eddie_and_roger_rabbit

Harry Knowles has today published a telephone interview with Robert Zemeckis at Aint it Cool. For the most part they talk about A Christmas Carol, detailing the shape the film is in today and how it is going to showcase advances in performance capture technology and so on, but the chatter comes around, with seeming inevitability, to one of Zemckis’ past projects.

Bob Hoskins is appearing in Carol as Fezziwig, past employer of Ebeneezer Scrooge. According to Zemeckis, on set (or, perhaps more properly, “in volume”) conversation touched upon Who Framed Roger Rabbit and a potential return for Eddie Valliant, Hoskins’ character therein. The good news quote, simple as it is, lies beyond this break.

Here’s the back-and-forth between Harry and Bob, starting with Harry:

Did you have any discussions with him about returning as Eddie Valiant?

Oh yes, he always has them with me. He loves Eddie Valiant and he would love to do it. We talk about it and it’s something we are thinking about.

Something we are thinking about. Really? I do hope so.

There has been talk of a Roger Rabbit follow-up a good few times over the years, and I’ve even read the screenplay for one proposed picture. That one was going to be a prequel that took us from Roger’s early years to his mission to rescue Jessica Krupnick, later his wife, from the Nazis. Toon Platoon was planned as a direct-to-video picture and definitely wouldn’t have been directed by Zemeckis and, frankly, I’m rather grateful it wasn’t made at all. The low point, I think, was the revelation that Roger’s father was none other than… drumroll, please… Bugs Bunny. Ech.

Zemeckis suggests to Harry Knowles that any Roger Rabbit sequel would likely be a few years off, as he’s currently on something of a crusade. After Knowles asks Bob if he has any plans to return to live action film making, the reply comes as follows:

I’m really committed to getting this art form [performance capture] off of the ground, but of course I would and I’m never going to say never to anything, but right now though I really want to make sure that we get this out there so that younger filmmakers have these absolutely breathtaking tools that they can use.

There’s a lot of cynicism about performance capture out there, but I can’t say I share it. Zemeckis really is expanding the filmmakers’ toolkit, and I’m both impressed and actually rather grateful to him for it.

  • Sequel to roger rabbit? As much as i would love one, do we really need one? and who knows what kind of route they would go down with special effects today... a motion captured roger rabbit or Toon world? no thank you.
  • Zemeckis Sucks
    NO! We do not need one! It's a little too late to make a sequel. Robert Zemeckis is a freaking HACK! Leave great movies alone! Sequels like this only destroy the originality and the quality of the original. Man! what is wrong with freaking Hollywood? Can't they come up with something new?!!! And Robert Zemeckis has something up his butt with motion capture. Motion capture SUCKS!!!!
  • i won't go as far as to call zemeckis a hack or for that matter say that motion capture sucks, but he just over uses it. for the past what 2 or 3 films he's just been using the shit out of it, its getting really old really fast.

    but agreed, we do not need a toon town 2
  • /ambient
    That's cool that Zemeckis wants to push performance capture as a usable form for filmmakers. Judging from films using motion capture and also being a filmmaker myself, I don't find motion capture as particularly interesting as shot footage. What you can do practically is more impressive than, well, Beowulf. I liked Zemeckis better when he shot footage not when he manipulated things through a computer.
  • Zemeckis Sucks
    I am an animator! and Motion Capture is terrible. It does the complete opposite of what it is supposed to do! Motion capture makes the characters looks so fake, robotic, and unnatural. The only real type of animation is key framed!
  • fanboy_d
    hate that he's sticking to performance capture, it's soulless and he hasn't found an application for it yet that isn't redundant
  • filmbuffrich
    Brendon-

    Where did you read that Toon Platoon was going to be direct to video? Everything I ever read on the subject indicated that it was intended as a theatrical release and was only scuttled because Disney and Spielberg kept disagreeing over the direct of the RR shorts. (And a post-Shindler's List Spielberg was already moving away from more cartoonish depictions of Nazis.)
  • Why the hell are they even considering a sequel? Why can't we just leave 80s classics alone? Oh god. and it's been 21 YEARS since that movie came out.
  • Buffalo Bill
    Performance capture DOES have a use: It's giving fantastical creatures that don't exist in the real world an actor-caliber performance level on-screen. That's what James Cameron is using it for.

    Zemeckis, on the other hand, is just being retarded. What's the point of capturing Tom Hanks' performance and then using a CGI version of him rather than just PUTTING THE REAL HANKS IN THE DAMN FILM?? Somebody tell me!
  • Zemeckis Sucks
    The only use Performance/Motion Capture has is to create stunts to dangerous for a normal stunt man to do him/herself. A great animator can do the actor-caliber performance level of any character on-screen better than some actors. Key frame animation is and always will be far superior to performance/motion capture. Why is it that performance/motion capture always needs to be corrected by an animator? I'll tell you why, because performance/motion capture SUCKS! So does Robert Zemeckis - he needs to go back and stick to live action films - he needs to make films like Forrest Gump and Back to the Future. All the animated films he's worked on were horrible.
  • Burton
    I loved The Polar Express and I liked Beowulf. I guess I'm in the minority.
blog comments powered by Disqus