D-Box

It’s a slow news night, so I thought I’d post this report from /Film reader Joshua R about seeing Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince in D-Box seats.

For those who don’t know, a few movie theaters have begun installing these motion seats in select theaters. D-Box programs the seats to move in sync with the action during the film presentation. Many people are quickly writing off the seats as a gimmick — something that belongs in a theme park and not a movie theater.

Is it as distracting as it sounds or does it provide a unique viewing experience worth the extra ticket price? Read Josh’s quick review after the jump.

The following report was written by /Film reader Joshua R:

After hearing about the ‘Watchmen: Director’s Cut’ being screened in four theaters in the country, I decided to take a trip to see one of them. I live in Phoenix and my nearest screening was at the Chinese Theater in Hollywood (about a 7 hour drive.) When buying tickets for it, I noticed that the Chinese Theater is also one of the three theaters in the country that has D-Box Motion Code (with the moving seats) and is currently playing “Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince.”

This was a rare opportunity which I felt was worth the trip.

The first night was Harry Potter in D-Box. I was surprised to see that the entire theater wasn’t outfitted with the D-Box seats but only two rows (about 30 seats.) The seats allocated for D-Box were the best seats in the house (of course, that is subjective) eye-level with the screen, three fourths back into the auditorium from the front row. Each seat has a self-adjuster on it which allows each theatergoer to set how much they want their own chair to move. Of course, I set mine on 4.

The beginning was very cool with the dementors flying about. The chair would buck left and right as they turned and vibrated when they crashed through walls. As the beginning sequence is filmed in an exciting behind-the-shoulder view of the dementors, this sequence felt more than ever like a ride at Disneyland. As I understand it, this is also the scene in 3-D when it opens wide in IMAX. The beginning was the best part.

The motion is not over used, which is a good thing. Dialogue scenes have no motion in them whatsoever which makes it special when the movement starts (and thrilling when used with a jump scare as in the end with the hand coming out of the lake.) This sparing use of the moving seats, however, became my biggest disappointment as well. In any of the other Harry Potter films, this would have been an absolute blast. This is certainly the least action filled installment however and I found myself waiting through the talky scenes hoping for another action sequence which is not how prefer to watch Harry Potter films.

Ultimately, I felt it was a gimmick. I was trying to place the sensation it gave me and I thought ‘rumble pack!’ It’s the same way I felt when I played ‘Starfox 64′ for the first time. Of course, that technology became standard in video game controllers. With the whole movement towards making going to the movies an ‘entertainment experience,’ I could see this technology taking off. If this film was in IMAX 3-D and D-Box, it would have been pretty amazing. I still think it would be better suited other films, it would have been great for ‘Star Trek’ although ‘Transformers 2′ would have been too much, I would have gotten sick.

At the end of the day I was happy to pay $20 for my ticket although half of that was seeing it digitally projected which looked absolutely gorgeous and will tide me over until I can see it in IMAX. Also, the Chinese Theater is a stunning movie house where all the screens are crystal clear and you could eat off the floors. All in all it was a great experience.

  • quintushalls
    Apparently most Blu-Ray DVDs come with D-Box motion code. I wouldn't recommend getting a D-Box for the home, unless you have enough money for a home theater. But I would really like to experience it in movie theaters as a standard. I actually thought motion control would have taken off sooner than 3-D. I think the only thing that makes it a gimmick is the fact that it isn't necessary to see the film. Buttkickers are becoming a standard in IMAX screens. I don't see it being far off. Besides, movie theaters need to set themselves apart from the big sets at home. I would rather watch a movie at home then sit with a bunch of screaming kids at a theater. I need a reason to go to a movie, and if it is a ride, then that would draw me there. Theaters are a gimmick, in the fact that we don't need them, and this is what theaters need. Besides, who doesn't like going to Disney Land?
  • i think that sounds awesome! i would love to see a movie like that, but not ones like HP half blood prince
  • Yoji
    So does that mean like during sex scenes we'll move with the thrust? -.- anyways, this sounds like something I would try to see how it affects a viewing of a movie.
  • cellchild
    vibrating seats in theatres... hmmm... they'll do anything to get chicks to the theatres
  • quintushalls
    Making out in theaters has never been better!
  • Michael_C
    THEY'RE NOT DEMENTORS THEY'RE DEATH EATERS OH MY GOD YOU KNOW NOTHING. In all seriousness these aren't going to be used as anything but a gimmick for a long long time.
  • Joshua
    You're right, that was my mistake. In the book it's dementors which attack the bridge and Death Eaters in the film. Please don't assume I know nothing, though. I don't remember Death Eaters flying around as black smoke in the books, it's an easy mistake.
  • starscream9289
    Imagine watching Transformers in one of those!

    You'll be carried out with a dislocated neck.
  • Justin
    Sounds horribly gimmicky.
  • Danos
    Sounds horrible full stop.
  • The Half Blood Prince was disappointing. Too much time was spent on the relationships between Harry/Ginny and Hermione/Ron. I was looking forward to the action sequences near the end of the book. They were omitted. The confrontation between Harry and Snape is also omitted. If you want to see this movie, go at the cheapest time of day.
  • funkyjebus
    Didn't they try this vibrating seat years ago with Earthquake. They put loads of subs under the seats!?
  • My aunt owns Sound Environment in NB and I was able to watch a movie (The Italian Job) in a seat like this. It was over 3 years ago. The chair cost around 15k and was as comfortable as a Lazy-Boy. It was quite the experience to be honest. The boat ride at the beginning of the film was amazing. There are no speakers in the chair however and they don't blast subs up your ass. Actuators and hydraulics power the chair. I was thinking it was going to be noisy but the sound is non-existent.

    If you have the money for a nice home theater, not one in your living room but a separate room with stadium seating, then yeah, these chairs would be awesome.

    As for them being a gimmick in a theater, I think so for sure. Who the hell would want 250+ chairs all moving at once? The noise in one chair is hardly noticeable, but 250+? No thanks. Anyone who has been on a 3D ride at Universal Studios knows what the experience would be like during a 2hr movie....shit. It's annoying enough to see people texting, think about the chair moving while texting. Light streak show anyone?
  • evilpanda
    It depends on which D-Box chair you have and your setup. You really need the 3-axis (rather than the 2-axis) and a comfy chair that's independent of it's neighbour.

    I've been wanting to get one ever since I experienced "The Incredibles" with the chair and since it also works with DVDs it'll work with my Kaleidescape system. That said, it's not great with every film and in some cases it's surprising that it kicks in (musicals and the sort).
  • Joshua
    Thanks for posting this, Peter. I didn't even notice that you had until just now.
  • Name
    When has "going to the movies" not been an "entertainment experience?"
  • Joshua
    Transformers 2.
  • jwsutts
    I would love to try this...

    Provided it IS quiet - and has a user controlled ability to turn it off (for those who have issues with movement and getting sick)

    Despite home theaters 'taking over' (my local cinema's seem to be able to fill seats fairly regularly) - Theaters DO need more to differentiate themselves. This could be a really good investment.

    The more theaters that adopt it - the more movies will be made to really capitalize on it. I can picture movies essentially created to BE 'rides' - designed and tailored to make REALLY good use of 3D and the D-Box.. Theaters could run those screens/films as almost an event a couple days a week, when they don't need the screen for a regular tent pole.

    I don't know.. in my head it's pretty rad.
  • plagueoftruth
    The seats are completely silent and there is full user control. It's not a rad as you'd think it would be, but I think that's because they're too afraid of people complaining. Every time the seats would lean left I found myself wishing they would lean just-a-little-more left, when they would vibrate I wanted, well...more. It just felt restrained. Even on level 4.

    I love the idea, though. As I had mentioned in my report, if this was combined with 3-D the effect would be tremendous. It would be a more immersive experience than most people will have had outside of an amusement park.

    I also completely agree about the 'movies can be rides' thing. The beginning of HBP was absolutely the best. I can't describe the rush of flying through the air with those death eaters turning left and right, wobbling with the bridge or crashing through the wall at Diagon Alley. Unfortunately, it kinda (if you'll pardon the expression) blew it's wad too early. The start was like Star Tours Lite, though, and that was well worth the ticket price.

    I would love to see entire films that are almost roller coasters. Sure, keep them short. Break up the action with five minute or so scenes of meager character development to build minor stakes in the adventure. I would bet that if they had film rides like this in both D-Box and 3-D, people would happily pay $10 even if they were only an hour long. It would be a way of jamming more showings in the day so they wouldn't have to charge $20 per ticket to make it profitable. I could see families taking a short break into the theaters while shopping at the mall.

    For now, I'm just hoping that 'Avatar' will be in D-Box and 3-D. That would be amazing.
  • Joey McPoopstain
    So why not just sit in front of a kid that just ate a bag of sourpatch kids and let his kicking the seat simulate the motion?
  • CityOfAvondale
    hahahah joshua r is n00b theres dbox in surprise hahahahha 14 hours of driving for no reason hahahahhahaha
  • plagueoftruth
    There certainly wasn't as of July when I wrote this. Not to mention half the reason I went was to see 'Watchmen: Director's Cut' on the big screen at the same theater. Or are you going to lie and tell me that was also playing in Surprise? Also, I went to have a fun time on a road trip. Driving to Surprise isn't that fun.

    While I appreciate that you don't have anything better to do than troll my article, you might want to get your facts straight.
blog comments powered by Disqus