500 days of summer

One of the many reasons I loved 500 Days of Summer is the clever screenwriting. And by clever writing I don’t mean overwritten dialogue ala Diablo Cody, but fantastic story beats that take full advantage of the film medium. Fox Searchlight has released a new clip which perfectly illustrates what I’m talking about. As you might already know, the film stars Joseph Gordon-Levitt as Tom, a hapless greeting card copywriter and hopeless romantic, who is blindsided after his girlfriend Summer (Zooey Deschanel) dumps him (this is how the movie begins), he shifts back and forth through various periods of their 500 days “together” (hence the title) to try to figure out where things went wrong.

The video clip after the jump takes place after Tom and Summer reconnect after the breakup, and Tom is invited to a party at his ex-girlfriend’s house. Tom, of course, thinks this is an opportunity to rekindle their relationship, but as you might expect, expectations and reality diverge. Screenwriters Scott Neustadter and Michael Weber have expertly crafted a scene that I believe is so brilliant, that it makes you wonder why no one had come up with this concept prior. Everyone has encountered this situation at one point in their life, and everyone knows how it feels - yet I’ve never seen a movie portray the feeling so accurately, visually, without employing a ton of exposition before hand. The scene in the movie goes on a bit longer, and has more of a dramatic effect on the story (as you might expect, reality gets worse). The sequence works better in the context of the film, but you’ll get the point. Watch the clip embedded after the jump.

500 Days of Summer begins hitting theaters on July 17th 2009.

  • whoa i want to go to there
  • Wow...from the way you talked about that scene.....Shrug, Example A of Expectations not meeting Reality.
  • Everyone has gone through this emotion/situation before, and it has been done in so many movies previously. But I'm betting that you can't name one movie that connects like this one without a ton of exposition and set up?
  • I'm with Sauce on this one.
  • It connects without a ton of exposition because it's so blatant. I'm not saying it "cheats" or anything, but where other movies might try to give you an idea of what he expects so that when reality falls short the audience really feels it, this just puts two panels on the screen and skips the hard work. Also with Sauce.
  • Cameron
    The feeling and situation may be obvious, but the split screen gimmick (i hate to use the word gimmick because it really isnt a gimmick in this case) really places you in the viewpoint of the main character. I'm with Peter on this one.
  • True, off the top of my head no, but I wouldn't call this some new revelation. When you trumped it up, I thought I'd see something a little more than split screen. That's been around the block and abused for decades now. Most of the uses are in action/heist movies (all that's coming to mind right now). But in all honesty this use of it didn't impress me. I get the why...It simplifies things and like you say, circumvents the need for a lot of set up. But I'm not sure it qualifies as "expertly crafted". A good device, yes, but does it achieve more than that in this one minute clip? I'm not so sure...

    I'll admit that there's really no way to judge this properly by just seeing a minute of footage. I have no context for this scene. I absolutely get that it works in the film and I'll take your word for that. I'll also admit that this happens All the time in life especially when it comes to love. It's a pain in the ass.

    But "Must see" seems like a stretch to me.

    +1 points for the writers/directors trying this shot though. Much love there.
  • PS. Fox Searchlight has added a lot of new screenings for this movie since /film ran their article about them. Some are still open, like in Boston. Might want to check back in and see if there's something near you still available. Go to the (500) Days of Summer website on fox searchlight. Right side, under find tickets.

    Since I live in the NYC area, all tickets are gone. Sad Sauce_.
  • shameless
    whats missing is the new guy that she has replaced you with. that is what really shatters your expectations.
    also, the music seems kinda off for me, at least in the beginning.
  • Stark1288
    I have a feeling thats what Peter was hinting at by saying the scene goes on to a more dramatic story beat
  • shameless
    ah, well i suppose i'll just have to wait for the movie. i wouldn't be on this site constantly if i didnt trust peter's judgement on movies.
  • jason B
    ahh peter!! i wish i had posted this sooner, but rules of attraction did this exact same thing years ago!! little or no exposition, split screen, reality vs expectation, etc...but the exact same thing.

    ian sommerhalder & james van der beak are getting high in a dorm room, screen split aaaand action. we see it play out both ways. in fact, avery pulled it off with NO dialogue whatsoever.
  • CyT
    I get you Peter. Its a touching, complex scene simplified but beautiful at the same time. I know montages and all that have existed before, but to employ it in this manner I cannot think of anything like it. A good filmmaker is one who pulls off creations using out of the box ideas, and it seems this one really paid off. I got a great sense of the film from that 54 seconds which is an accomplishment in anyones book. Really looking forward to the film if/when it comes to Aus.
  • Really? I think it's the first clip that got me really, REALLY excited about this movie. I'm in AUS, God knows when we'll get this...!
  • loved it.

    reminds me of cartman in South Park inventing the "gay Fish" joke.

    so there's another one that's done well. ;)
  • Hahaha. I was trying to think of something similar and that was probably one of the funnier examples anyone could come up with. The best (and I guess worst) part is that some people are actually like that. Kyle's explanation was the best, Cartman's fragile ego is just acting in self defense. Brilliant.
  • Screenwriter Spy
    I can tell that Peter must have a screenwriting or writing background from his praise of this sequence. I'm a working screenwriter and I'm amazed at the cleverness of the use of split screen to relate the emotion of the main character. I also don't recall this ever being used to this effect ever before. I'm more interested in ever in seeing this movie.
  • jason B
    rules of attraction did this years ago.
  • What's the song in this sequence?
  • Found it, HERO by Regina Spektor
  • Travis McGee
    I love that whole album by Regina Spektor. Don't just download the song, get the whole album.
  • Was this a joke comment? It sounded like one. Like someone pretending to be Peter on an anonymous account. If not, my bad. You're entitled to your opinion I guess.
  • Screenwriter Spy
    I was being serious
  • Stark1288
    I now want to see this movie.
  • Hey guys. Long time listener, first time caller. Wanted to say that after reading Peter's lead-in, I think I was almost expecting a face-melting experience similar to when they opened the Ark of the Covenant. With that said, I do think it was a very clever (and original) scene and I'm sure if I were able to see the full scene in the context of the entire film it would probably have even more of an effect (as Peter alluded).

    It sort of reminds me of a chapter from the Chuck Klosterman book "Downtown Owl" involving nothing more than a conversation between a guy & a girl at a bar. What makes it great IMO is how the conversation is presented. Each character's dialogue is written first as "What he/she said" then is followed with "What he/she meant." I had never seen that done and thought it was an interesting viewpoint of the unspoken awkwardness in social situations, akin to this scene from "500 Days."

    Anyway, just wanted to say I enjoy the show, and I'll hang up and listen.
  • Clever Name
    just saw this at The Landmark in LA. this movie was refreshingly different, genuine and heartfelt. The music, cinematography, and cast easily made this one of my favorite movies.

    Oscars? I hope so...

    9.8/10
  • jason B
    9.8 ... really? what separates it from a 9.7 or 9.9? i can't tell if yer being serious or goofing.
  • I wish they screened it in Atlanta... Sigh.

    Also, that scene broke my heart.
  • HOLY SHIT! Peter, I have to thank you for reminding me of checking if they would add more cities to their free screenings, and they added Atlanta. Thanks Peter!
  • musicsoup
    I liked it. I laughed at the end. I keeps you focused on the movie, and I could see how it could be fun to watch it twice, if you really wanted to pay attention to each side. It also just feels like a quick, quirky little moment in the film, to set things up without saying much, and I totally got the point. Makes me want to see the film more.
  • awesomeclip
    The reality wasn't really all that bad. : It's only sad in comparison to the expectation which is much better. I paid more attention to the expectation side because it seems like it was presented first and was more important...
    It seemed so hard for him to tell the joke :(

    I think I'm going to see this movie twice.
  • almostinfocus
    The song in the background was distracting. It's a good scene. Reminds me of the subtitled conversation in "Annie Hall".
  • Bob
    I agree with Peter about this scene. Trust us, folks. This brief little clip may not seem like much. But when you see the full sequence and its context in the movie, this scene will be almost heartbreaking. When I saw (500) Days, the theater was dead silent immediately after this scene, with the exception of the random "Whoa" comment from one of the audience members.
  • Phontsolo
    Very well done. Good idea.
  • GoreBaby
    "And by clever writing I don’t mean overwritten dialogue ala Diablo Cody, but fantastic story beats that take full advantage of the film medium"

    THANK YOU.

    but i still dont know about this movie...
  • jason B
    'rules of attraction' did this very thing. the split screen with van der beak & sommerhalder when they are in a dorm room getting loaded. its the very 'expectation' vs 'reality' 'revalation that everyone is buzzing about.
  • That's just so amazing with the subtle differences between the two with just the way they walk and what people are drinking it just makes this such a cool scene.
  • It's not as genius as you make it out to be but it's pretty good. I think it could do without the text.
  • Deschanel can't act her way out of a paper bag
  • moogalicious
    Yawn. More proof this film is dreck.
  • Man, this is hard. I really want to see the clip, but I have a strict "No Clip" policy. Trailers only show quick cuts, but clips show the full thing. No, I have to wait. Damn, I want to see it now!
  • CyT
    I love movies that are low on the dialogue and high on the visual communication so something like this seems right up my alley. Good pick Peter.
  • jason B
    hey peter,

    rules of attraction did this exact split screen 'expectation' vs 'reality' bit years ago. there's a scene where james van der beak & ian sommerhalder are getting high in a dorm room, and we see this very concept play out from sommerhalder's POV.

    its a great visual tool, and while the 2 films play it out in their respectively appropriate ways, 500 days isn't the first film to do it - i'd say ROA was, but who knows, maybe even avery got the idea from someone prior. fun clip nonetheless, and i can't wait to see this film.
  • jason B
    avery's 'rules of attraction' did this very thing years ago.
  • josh
    what is the name of the painting/picture after this scene? its black and white with the background erased?
blog comments powered by Disqus