half-blood-prince-international-poster1-560x862

[This is part four of a four-part series. You can also read part one, part two, and part three. This article contains SPOILERS for Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, but NOT for Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows]

Over the past seven days, I have plowed through 15 hours of Harry Potter movies in an attempt at exploring the cultural phenomenon of this series. Crucial to this adventure has been my complete unfamiliarity with the Harry Potter books. Unencumbered by the expectations and anticipations that accompany Potter-fandom, I tried to evaluate how well these films work as films in their own right.

The process of adapting thousands of pages of novels into a series of movies is undoubtedly daunting. The closest analogue in recent memory is The Lord of the Rings trilogy. Taken as films alone, that series had flaws that are occasionally inherent to the adaptation process, especially for books set in a fantasy universe (as opposed to, say, a procedural crime drama by Grisham). For example, characters, whose rich back stories fill the books, were sometimes introduced with very little context, and story elements were occasionally confusing, since they could not be explained at length.

The Rings trilogy, however, had a lot of other things going for them to distract from their flaws as films: Stunning direction and a unifying vision by director Peter Jackson to guide every movie; epic and crowd-pleasing battle scenes that used state-of-the-art (at the time) special effects technology; the simple, underlying story of the bonds of friendship between Frodo and Sam; and the back-to-back-to-back event-style theatrical releases that took place during the holidays three years in a row. The Potter series has to deal with different challenges and after watching all six films in one week, culminating with Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, I am unfortunately more aware of its flaws than ever.

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (2009)

The latest film in the series sees Hogwarts amping up their security, as Voldemort’s Death Eaters increase the frequency of their attacks. A shield of some sort (never explained in the movie) is established around the school to protect the students and staff from the Death Eaters, but the devious Draco Malfoy (Tom Felton) may have devised a workaround. Moreover, a series of assassination attempts on Dumbledore (Michael Gambon) bring urgency to his attempt to destroy Voldemort once and for all. In doing so, he enlists the help of Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) to cozy up to one of Voldemort’s old instructors, Professor Slughorn (Jim Broadbent).  Meanwhile, Hermione (Emma Watson) is directly confronted with her feelings for Ron Weasley (Rupert Grint).

After hearing the buzz and knowing about the more mature nature of this book, I had high hopes going in. Director David Yates not only had the ability to see where his predecessors had failed and succeeded as directors, but he himself had turned in an entry to the series already (Order of the Phoenix). The big question on my mind was: With the benefit of hindsight and with his considerable talents behind him, could Yates create a film that worked not only as a Harry Potter movie, but as an adventure movie on its own?

My answer: Not really.

There is a lot to like about Half-Blood Prince if you’ve seen the previous films. As the latest entry in a series of very similar films, it completely works. It is, perhaps, one of the most beautiful movies of the year, with excellent cinematography by Bruno Delbonnel (The IMAX trailer for this film, which is embedded above, is my favorite trailer of 2009 thus far). There is a lot of humor in the interactions between the students, and when Ron implicitly rejects Hermione, you feel just as angry and frustrated as she must. Our reaction to these scenes is only possible after having spent time with these characters for nearly a decade.

There are also plenty of moments of pure cinema in this movie, scenes that made my geek heart swell with pride. I am absolutely in love with the liquid motif that Yates employs for the flashback memory sequences, which feel simple, yet breathtaking. The scene when Harry and Dumbledore travel into a cave to retrieve a Horcrux contains one of the best jump scares I’ve seen in my life, but also features a spectacular fire sequence that’s a wonder to behold.

But even as I was enjoying these elements, the films problems kept lingering in the back of my mind. It should be noted that the movie doesn’t really stand up on its own as well as the other films, since it ends with a very clear cliffhanger. I’m not going to dock points for that, since it’s inherent to the storyline, but what I’m justifiably unhappy about is that the fim squanders some of the little dramatic potential it has. As with some of the less enjoyable Potter films, Half-Blood Prince takes an excessive amount of time in setting up the main conflict of the story. By the time you understand what all the pieces of the puzzle are, the film is almost over.

Arguably one of the most significant twists of the series is the fact that Severus Snape (Alan Rickman) has been working for the dark lord this entire time. In this film, he is introduced, matter-of-factly, as being on Voldemort’s side right from his very first scene. You could argue that his allegiances are actually ambiguous throughout the film, but I would argue that every single scene Snape is in during this film cements his status as a bad guy (not to mention the fact that halfway through the film, we learn about the true nature of the Unbreakable Vow). Also, the final reveal that Snape is indeed the Half-Blood Prince carries no weight with it; what feels like it was supposed to be one of the film’s big moments falls completely flat.

There’s also the matter of Draco Malfoy, who I think is completely wasted in this movie. The idea that Malfoy is chosen to assassinate Dumbledore is incredibly interesting, but he is given almost nothing to do in this film other than stalk around the school’s hallways a lot, get hurt by Potter in the bathroom, then scream a lot towards the end of the film. Why was Malfoy chosen for this task? Why does Malfoy feel this is a task he has to complete? What is the nature of Malfoy’s internal conflict? None of these questions are answered in a satisfying way. I am not exaggerating when I say I literally learned more about Malfoy’s motivations in the first few films, when Malfoy is still a kid and opining about how dirty mudbloods are.

If there’s one thing in the movie that really worked for me, it was Dumbledore and his relationship with Harry. We learn some of Dumbledore’s history with Voldemort, and Harry’s loyalty to Dumbledore is tested throughout the movie (The famous line, “Once again, Harry, I must ask too much of you,” is great not only for Gambon’s delivery but for the pathos it carries). When Dumbledore’s assassination finally comes at the end, it is a death exactly as tragic as it should be, a momentary triumph of evil over good and a signifier that from this point on, Potter and his friends are on their own.

I wanted and expected Half-Blood Prince to transcend the constraints of its pedigree, but I found that overall, Half-Blood Prince exemplifies everything that is right and wrong, cinematically, with the Harry Potter series. It suffers from languid and uneven pacing and manages to contain too much exposition and not enough exposition, all at once. It successfully creates its own universe and lets us inhabit it for a short period of time, yet often struggles with how to make that universe’s events suspenseful or purposeful. The greatest joy in this film, as with the entire series, is getting to spend more time with the characters we know and love. But if I had to guess (since I haven’t read the books), I would say that like the rest of the series, this movie relies way too much on one’s knowledge of the book’s characters to make it thoroughly enjoyable on its own.

/Film Rating: 7 out of 10

Discuss: What did you think of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince?

[This is part four of a four-part series. You can also read part one, part two, and part three.]

*As a closing note, I just wanted to give a big thanks to everyone for joining me for this series. It’s been quite an adventure this week and whether you’ve commented constructively, or if you’ve just read my ramblings, I’ve been grateful to learn more about the Harry Potter series with you guys.

About the Author

David Chen currently does research and writing for a university in the Boston area. He can be reached at davechensemail(AT)gmail(DOT)com.

  • Luke
    Saw it last night as well. I mostly agree with your points here. I don't think Yates can be blamed too much here, as not a whole lot happens in the book itself (it's all mostly set-up for the last book/last two movies). This is a film / book devoted to the characters, and I think he captured that.

    I definitely agree that the main problem in the film is the development of Draco and Snape. Malfoy has one too many scenes of him wandering the castle moodily, and the Half Blood Prince storyline isn't built on nearly enough in the film for the big "reveal" at the end to have any impact.

    That being said, Dave, I definitely recommend you watch the final two films as they have the potential to be the best in the series. The final book is paced much more like a film, with a sense of urgency, plot direction, and is littered with action scenes intertwined with character development. I enjoyed the series, look forward to the slashfilmcast to hear what the rest of you thought.
  • CaptainSolo
    Luke, we're gonna have company!
  • urkel
    To me, the biggest problem with the entire Harry Potter series is that the side characters are infinitely deeper than the main protagonists.

    I know, it's his story and all but when you compare the simplicity of the Harry/Ron/Hermione/Draco relationship with the complex story of Lupin/Black/Pettigrew/Snape/Potter Sr/Lily then it's no contest as to who has the more interesting dynamic. But in the end then the adults are wasted characters that are used as nothing more than plot devices for Harry's next Scooby Doo adventure when they deserve so much more.
  • jehovahswitnessdude747
    First off, *minor spoiler alert* Second, I highly agree. The cinematography was very brilliant I believe, yet sadly this one like several other films I didn't feel for half the characters and really only knew what was going on half the time because I had actually read the books. Plus, if anyone read the books they would be highly saddened by this adaption, as it took out tons of things which I believe are being put into the 7th block of movies since I think Yates said in an interview it would help give more material to the 7th block of movies but really, if you read the 7th book that thing is loaded with content. Not that this is a bash hour I believe Yates did pretty well overall but the characters' motivations are hard to feel for compared to how the books were elegantly able to make you almost feel sorry for Draco and the task he had to accomplish. In the end, my huge complaint would be that they cut off Dumbledore's funeral scene(which i found to be very powerful in the book) and just kinda ended the movie after his death with harry ron and Hermione all talking. Although i think it was rumoured the funeral scene would be in the 7th part 1 movie? Anywho, the lasting thing I want to talk about was about Harry's character just at the very very end, whom isn't as depressed, sadened or enraged as he was in the book. His line about how he has to do it alone now was powerful in the book, but felt like it didn'thave that same meaning within the movie. Overall the movie is decent, but had huge potential and wasted most of it. Hopefully Yates will make the 7th block of movies brilliant and waste no time delievering the sadness of each death like ti was delievered in the book, and believe he he has plenty of chances to practice death scenes, theres plenty of them in HP7. Well thanks for your time and I believe this is a great blog site keep up the amazing work! =]
    sincerely,
    jehovah's witness dude747
  • super_aj
    I totally agree, I haven't see the film yet, but I heard that the *(spoiler) end of the 6th book isn't in the film. the book was really powerful because of the funeral and the sense of an adventure on the horizon, knowing that harry won't be at hogwarts next year, it really made the whole book for me. oh well. guess we'll just have to wait till numero 7.
  • Itri12
    Hmmm....

    Agree about Snape and the Half-Blood Prince. Didn't carry the weight as it did in the book, but if I'm not mistaken, it wasn't that great in the book either. Better, but not anything to write home about.
  • I thought that reveal was much better in the book, partly because that whole scene was better. Snape was more frantic at the time, ("Don't call me coward!"), not so calm, and there was a whole battle going around.
  • It never occurred to me that by just watching the movies the ambiguity of Snape's character could be lost, but if you ever decide to give the books a go (and I would recommend waiting until after you've seen the films through) you'll understand why Snape is truly the most interesting character Rowling ever put to the page. The book places much emphasis on the fact that Dumbledore, above all, trusts Snape. I won't say anything more, but David, you should have a peer read this comments section and stop you from reading any spoilers about the final book/film, because I'm sure people are going to want to inform you of some things...

    P.S. Malfoy was given the task of killing Dumbledore because Voldemort was punishing Lucius Malfoy for failing to obtain the prophecy in the previous book/film. In the book it's hinted at that Voldemort doesn't actually expect Draco to succeed. In the beginning of the film Draco's mom comes to Snape out of fear for her son. Bellatrix recommends the unbreakable vow in order to better read Snape, because she doesn't trust Snape's loyalty to Voldemort
  • jason B
    @ david:

    jamesmibbens is right...i won't spoil anything for you, but there is a lot more going on than you are aware of. and as far as this new movie goes, rowling specifically said that this book and the final book are basically two halves of a whole, so it seems pretty impossible to escape that in the film, which might explain some of your disapointments. i thought the film was brilliant, and the 2nd best in the series. good articles though.
  • Val
    It's been awhile since I read the far superior book. I went to see the movie last night. Wasn't disappointed, but basically this is more of the same and I am now SHOCKED by the glowing reviews this film is receiving.
    The first movie was the best. After that one, the bad acting by the three leads and the sloppy story telling as adapting book to movie pretty much did the series in for me. Yet, hope keeps me going back for more. I don't buy the DVDs anymore. Just go and spend my $20 and leave wanting more.
  • super_aj
    you thought the sorcerer's stone was a better movie than prisoner of Azkaban? I'm not trying to be snarky, I'm just intrigued because the 3rd film is universally accepted as the best in the series. It's interesting because I consider the first movie to be the worst. too much fan service, and a little bloated. but to each their own.
  • Swarley
    I myself was so happy with this sixth film because Yates completely destroyed the fifth movie, at least I think. To me, the fifth was the worst of the series, and I was praying that he didn't ruin the sixth, being my favorite book. With all that considered, I was pleasantly surprised and also just generally excited about there being a new movie. I can imagine that's why others were so excited to talk about how good it was.
  • Fifth was the worst! Always nice to find someone who agrees with you.

    Shortest film, longest book? WHAT THE HELL?!
  • i agree sorcerer's stone is the most faithful and yet the worst. i hate PoA and it was my favorite of the books at the time it came out. i think that's the reason for my dislike of it because the version in my head is way better than cuarons.


    i agree with the problems with order of the pheonix, regarding it's length, but i think that's the studio's fault not the film maker. i think with the film they delivered us this year, they realize that people will sit through a long hp movie. just my two cents.

    by the way if anyone cares i think chamber of secrets really did an awesome job with pacing and set up and character alot better than the other films. and goblet of fire is the worst in the film franchise as far as i'm concerned.
  • Dr.Psilo
    Thanks, David; these reviews have been fantastic and I have mostly agreed with them.
  • mcgruff
    yeah dave, youve gotta read the books now. while it may not make up for the fact that the films lose a lot of the character development and extra info from the books, it will make you understand the characters a LOT more.
    awesome series though. really enjoyed hearing about it from someone with no experience in the series. everyone i talk to is always just as obsessed as i am.
  • I agree with most of what you said in your review.

    Half-Blood Prince does indeed have quite a few problems. I don't mind that they cut out or changed parts from the books (on the contrary, I think that the most successful adaptations have to take liberties with the source material), but the movie does feel very uneven and the ending especially is a bit anticlimactic.

    Unlike you, though, my overall impression of the movie was very positive. You mention you were disappointed, but I was actually very pleasantly surprised. I expected another enjoyable but forgettable Harry Potter movie, but in the end I got more than that. Half-Blood Prince is without a doubt the best movie in the series. Wonderful cinematography, delicious chemistry between the characters, great soundtrack...

    Sure, the movie's far from perfect, but it sucked me in effortlessly and I had tons of fun watching it. So while objectively speaking I agree with most of the flaws you rightly pointed out, I'd personally knock up the score to 8/10. The movie might be flawed, but it was also magical, which is something you don't find all that often.
  • Swarley
    I agree completely with your response.
  • YazzyDream
    Ditto.
  • zinkywinks
    While you're right in saying it's a set-up to the final book, a lot does happen in HBP that wasn't shown or even mentioned at all in the movie. Quiet sad really.
  • zinkywinks
    That was meant to be a reply, damn this commenting system and it never working correctly for me.
  • rowan
    i agree that some of the plots in the movie seemed unclear if you are not familiar with the books but i think if you look at the little details closely, you'll be able to gather enough clues to answer questions. for example, why was draco chosen to kill dumbledore? the answer really goes back at the end of the 5th film...his father failed in a mission given by voldemort and was caught by the ministry...something that was shown in the sixth film, at the newspaper that harry was reading at the start...one of the headlines is about lucius malfoy's imprisonment. i guess it's true that hp6, or the hp movies in general, are impossible to comprehend individually...but i guess that's because one's not supposed to look at each film individually. all films are part of each other and sometimes, questions in one film can be answered in other films of the series.

    as for snape's actions...let's just say that a lot of things said and done during the sixth film which looked like one thing, will be seen in ENTIRELY different eyes once hp7 part 1 and 2 are done.

    nevertheless, thank you for taking the time to actually view the entire series and really, READ the BOOKS! you are depriving yourself of something amazing by not reading it.
  • DanJ
    Hey David,

    Just saw the movie yesterday, and definitely agree with most of your comments. Everything about the visuals of this movie continue to impress me, and cinematically, I am truly put into this alternate world by it. Also, this was the first movie I have seen in 4k digital projection, and that was truly breathtaking.

    As someone else who has not read the books, it feels like the flaws of the movie come mainly from the fact that it is an adaptation, specifically one of a children's book. Your remarks about the pacing of the film were spot on in my opinion, and this seemed to be a problem with adapting such a large novel.

    Additionally though, the line between light-hearted late night fun in the dorm rooms, and incredibly serious themes of death and betrayal is so thin, that it makes it difficult for me to take either seriously. For instance there is literally a scene in which we are laughing as Ron is drugged out on love potion, doing prat falls, and then one of those falls ends up being due to him being poisoned, and nearly dying. This continued ebb and flow from wacky comedy to very serious seemed in my mind at least to be an extension of the fact that the original work was a children's book, that needed its main character to be a kid.

    While there was a lot to like about this movie, in the end, I couldn't help but asking, why is the center of this storyline Harry Potter? The forces of darkness seem to be very successfully working towards bringing down all of society, yet the story we are seeing, makes it seem as though Harry, Ron, and Hermione are the only three people in the entire world willing to help Dumbledore actually fight against this evil. As a viewer, how can I justify spending time watching Harry win a sports match, when the end of the world is being fought over somewhere else.
  • That's the whole point of the film Dan. Even during wartime, life goes on. This isn't a big old war with battles occuring everywhere, life is still occuring like normally, a few things aside. And what do you mean? The whole Order of the Pheonix is helping Dumbledore. And well I do agree with your point about the adults being ignored, this story isn't about the adults, it's about Harry Potter, plain and simple. I also agree about the poisoning though, in the book it is played like Katie getting possessed, but in the movie it is played for laughs. And I don't understand a thing you are saying about children's books and children in them or what not. Please elaborate.
  • Josh
    Yeah. I get really upset when people call these "children's books" I don't view them as that at all. I think the last 5 books stand on their own as great pieces of LITERATURE.
  • Indeed. The terms "children's fiction" and "youth fiction" are thrown around so flippantly these days. Even if they are "children's books", that doesn't mean they can't be "literature".
  • JohnnyUtah
    good review. i think it's really interesting to hear what these movies are like for someone who hasn't read the books, as there's so much character/plot development that those of us who have read them take for granted.
    i found this movie entertaining—possibly the best of the series so far (3 is still great)—but they all still seem disappointing in a way i can never really put my finger on, due in most part i to the seemingly impossible task of adaptation.

    part of me wishes they had done/will do a 7 season series on PBS or the BBC so they can do it right.... or at least better. *sigh* someday.

    ps—that jump-scare in the cave got me big time. so good.

    i often wish they had
  • JohnnyUtah
    woops, scratch that last line por favor
  • Or a graphic novel/comic book.

    ...I mean, think about that for a sec. NOTHING cut out, you don't have the limitations of working with aging, real-life actors. No limitations of run time, etc.

    ...It could be a work of brilliance!

    (as long as it is illustrated by DeviantArt's Makani.)
  • mollilicious
    I would watch the hell out of anything drawn by Makani.
  • Matt
    I just wish that the finall fight scene at the school was included. It was anticlimatic and it was an alright movie but they added things that weren't in the book but decided no to put the final battle scene at the school. Also they left out things that are important for the 7th book
  • cough*Dobby*cough

    But seriously, it seems they replaced Dobby with Neville. Who gave Harry the gillyweed in the 4th movie? Neville. Book? Dobby. Who found the Room of Requierment for Harry in the last movie? Neville. Book? Dobby. I wouldn't have been suprised if Harry assigned Neville to follow Malfoy all day and night.

    (SPOILERS FOR BOOK 7) I sure hope to god Neville doesn't get stabbed in the stomach and buried at Shell Cottage. THen again...
  • Matt
    im afraid i have to disagree chen
    the half blood prince isn't supposed to be a big reveal, harry has lost his one tru source of protection, something that every wizard in the wizarding world sees as something that they can rely on: Dumbledore. When Snape turns around, destroying every one of Harry's curses, it is merely more than to diminish him further by revealing he is the Half Blood Prince. It is a sign to Harry that there are dark forces everywhere, and also shows us as the audience that there is definite threat in that Harry may not win over evil.
    I think the vanishing box had much greater impact on film, it worked as a mystery drama where as it felt like weighty filler in the book as it was explained with an impeccable sense of dullness, and personally didn't leave me caring for the box, but Rowling's writing, much like the film, reversed into its sinister nature in the outstanding third act.
  • SpinnersLibrarian
    I agree about the Half-Blood Prince reveal. It was never about solving the puzzle regarding his identity but the betrayal inherent merely in his being Snape. Much of the book and the film deals with issues of trust and betrayal. At the end of this year Harry loses both of the men he regarded as mentors and friends, even if one was only present in the pages of an old textbook. (This also mirrors Harry's usual relationship with the 'guest' DADA Professor). It's about Snape's double betrayal, both by being the Prince and by murdering Dumbledore, beautifully accentuated by his interaction with Harry on the Astronomy Tower, when you can feel Harry's despairing hope that, once more, Snape has arrived to sort things out.
    Mr Chen, as for establishing Snape's true allegiance from the beginning, you should ask yourself about the significance of the overheard conversation between Snape and Dumbledore and why, with the Chosen One at his mercy, Snape merely left. Ambiguity re-established?
  • urkel
    Hey Dave,
    Since you never read the books then I'm curious about your opinion of Voldemort. Is he intimidating at all or did the movie version create a generic enemy?

    My opinion (and this is only MY opinion) is that Voldemort never lived up to the hype and legend created around him. And in the end he isn't nearly as intimidating (or interesting) as his own henchmen.
  • I completely agree. In the books Voldemort was an ominously fearful presence, and while he's still very evil and at times scary, he isn't the most imposing character. I remember being very disappointed when I saw the fourth film, and he was high-strung and sniveling rather than quiet, pensive, and terrifying. As I've said before though, it's up to the actors to do what they're capable of, not what the books dictate.
  • Dan
    David Chen hated The Dark Knight, now David Chen hates 'Half Blood Prince'. What's next summer's biggest movie? I can tell you Dave's review of it right now.

    This movie is awesome. It is this year's Dark Knight (both quality wise and boxoffice wise) All your criticisms are bs and are mostly there because you didn't get the movie.
  • Firstly, after barely searching the interwebs you can find that David Chen has loads of great things to say about The Dark Knight. Secondly, do you have the names of anyone who didn't like The Dark Knight written on the bottom of your shoe? (Note: I'm acknowledging that the names of anyone who didn't like The Dark Knight would probably fit in that amount of space.) Are these people forever disqualified from having an opinion?
  • James it's a running joke here that Dave hates the Dark Knight and loves the mummy 3. I was going to actually make the same joke.

    But Dan, what the hell. His criticisms are not BS. Well I didn't agree with him about most of the stuff either, that doesn't mean they have no worth or value.
  • cineman
    To be honest, there aren't many major events in the book either so I'm surprised at how well he was able to work with them. The cinematography, wow. It really was the most artistically beautiful movie I've seen since Return of the King. Hermione on the staircase, Harry in the Lake, and running to the Burrow through the cornfield all made my heart skip a beat.

    I definitely agree that the Half-Blood Prince reveal falls flat. You kind of forget about that through the whole movie, and when it happens you kind of go, "oh yeah..."

    I don't agree with you about Malfoy. While we did have to see him pull the blanket off that cabinet an awful lot, there wasn't much to explain there. He was chosen because he was in Hogwarts, and wouldn't arouse suspicion as a student. He's a jerk, so he's expected to be skulking around anyway. He feels he has to carry out the assassination because Voldemort will kill him if he doesn't (he even says that), and yet he doesn't want to follow through because he doesn't want to kill. Dumbledore has still been his teacher for six years, and he is still only sixteen. I can't blame him for not slaughtering anyone.

    Overall, the movie had its flaws, but not enough of them to keep me from absolutely loving it.
  • I do agree with your review....
  • Fredo
    Saw it yesterday and enjoyed it.

    That said, I think the problems in the movie are inherent to the story as laid down by Rowling. This book/movie serve as the launching pad into Deathly Hallows - which is the most action-packed of all the books. But without the moments and information in Half-Blood Prince, then Hallows cannot happen.

    I enjoyed all the teenage/school/angst and love moments probably because they are so absent in Hallows; which will surprise folks who've never read it by being so damn dark and dangerous.

    HBP strikes me similarly to The Two Towers - in the end, not much happens to resolve the conflict but you learn why it's important the characters do what they have to.
  • Mariel
    I thought this was the best one yet of the Harry Potter series, sadly I didn't really like it that much. There were some good funny parts, as everyone has been saying it contained beautiful cinematography, and the jump scene was just perfect because even if you didn't read the book you know there's something down there, everyone jumped in my theater.
    However I found myself wanting it to be over, I kept asking myself "is it over yet, is it over yet??" This was the perfect time to really dive down into characters, because we have had the last 5 movies to get to know them but I thought found them flat. This all maybe because of reading the books, I knew what was going to happen, I knew what the characters would do and just left me bored.
    I have been enjoying this review of all the Harry Potter films from fresh eyes, because everyone I know have read the books, except my Mother and shes tried to watch the movies, but she is always confused and gives up, which tells you something about these movies.
  • johnoneil
    I can understand a lot of your points here, except for the one about Malfoy. For me, his characterization made perfect sense and was one of the stronger aspects of the film. He wanted to be a Death Eater like his father. He was chosen because of his status as a student at Hogwarts. When he actually figures out what the job entails, he hesitates. Malfoy has talked the talk for several years. But when he is actually chosen to do something, he realizes the painful effects of his deeds. This is a very good example of disillusionment
  • Swarley
    Considering that the seventh book is going to be in two parts, I'm sure they will find a way to put in *almost* every scene that occurred in the book. With that said, I'm sure the questions of Draco's back story with his family's involvement with Voldemort and Snape's apparently one-sided attitude will be cleared up.

    With the exception of the funeral being cut, my biggest disappointment had to do with Draco, and his conversation with Dumbledore at the very end. Yes, they make it clear that Draco doesn't really want to go through with his task. But the one thing that they didn't add into his dialogue, the thing that I thought really cleared up all of Draco's inner turmoil, was him mentioning that Voldemort would come after his family if he didn't go through with it. He says "I have to kill you, or he will kill me" when, in the book, he says something more like "I have to kill you, or he will kill my parents." The movie's version makes it look like he's just watching his own back, when really he's supposed to be at least a little more noble than that. Draco's had to deal with living in the shadow of his father (which he doesn't really like) and doing whatever it takes to keep his family safe (which requires doing what he doesn't want to do) which overall makes him a much more complex character than the movies make him out to be. Also, the scenes of him testing the cabinet thing are scattered way too far apart and made me go "So it took him like 6 months to do three different tests?"
  • It has been thoroughly enjoyable, watching you catch up on the series, and I've really enjoyed your insight. It is almost impossible for me to watch these movies objectively. I'm very harsh, because I love the books, but I'm very lenient, since it's Harry Potter. I almost always walk away disappointed at first (HBP was no different), but once I'm used to what they've changed I typically accept it. HBP had a lot of problems due to snips from the books, and there are lines of dialogs (literally, three sentences) that I was looking for that gives certain characters so much more weight (and would have taken fifteen seconds to say).

    We can agree however, that it was a a BEAUTIFUL film, such that I wish all the films looked like that. The fire scene might be one of the prettiest, most moving shots of motion-ART i've ever seen (that is a rare instance, perhaps the only instance, where the films have outdone what I read in the books).

    I need to see this again, to get a better feel. But I thought the romance was overplayed, Snape was underplayed (such a great character, it's too bad how they cut him out), the changes made no sense: For instance, the last scene is supposed to be a complete attack at Hogwarts. Why did Draco need to wait so long to kill Dumbledore? Why did he need to complete the cabinet? How did he know to be in that tower, when Harry and DD got back?

    All of these things make more sense in the books, and the movies glance over them and expect you to know (which, let's face it, most do). The strength in Potter is that, for what will 8 films, they've made consistently good movies with good, unchanging actors, who grew up along with the characters they played. It hasn't been just the best cinema ever, but it's always been good. Hard to do, for a long series.
  • "The idea that Malfoy is chosen to assassinate Voldemort is incredibly interesting." There's something wrong with that sentence Dave.
  • anonymous
    Draco's task was to kill Dumbledore, not Voldemort, and the first scene where Harry is reading the newspaper displays Draco's motive: his father is in Askaban. Also, in the beginning, Draco's mother seeks Snapes help in protecting him "if he does not complete the Dark Lord's orders". Voldemort is angry with Lucius and thus takes it out on his son.

    Honestly, if you don't read the books, you will be sorely confused by this movie. If you do, you will be equally disappointed.
  • Johan
    I agree with some of the points you make. My biggest problem with the movie and here is were I agree is it felt uncomplete, i wasn´t satisfied by the ending. Not enough anyway.

    The ending felt anticlimactic indeed. I would have liked to have a little more fireworks in the end. Just a little, not saying fireworks for the sake of battle sequences, but they kinda cut Dumbledores kick ass firestorm too fast, they cut back to Hogwarts before we saw how Dumbledore and harry got back over that lake. I know some would argue, that the director made his point, we the audience understood that Dumbeldores fire magic was too powerful for those gollum creatures, that he burned every single one of them and parted the lake, but still... I wanted a little more.

    I don´t agree about Malfoy though. I think his story ark was wonderful. Same goes for all the dark characters and Snapes turn at the end. I didn´t see it coming or at least i didn´t suspect that he was the half blood prince, but then again I´m a harry potter virgin. I haven´t read one single novel and don´t read spoilers except see the trailers.

    I wasn´t annoyed by all the romance and comedig side of the story, which i thought i would be after everybody said the whole movie was filled with kissing teens. Sure they kissed more than the other movies, but there was so much else going on.

    One scene i thought was hilarous was the one with Hagrid spider and her "burial speech". Brilliant.

    But what really did it for me was the look. I had heard it was the most painterly of the movies, but it didn´t show from the trailers. The whole movie looked gorgous. Dumbledores study never looked so magical. One shot of Dumbledore talking with Harry and the pheonix blurred, behind them. Fucking genius. Subtle details that left me beathless. Same think with the dead spider. It was just a prop, but somehow it did it for me. When i think about it there were no magical creatures in this one, not so much "on stage magic", except dumbledores neat fire magic at the end but the colours of the movie made it the most magical and that i think was the real beauty of this episode. Can´t wait what the director does with the last two.
  • Johan
    All in all I think the director did a great job to balance the sad and comedic parts. The only time i thought he should have reigned in was at the end when Hermione mentions that harry kan kiss rons sister or something... It came too fast after dumbledore has died and they talk about leaving hogwards and other serious stuff. I thought enough about kissing already. But that was the only time really.
blog comments powered by Disqus