Tetro

Francis Ford Coppola’s Tetro has premiered at the Cannes Film Festival to a mixed to lukewarm response. It seems like most critics aren’t too impressed with Coppola’s first original screenplay since 1974’s The Conversation. Here is a quick round-up of the early festival buzz:

Variety: “Tetro is still a work of modest ambition and appeal.” … “Coppola’s gradual lifting of the dramatic lid over the course of more than two hours frankly feels old-fashioned and labored.” … “Coppola lacks the writerly flair to make the big scenes soar or resonate with multiple meanings and dimensions; rather, they more often than not seem abruptly curtailed and somewhat unsatisfying.”

More after the jump.

ScreenDaily: “Tetro offers glimpses of a golden-age Francis Ford Coppola” … “Although it feels at times like a vanity project, some strong performances … save all but Tetro’s most cringeworthy lines.”

The Hollywood Reporter: “striking visuals, music, dance and classic drama” … “It has style to burn, eye-catching acting by an international cast and a story that harkens back to many literary classic” … “Yet somehow the piece comes off as derivative but also original.”

Indiewire: “Neither complete misfire nor triumphant return to form, Francis Ford Coppola’s “Tetro” works as a competent family drama right up until the messy final act. If a first-time filmmaker had directed this stylish black-and-white-and-sometimes-color melodrama, it might gain some notice for suggesting great things to come. Instead, on its own terms, the movie is only a mildly interesting entry in Coppola’s thirty-plus years of work.”

  • It's hard to compete with Coppolla's masterpiece.

    You know, "Jack."
  • ah yea, the prequel to Benjamin Button
  • Taylor
    Can't say I'm surprised, but I was hoping it would open to overwhelmingly positive reviews. I just don't think he has it in him anymore. Nothing great since Apocalypse.
  • Goobity
    Based on the trailer, this looks like a bold work. I'd love to see a truly great Coppola film again. I'm hoping the 'buzz' is wrong...
  • Yes, but is it better than Tucker?
  • It's such a shame people will always have The Godfather and Apocalypse Now resting in the back of their minds whenever they watch a Coppola film. Everything pales in comparison to those films.
  • Totally true. I'd add Godfather Part Two, of course, and the one far fewer people have seen--but is great in its own very distinct way--is The Conversation. Those were the four films he directed from 1972 to 1979. (And he was the producer--the "producer" producer, not like the 35 producers per film these days--of American Graffiti.) Truly an incredible stretch.
  • I don't care if everyone says it sucks... I'm still seeing the movie
  • i'm interested in seeing this - a well shot, artistic endeavor by coppola is something i'm always down for...
  • Yankees suck
    Fuck Variety...getting paid 20 grand a year to write about the popular kids. FUCK THEM. COPPOLA IS GOD!
  • That's too bad. The visual style of the movie still has me hooked so I'll still check it out. I reallly liked Youth Without Youth. I kinda like Coppola's new style. Every director's style kinda evolves. I mean look at Spielberg and Scorsese. Their movies today are nothing like their movies 30 years ago. Not in a bad way. My point is that Coppola hasn't lost his touch. Everyone has their golden age and his was the 70's. He has a new style now and I like it.
  • gah
    Was anyone really expecting a comeback with this?
  • Can you blame anyone? Coppola's the man. Err, was.
  • gah
    @ Peter
    IMDB has Coppolla listed as having "The Conversation" in development. is he remaking his own film??
  • It's actually a tv series (in development, not sure the status) with Usual Suspects scribe Christopher McQuarrie attached as writer.
  • freemachine
    Love McQaurrie. The Way of the Gun was excellent IMO. As far as The Conversation, the scene where they're bugging the square and the ending where Hackman is tearing up the floors, etc, made me so paranoid afterwards.
  • Harvey Grey
    Everyone knows Coppola's ability, but it's a puzzle to understand just why he hasnt made more great films. After the great 3 he made in the 70's (do I really need to name them?!) it seemed as though he was set up to make whatever he wanted. Was it poor decision making? Did he stop caring? Who knows... He is still brilliant in my eyes and Tetro is certainly one I'll queue up for, especially to see Gallo - if anyone is unfamiliar with him, he is a very natural and intense performer. Coppola, keep working and being true to yourself, it'll come good again.
  • freemachine
    This movie looks like shit. Coppola lost his touch (and sanity) years ago. Too bad, because is early work, especially The Godfather, blows everything else out of the water. As much as I love other directors (Scorsese, PTA, Spielberg) and think they shit gold, they've got nothing on Coppola's early films.

    EDIT: What's up with the hit and run comment, Dude Diggler?
  • It hardly looks like shit, it looks amazing if anything
  • I'm not sure, somehow my comment was deleted ????

    Anyways I think what I said was... if anything, this movie looks amazing and not like shit

    Edit: That's weird, the comment is there on my home page but it's not here.
  • freemachine
    You must be a Fellini fan. Tetro looks like some artsy 60's Italian film at best, and some fragrance commercial at worst. Sorry, but this is going to be a suck-fest.
  • ----
    It does indeed look like shit, and Vincent Gallo is probably the most repulsive actor on the planet.
  • C'on
    I will check this out, but it kind of looks like one big Calvin Klien ad. Look at the pic above.....Just Be.
  • wkamp
    I must disagree. I just saw this movie last night at the 10:00 screening. It was neither lac-luster or "unsatisfying." While this movie may have been slightly long and convoluted with (spoiler) some odd CG ballet dance sequences, it was never unsatisfying. The movie was a return to form for Coppola, and from the moment the movie opened I immediately knew the film was uniquely him. The Cinematography is classically gorgeous, but brings the new technology's qualities with it. I saw this with my father who is the slightly above average movie go-er, and he, while detesting some of the Competition movies such as "Spring Fever" and thinking "UP" was only average (we saw this opening gala and let me note i do think UP's story was above average, but its real draw is its use of 3D, but that life changing experience is for another post...), [he] thought that the depth created was intense. I must agree with him here, as the only real detractions to this movie were the CG effects that seem as if a Film Student got ahold of After Effects and threw in some animations. The story, acting and cinematography? Definite representation of a master at work. Coppola shows that he has become maybe more allegorical in his work... more festival if i can say that... but has not by any means lost his sanity. This is a work of reflection, and being forced to face past greatness, and trying to (maybe vainly) put it behind him.
  • It doesn't sound too interesting, but I'll probably rent it when it comes out.
blog comments powered by Disqus