blair_witchers

It’s a couple of weeks over ten years now since The Blair Witch Project proved to be a strange freak of box office nature. Back at it’s release on July 30th 1999 the film was given a crazy leg-up by its accidentally wonderful online marketing and a public desperate to buy into something spiritual-mystical, however crazy. We also shouldn’t underestimate the voracious appetite of the dedicated horror audience, of which I would suppose I am a member, and our never-ending desire for something new, fresh or exciting.

The sequel, Blair Witch 2: Book of Shadows, was an entirely different beast to the original, eschewing the Last Broadcast-style handicam aesthetic for something in the vein of classical narrative film stylings. Personally, I thought it was conceptually a far more exciting film than the first though somewhat hampered by its lackluster realization. I do still relish the irony, though, that this second film was directed by Joe Berlinger, typically a maker of documentaries.

So, which way would a third Blair Witch film go? Back to the faux-doc approach of part one? Or further into the potential of ‘traditional’ film language?

The BBC have spoken to Eduardo Sanchez and Daniel Myrick on the occasion of the film’s tenth anniversary, and their conversation turned to a possible sequel.

Sanchez admits they are still undecided how to proceed with the project, whether to stick with the grittiness of the first film, or make a more polished and more obviously expensive sequel. Sanchez began by explaining one of thei abandoned ideas:

Ideally, each Blair Witch film would be a completely different kind of movie. We’ve thought about doing a film that takes place in the late 1700s and looks like a Kubrick movie with gritty looking people and lighting.

Gritty looking people? Nice. That idea, however, has already given way to something more in step with the series’ legacy:

But now, we’re thinking about going back and and seeing what happened directly after the first film finished. I think it will have some kind of video element in it, but it won’t be a first person hand-held movie.

“Some kind of video element” brings back bad memories of Fear.Com and Halloween Ressurection.

Myrick was also asked about the possible return of the originals’ cast:

I talk to Josh quite regularly and Mike Williams as well. Actually, he had a role in my last movie. Heather, I haven’t seen in years. The last I heard, she had got out of the business and gone up north and is living on a ranch somewhere. Maybe she’s still traumatized.

The Blair Witch mantle seems likely to be scooped up by Oren Peli’s Paranormal Activity, in both low budget and studio-funded remake forms. Will a relevant Witch sequel make it out of the traps before the brand is completely devalued?

  • lobsterfancy
    I remember seeing an ad to win a walk-on role in "Blair Witch 3" about 8 or 9 years ago in the back of a magazine.
  • BrendonConnelly
    Did you enter? If so, you might be getting your dream soon.
  • We can thank Blair Witch 2: Book of Shadows for bringing Jeffrey Donovan onto our televisions... thats about it.
  • Yeah the only thing I remember about the 2nd movie Was Donovan.
    But I loved the first film. It was a great idea and as you said the online marketing was brilliant. I remember hearing about people going up there after the movie thinking it was all real.

    The first time I saw it I really enjoyed it, but left not thinking it was that scary, until I got home to an empty house (I had just graduated high school at the time) and was a bit freaked out. The next day I went to a weekend camp and remember waking up in the middle of the night hearing what sounded like kids outside my cabin's window. It scared me to death.

    I saw the movie twice more after going to college. Both those experiences were memorable to me, but mostly for the people I was with and the events surrounding than the movie.

    But that last scene will stick with me forever.
  • purdy
    I remember feeling the same way. I originally thought it was an entertaining movie but really not very scary, then I went camping. Hearing movement out in the trees freaked me out. It's a fun movie.
  • Saladinho
    The last scene/shot alone is worth all the hype.
  • Anrkist
    I remember the fear as well. I just spent my last few bucks on this piece of...
  • kolbe
    I would love to see a real sequel. I found the first one so interesting, I would really like to see what the next step for these guys would be.
  • I definitely would like to see an "aftermath" type story if they chose to continue the BW mythology, but I think I would rather that they just let it go. Trying to cash in on a cultural phenomenon a decade after the fact seems a lot like being the guy who can't get past his glory days on the high school football field. Still, a mockumentary about the world 10 years after the original took place would be interesting provided they didn't use it as a frame story to put new filmmakers in the woods and essentially remake the first one. It'd be cool if they did it "Last Broadcast" style instead of another 100% found footage film.

    And a quick side note, Brendan. I think that the full remake rumors for Paranormal Activity might be unfounded. I actually saw the movie at a festival a few years ago and was lucky enough to see it again at a special screening at Paramount. It was the same movie, they just gave it a shittier ending. I'll withhold all spoilers but I will say that this film is going to scare the ever loving shit out of a lot of people.
  • i liked the first, but have no interest to see the second or third
  • MovieGuru85
    they should make the lost tape and have it shot like cloverfield or quarantine
  • dangeer
    The original Blair Witch Project movie still scares me if I watch it alone late at night in the dark. Aside from the theater, where it is possible for everyone to be quiet and create the right atmosphere for watching this film, it is impossible to not have silly commentary amongst friends while watching it together at someone's house.
  • probot
    I enjoyed the first one. Yes, the ending still gives me chills every time I watch it but the second one missed the mark completely for me. Maybe A third movie could wash the bad taste of the second movie out of my mouth. So I say...go for it.
  • Hey, Rue Morgue Magazine had this same information in an interview with Sanchez and Myrick TWO MONTHS AGO.

    But it's still a pretty awesome idea. I actually like the idea of the prequel much more than any sort of continuation of the "modern" portion of the story.
  • ME
    "We’ve thought about doing a film that takes place in the late 1700s and looks like a Kubrick movie with gritty looking people and lighting." Yes, Thats all a movie needs . . .
  • nic1
    First film - great concept, innovative filming technique, clever use of the net and great ending. Second film - traditional so-so teen gothy horror. First film - groundbreaking. Second film - forget it. Third film - bad idea. Leave the Blair Witch idea alone and have some new ideas. This is one cash cow that doesn't need to be milked anymore. Think Exorcist, guys. Law of diminishing returns!
  • GoreBaby
    "Personally, I thought it was conceptually a far more exciting film than the first though somewhat hampered by its lackluster realization."

    brendon, you just love to be a goddamn idiot all the time, dont you?
  • enzomoran
    Wow. How unnecesarry
blog comments powered by Disqus