zz525ee69a

I thought we were done with the crazy Batman 3 rumors, but it seems like the recent release of the teaser trailer for Christopher Nolan’s next film, Inception, has excited the rumor mill.

First up is Ain’t It Cool News, risking it’s geek rep on a rumor that Christopher Nolan is planning to shoot the entire third chapter of his Batman series with full IMAX cameras (no, not the fake digital variety). While we don’t have any idea if this is true, the idea shouldn’t come as a huge surprise, as Nolan has said that he’s wanted to shoot an entire film using IMAX for years.

Before The Dark Knight, he even shot a couple test shots on The Prestige using the IMAX camera to get a sense of that the issues were going to be. And for The Dark Knight, Nolan originally planned to shoot five of the scenes in IMAX but he kept increasing the use of the cameras through out the production. But working with IMAX cameras aren’t easy. The cameras are much heavier, and normal camera equipment had to be modified to be able to handle the weight. Also, the cameras only allow for a maximum of two and a half minutes film load. Another big problem, made obvious by Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, is the amount of design and render time to get the visual effects to look as clear as the rest of the 70mm image. Here is a quote from Nolan from our roundtable interview at The Dark Knight junket:

We found ways and we planned ways of getting around for example, the short load-times which is you know, we would just swap one camera for another when it ran out of film and that kind of thing,” explained director Christopher Nolan. “Generally with action sequences which is mostly what we were shooting you really rarely roll for more than ten seconds for example so it tends not to really be a factor. Shooting a dialog scene with an IMAX camera would be a bigger challenge because of the noise of the camera and the short length of the loads and so forth but we got better and better at it, we had a terrific crew, a lot of our camera mounts and things were 35 millimeter they were ones they’re built to withstand enormous abuse, so they can take the weight of a much larger camera.

Dialogue scenes would definitely be the biggest concern, but I’m sure solutions have been explored since the production of The Dark Knight. Of course, this is all but a rumor. Everyone involved in the production has recently insisted that no deal has yet been signed for a third Batman film. But that might just be the company line, who knows?

The other big rumor to hit today comes from UK’s gossip newspaper The Sun, which claims that not only is a Dark Knight sequel being prepped, it will begin shooting next year for a 2011 release, and will star Megan Fox as Catwoman. The only strange part is that The Sun doesn’t use the typical rumor language of “my source tells me…” but instead reports it as fact: “MEGAN FOX has signed up to play Catwoman in the next Batman movie.” Okay, I might be able to buy the first part of that report, but Megan Fox as Catwoman? Does anyone actually believe that Christopher Nolan would cast Megan Fox in any of his movies? I’m sure that there is no truth to this rumor what-so-ever, and here is why.

Ellen Page and Marion Cotillard make up the female leads in his latest film Inception. Cotillard won an Oscar, and Page was nominated for one. Maggie Gyllnhaal might have been the weakest link in The Dark Knight’s main cast, but she’s critically acclaimed and has been nominated for two Golden Globes and two Independent Spirit Awards in the last six years. And The Prestige featured Scarlett Johansson in a time when she was nominated for four Golden Globes in the period of just over two years. Point is, I don’t believe that Nolan would even consider someone like Megan Fox, who is great to look at, but not much more.

And the fact that this rumor comes from an unreliable news source like The Sun, doesn’t help the argument. And we’re talking about an article that uses stupid puns (”I have a strong feline she is the purrfect choice for the part”) and is written by someone who goes on to offer his (or her?) assistance getting Fox into the super tight wardrobe (talk about professional journalism).

I don’t believe that Nolan has even signed on to Batman 3 at this point, nevermind picked characters or begun casting, so I doubt that any of this is true, at this point. But for fun, lets go over the scientifically accurate estimated odds that some of these crazy rumors could actually happen:

Estimated Chance of Megan Fox being in Batman 3: 2.5%

Estimated Chance of Batman 3 beginning production in 2010: 58.2%

If Nolan Makes Batman 3, Estimated Chance He Will Shoot Entirely Using IMAX Cameras: 68.3%

Update: And yes, for those of you who didn’t get it, this is a joke… there are no scientifically accurate estimated odds

Fox Catwoman photoshop via: badtaste

  • Marion Cotillard could be catwomen. also, Nolan should pull a Cameron and develop new IMAX tech to shoot Batman 3 with.
  • that1
    That's part of the rumor too. Apparently one of the reasons he taking a break and doing Inception is so that he could get IMAX cameras built to his specs.
  • EvanJDeBiase
    ya isn't there someone who could develop a custom reel that is extra big so they could shoot it in imax? I'm sure someone could do it
  • Ghost
    I think Nolan learned his lesson after casting Katie Holmes. A bad actress is a bad actress. A 4.5% chance is being wildly optimistic.
  • MickJ
    Having just watched Begins again, I have no choice but to skip her scenes. I really tried to put up with it, but the difference in acting from scene to scene is too jarring. Everyone else is chewing on the scenery and she's not even aware they've started eating.
  • TheScumfrog
    She was better than Maggie Gyllenhaal as Rachel Dawson. I wasn't bothered when she died in THE DARK KNIGHT. But if it happened to Katie Holmes in THE DARK KNIGHT I think it would've hit home more because Bale and Holmes had a lot more chemistry.
  • Gelman
    I think if Megan Fox signs on, the movie will be almost as good as "Batman & Robin."
  • the odds are as high as there is the slight chance Nolan doesn't direct the third film. Imagine if someone like David Goyer took over. Could he cast Megan Fox? may be :P
  • [A]
    ..and Shia LaBarf as Robin! yay!
  • MickJ
    gag
  • that1
    And while we're at it, can we get the nipple suits back?
  • Gelman
    And Arnold to scream the phrase: "Let's kick some ice!"
  • If some of the delusional internet fanboys get their way and Snyder gets The Dark Knight, then maybe. But that's the only way I can see Fox in a Batman movie for a long time. And It aint going to be happening.
  • William_Wright
    a thing missed in the AICN article is that he was MAYBE filming Inception inbetween so that the imax camera technology could improve further. that is a bit far fetched. no one makes a 200 million stop gap.
  • Because no one in their right mind would cast Megan Fox in a role that requires too much speaking, what would some good Catwoman choices be? I'm leaning towards Rachel Weisz :)
  • [A]
    Yes. Not that I wanna see Catwoman in a Nolan's film though..
  • nindie
    What about Penélope Cruz as Catwoman? She's been nominated for an Oscar, won an Oscar and was nominated for a few Golden Globes.

    And according to imdb, she likes to keep stray cats!
  • Gelman
    Cruz? I'd rather see TOM Cruise as a transgendered Catwoman.... Then we'd have something...
  • nindie
    Whatever floats ya boat mate
  • Gelman
    Lolz. I only meant it as a joke, but the more I think about it, it sure would be freaky!
  • CyT
    Rachel Weisz is gorgeous but it would be a strange kind of catwoman. I find her too nice, although I guess I'd say the same about Michelle Pfeiffer ... Id probably have to vote for Natalie Portman for an interesting take on it and because she has good acting ability. And is sexy as hell.
  • erictvoigt
    We keep hearing from Brendon and now you how terrible the UK tabloids are, and yet time and time again they're referenced. Whhhhhyyyy, Peter? Whhhhhyyyy?
  • I don't think Nolan is even thinking about Batman at this moment, he's right now focused on a really good looking project.

    Really? Megan Fox? REALLY?
  • Because they have a lot of readers.

    Because they are a newspaper.

    Because we'd get 100 emails tipping us to the story in the next day if we didn't post about it.

    Because if we don't debunk these rumors early on, they grow.

    Plus, I was going to run the AICN rumor anyways, so it fit into a nice package.
  • Because all these clickthroughs are netting you sweet advertising cash?

    Just kidding Peter, though I can't imagine they hurt. (I am in no way saying you post sensational articles for advertising money).
  • I could be getting a lot of hits posting every Twilight story that comes along... believe me, A LOT of hits... but I don't because A. It doesn't interest me, and B. It doesn't interest the readers. I think we both agree that readers want to read a story like this. And honestly, I love the first half of it, the idea of Nolan shooting an entire Batman sequel in IMAX. So both A and B were covered :)
  • quintushalls
    In reply to Peter's comment, yes, Twilight stories wouldn't really work for Slashfilm's audience. But it would work for Slashgossip's audience, a website entirely focused on gossip stories, owned by the same people.
  • quintushalls
    Well, I would prefer a different way of phrasing the topic title. The single mention of rumors doesn't seem to be enough. The question for the reader, I think, is to how likely is the rumor to be true and if there is a reliable source. I think you have done that quite well after the jump. Something from British tabloids, I don't think anyone one would even consider, especially if they don't list a direct source like "drunk quote at strip club from Jonathan Nolan". If anything, it should be a "Page 2" story and not something worthy of frontpage on Slashfilm.
  • CyT
    I enjoyed reading it. Its interesting to find out that there is a possibility of a great Batman movie done in full IMAX and I get to think about Megan Fox in a skin tight black suit. I really cant complain with either of those things.
  • dashiel
    i agree, it's widely reported that he doesn't (seriously) think about his next project until his current one is completely finished. i sincerely doubt he has the ability to wall himself off completely, but i also doubt he's made any significant decisions about b3.
  • Yeah, I'd prefer no Catwoman in the film... I'd like to keep Audrey Hepburn in the role in my head forevers.
  • Saladinho
    I'd like to think Catwoman wouldn't be in it at all. Either way they need to do a better job of casting the female lead, whatever character it may be.

    Maybe Jessica Biel as Catwoman, if it must be so.

  • Anonymous
    You're being sarcastic about the Jesica Biel comment, right..?
  • Saladinho
    No. She was pretty good in Home of the Brave. I don't really think it's a good idea to have Catwoman at all, but, she was the only fit lass that looked the part I could think of.
  • cornchips
    jessica biel? yuk...rosario dawson all the way
  • MonsterKilledThePilot
    I dont wanna read into the IMAX news too much but is it possible Nolan wants to do the whole movie (or most of it) in IMAX because the story calls for it? Maybe there'll be a certain character that warrents this type of filmmaking. It'd be cool to follow Catwoman as she leaps from building to building all over Gotham.
  • I just don't know if Nolan will cast a big name in the role of Catwoman (or whoever the villain turns out to be - most likely NOT Catwoman). I mean, look at his past choices of villains: Cillian Murphy, Aaron Eckhart, Heath Ledger. The biggest name here is Ledger - but at least the dude was coming off an Oscar nom for playing a gay cowboy! I think he'll surprise us once again, and that's what I want.
  • Just an addendum: if they brought back The Joker, they need to hire Michael Shannon.
  • jeffe
    Personally, I'd like Joseph Gordon-Levitt.
  • Lauren
    Yeah JG-L would be a good choice. I heard he was going to be in Chris's movie Inception, with Michael Caine, Marion Cottiard, Cillian Murphy, and Ken Wantanabe. I see alot of possibilities, but for the role of Catwoman, I'd say either Eva Green or Kate Beckinsale.
  • 2.5% is way too high. I'd put it at 0.25%
  • luke_test
    Have Disqus updated their layout? Looks nicer.

    So are you still from your sources that he hasn't signed on?

    I tend to believe that.

    EDIT - Peter, when I click on an article, it automatically redirects me to a Disqus hosted page that just says "Type comment here"
  • Josh
    Megan Fox is a better actress than Scarlett Johansson. Also Katie Holmes isn't a bad actress.
  • ...Dude.
  • erictvoigt
    Ditto that.
  • Octoberist
    You must be joking me.
  • Josh
    Did you see her embarrassing performances in The Presitge, Black Dahlia, Match Point, The Man Who Wasn't There, etc. She can't act. She is terrible and the fact that she was cast in Iron Man 2 scares the shit out of me.
  • Ghost World + Lost in Translation > Confessions of a Drama Queen
  • Octoberist
    I think by saying that Megan Fox is a better actress than Scarlett Johansson (Ghost World, Lost in Translation) and saying that Katie Holmes isn't that bad, you've automatically thrown your argument(s) out of the window.
  • Josh
    I am not saying Fox is a good actress. What I am saying is that Johansson is a terrible actress. If there was to be a Catwoman, I think Kate Beckinsale would be a decent choice. However I don't think Catwoman fits into the Nolan universe that well. They will have to put a female character in the film and I think Vicki Vale might be a good addition. Especially with a Batman on the run story. I would pick January Jones for Vicki Vale.

    I don't get the hate for Katie Holmes. I think she is a good actress. If you need proof of this just watch her excellent performance in Pieces of April or watch Wonder Boys.
blog comments powered by Disqus