asimovfoundation

I sat down for a fun interview with director Roland Emmerich today, here at San Diego Comic-Con to promote 2012 in theaters (November 13. 2009). The full video interview will be up soon, but during the interview, I asked Emmerich about his work on Asimov’s Foundation trilogy. Foundation fans will recall that not too long ago, Columbia won the rights for the trilogy of books with Emmerich attached to direct, which (as I wrote back in January), “centers around a mathematician named Hari Seldon, a psychohistorian who is able to predict large-scale events using scientific principles. When Seldon foresees the downfall of the Galactic Empire, which will precipitate a dark age lasting 30,000 years, he establishes two human oases (”Foundations”) in an effort to preserve human knowledge. Asimov’s series was considered groundbreaking and won a Hugo award in 1966.”

“As a kid I loved it,” Emmerich said of the books.  “I think everyone who is a science fiction fan has read that thing.” But Emmerich also revealed that several months ago, he hired Bob Rodat, writer of Saving Private Ryan and The Patriot, to work on the script.  Emmerich said, “He’s working on it and pretty soon, I will see the first script.” Overall, Emmerich opined, “It’s very difficult to make into a movie, but I think we’ve cracked it.”

Discuss: Do you think Rodat has the chops to adapt something as complex as Asimov’s book series?

Related Posts with Thumbnails

  • To All,

    The choice of Rodat for the scenario seems to me, it is the first "director's choice", and it is not a bad one. The story of the 3 main books of the cycle is not trnaslatable into a good movie, unless rewritten. And Rodat is good at it.
    Isn't he?
  • Name
    Hey it could be worse. At least it's not MEL GIBSON.
  • Colonel_Kurtz
    I understand all the hate being tossed Emmerich's way, but he does actually make technically good films. Except for 10,000 BC, his movies have been entertaining enough, and you can't fault him on production value. His failures are plausibility and basic physics. As long as he let's Asimov's writing do the heavy lifting, he should be ok.

    Note: This may just be me being overly optimistic since I've been waiting for this to happen for over 20 years now.
  • Nooooooooooooooooooo !

    Neither Emmerich or Rodat have what it takes to adapt such piece of SF litterature. I am soooo sad right now.
  • Give it to Proyas
  • sharonedreyer
    Rodat may have to suck it up and create a partnership with others of his ilk simply because of the complexity of the Foundation. Should Rodat and/or other Hollywood producers and directors water down the Foundation, it will absolutely be an insult to Azimov and the intellence of his well-written series.
  • lermaj
    Emmerich is to movies as shit is to ice cream.
  • slavmax
    Relax people, its just a movie. There's nothing wrong with bringing classic Sci-Fi novels like Asimov to the big screen. There have been more duds when this has happened than there have been successes i.e. DUNE. I'm all for it and would love to see others like Niven's Ringworld, Clarke's Rama, and Orson Scott Card's Ender's Game.
  • Bull
    I would love to see more science fiction books brought to the big screen. But not by Roland Emmerich.
  • Andrew
    Absolutely not. The man is a hack. Incapable of making a movie. Day after tomorrow, independence day, all entertaining, one time only action fests, but complete crap. I would rather have Zack Snyder direct movie adaptations of all of my favorite graphic novels (Transmetropolitan, Ex Machina, Sandman, Maus, etc) than have Emmerich go anywhere near Asimov. I, Robot was bad enough, and that was ALEX PROYAS! No more abominations to Asimov please, the man deserves better
  • dagreenman18
    Stuff will asplode, that much is certain.


    I wish he would realize that he just dosen't have the talent to make this movie, hand it off to someone else, and just take a producer credit.
  • Ian
    Emmerich, Kubrick, Orson Welles, Akira Kurosawa, and Uwe Boll. I see you have an eclectic taste in movies.
  • rpk
    Yeah, you can pretty much chalk this one up as another future over-the-top-cheese ball disaster movie thanks to Roland Emmerhack (like that? I combined 'Emmerich' with 'hack'! I am a genius and have never seen that done before.)
  • jt
    Why is EMMERICH doing this? This book is nothing but people sitting around talking - it defines "hard Sci Fi" ini that it is all ideas. There are no action scenes and little eye candy. Someone told ol' Roland that it was about the end of the universe, and he geeked out at the opportunity before failing to realize: .... It. Is. Just. People. Talking. The whole damned book.
  • shadow
    Roland Emmerick can go to fucking hell.
  • brett
    Oh no, the director of 10,000 BC. How could anyone pair the ultimate science fiction tale with the maker of that film. They will tare a hole in space time.
  • samyung
    whoa dave, spoilers! As I recall, the first book didn't have you find out until the end that there was a second foundation.
  • carrierpigeon
    Both foundations are mentioned at the start of the book aspart of Seldon's plan. We just never hear anything more about the second foundation until, ahem.. certain events transpire.
  • The book has been around for 58 years, I'm pretty sure the time for spoiler alerts has come and gone.
  • sauce_1
    I'm gonna say this now, NO ONE has the writing chops to make that series into a movie. No chance. Sorry kids. It covers too much time, too many events, and too many characters to really make into a movie.

    Oh, and yeah, even if Jesus came down from Heaven and wrote the perfect script Himself, it wouldn't matter: Director Roland Emmerich kills any and all hope.

    Thems the breaks.
  • I'd have to agree. I don't see anyone being able to adapt this for the big screen. It'll probably be like a lot of big Hollywood adaptations: recognizable only in name.
  • Craigasorusrex
    I think the question should be does Emmerich have the chops to direct an Asimov adaptation.
  • DataLifePlus
    My sentiments exactly. With Emmerich at the helm, we know exactly where this film is headed - the bowels of summer blockbuster hell. I'm picturing a cross between 10,000 BC and Independence Day.

    Why does this always happen with good science fiction stories? So frustrating.
  • Bull
    Why whatever do you mean? 10,000 BC solidified Emmerich as a master storyteller. Right on par with Stanley Kubrick, Orson Welles, Akira Kurosawa, and Uwe Boll.
  • MickJ
    How is that even a question? The answer is no, not without making a mockery of it.
  • Craigasorusrex
    I posed a rhetorical question. I thought the answer was obvious enough that someone didn't need to reply.
  • Guest
    welcome to the internet
blog comments powered by Disqus