i love you phillip morris

I Love You, Phillip Morris premiered at the 2009 Sundance Film Festival to fairly good reviews, but distributors have been turned off by “the graphic homosexual sex depicted in the film,” and the film has yet to score domestic theatrical distribution, until now. Variety reports that the Jim Carrey/Ewan McGregor comedy has finally been acquired by Consolidated Pictures Group for domestic distribution. An earlier report stated that thefilm was being re-edited in “a last ditch attempt to find an American distributor. It is unclear if the original cut or a new cut will be distributed to theaters in the U.S. And no word yet on a release date.

The movie is adapted from Steve McVicker’s 2003 novel, and based on a true story. Carrey plays Russell, a criminal who falls in love with his cell mate, Phillip Morris (McGregor). After Morris’ release from prison, Russell attempts a variety of bizarre prison escapes in hopes of reuniting with the love of his life. The movie was apparently pitched as “Catch Me if You Can meets Brokeback Mountain“. The screenplay was written by the team who did Bad Santa. Film School Rejects said the film feels like “a mixture between the silliness and absurdness of a Farrelly brothers movie, but with the intelligence of a Coen brothers flick.”

The lack of interest due to the film’s gay storyline somewhat baffled me. Movies like Milk and Brokeback Mountain found their way into the mainstream despite what some distributors would label as a “disadvantage”. I understand there is a graphic gay sex scene in the first 10 minutes, but I think audiences in more liberal cities don’t really care.

This film doesn’t need a huge wide release. It was filmed independently for only $13 million, and has already sold theatrical distribution in UK markets. It seems to me that Jim Carrey’s name alone would be enough to market this film. And if distributors were smart, they could make 20-30 million off of a small screen release.

  • : D
    that's faaabulous
  • I will admit that I lol'ed.

    ;-)
  • Lawdog
    I keep hearing that "liberal" audiences won't mind a little graphic gay sex at the beginning of the movie. I beg to differ. Since moving into a gay neighborhood 10 years ago (wasn't one of the questions I thought to ask the leasing agent), I've made a lot of gay friends. They mostly feel the same way about straight sex as I feel about gay sex. Whatever floats your boat, baby, but I don't want to watch.

    Of course, if it's funny graphic gay sex that's different. That might be funny as shit. Let's Go To Prison could have used a little more graphic gay sex.
  • whsmith
    as a straight person, I've seen gay porn. can't say it disturbed me. can't say that R rated gay "sex" scene will disturb me either. America needs to grow up. How "graphic" could it really be? Anyone who would find themselves offended watching such a scene is the kind of useless and clueless movie goer that takes their toddler to see Crank 2 thinking it's about cartoon trains or something.
  • "for only $13 million" ...
  • Look at the cost of a Jim Carrey comedy and 13 million is very low. In fact, the project was funded independently, so its technically even an indie film.
  • I know, i know. It's just ... that's still a lot of money.
  • Exactly! Why can't a decent film be made with $100,000? With a $100,000, I could have my own tiny McDonald's franchise for that price.
  • AWhitman
    the money that goes into a movie isn't just what's on screen, they create an LLC, a business, for every single movie with its own accounting department and 50-500 people on payroll. plus, the production budget could be 100,000 but post-production and marketing costs could drive up to a the millions easily.
  • Glad to hear that this film got picked up for distribution. It's disgusting how we can have so many movies with scenes of naked boobs, chicks making out, graphic violence with lots of gore (SAW, anyone?), yet a movie about two gay men in love is considered taboo.
  • I remember a trailer of this a while ago. Is that still the main trailer?
  • Hahaha, funny post!

    It's not every day that you read stories that include "graphic homosexual sex" and Jim Carrey in em'.

    But seriously, you make some great points Peter. Mainstream movies like the ones you mentioned above didn't seem to have any trouble finding an audience. I personally believe that given our recent events, a comedy would be on everyone's list!

    The movie sounds like it has a decent concept and plus you know that Jim Carrey will make his character as faaabulous as possible!
  • SteveP
    I've yet to meet a gay person (of which I am a part-time member) who objects to seeing straight sex on screen. At all. It's never even come up.
    I have no problem watching it, I find that a little spurious.
  • James
    I have to agree with SteveP, I'm gay and have no repulsion to seeing straight sex on screen. When it comes down to it, it should be the filmmaker's decision to put whatever they want in the film, and the public can answer with ticket sales.
  • Lawdog
    I never said anything about repulsion or revulsion. I said "want" as in desire. I can't speak for the gay community. I can only tell you about the gay people I personally know, but they're a fairly diverse group. When you get 10-12 gay people and 4 or 5 straigt people sitting around a couple of poker tables drinking and smoking pot until the wee hours of the next afternoon, the subject of straight sex/gay sex is gonna come up...a LOT. Then again, maybe I just know a lot of sex addicts. I've heard in graphic detail pretty much everything I need to know about the *ahem* in's and out's of gay sex. I know now to never ask why someone is wearing a name tag that says, "HELLO! My name is Bear Top" I don't think Jim Carrey and Ewan MacGregor are going to be doing anything that would actually shock me. That doesn't automatically mean I want to see it. If it's funny, leave it in. If it's just a graphic gay sex scene for the sake of being edgy, then I don't want to see it. I don't want to watch fat people having sex either. Lesbians, yes. Just none of the lesbians I know.
  • If this goes well you don't think we could get a Rourke like revival for Carrey do you?
  • If this goes well do you think we could get a Rourke like revival for Carrey?
  • Merlin Missy
    Um, people have noticed that straight women often like watching men make out with each other, y/n? Brokeback Mountain was driven by female sales, iirc. A little romance, a lot of good characterization, and a bit of nekkid men and you've got the next movie women head to in droves with their best friends. I hope the marketing guys remember that ...
  • What exactly are you expect the marketing guys to do? "I Love You, Phillip Morris - It's a movie about two gay men, for women!

    ...

    Somehow"
  • Merlin Missy
    The phrasing "quirky love story" comes to mind, along with billing it as a romcom instead of a standard Jim Carrey comedy. Worked for Brokeback, it can work here. Not all women, but quite a large number enjoy male/male stories the same way guys like to see two hot women kissing. :)
  • Palmer
    I've never even heard of Consolidated Pictures Group.
  • Nick
    I hope it's the director's original cut. I saw that four minute promo reel awhile back and it looks batshit insane.

    I really don't think gay characters are as big a problem for straight audiences as they seem to make it. Brokeback Mountain was a hit and it played to lots of straight audiences.

    This also has the added marketing benefit of being a comedy. A few snappy posters, and a smart trailer and you'll make your money back.
  • infrafan
    Just give us the original cut on DVD and save some time and grief.
  • Boxoffice Marco
    Worst Previews (through Variety) says the release date is Feb. 14, 2010 (Valentine's Day).
  • blahblah
    The only people I know who saw Brokeback Mountain were women and gay men. Straight guys will go see something gay only if there is zero chance of any man-on-man action. That's why this movie was made for only $13 million--it's the only way it was gonna get made and hope to turn a profit.
  • Nice to hear this movie finally got a U.S. distributor, and now we just need to see a trailer.
blog comments powered by Disqus