Lemony Snicket

Last month we learned that there is still hope for another Lemony Snicket movie. Director Brad Silberling said that he “would love nothing more” than to direct another Snicket film, and admitted that he is “in constant touch” with a screenwriter about the possibility. One thing we didn’t touch on was Silberling’s statement that the movie sequel “may take a wildly different form.” Wildly different form? What could that mean?

Silberling explains further in a a recent interview with MTV, stating that he would like to shoot another Lemony Snicket film using stop-motion animation with “incredible detail and very twisted artistry.” I’m immediately imagining something with the Tim Burton look and style. And with the sucess of Coraline, 3D could be the selling point Silberling needs to get another Snicket film green lit.

Shooting the sequel as an animated film also makes sense logisticly as the young actors from the original adaptation are now older. But how would you explain the change from live action to stop motion animation? Silberling says that they film could open up the movie with Lemony Snicket telling the audience, ‘Okay, we pawned the first film off as a mere dramatization with actors. Now I’m afraid I’m going to have to show you the real thing.’ That’s soooo a Lemony Snicket thing to say.

Discuss: What do you think of the idea?

  • This could potentially solve a lot of problems, and I would love to see how well Silberling could pull it off, so count me in.
  • I don't think it's possible to express how much I want this movie to get green-lighted. I can't say that I adore the first film (I'm sorry, but Jim Carrey was completely wrong, and I had problems with a few of the other actors cast), but I am an enormous fan of the books, and they deserve a second chance.

    Also, stop-motion would do nothing but help the already 'creepy' gothic tone and feel of the books!
  • Orange
    Totally agree! Also i think the "three books = one movie" idea wasn't so great... I hope they won't make the same mistake with the sequel! And stop-motion animation would just perfectly fit the feel of the books! Though i don't want Selick to direct it... Tim Burton might be good... I don't know!
  • omar
    if Tim Burton did it that would mean johnny depp would count olaf and Helena Bonham Carter would be esme squlaor
  • ----
    The first film was alright, doing a sequel as a stop animated film is going to be a hard sell.
  • This is a fantastic idea!! I would much rather see this series continue in stop motion than live action. In fact, they should have gone that route in the first place. Not that I didn't enjoy the live action movie it had its merits, but it wasn't a very good adaptation of the first three books.
  • The credits were the best thing about the 1st movie - do the entire movie in that style and it would be great.
  • Josh
    You read my mind. I would totally be down for that.
  • Jessica Quest
    Hell yeah! And find a way to work in that end-credits music, too.
  • meee
    really? oh i hated it ...that might just be me though
  • shameless
    if the stop motion is anywhere near as good as it was in coraline. i would definitely watch it.
  • Emm
    I hope this gets green lit too. Quite surprising they are thinking about it, seeing how the first one bombed.
    i'm glad they are thinking about giving it another go, with a different direction. The first one left no real impression at all. The best part of the film for sure was the credit sequences, I would love to see them do it with the paper cutout type of graphic sensibility.
  • So am I the only one who has love for that first film? I love this kids series. In my opinion it pees all over Harry Potter in terms of delicious darkly delight. And I'm English. I so want this to happen. Do another three books in one film as stop motion and then maybe go for cgi. It's like when you change the actor who plays Bond. The same but different....

    Also Bourne pees on Bond.

    And I'm English sokay.
  • dagreenman18
    Call Henry Selick NOW!! i want him on this pronto!!!!
  • Dr. Handsome
    The books are just plain fantastic and while the first movie isn't necessarily bad as far as kids movies go it wasn't anything near the the quality of the original stories.

    I think they’d have an easier time translating that kind of dark gothic atmosphere the books seem to have using animation. In a way, I think they the animation will give them more freedom to play with the style.

    Take Coraline for example... it’s not a completely dark movie but it’s just bizzare looking and I think if it were live action it would have fared a lot worse with kids.
  • Jessica Quest
    I, on the other hand, would have seen a live-action Coraline like 100 times in the theatre. :)
  • Oh man, I would be there opening day! When I first heard they were making SoUE movie, I was hoping it was going to be animated. When it wasn't I wasn't too disappointed, but if they make this next one stop motion... OH MAN! How Sweet would that be?!
  • Cole
    Heck yes! That would be SO cool. I really hope they give the books another chance the first movie was pretty bad but with stop motion this could be a REALLY cool movie. =)
  • I didn't really care for the first film, but I wholeheartedly support stop motion animation in the next picture. I think that type of art style would work so well with this series. Long live stop motion!
  • Lpfanaddy
    Stop-motion could save this franchise after that disastrous first film (disastrous in my opinion as a big fan of the books). How they could possibly cast a boy and not put him in glasses is beyond me since it kills any possibility of an adaptation of the fourth book in the series where the plot really hinges on his poor eyesight.
  • The first one had an amazing Thomas Newman (Finding Nemo, WALL-E) score, beautiful closing credits, and an all-around wonderful direction in terms of clothing and building style. It felt a lot like Gilliam or Burton. Just the right amount of gothic tones and bright tones, something strange but not impossible for our world.

    I really enjoyed the first film and would welcome a sequel!
  • Jessica Quest
    I loved everything about the first film except for the ending (sappy and so NOT Snicket-y, in my humble opinion), and Jim Carrey. And I was sad because I really actually like Jim Carrey, but he was SO miscast. I mean, I imagined, you know... Someone like Bill Nighy or SOMETHING. But not a comedian or someone as young as Carrey. HOW CAN HE BE SCARY IF HE'S FUNNY?!?

    I know, I know... it's for kids. They had to tone it down because they think children are delicate snowflakes who can't handle scary things. SIGH. It's not true. Kids are way more hearty than we give them credit for. :p
  • iec
    That's...sort of...a Lemony Snicket thing to say. But these movies aren't that great when you try to pack three books into one. The first movie was utterly ridiculous, tore the book stories to shreds, and then added crap that had never been there in the first place. This would work better as a mini series or something. No movie will ever really try to or succeed at capturing the books, so you might as well read the books.
  • I like the first movie. I shall look forward to the sequel
  • moovee
    If it isn't already influenced by Coraline, then it should be because Coraline was awesome.
  • Like other users, I loved the Series of Unfortunate Events books, and 4 through 6 (which I believe are the ones at the factory, the private school, and the one in the village) are even grimier than the first. Stop-motion would fit the atmosphere really well, because the entire world that the three kids interact with is disjointed from reality.

    "‘Okay, we pawned the first film off as a mere dramatization with actors. Now I’m afraid I’m going to have to show you the real thing.’ That’s soooo a Lemony Snicket thing to say."
    I'm not sure if you were being sarcastic Peter, but it sorta is.
  • Uve
    I disagree with all of you.
    The true Snicke fans want it live-action with Jim Carrey, Liam Aiken and Emily Browning again.

    You can't start a series with a live-action movie and then change it to animation. It just doesn't make sense. We are signing two petitions (we have 5,000 signs right now), we're sending a bunch of letters to Snicket and we're creating a website too.

    Liam Aiken is 19 and he still looks like Klaus. Emily is 20 and if you have seen The Uninvited, then you'd have realized how young she looks. They'd have to re-cast Sunny, of coures. But Jim Carrey also agreed with being in a sequel.
  • Adam
    I agree, I dont see any reason for the actors not to be recast again, Harry Potter actors Daniel Radcliffe and the others must be in their twenties and still play students of hogwarts.
  • That would be absolutely beautiful. What a great way to take the series. I loved the original movie, and saw nothing wrong with it. But this would be great since the actors are probably a lot older than they were in the original movie.
  • very fast donkey
    Yes, I think stop animation will do wonders for the series and add a whole new dimension and gothic feel to the film. For the first time ever, I can't belive im saying this but "bring on the sequal!" I can't wait. Have the decided on any voice actors yet? I would love to see Tim Curry do the voice of Count Olaf and I hope they scrap Jude Law and bring on Dainel Handler for the narration. I mean, comeon, its his book!

    They should of done in animation right from the beginning.
  • OMG! I remember when my friends and I were asking eachother if there was ever going to be another movie. And now there's one that's going to be better than the first 8D
  • Guest
    i hate the idea of an animated film, i personally think it would ruin the books and first film. Wouldn't it be possible to re-cast the kids? -Surely that would be better for those teens who grew up with the books. animations only really appeal to younger audiences - Teens and adults wouldnt want to go out to the cinema to see it.
  • meee
    Oh and the only problem with the 1st film was jim Carey was too funny to be scary and i think making it stop-motion would take away from the scary and just destroy the books. Scary can only really be done through live motion which this film should be
  • Vincent Price
    Ok, you are all a bunch of morons. First of all Tim Burton was originally attached to direct with Johnny Depp as Olof. He left and so did Depp because he couldn't get it right with the studio. Ego's clashing I presume.

    Now, Brad Silberling badmouthed Jim Carrey after the film didn't go over like everyone had hope.

    Brad Silberling is a hack spoiled brat wannabe director that belongs next to Micheal Jackson in Hell. That's my opinion anyway.
  • Bellatrix
    i don't think the actors would be too much older, i mean the film could be set a few years later anyway. i think stop motion as a second film would never be as nice - just get violet and klaus to be older, and sunny and the others will be simple to find replacements. oh, yes, and a second film would be wonderful, after all the books are a series. and if it isn't possible to have a live film, stop action would be better than nothing.
blog comments powered by Disqus