deadpool_header

Ryan Reynolds has told Empire that he’s insistent on Deadpool’s habit of breaking of the fourth wall to carry over from the comics to the big screen. That means, in effect, that Deadpool/Wade Wilson will sometimes address the audience directly, as with Ferris Bueller, say, or the character of Paul in Funny Games. Other forms of metahumour have cropped up in the Deadpool comics, with him occasionally making explicit reference to his being a Marvel comics character. I’ll give you a handful of examples after the break.

Deadpool’s first metareference apparently came in the fourth issue of his ongoing series. Writer Joe Kelly not only had Deapool ’sing’ the theme tune to the Hulk TV show, in reference to a plot development involving the jolly green one, he also had the characters give a plot recap as though directly to the reader. When future issues needed recaps they were dressed up in all manner of ways, from interviews to stand up comedy monologues.

Coming back from the dead in one plotline, Deadpool was given captions that read ‘Do I still think in little yellow boxes?’ and ‘I missed you little yellow boxes! What fun we shall have together’. I wouldn’t be surprised to see a similar reference to voice over in the movie.

During Christopher Priest’s run as a writer on the series, Deadpool virtually adopted a meta-mantra: ‘None of this is really happening. There is a man. With a typewriter. This is all part of his crazy imagination.’

For my money, Grant Morrison’s run on the Animal Man comics not only used these same devices first (though he in turn was inspired by Bryan Talbot’s work - and outside of comics, of course, the device is ages old, becoming very popular in theatre almost 200 years ago) he used them to a better end. I wouldn’t want to spoil it for you, but some of the Animal Man stories, particularly The Coyote Gospel, are amongst my very favourite comic books of all time and absolutely worth hunting down.

My pocket comic book expert, Rich Johnston of Bleeding Cool, tells me that Joe Kelly was likely to have been more influenced by John Byrne’s work on She Hulk, a series that coincided with my time working in a comic shop and so which I know quite well. I can definitely see the similarities.

I’m not, at heart, a big fan of breaking the fourth wall. This practice is typically assumed to be the dismantling of a barrier between the audience and the movie, though I’d argue that it is simply replacing on vague barrier with a blockier one.

Screenwriter Ken Levine found that Nicholas Mayer pulled a postmodern trick with the subtitles when filming his screenplay Volunteers. Levine and his co-writer David Isaac have argued that this one change alone ‘destroyed the movie’. You can see the scene and read Levine’s complaint on his blog. One good example, I think, of the risks the Deadpool movie will run.

Knowing that the film is going to be ‘playful’ in this way could be an indication of what directors they might be pursuing for the gig. Any guesses? From what I know about Zombieland, Ruben Fleischer seems like a hot pick.

  • Binaryshock
    One way to look at this is, all comic book movies of recent memory have been pretty straight forward. Origin stories or the hero/heroes fighting a new bad. It's the way it should be really. Now I've read a lot of times on this and other sites that people are getting "tired" or Superhero movies. Maybe it's cause no matter the character they tend to go through the motions, but depending on the actors and the sfx we judged the movies differently (Fantastic 4 not so good, but Iron Man awesome)

    Maybe we need something like this for a new freshness, so that Deadpool doesn't end up being just another Super Hero movie. It might not work, but it might work great and really set itself apart and give people something different within the same genre.
  • I couldn't agree more. Mix it up Hollywood. People are ready.
  • jason B
    yes godammit!! i was just about to lecture on everything you have said! we are currently in the midst of a very formulaic breed of comic book films. the comic book film genre NEEDS to take a detour before burnout occurs.

    i don't care who did it first, but deadpool is the most well known for it. its as iconic to him as his costume. also, aside from speaking to the reader, pool' frequently talks to himself.

    therein lies the key to a very unique opportunity for the directors: between a ferris bueler-ish way of addressing the audience, and a voiceover, they need to come up with a different spin on the way he acts as our narrator.

    otherwise its the same f-ing thing we've seen for the past dozen or so comic book films, and such a wasted opportunity to do something different.
  • JB
    I ***REALLY*** like Ryan, but I'm not up for this. Look at all the "funny" moments from any comic book movie (*sigh*... Spiderman) and they really suck. Dunno if this'll work.
  • Jeff
    This worked very well in "High Fidelity," but I'm not sure how it would translate into this.
  • Sketch
    This definitely breaks the typical linear storyline of a comic book flick a bit. While it's still gonna go a set path, it wouldn't be so straightforward and the comedic asides will stop it from being so serious, which a lot of films these days are taking themselves as.
  • DogDoctor
    I really hate breaking the fourth wall... It's just an awkward and painfully unfunny thing to do, especially when it's a character looking at the screen and going "I always wanted to do that!" I hate that the most.
  • It's still Fox ... They will find a way to fuck it up ... oh wait, they already did.
  • fox doesn't fuck the comic films up.. its the writer(s) and director who fuck it up.. X1-X2 were brilliant comic to film adaptations
  • Octoberist
    Fox is still responsible for hiring the producers and directors for each project. And they micro-manage the production as well. Remember, it was Fox who demanded a recut of Daredevil from its original form.
  • Really? Read some news about the whole production of the Wolverine movie.

    And don't forget Babylon A.D. Not only did Fox interfered through the whole production and didn't allow even one scene to be shot the way it was scripted, no, they fucked up the whole movie by releasing it with a extremely-shitty cut. Read it up. The director's cut / european version was really good.
  • jason B
    dammit...i got all excited & totally forgot fox has this film. fuck!
  • dagreenman18
    I think the best way to approach this is to not treat the audience like their stupid, even if they are. A show that does this very well is Chowder, which takes the 4th wall and makes it it's bitch.
  • skyguy
    yeah. chowder rocks! (i'm 15, i can say that).
  • JKW3000
    I don't see why everybody is so pessimistic about it; the key behind the comic character's use of the technique isn't his cognizance of the audience, but rather his awareness that he is nothing more than a fictional character in a piece of entertainment. Unlike Ferris Bueller, a full translation of Deadpool's fourth-wall break wouldn't simply be him addressing the audience, but instead noting to a viewing audience the genre techniques and cliches that are clearly happening around him and making fun of them. In the comics, this is a character that talks TO his voice-over thought panels in addition to using them. That, combined with the fact that unlike other characters Deadpool is bat-poop crazy, will make his break so much more entertaining than either Bueller or Raimi's use of comic book humor in the Spider-Man series.

    Smart call by Reynolds, it's probably the most unique aspect of Deadpool's character and a big reason for his popularity in the comic book community. If they don't do make him as much of a smart-ass aware of being a comic book adaptation, then yeah, it'll fail, but DP's a psychotic smart-ass, hopefully they'll translate that if they're going to follow through with this idea.
  • Huh.... so they already announced a writer, huh?
    Well, I REALLY would've liked Joe Kelly or Fabian Nicienza to write the screenplay.

    ...I'd be a happy boy.
  • Michael_C
    This is fantastic news, simply because breaking the fourth wall is integral to Deadpool's character. Just watch the Marvel vs. DC with him and the cast of Watchmen. And for those who think breaking the fourth wall can only lessen an experience, might I direct you to one of the greatest television series of all time, Arrested Development, which frequently and brilliantly referenced the fact that it was a TV show to hilarious effect.
  • Rockie
    i dislike when the 4th wall is shattered as well

    but this is Deadpool we are talking about, he can do backflips off the 4th wall for all i care
  • tomtun
    Zack Morris! Time Out!
  • Ben
    If it's as funny as it is in the comics I'm not worried at all about it. When he breaks the 4th wall in the comics its usually some of the best and funniest moments of the issue.
  • I'm all for them mixing up the comic book movies but I really don't think this will work. It'll be extremely difficult to pull of in an action film. Has the forth wall ever been proper broke, not just a little glance, in an action movie that wasn't a spoof? Last Action Hero was probably the closest and we all know how that turned out. Reynold's brand of wit might make it even worse as well.
  • JP
    Dude, FUCK Ant-Man. THIS should be Edgar Wright's movie!!!!!!
  • the_ace_of_knaves
    I think if they do it intelligently there shouldn't be a problem. I mean, a lot of movies have narration or voice overs. You could even make Deadpool a sorta parody of those old school film noir/pulp movies where the antagonist is constantly narrating. But add the insane, erratic Deadpool spin to it.

    And I remember there was a scene in his first ever solo issue where he was stalking a platoon of soldiers in the jungle, narrating as he goes, then one of the soldiers is like "S-Sir, I-I can hear him?!" Then Deadpool proceeds to obliterate the entire squad. I think that would be a great way to open the movie and introduce every to Deadpools world.

    And as someone else pointed out, breaking the fourth wall doesn't necessarily mean he straight up talks to the audience. That would be too easy and cheesy.

    All it means is he acknowledges that there is another universe outside of the film (our universe for instance) or that he takes the piss out of the formulaic cliches of other comic book movies. Basically, Deadpool is a satire. And the comic book movie industry needs this sorta thing, as long as it doesn't descend into complete and utter spoof like those god awful spoof movies made by those hacks. You know what ones i'm talking about.
  • RGC
    As a fledgling writer myself, I know that there is a right way and a wrong way to do everything in fiction. Just because the masses do not think it will work does not mean the artists have no tricks up their sleeves. Remember, people did not initially think that Rickard Donner's SUPERMAN or Tim Burton's BATMAN would work, either.

    In defense of the method, think about Freakazoid!, the superhero parody from 1995. Having rewatched the series on DVD, it has become apparent to me that the show has no fourth wall, thereby becoming self-aware of its self-awareness, and that show worked incredibly well. [I know it was cancelled, but that was because WB wanted more money for Pinkey And The Brain.]

    The trick is remembering that breaking the fourth wall is not Deadpool's only aspect. It is just one of his many quirks. If the movie relies fully on this trait, and treats it like a gag, THEN there is a problem. It is similar to the choice of not introducing Tony Stark's alcoholism in IRON MAN, because there is so much more to him than "drunken playboy becomes superhero."

    Me? I'm more concerned about if Reynolds is willing to give up face time by never removing his mask [which Deadpool, you'll recall, considered his real face], or if Fox will be game for that.
  • The_F
    Actually, if I recall correctly, the whole "my face" thing was a spoof of Watchmen.
  • RGC
    Quite possibly. I cannot confirm or deny that. But no matter the origin of this trait, it is still an intrinsic part of who Deadpool is, just as much as breaking the fourth wall. Also, there is the fact that he is a mercenary, and therefor not a superhero, nor a supervillain. His loyalty is to whoever pays him.

    All of these traits are needed for Deadpool to work. We must not put too much emphasis on one aspect or a multifacted character.
  • Well i think its interesting,
    like how the current broadway production of HAIR really involves the audience throughout the whole experience
  • Chris
    self-aware filsm NEVER work. they take the audiance out of the moment and as a result remove the empathy on the screen for the characters.

    it will not work, but there is no reason to give too much of a damm, as the picture is FAR from being made.
  • Foo
    ...we're supposed to empathize with Deadpoo.?
  • I loved it when I read ‘I missed you little yellow boxes! What fun we shall have together’ in the comics. Now there's yellow and white. lol.
blog comments powered by Disqus