penguins_dance

According to a new story on Sci-Fi wire, George Miller is currently recording voices for Happy Feet 2 with Robin Williams set to record his role in January. Possibly roles plural, in fact, as he had a few characters to take care of in the first film.

George Miller’s original Happy Feet is something of a “best kept secret”, really. I’m not promising you’ll like it but chances are, if you haven’t seen it then you very possibly don’t really know what it’s like at all. The trailer definitely suggests an entirely different animal than the film ultimately provides (well, not literally, both are positively stuffed with penguins) and there’s a last act surprise that divided audiences with the sharp polarity normally associated with Marmite.

If I drew up a shortlist of films from the last ten years that I’d really like to see get a sequel, however, Happy Feet would definitely be on it. And, no, that’s not because I want more of the same but because I can only imagine what kind of strange odyssey Miller could have in store for next time. His own Babe follow up, the misunderestimated Pig in the City, proved how just surprising his approach to serial franchises could be. That one was one heck of a curveball from left field.

Good then, that those rumors of a Happy Feet follow up were almost as persistent as those promises of a 4th Mad Max film. And it seems that both series are moving ahead, so good times for the Miller hardcore.

Williams will be flown out to Miller’s studios in Australia, which suggests the director will have a large degree of personal control of the film, or at least a friendly home base in which he can incubate it. Who knows what that weird egg will contain when it hatches. I’m hoping that the premise for Happy Feet 2 goes far beyond even my least logical, most hairbrained fantasy.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

  • Though the movie was bearable and even slightly enjoyable as a feel good to be watched with younger children I really don't feel that a sequel is necessary - or even merits much attention.

    At least not at this point.
  • Bobby
    Well, as a few people have mentioned, there was a rather large subplot cut out of the first film at the last minute. It featured aliens not in the metaphorical sense that the finished film used them, but honest-to-goodness extraterrestrials who looked like the penguin god we saw at the beginning of the film. The rumor is that that might be the basis for some of the plot of this up and coming sequel.

    It's good to see it finally get started. We've been hearing about it for a while, but nothing concrete. I'm more interested in the new cast-members, whoever they might be.

    Also -

    "I really don't mind if a film has a message or not, but when a character literally cries out "We're Stealing Their Food!!!" its no longer a movie as it is political propaganda."

    You tell Hiyao Miyazaki that. Or Martin Rosen.
  • Dan W
    Happy feet creeped me the hell out
  • Gelman
    As one reviewer explained: "This may be the darkest, most disturbing feature length animated film ever offered by a major studio. At least 80% of the film’s running time shows its penguin characters in pain or danger. The PG rating is a joke since the film is wildly inappropriate for young viewers under seven. The title “Happy Feet,” suggesting a feel-good frolic, could hardly be more deceptive for a deeply ill-considered project that will make most audience members feel gloomier and more depressed than they did when they entered the theatre.

    "The propagandistic theme suggests that the biggest menace for the lovable penguins is the human race...

    "There’s also a bizarre anti-religious bias operating unmistakably and gratuitously in the film...

    If you want more, the rest is here:
    townhall.com/blog/g/5094f586-fed7-4cf4-872c-d20b94c78024
  • Bobby
    There's a rule of thumb that I stick to, and it's never yet steered me wrong, and that is - Michael Medved is a terrible critic. Proof, you ask? Why, he's given glowing reviews to "Batman & Robin," "Death Race" - take your pick. Outside of film, he also seems to think that 'that slavery thing wasn't such a big deal, and we should really just forget about it.'

    Having said that, while I wouldn't necessarily agree that it's anti-religious or anti-human (in fact, the film is quite optimistic in this regard), that subversive "Watership Down/Golden Age Disney" quality is one (but just one) of the things that a lot of people find so interesting about it.

    This is the third time I've typed this up. Damnable Opera browser.
  • Bobby
    There's a rule of thumb I often follow, and it's never led me astray. And, that rule is this - Michael Medved is a terrible critic. Proof, you say? Why, the man gave "Batman & Robin," "Death Race," and - well, take your pick. He also thinks 'that slavery thing wasn't so bad, and we should really all just stop talking about it.'

    Having said that, while I wouldn't necessarily agree that it's anti-religious or anti-human (in fact, the film is quite optimistic in this regard), that subversive "Watership Down/Golden Age Disney" quality is one (but just one) of the things that's so interesting about it. Especially in contrast to Pixar's stuff, which I do enjoy, don't get me wrong.
  • zebrat
    "There’s also a bizarre anti-religious bias operating unmistakably and gratuitously in the film..."

    ...sounds cool.
  • BrendonConnelly
    I guess all of that factored in to what I found so interesting.
  • Jon
    Misunderestimated? The "mis" surely cancels out the "under" of that "word".
  • BrendonConnelly
    It was a joke, a reference to something George W. Bush said.
  • What ruined the film was the message they crammed down viewers throats. I really don't mind if a film has a message or not, but when a character literally cries out "We're Stealing Their Food!!!" its no longer a movie as it is political propaganda.
    I was promised a cute kids film and that's not what I got, I could not care less about a sequel.
  • shadow
    Robin Williams, personally, completely destroyed the first film for me. He was called on to narrate when no narration was needed. The entire last act would have been far more impactful without a single line from him. I wanted lovelace to fucking die the entire time he was on screen.
  • Aargh. The first one was terrible. Why do we need a sequel?
blog comments powered by Disqus