zz636ef781

Trailer Addict have captured a sequence from Backlot Buzz that features Robert Zemeckis and Jim Carrey talking about their upcoming adaptation of Dickens’ A Christmas Carol, revealing some quite astonishing new art and explaining some of their process. You can see the clip embedded below the break.

I think that I’m in the minority – so far! – in being convinced about this one. The story is a corker, Zemeckis is a fine, fine storyteller and Carrey is a wonderful choice for the various roles he’s been given: Scrooge and the various ghosts. As you’ll hear in the clip, Zemeckis cast one actor in all of those parts as the spectres are readable as projections of Scrooge, facets of his character.

Amongst the concept art you’ll see are images of Ebenezer Scrooge at various stages of his life. There’s a seven year old incarnation that ranks alongside the puppy Gromit from the opening credits of Aardman’s Curse of the Wererabbit for sheer cartoony cuteness. Interesting how handsomified Carrey looks in the two mid-range ages, though that’s largely down to the smoothing out of the skin, I suspect, and the extension of the chin… though that definitely bends back on him (literally) in the oldest, basic incarnation.

The candle spectre (the Ghost of Christmas Past, I presume) is a particularly wonderful design, and a brilliant use of motion capture techniques.

I’m starting to suspect that Zemeckis’ insistence on working in motion capture over and over is nothing but live action’s loss and his gain. He’s pushing the envelope with the technology further and further, though perhaps not in the respects most viewers are immediately aware and most concerned. Which is to say, he’s elaborating on the possibilities of motion capture in all sorts of exciting directions but still not finding a way well clear of uncanny valley. That day will come, however, and then Zemeckis will the most experienced director with a new and super flexible toolkit.

I love live action, I love cel animation, I love stop motion animation, CG animation and all of the above combined. People tend to agree with me on those. Where I meet more resistance is in my love of motion capture right along side them. Like 3D, I think, it still has some way to go to prove to the most of us that it’s more than a gimmick.

Hopefully A Christmas Carol will play some part in this proof.

  • I love the Christmas Carol. I've been excited about this particular project since they announced it. The above video has made me even more anxious to see the final film.
  • freemachine
    While I absolutely hated Beowulf, this looks pretty awesome. Finally RZ is taking full advantage of motion capture, providing such a unique look to a Christmas classic.
  • You mean like filming "actual" people without the CG part?
  • bombs away nada
    Has anyone really enjoyed anything from Jim Carrey since Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind?
  • jason B
    nope.
  • jason B
    then i'm in the minority too brandon. the second i hear motion capture or 3D i'm un-interested.
  • freemachine
    Sorry, I meant performance capture. Specifically that Carry will play the parts, yet his face will be altered significantly. While RZ aged Winstone's Beowulf, he virtually gave everyone else a photorealistic look that resembled the actors themselves (i.e. Jolie). I love how he's radically changed Carry's face for Scrooge.
  • BEC
    I got to meet with Robert Zemeckis for a few hours last month and he showed me some things from this movie and talked about why he uses motion capture. I am more on the key animation side of things than motion capture, but he was very convincing in why he chooses to do performance capture, making arguments for it that I hadn't heard.

    But for the scenes of the actual movie I saw, there are some good things and some bad things. It looks great, the performance capture looks fantastic (not nearly as stiff or bland as Polar Express or Beowulf), especially the facial animation. That stuff looks a lot better. The overall look is pretty good. The bad part is that the tone is kind of confused with itself. There are some scenes, like when Marley shows up, where it is supposed to be very scary for most of it, and actually succeeds at being pretty creepy, but then there's some weird gag that is supposed to ease the tension. Unfortunately, the gags usually feel out of place and I'm not sure if I'm supposed to feel scared or laugh at those parts.

    I realized the main problem that this film (from what I've seen) will most likely have, and it kind of goes along with some of his previous mocapped movies, is that since it is technically animated, Zemeckis wants to make his version of a Disney movie and have gags and stuff. He is basically trying to make scenes where there are elements that are strictly to entertain adults, and some for the kids. But they do not mesh well together. The bad part about this is that it's no the kind of movie he is good at making, and he's trying to be a kind of director that he is not. What he is good at is fantastic, but things get a little inconsistent when he tries to do what he has been doing. (and yes, i realize that back to the future had a lot of gags, and roger rabbit was animated with lots of gags too. too bad it doesnt work as well in these movies).
  • I've always loved A Christmas Carol and like I said in the last video about it, I'll be seeing this without a doubt.
  • Dan W
    I love Jim Carrey. This will be great
  • I like motion capture, but it still looks stiff in the motion some and the facial expressions. Face expression being the particular.

    I heard there was a facial spray dust that now reads all of the features. We'll see.
    If the story is good it'll make up for it.
  • C'on
    I did not like Polar Express or Beowulf, but I am really looking forward to this one. I think all the elements will come together perfectly. I look at it as RZ making up for the Christmas cheer Polar Express lacked---plus, Oldman as Tiny Tim??? I'll pay to see that.
  • Amy Adams
    ? TRUMAN SHOW?!?! MAN ON THE MOON?!?
  • Shilo
    truman show and man on the moon were all before eternal sunshine. i did like "dick and jane", but that was another life
  • Kris Kringle
    You're right. I didn't realize that he wrote "since." He's new movie "I Love You, Philip Morris" Looks very good though.
  • C'on
    Serkis should have won, or at least been nom'd for Gollum. He was robbed. Big time.
  • movieman11
    This reminds me of the Polar Express,a Christmas story with an actor playing numerous roles(Tom Hanks)
  • Weyland_Yutani
    Zemeckis has squandered his talent and his potential to leave any sort of lasting mark as a director. Great filmmaker lost in some sort of Mo-cap backwoods.

    For whatever reason, motion capture violates my sensibilities. Unless it is to create a scene of swashbuckling skeletons, I want no part of it.
  • freemachine
    MoCap is pretty weak when you are attempting to create lifelike humans. I really don't see the point. Rotoscoping is by far the best way to go if you don't want to have the actors in the finished product.

    On a related note, I think that Cameron's Avatar will change the way we look at MoCap (and 3D) in the future. I'm positive we can all agree on that.
  • Well no one has seen anything (besides people around cameron and who he allows), but we all certainly do hope so.
  • jiggler
    I can safely say, this movie will change what you think about mocap, and make you see the potential it has, and it comes out before Avatar.
  • corniest. interviewer. ever.
  • I'm fine with the motion capture, but if we are going to have Jim Carrey as such an iconic character, I'd rather see him actually acting. This is a great role for old rubber face.
  • All right, that's it ! The first website I'm looking at, just after waking up, is slashfilm.com. I had a lot of opportunities to post some replies, but I never...since today. I must say that this featurette (just like any other) is too short !!! I love Jim Carrey and seeing him almost one time a year on the big screen is a shame. This year, we'll have the chance to see him twice (and even more, thanks to Robert Zemeckis), if this Christmas Carol movie is released in France before the end of 2009. This project looks definitely exciting to me ! And I also love CGI movies as much as live action movies. I'm sorry if I look confused and excited for this first reply. See you !
  • the F!
    hmmm.
    At this point i can only say "we'll see".
    I'm still not convinced this is the "future of filmmaking", and it isn't. just like CGI animation didn't wiped out 2d animation, even the most refined mo-cap will not wipe out live action. It's just another techniques.

    but we'll see.


    ps, the design of the ghost of christmas past is one of the corniest design i've ever seen. Seems a man in a candle suit.
  • gah
    Anyone know if it's possible for someone to get an academy award nomination for a mocap performance?
  • Pitt was nommed for Button.
  • But he was only doing motion capture for 2/5 of the movie. The rest of the time was done with makeup. I don't think that should really count.
  • Weyland_Yutani
    possible? Knowing the nomination process for such things, I think it's pretty safe to say that you will never see that happen. Nickelodeon or MTV perhaps, but never the Academy.
  • Gennaro Gattuso
    Zemeckis fell off so hard in the '90s I actually feel kinda sorry for the guy (not too much, though - this is the clown that made Forrest Gump, and for that he can never be forgiven). His obsession with motion capture is just sad, really, and these character designs are mediocre at best.
blog comments powered by Disqus