hood_header

Ridley Scott’s Robin Hood is currently filming on locations up and down the English countryside. Courtesy of The Daily Mail you can see a handful of paparazzi shots of King John’s soldiers attacking a village. These were all filmed in Bourne Wood, Surrey but the film has skipped between a handful of counties. There’s one image above and the others are hidden away down below the break in this story.

The same Mail article quotes Dame Eileen Atkins who recently took up the role of Eleanor of Aquitane. She seems rather concerned about having to act with a live owl but also confirms just how tricky the constant heavy rewriting is proving:

I am completely bird phobic - it’s the same owl that appeared in Harry Potter and apparently it weighs as much as a dog. I have to feed it - probably dead mice - and I’m going to go to an animal sanctuary to help me get over my phobia. They keep rewriting the script and changing my lines quite dramatically, so I’m terrified of forgetting them.

The last story we had on the matter of Robin Hood rewrites revealed that Tom Stoppard was taking up the pen. Stoppard is my dream idea of a script doctor so I’d argue that there’s very little to worry about on the surface there, but it seems like he’s being given very little time to get the new pages in.

Here are the pap snaps.

hood1hood2hood3

It isn’t too easy to see in these pictures but I’m sure that the costumes and props will be of the very highest standard, Ridley Scott being Ridley Scott and all. Indeed, it only seems to be the scripts that have speed-bumped any of Scott’s films since Gladiator and the better written films he’s directed since then - Matchstick Men and American Gangster in particular - have been really rather excellent.

  • the heavy rewriting process is still scaring me.
  • gah
    seriously. look what it did to Terminator.
  • oh come on... :P
  • mbellerbrock
    Yeah, no kidding, this will be awesome based on that.
  • It worked for Gladiator.
  • I would have Ridley Scott's man babies so I'm excited no matter what.
  • Tepidly excited. Octoberist is right though, rewriting is scary.
  • You know what would make this even better? Kevin Costner.
  • freemachine
    Yeah, Costner skewered on a pole-arm. JK, I like Costner. ^_^
  • vva
    Gladiator had tons of rewrites too (while even on the set with Russell Crowe re-writing his own dialogue) and we all know how that OSCAR winning film turned out.
  • Brian
    You say OSCAR like it means good films win Oscars...what? Yea Gladiator was awesome and deserved everything it won, but Oscars don't depict good film these days. Not with an Academy so gung ho over political issues that they overlook a better acting performance *cough* Sean Penn winning over Mickey Rourke *cough*

    As for the rewrites in Robin Hood, well are we really going to speculate that much before we see/read/hear anything about it? Sure it's fine to speculate this sort of thing with a lot of how do I put this lightly...not as impressive films by not as impressive filmmakers, but given the history of Scott's films, I highly doubt he'll let them rewrite it into something awful. PLUS as mentioned by Brendon:
    "Robin Hood rewrites revealed that Tom Stoppard was taking up the pen."

    Yet you all worry. haha.
  • freemachine
    Medieval combat is wicked! I can't wait to see the variety of sick weapons they employ in the film. I hope this get's an R rating for graphic warfare, much like Braveheart. Anything less would be a travesty.
  • ziggi
    needs the holy hand grenade of antioch.
  • macca
    There's no need for concern over re-writes, given the history of big Scott films. Crowe is a producer on this one, Grazer is charge for Universal ... these people know how to make movies. If some dialog needs tightening, if a scene isn't working right, if something needs clarification or more nuance ... they'll recognize it and make corrections of the fly.

    Scott shoots scenes with 4 to 5 cameras on a scene, so the editing process has many choices to work with. Heck, Gladiator's Proximo even died during filming and they were able to rewrite his scenes and use CGI to recreate him. What's required is writing on the fly, and that's what is going on.

    The Mail article is cobbled together from old stories, some pure speculative gossip. They haven't talked to anyone, have no new insights or information. The papz took a few pictures and The Mail fabricated a story to "explain" what was going on.
  • Tee
    "Prince" John, not King John. King Richard was the king and away fighting the crusades. That's why Prince John was trying to take over. Never read or watched any Robin Hood?
  • Change the title back to Nottingham!
  • Elizabeth Woodsmall
    The Robin Hood legend is a favorite of mine. However, the BBC version has never captured me. Please don’t draw your bows, fans -- but, Jonas Armstrong’s character, as it is depicted, does not make a believable Robin Hood. I can’t see any band of men (merry or otherwise) following him into outlawry and danger. Moreover, his character is overshadowed by some really good, bad guys.

    I’m looking forward to Ridley Scott’s “Robin Hood.” As a director, Mister Scott puts intelligence and guts into his films. And, Russell Crowe will be a convincing outlaw leader – he’s got some edge to his sword!
  • These photos need the classic Ridley Scott desaturated look! Stat!

    Brian, it could very well revert back to "Nottingham". Sometimes titles are switched around for various reasons during production. I agree with ya, tho.
blog comments powered by Disqus