jack_ryan_actors

Just the other day there was a mention that George Clooney might be interested in taking up the mantle of Jack Ryan, the hero of Tom Clancy novels and films like The Hunt For Red October and Patriot Games. Now there’s confirmation, via Anne Thompson, that Clooney’s name is indeed in the mix. But more important, the Hossein Aimini script that was commissioned last year to reboot the franchise, currently just the Untitled Tom Clancy Project, should arrive shortly, and then Paramount will be able to make a decision about really moving forward.

In December of last year, word came down that Killshot and Jude screenwriter Hossein Amini had been tasked by Paramount with scripting the revival of Jack Ryan’s onscreen persona. As I mentioned the other day, this would be a full reboot, and the idea is to use an original plot rather than an adaptation of one of Clancy’s novels. (Are all the novels optioned/spoken for, and if so how would they be held by anyone but Paramount? Doesn’t really matter, just a curiosity.) Going all-new is both a way to reintroduce the character and avoid the endgame of Clancy’s original plotting for Ryan, who in the novels becomes President of the United States.

I hadn’t thought much about Amini when I wrote on this the other day, but he’s an interesting choice. While his resume has many period pieces (Jude, Shanghai, The Four Feathers) those movies also feature doses of military influence, espionage and heightened tension between characters. I don’t think there’s one of his written films I really like (and in some ways I really dislike Jude) but he’s got a lot of the right ingredients to do something interesting.

On the Clooney note, the fact that Paramount is proceeding with a full reboot suggests that Clooney woulnd’t be the guy. Seems like a reboot would call for a younger lead. Clooney would also require a lot of control over script and director, though perhaps not the legendary Harrison Ford level of control. And, as Thompson points out, Clooney and Clancy aren’t exactly aligned politically.

  • Lance_HBomb
    Hm, so James Bond got a reboot, and Jack Ryan will as well?

    America would like a native espionage hero that's not as character-centric like the Bourne (Movies) series, which was basically a dude trying to remember stuff.
  • how was james bond a reboot?... because they cut ties with Pierce Brosnan, who did 4 movies. was it a reboot when they cut ties with Connery after 6 movies, then again with roger moore for Timothy Dalton, it's not a reboot, its called actors getting old, and not portraying the character to its fullest effect at age 65. A reboot is hulk, something that was a phenominal flop, they scrapped the whole thing and brushed it under the carpet, James Bond does none of this in any movie, since they are based on books, and each movie progresses with each book...
  • vadmspartan
    I think Casino Royale can be considered a reboot in that instead of just getting a new actor to play the role, there was also a change in the tone, style and even setting. The last couple of movies more than the recent Brosnan pics seem to be based more in the real world. Just look at the differences between Die Another Day and Royale.
  • Lance_HBomb
    Uh, Casino Royale started with Bond just becoming a 00 agent for MI6.

    If you don't consider that a reboot, I don't know how else to explain it.
  • Will
    What about Clooney in the James Earl Jones role? Or would that be too weird?
  • Gelman
    Wait: It's going to be Jack Ryan, but NOT an adaption of one of Clancy's novels? What the hell's the point? It is an entire film series based on bestselling books! I think the reason for this nonsense is that in the remaining unfilmed books, the enemies are asians, muslims, liberal eco-terrorists, and other groups that liberal hollywood doesn't want to make targets. We're going to see another "Sum of All Fears" fix where the bad guy is a Swedish grandmother who works at night as a white supremacist. Ugh.
  • I love the Jack Ryan movies so I am really hoping that there will be another film. George Clooney could still do the role. But before this news came out I was thinking they would maybe have him play Jack Ryan has President.
  • vadmspartan
    I actually think Clooney would be perfect for the role. He would make a great seasoned analyst who gets in over his head, although that would be a retread of the earlier movies. I'm not really a fan of picking a young guy and making him a hotshot field agent which is not what the character is. Either way I'd be interested in seeing how this goes forward.
  • zerosum0101
    I honestly don't care for Clooney as Jack Ryan. He's a fine actor but I think there are better choices.
  • Nathan2009
    I'm not very enthusiastic about a Jack Ryan movie that is completely unrelated to a Clancy novel. "The Sum of All Fears," a movie that I liked a lot, strayed pretty far from the source material but still remained true (in my opinion) to the themes of Clancy's novel. I'm afraid this movie could be Jack Ryan in name only.

    Even just using one of the novels as a jumping off point would be better than not using it at all. For instance, what about taking the story from "The Cardinal of the Kremlin" and updating it for the post-Soviet Union 21st century? I think showing the U.S. trying to contend with a character based on Putin could make for interesting drama.

    I'm also not against them adopting "Executive Orders" into a movie, although post-9/11 they should drop the whole plane hitting the Capitol storyline. What if Ryan became vice-president after the resignation of the Vice-President and then moved up to the Presidency after an assassination (which only killed the President.)
blog comments powered by Disqus