year_one_review_1

In the wickedly underrated David Wain comedy Wet Hot American Summer, there is a sequence where Michael Showalter, in character as a stand-up comic geezer, entertains a bunch of kids at camp with awful jokes about the Stone Age. The joke isn’t his routine, but that the kids are laughing at these terrible, stale caveman gags. Thinking along those lines, I’d be happier (though unconvinced) if Harold Ramis argued that his new movie Year One was a full-length meta comedy about terrible jokes, though I know it’s just a bad, ramshackle movie that assumes its audience is comprised primarily of children.

No topic is off limits for comedy in Year One, which means I should love it. Characters eat poo, urinate on themselves, carry around desiccated testicles and are coerced into uncomfortable homosexual situations. I expect to write more or less the same description for Bruno in a couple of weeks, but there will, I hope, be one difference: I pray that Bruno will make me laugh frequently, rather than fitfully.

Year One very vaguely recounts the Old Testament’s Book of Genesis. It’s more like the Cliff Notes version, as summarized by an ADD student that spent most of his study time drawing tigers in a Trapper Keeper. Zed (Jack Black) and Oh (Michael Cera) are forced to flee their village after Zed eats from the Tree of Good and Evil. Out in the big bad world, they run into Cain and Abel (David Cross and Paul Rudd) and the circumcision-happy Abraham and his son Isaac. (Hank Azaria and Christopher Mintz-Plasse). Two girls Zed and Oh had crushes on back home have been sold into slavery, and most of the cast ends up in Sodom, where the two leads attempt to free their would-be girlfriends. Hijinks ensue.

The plot only barely sticks; this is more a sketch film than anything else. Year One would rather indulge a moment where Michael Cera has to rub oil on the chest of Oliver Platt’s High Priest of Sodom, who is carpeted with body hair like a Labrador. That’s the setup — Platt is gay and hairy, and Cera isn’t — but this film treats it like the payoff. That’s the entire comedic mode here: ridiculous situations with very little follow-through. It’s Epic Movie-style filmmaking with a comedy all-star cast. The laughs I got out of it were purely due to moments of outrageousness that mock the PG-13 rating.

Jack Black and Michael Cera are playing themselves, or loincloth-clad versions of their typical screen personas, but Cera at least has the timing and sensibility to throw off a handful of great asides. He can really kill with a barely audible bit of wry commentary, playing the sharp-eyed outsider who just needs the confidence to jump into life. Black, meanwhile, is always working with his mouth set to eleven and facial expressions that make vaudeville look subtle. Though Black’s schtick is old enough to fit right in with Year One’s concept, it can be channeled into comedy. But you get the idea that Harold Ramis didn’t direct so much as occasionally give the high sign to turn on the camera.

year_one_review_3

The supporting cast doesn’t get much of a chance to save scenes. Bill Hader does a bit of funny patter under full makeup that leaves him almost unrecognizable. The women, Juno Temple, Olivia Wilde and June Diane Raphael, are periodically dangled as eye candy, but the closest any comes to being a character are moments where Raphael, as the object of Black’s affections, gets to tell him that the entire movie is his fault. Don’t hope for much out of David Cross, either; his only joke is that Cain is selfish, and it’s played as broad and thin as the rest of the movie.

The end result of this stinker doesn’t have anything to do with Year One, but with the proposed Ghostbusters 3, for which  screenwriters Lee Eisenberg and Gene Stupnitsky are writing a draft, and in which Harold Ramis may be intimately involved. It’s easy to suppose that a lot of the screenplay here was used as a base guideline at best, but there are so few glimmers of character here that the idea of this team resurrecting the Ghostbusters franchise seems like a more terrible idea than ever.

/Film rating: 3 out of 10

About the Author

Russ Fischer is a dedicated media nerd living in Atlanta.

  • jd123
    first
  • adam
    shame. it doesnt look very good. i was hoping i was wrong.
  • oldschoolbishop
    Saw it stoned. Made all the difference.
  • el fernando
    doing that tonight.

    lol
  • heh
  • Ouch. That's quite a scathing review. I knew this film would either be great or terrible...

    My taste in comedy is pretty broad, though, so I'll try to give it a go. Though the premise of poo eating doesn't really appeal to me.

    I did, however, laugh out loud at your description of Abraham as 'Circumcision happy,' so there's some potential. More importantly, Oliver Platt and Hank Azaria are some of the greatest supporting characters/scene stealers out there.
  • dagreenman18
    Damn, thats a shame. I was looking forward to this.
  • ----
    Why?
  • Sketch
    Yeah seriously? At least for me going by the trailers, it didn't appear to be that funny. Sure you can't judge by the trailer alone but seriously, come on.
  • Egger Buckland
    You guys don't pay much attention to anything, do you?
  • Fir3Wolf
    Not surprising that it sucked. All the trailers I've seen for the movie didn't even get a chuckle out of me, so I knew it would be a very bad movie. Looks like I was right.
  • tHE
    I figured the trailer was not funny because they were saving all the good jokes for the film, a hardy balance when it comes to films like Adventureland, whose only had a few jokes to begin with, and I Love You, Man which suprised the hell out of me.
  • i hope Ghostbusters 3 doesn't nuke the fridge on us. Guess people will get a third slice of Hangover this weekend.
  • ----
    Or maybe they'll go... outside?
  • Quenfis
    Outside, like the Drive-In? Not sure what you mean. :/
  • nigroach
    your a scath
  • DC Donner
    You're an idiot.
  • The trailers looked pretty lame, and with that being the case, the movie is usually even worse.
  • Quenfis
    You started your review with Michael Showalter, and I knew exactly where you were going with it. Very nice. "Day, B'day, B'day..." I have yet to see a critic who liked this movie. What a shame.
  • broadway joey
    Bring back intense debate!
  • To the Ghostbusters 3 comment, it won't live up to what everyone expects. If is has the same writers and a lot of the same crew, it's definitely not going to be that good. Everyone wants too much from that movie... it's not going to be that great then...
  • Michael_A
    That's foolish. If anyone has played the new video game that came out, the story is great and involves Harold Ramis immensely. So I have high, and even somewhat realistic, hopes for Ghostbusters 3. This just didn't work out.
  • RussFischer
    Ramis didn't write the game. Neither did Aykroyd. They both get credit, but all they did was a pass on some of the dialogue. The game script was written by guys at Terminal Reality.
  • Exactly. If they want to make a good Ghostbusters 3, hire someone who didn't write the first two, but knows the series enough to not go "overkill" on nostalgia.
  • INS
    Pretty much what I expected from the trailers and millions of ads they kept airing during the NBA Playoffs.

    The more they showed of the movie, the shittier it looked, but I didnt expect to hear that its on par with Epic Movie, thats sorry!
  • kfizz
    God it was just so spotty and they took alot out so it must have been the funny. I saw it at a sneak peek thank god it was free.
  • BORICUAR
    THIS MOVIE SUCKS BAD JOKES BORING MOVIE THE WORTS JACK BLACK MOVIE EVER
  • figured this would suck from the second i saw the preview trailer during the superbowl.
  • Ouch! Year One looked bad, but I didn't think it would be this bad. I'll heed the review and avoid this one altogether.
  • krackajap
    So I should just watch History of the World Part 1 again?
  • GreatBigLion
    Excellent review, Russ. My friends actually want to see this, but no one can force me. Hoping for the best from Ghostbusters 3.
  • Jeff W.
    It's bad??? Gee, what a surprise. I could tell it was awful after watching the trailer for 3 seconds.
  • It looks like you were expecting more from the movie than it was destined to give you. I thought it was an enjoyable, brainless comedy. It wasn't extremely cohesive, but it didn't need to be. The outrageous mis-tellings of Biblical stories was enough to make me laugh and that's all I needed. Granted, it's not the #1 comedy of the year, but I didn't think it was bad enough to warrant "lifeless and laughless"
  • TransFarmer
    I'm with you on "Year One" being better than reviews are making out to be. I don't get the bashing? ...Touchy people with sensitive Christian sensibilities?
  • Money_Man
    lol its a comedy. few comedys get good reviews cause a persons type of comedy. the hangover is the best comedy of the year though.
  • Brian
    Well the duo of Michael Cera and Jack Black should be enough to basically seal the deal in terms of it being laughless and lifeless, but a lot of people still thought it was going to be a good flick. Cera cannot act, cannot be comedic, and is the exact same character in every role he's ever been given. Jack..eh he's hit or miss. Honestly, with people like Cera getting role after role in Hollywood, I haven't much faith left in the film business.
    I'm glad you're providing a real review of it with no sugarcoating! Thanks Russ.
  • Mike
    Ever heard of Arrested Development, fool?
  • Joshua Ruth
    While I agree that Michael Cera is the exact same in every film he's in, I disagree that he cannot be funny. I think you're just prone to hyperbole. I'd bet that you laughed at some of his stuff in SuperBad at least.
  • I WAS somewhat excited for this film when I saw the first plot synopsis, then the first picture, but when the first bit of footage came, it looked like a real piece of crap, so this isn't too surprising.
  • frelling_cute
    This looked pretty dumb from the get go and Michael Cera and Jack Black playing themselves again.
  • Edward
    The term "worst movie ever" gets thrown about a lot on the internet nowadays. This would be one of the more apporpiate moments to do so.
  • Is there any doubt that Ghostbusters 3 will nuke the fridge? Come on. You know it's going to be awful. The ability of the movie geek community to indulge in self delusion is stunning.
  • justrobby
    Well thats not far off what i was expecting, but i will still go see it..
  • That makes a lot of sense
  • justrobby
    The film hasn't had good reviews, but im still going to go and see it. Its got Jack Black in it, so even to see his comedy is worth a ticket.
  • Adam G
    This movie is horrible!! People were getting up and leaving durning it! I laughed out loud maybe twice. I should of just seen The Hangover again.
  • i thought it was going to be pretty good,oh well.
  • Luke
    When I was watching it, I kept thinking about how LIFE OF BRIAN did all of this so much better thirty years ago. Now I get why you guys didn't like TAKING OF PELHAM 123 in comparison to the original.
  • maxb
    Your Epic Movie comparison kept me from seeing this tonight...
  • Andrew
    Granted I was half asleep(not much sleep the nights before) this movie made me laugh a lot. It had a lot of good parts, and kept me laughing and entertained for the entire movie.
blog comments powered by Disqus