The Works of Sam Mendes

sam-mendes

This post is sponsored by Focus Features - See Sam Mendes’ new movie Away We Go in Theaters Now!

Few directors have ascended to the upper echelons of Hollywood talent as quickly as Sam Mendes. While Mendes was no slouch when he first got into the film business (he had directed several critically acclaimed stage plays, many featuring movie actors), he became one of the few directors to earn an Oscar for a directorial debut, for his work in 1999’s American Beauty. Since then, he has expanded his style considerably, crafting a different world for each of his films, every one possessed of a distinct palette and a unique texture.

Above all, Mendes’ films are films of ideas. Even when set in the relentless monotony of the suburbs, each one of his films feels epic in scope and sweeping in message. Yet each one of his films (even Jarhead, which examined military bonds, as well as his new film, Away We Go) seems to return to the common theme of family and the ties that bind. I can’t say I’ve thoroughly enjoyed all of his movies, but I can say I’m glad they exist because they are always thought-provoking and, as a bonus, beautiful.

With the recent release of Mendes’ new film Away We Go, we thought it’d be cool to take a look back at Mendes filmography. Hit the jump for a quick take on each of his films [very minor spoilers for all films follow].

American Beauty (1999)

Unquestionably the film that propelled Mendes to stardom, American Beauty actually sticks out in my mind more for Alan Ball’s incisive script than for Mendes’ style. It was in this film that we saw Ball take on the seedy underbelly of suburbia, an interpretation he would deepen and perfect in the brilliant HBO series Six Feet Under. Mendes would later return to the idea that the facade of suburban life covers the deepest of tragedies in 2008’s Revolutionary Road, but American Beauty was much more hopeful, insisting (almost to the point of self-parody) that there is beauty to be found in the simplest of sights and circumstances.

While I don’t think American Beauty has aged particularly well, I liked the main thrust of the film and found a visceral thrill to watching Kevin Spacey’s Oscar-winning performance as the fed-up Lester Burnham, willing and able to break free from his domestic confines. As for Mendes’ work, it seems to match Ball’s style perfectly, as simple words are given the utmost importance and the story is propelled, inevitably, to its tragic conclusion.

Road to Perdition (2002)

Notable for its use of perpetual-nice-guy Tom Hanks as a hitman, Road To Perdition saw Mendes take on his first period piece, based off the graphic novel by Max Allan Collins and Richard Piers Rayner. Perdition works on a number of levels, both as a trenchant examination of familial ties and a cat-and-mouse thriller. Featuring a bravura performance by Paul Newman as John Rooney and , Perdition also had the talents of cinematographer Conrad Hall, who helped capture the 1930s with grace and beauty. This film proved that Mendes was willing to stretch himself and make use of the considerable creative (and budgetary) leeway he’d been given in light of his Oscar win.

Jarhead (2005)

In a world with action-packed war movies like Saving Private Ryan and Black Hawk Down, Mendes decided to go against the flow by making Jarhead, a film based off Anthony Swofford’s 2003 memoir. Featuring less combat and thrills than many contemporary war films, Jarhead examined the psychological toll of the Gulf War and the resulting camaraderie that developed between the soldiers through the eyes of PFC Anthony Swofford (Jake Gyllenhaal). The results were decidedly mixed. As usual, the film looked great and was well-acted (featuring the likes of Peter Sarsgaard, Jamie Fox, and Chris Cooper). However, many felt that Mendes’ reach went far beyond his grasp in conveying the true “suck” of war. And of course, from a marketing perspective, the film subverted any expectations of war films that you might get from the trailer. Nonetheless, Jarhead demonstrated that Mendes was willing to take chances with source material and was an admirable choice.

Revolutionary Road (2008)

What if Jack Dawes and Rose Dewitt got married, moved to the suburbs, and seethed with self-loathing and mutual hatred for a years before things spun wildly beyond their control (with disastrous results)? It would probably look a lot like Mendes Revolutionary Road, based off of Richard Yates novel of the same name and featuring the on-screen reunion of Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet. In our podcast review of the film, I remarked that Revolutionary Road was a beautiful film and one that was incredibly well-acted, though its shouting matches sometimes felt a bit too scripted. It’s also absolutely gorgeous to behold, with some great cinematography by Roger Deakins and impressive production design by Kristi Zea.

Most of my problems stem from the film’s script (and by extension, from Yates original novel), which is unflinchingly brutal in its depiction of 1950s-era mental illness bred by a patriarchal society coupled with suburban ennui. Yates seems to insist that survival in suburbia requires the surrender of (at least a part of) one’s soul and oftentimes, that’s simply not the case. But regardless of my feelings about the film’s message, one thing’s for sure: It is extremely effective at beating you, the viewer, into submission (a fate shared by that of the film’s characters).

Away We Go (2009)

Out in limited release now and expanding wider in the weeks to come, Away We Go chronicles the story of two thirty-somethings (John Krasinski and Maya Rudolph) struggling to find their way in life. While I haven’t seen the film, /Film’s Adam Quigley was very complimentary of it in a recent /Filmcast episode, and the movie seems like it grapples with issues of identity and inner turmoil, which Mendes has proven himself more than capable of handling. Perhaps the most light-hearted of Mendes’ works to date, Away We Go will hopefully see Mendes’ continue to challenge himself in his career going forward.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

  • I love Sam Mendes as a director, all his films have a focused direction that encapsulates the viewer. The problem was post-1998 was that Mendes had made his 'masterpiece' in the absolutely brilliant 'American Beauty', however while he hasn't reached the same heights, I'll agree with David by saying I really enjoyed 'Road To Perdition', 'Jarhead' and 'Revolutionary Road' was one of my favourite films of 2008. And with all that said, I'm looking forward to seeing 'Away We Go' eventually.
  • topheavy
    What Mendes failed to accomplish after American Beauty was to live upto the expectations of him with his follow-up films, which might be a little unreasonable.

    Road to Perdition, Jarhead.. are all well made and conscise but ultimately fail to maintain the interests of those that expected more of what made American Beauty special. You could almost say that the person that made American Beauty is a different person than the one that made the later films. Which is a shame
  • dan
    the whole "focus sponsored" business shouldn't come as a surprise. focus was always a moneymaking scheme posing as an art house studio. Right down to its leader, who is not a tastemaker so much as a thief.
  • Mike
    Do you have any evidence to back up that claim at all? Focus is a great studio.
  • guest
    Delete Slash Film from your bookmark? Is that your big threat? Wow! Is your summer that boring Brian? HAHA! These comments are too funny.

    People, grow up!
  • brian
    I've been reading for the last 3 months... thought it was going down hill.. thanks for making this an easy decision *deletes /film bookmark*
  • Lance_HBomb
    What a wuss. Lol much at your dramatic statement?
  • sammyjankis
    Oh no, Brian is gone......he will be missed ?
  • Pussy Galore
    i've been reading since 2007 and other than the new website design, i haven't had a problem with this site. I'm kind of a purist when it comes to change and am still trying to get used to the new look of the website.
  • guest
    He called out that it was sponsored vs. most film sites that do have something sponsored but don't call it out. You can't crucify the kid for being honest while most of us are reading sponsored stories under the radar all of the time.

    Honestly, between exclusive clips that some sites get (and others don't) to editorial/interviews to film junkets to screenings, what is truly not forced by the studios on film sites? Is there really a true voice out there that will shun all studio support? If so, please let me know. I'll scratch your back, if you scratch mine is happening across all sites no matter how much denial you might have here. I admire Slash for not hiding that fact when they wrote this post that it was sponsored. At least now that I read it, I can take it however I want. They gave FULL DISCLOSURE. This means that if I read another article on the site that does not say "sponsored", I can feel confident. I don't have that same confidence with other sites I visit as majority would not disclose it.

    An interesting, mature debate can happen in regards to advertising and the film industry and the role of the blogs/film sites. Let's not go down to Year One level guys. We are all better than that.
  • Tommy Salami
    This shill is sponsored by Focus Features. I enjoy some of Sam Mendes's films immensely, but this isn't exactly what I expect when I come to slashfilm.
  • zstrankman
    Cmon give Dave a break. Slashfilm is blowing up and peeps want to get their hands all up in it. I don't blame them. It is absolutly astonishing to me how personal the show seems to listeners yet somehow they are interviewing pretty big effin movie stars and directors. But interviewing them with a style they have never abandoned....humor, wit, and sarcasm come to mind. Honestly, I know many will disagree but who cares if Focus pays some bills? I know I don't. David is still is a trustworthy writer and film geek in my mind....not to mention he's a natural emcee and pretty much the glue that holds the entire thing together. I didn't get as much as a whiff of any corporate intervention in Davids piece. It was interesting and fun to read as usual. Btw, Mendes is a hell of a director IMO. I think personally AB has aged just fine Dave. Road to Perdition : Good film. Jude Law still confuses me to this day with his performance. I need to watch it again to fully realize just how dirty that guy gets in that one. Newman : incredible, gracious man. Fantastic human being. Jarhead : Top five performance last 20 years IMO from Saarsgard (sp?). Revolutionary Road : hate admitting this but I actually could not watch the last two thirds of the film because of the ominous feeling that crept into my soul. I would say it was sort of akin to watching a man prepare to walk across snow covered glaciers with a club ready to bash baby seals heads in. Just didn't want to see what I knew was coming. Very effective film-making.....maybe when I toughen up I will try that one again. Ok well just my two cents on the matter...."love the people you love"
    Zach s.
  • javaboy
    Huge slashfilm fan. I look forward to every post. But this post is a serious disappointment to me. Now that you've introduced commerce directly into the news stream it will cause many of us, myself included, to read future items in a different light. There is no other way to say it.
  • I saw Jarhead. I wasn't a fan. I thought it kinda sucked...
  • Crashlander
    Just want to express my unhappiness with the shilling going on here.
  • cbebop007
    What is this "sponsored" garbage? I can't begin to describe how far my opinion of this site just lowered. (I'm now also wondering if this comment is going to stay or get deleted).
  • tenno
    Also disappointed/surprised they've deleted several critical but relevant comments. Not what I expect of slashfilm.
  • Bob Funn
    They do it all the time.
  • patrickoriley
    really?
  • Mike
    Have no problem with the post. David's overview was critical and from what I read genuinely appreciative. It's not as if SlashFilm is doing an overview of Michael Bay to get people into Transformers. That film and that film maker doesn't need anyone's help. Away We Go is a small movie that needs all the exposure it can get against summer blockbuster fare.
  • terminals
    i'd love to see a retrospective on michael bay.
    would be thoroughly entertaining seeing his films get ripped apart one at a time.
  • i'd have to disagree. i think american beauty has aged great. it's an incredible movie. as far as mendes movies go though. he's just been getting less and less.
  • Smither
    This is an awesome post David. Sam Mendes is my favorite director. He deserves a lot of praise, especially for AB and RTP. He and Roger Deakins are deadly as duo (and Conrad Hall in his first two) rounding up some of the best films I have ever witnessed. Thank you!
  • Jason K.
    I hate when wanna -be "movie buffs" abbreviate a movie with its initials. Please, take the extra split second to type out the title. Especially to pay homage to something you love.
  • dagreenman18
    Jarhead was his biggest disappointment for me. I wasn't a bad movie, it just wasn't all that great. Meh if you will. But i will admit that scene in the burning oil field looked amazing.
  • Bon Champion
    I liked Jarhead a lot, but I saw it well after it's theatrical run. I think the failure of Jarhead was in the marketing. It was advertised as an action-filled war drama, when it was really a psychological character study of men at war. It still had its flaws, but I think it would have been better received had it been more honestly represented in trailers. And given the quality of his canon, "biggest disappointment" isn't saying much.
  • mbellerbrock
    Agreed, I loved Jarhead, but I went in knowing it had very little action in it. Many people expected it to be an amazing war movie and hated it for that. IIRC not a single bullet was fired until the end when they were celebrating.
  • tenno
    "This post is sponsored by Focus Features - See Sam Mendes’ new movie Away We Go in Theaters Now!"

    I don't like the direction this is going. This is the definition of shill. Things like this are what make it hard for online media to be taken serious as journalism.
  • Stryker
    Well it's not like he's blindly throwing hyperbole. He isn't afraid to show his reservations for some of the films he wasn't taken with and this would have been an article I would have been interested in reading despite the sponsorship. I think you guys should consider doing this for more filmmakers, like Michael Mann when Public Enemies comes out.
  • Poppe
    Ditto. Really any filmmaker is good for me.
  • GreatBigLion
    Agreed; a Micheal Mann profile would be great. Other contenders: James Cameron, Micheal Bay, and Tim Burton.
blog comments powered by Disqus