such persons - this is the capstone of his lifetime of travel.
  • rapistwerewolves
    Peter I do have a question...how much does the film differ from the script? One issue I had with the ending of that was the Natalie character almost disappears aside from some mentions. I know it isn't her story, but she was one of the big things that made the whole middle of the script work so well for me.
  • I dont recall the ending of the script, but her character does get an on screen epilogue.
  • Weyland_Yutani
    It's pretty obvious that anyone that uses Juno as a reference for Reitman, probably hasn't seen Thank You For Smoking. It's a great film and really needs a viewing before you can attempt to understand what Reitman brings to the table.
  • well, I doubt I could like it less than Juno.
  • Octoberist
    I feel like even Juno gets too much hate. It's one thing to dislike it, but then you got the online bandwagon people hating on it, and even I - who didn't LOVE it - am defending it. I'm not saying that I want to change the opinions of people, but in the end, it's a fairly harmless movie.
  • Jim
    It's "aerial"
  • Name
    it must be a cool fanboy thing to do to hate Juno. it's okay if you don't like it but the fervor with which everyone slams Cody and Page suggests a mindless mob-mentality. but hey maybe it's just me.
  • muffin7
    I loved Juno, but I hate Cody and Page for getting such big heads after its success, which, judging by the movies Reitman has made and the movies those two have made since, I'd say that Reitman is the reason that Juno was so good, Page and Cody were simply along for the ride.
    At least Reitman doesn't have a big head on him. I can respect that.
  • probot
    I enjoyed both Thank you for Smoking and Juno so I have no doubt that I'll enjoy this film. I can imagine the marketing now though, "From the director of Juno".
  • J.D.
    "George Clooney stars as Ryan Bingham, a corporate downsizing expert whose life goal is to rack up one million frequent fly miles to earn him lifetime platinum member status."

    that reminds me of adam sandler in punch-drunk love minus the pudding.
  • steven ndegwa
    thank you for the most coherent review of this film i now have a vivid picture of what it might actually be like not like every other review ive read which are not so good
  • sbpw
    Simmons
  • JayCloned
    Great another quirky watch once and forget indie flick that will be hailed as the second coming around Oscar time.
  • Can't remember the last time I more eagerly awaited seeing a movie! Was on set of UITA for an afternoon, was one of the happiest experiences of my life.
  • carazelaya
    I guess it's a bit premature to say that Jason Reitman’s ‘Up in the Air’ is the most important movie of the decade, but I think its effortless brilliance, at the very least makes it a heavy contender. Just as Fight Club ushered in the disease of isolationism that set the tone for the next 10 years, in comes ‘Up in the Air’, as the antithesis and the remedy.
  • chris
    I have to say i don't know what to make of Jason Reitman because I loved "Thank you for Smoking" and i absolutely hated "Juno" even though Cera and Bateman are some of my favorites. Now i just finished "Up in the Air" and it's not bad movie by all means but i don't understand why it's making top ten lists of the year i personally didn't think there was anything that special with this movie, someone please tell me why this is so appealing to critics and audiences as well as getting nominations because out of all of the movies i see a year this is def not on my top ten for 2009.
blog comments powered by Disqus