Wolverine

The great thing about a sequel is that it has a built-in audience. The problem with sequels is that, as the numbers after the title go up, so does the production budget. Very hard to know for sure, but sources have told me that the production budget for X-Men was in the $75M range. X-2: X-Men United may have had a budget of about $110M, while the cost of X-Men: The Last Stand was, in all likelihood, as much as $210M. Why doesn’t it make sense to just churn out X-Men 4?

Look at these numbers.

X-Men – estimated budget - $75M
$20.8M opening day - $54.5M opening weekend - $152.3M domestic - $296.3M global

X-2: X-Men United – estimated budget - $110M
$31.25M opening day - $85.5M opening weekend - $214.9M domestic - $407.7M global

X-Men: The Last Stand – estimated budget - $210M
$45.1M opening day - $102.7M opening weekend - $224.4M domestic - $459.3M global

It’s pretty clear that, with no cost-containment on budget (especially the big cast), the X-Men franchise had reached the point of diminishing returns. So, X-Men Origins: Wolverine (Fox), debuting Friday, is a sequel, but, technically, a spin-off, without costing as much as a true sequel would.

I’m guessing that Hugh Jackman is working for a great price, also serving as a producer with a healthy backend participation. The rest of the name cast is essentially limited to Liev Schrieber (The Manchurian Candidate, The Omen), Dominic Monaghan (The Lord of the Rings Trilogy, NBC’s Lost) and Ryan Reynolds (Blade: Trinity, The Amityville Horror), and there is no Bryan Singer (X-Men, X-2) or Brett Ratner (X-Men 3) to direct. Instead, Fox and Jackman settled on the much less expensive, but still Academy Award-winning director Gavin Hood (Tsotsi). Now with a scaled-back story and cast, the movie comes in at a much more studio-friendly price while, hopefully, still packing an X-Men-style box office punch.

Fox has smartly positioned Wolverine as the first movie into the summer fray, and that is important because this is the one May huge release that may not have long legs (I believe that J.J. Abrams’ Star Trek will squash it like a bug on the all-new Enterprise windshield next week). I am told that pre-release industry tracking is in the stratosphere for this X-Men spin-off – Un-Aided Awareness, Total Awareness, Definite Interest and First Choice are all through the roof. When the tracking data gets this heated, predictions are dicey at best, but I am calling for $92M domestic. That would be just a tick lower than last year’s first-weekend-of-May starter Iron Man, which was $98.6M.

For those of you who may be reading my column for the first time, that $92M figure is my “prediction.” That means that based on my experience, conversations with sources at competing studios and interpretation of pre-release industry tracking, I am making a well-educated guess as to how X-Men Origins: Wolverine will deliver in opening weekend US sales. (The road is littered with other well-educated guessers, and I have missed substantially on a few predictions in the past.)

When I start writing on Friday, it will be based on early ticket sales. That will make my numbers “projections” instead of “predictions.” My Early Friday and 3-Day “projections” are historically off by no more than 5%-8%.

For the record, I believe that Mr. Jackman and the folks at Fox will be quite happy with anything north of $80M, but they are definitely working to keep expectations lower. In the end, I think they’ll be in the $90M-$95M range for 3-days.

Ultimately, Iron Man performed like a monster deep into the summer. It was followed by the box office misfire Speed Racer on the following Friday, giving the Jon Favreau-directed comic book adaptation basically 17 days alone in the marketplace. Wolverine doesn’t have that luxury with the aforementioned Star Trek, arriving next Thursday starting at 7pm.

Additionally, Iron Man was jet-powered by spectacular reviews (93% Fresh on Rotten Tomatoes) and excellent word-of-mouth. It’ll be more of a mixed bag for X-Men Origins: Wolverine, standing at 41% Fresh on RT as of Wednesday night. The multiplier for Iron Man was 3.22 (the number by which you multiply the opening weekend figure by to arrive at the ultimate domestic gross). Wolverine is more likely to finish with a multiplier of 1.8-1.9. If the picture hits my opening weekend number, that multiplier will put the final US total at something in the $165M-$175M range.

In addition to my final weekend prediction, I also believe that Wolverine may scratch and claw its way to one of the top five or six opening days ever for a comic book movie. That could make it the 2nd-biggest opening day ever for a film from the X-Men franchise, trailing only the first day for X-Men 3.

ALL-TIME TOP 10 OPENING DAYS FOR COMIC BOOK ADAPTATIONS
1. The Dark Knight - $67.1M
2. Spider-Man 3 - $59.8M
3. X-Men: The Last Stand - $45.1M
4. Spider-Man 2 - $40.4M
5. Spider-Man - $39.4M
6. Iron Man - $35.2M
7. X-2: X-Men United – $31.25M
8. Watchmen - $24.5M
9. Hulk - $24.2M
10. Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer - $22M

There is always room for an inspired piece of counter-programming, and Warner Bros is apparently executing just that. The Matthew McConaughey-Jennifer Garner-Michael Douglas rom-com Ghosts of Girlfriends Past could reach a very solid $18M by appealing to Females 25 Plus.

The only other wide release is Battle For Terra (Lionsgate/Roadside Atttractions), a sci-fi 3-D release unluckily sandwiched between Monsters vs. Aliens (Dreamworks/Paramount) and Pixar’s Up (Disney) on the 3-D release schedule. Despite essentially decent early reviews (70% Fresh on Rotten Tomatoes), Terra will not be putting up much of a Battle. The 3-D screen count will be low, and there has been no real marketing money spent on getting this one launched. I’m predicting about $3.4M, which might be enough to “sneak it” into the top twelve for the frame.

FINAL PREDICTIONS FOR THE WEEKEND OF MAY 1-3
1. NEW – X-Men Origins: Wolverine (Fox) - $92M
2. NEW – Ghosts of Girlfriends Past (Warner Bros) - $18M
3. Obsessed (Sony) - $10.2M
4. 17 Again (Warner Bros) - $6.5M
5. Earth (Disney) - $5.6M
6. Monsters vs. Aliens (Dreamworks/Paramount) - $5.5M
7. The Soloist (Dreamworks/Paramount) - $5M
8. State of Play (Universal) - $4.3M
9. Hannah Montana The Movie (Disney) - $3.9M
10. Fighting (Rogue) - $3.8M
11. Fast & Furious (Universal) - $3.5M
12. NEW - Battle For Terra (Lionsgate) - $3.4M

  • "NBC's Lost"... don't you mean ABC?
  • LOST_FAN
    Just about to do that.
  • lost sucks
    who cares lost sucks
  • Brian from OR
    Im sure its going to have a good opening weekend. The real question is how well will it do the next weekend. If it drops by over 50% then Fox is in trouble. I have seen all the other X-Men movies opening weekend. But for some reason I just can not get excited enough to go see it right away. I will see it eventually but just not opening weekend.
  • May is a pretty good month. Next week Star Trek then Terminator and Up. I look foward to Terminator. I can't see wolverine because of poor Deadpool.
  • A movie with a "rotten" rating is going to get over 60 million dollars?!
  • So far there's only 27 reviews. Most movies get around 200+ reviews so it may not end up being rotten. We'll have to see.
  • luke_test
    There Will Be Blood has a 91% fresh rating yet only made $40m in its total run.

    I doubt think the mass movie market really care about what critics think.
  • 92mil? I don't see it doing those numbers. High 70s to mid 80s, I bet, but 92? Seems too high for a movie that half the Internet has seen and been unhappy about.
  • MyNew Pep-Pep
    And the endless cycle of shitty movies continues..
  • gah
    Whats even more depressing is that an intelligent film like Star Trek is tracking soft right now. Keep churning out the shit Fox. Apparently our broke stupid American asses will still pay for it.
  • josh p
    so its stupid to enjoy a movie you dont like?
  • krazyguy
    The funny part is despite the slew of bad movies, the box office is on a roll. Thts a good thing for Hollywood but bad for us when ignorant studio heads highlight terrible movies they think have mass appeal. I bet if Wolverine was released last year it would hv bombed.
  • MyNew Pep-Pep
    Wolverine looks to be promoted to the Gay crowd
    with its half naked Jackman prance'n around in the posters flexed out and on the trailer naked screaming. .....RAWR !!!!!!

    lol this movie sucks
  • I predict $65-75 million range. And then huge drop off next week once Star Trek gets into gear, which will most likely be one of the top three movies of this year, if not THE top movie.
    Though I think top movie of the year might go to Harry Potter.
  • Top movie will be Transformers, just wait. It's got appeal to just about everyone below the age of 60. I work at a theater and every time someone walks by the standee they say something like "Oh man, I can't wait for Transformers". Star Trek will do good but won't play outside the gerk/nerd/dork circles, Potter will do better but still doesn't appeal to everyone like Transformers does.

    If you thought the first one exploded in box office numbers, just wait till Revenge of the Fallen. Total, it'll do $400 million, if not more.
  • My "educated guess" for the top three movies of the 2009 summer season is:
    1. Transformers 2 (325 Mio.$)
    2. Harry Potter 6 (300 Mio.$)
    3. Star Trek (260 Mio.$)
  • tom.
    I hope it doen's make that much. Shit movie + lots of cash = more shit movies.
  • No way $92. Under 60 for sure. And I base it on absolutely nothing. :)
  • Agreed. I don't see where this 92 million is coming from. I like your chances better because it's based on pure nothing. I'll be impressed with something just shy of 60 million.
  • what percentage did x3 drop off the following week? i would imagine wolverine, whatever the initial weekend is, would drop off by a significantly higher percentage than x3. 92 million sounds kind of high for its opening weekend.

    i'm curious if watchmen will have any impact on wolverine's bussiness? everyone i know who isn't a fan of the book absolutely hated that movie. they wanted a superhero blockbuster, and they were sorely dissapointed with what they got instead. i wonder if your average movie goer who saw watchmen and didn't like it will be less inclined to see another superhero movie, or if wolverine will be appealing because they know it won't be a 3 hour blue sausage fest and they still want to see a superhero blockbuster. or maybe that's a dumbass question and it won't matter at all...
  • edc
    wolverine was fun.
    fat losers who complain about it are still gonna see it, they're losers.
  • I predict 81 million - tops. Remember, I was right on Watchmen. Pioneer of the Nile will win the kenticky Derby , as well.
  • I predict 81 million - tops. Remember, I was right on Watchmen. Pioneer of the Nile will win the Kentucky Derby , as well.
  • charles
    I'm saving my money for Star Trek.
  • I guess the leak wasn't as disastrous as first thought.

    If Wolverine does well then that means Fox will probably green light Magneto (finally)
  • Yes, or (please God, please) Gambit.
  • gah
    honestly who the hell wants to see Magneto?
    1. Its made by Fox
    2. its written by David Goyer, who Batman Begins aside, is a horrible writer and rapist of superhero franchises
    3. It's freaking Magneto. Not Deadpool. Not Gambit. Not any other X-men known to be able to carry itself in solo adventures
    4. No Ian McKellan. So it will essentially be Hannibal Rising, but Magneto not Dr. Lecter
    5. Wolverine sucked ass and Fox clearly will not make this an exception. trust me if you screw up a Wolverine movie, the easiest character to get right, Magneto will not be good.
  • I'll give you 1, 2 and 5. But come on, Magneto can hold his own. I mean he's just a great character; almost up there with the Joker as far as complex/interesting villains go. (Almost.) And as for replacing McKellan, while it will be sad, it is kind of necessary if they want to make a prequel/origin story.
  • disagree - magneto is solid. as long as they include BLOB - blob needs a place in x-men - from here on... OUT~!
  • movieboy
    FOX should do X-Men 4 and bring back singer to direct it
  • what about the H1N1 flu scare? Won't people be too nervous to to the cinema on opening night, out of fear and paranoia? I'm curious if that could have a harmful effect on the film.
  • c'mon broomy, think positive, babe.
  • If you don't go, then the terrorist win.

    But if you do go, good cinema loses.
  • I don't think people in the US are going to stay away from the movie theaters because of swine flu. Hell, I live in So. CA and went to the movies last night and plan to go again this weekend. Those that stay in are buying into the media panic.
  • yes and Wolverine is also appealing to straight females, too, thank you very much.
  • ifonly
    Well I won't be contributing to that ridiculous number. What a piece.Watching a final battle between Hugh and Liev prance around with CG claws. That's laughable.
  • musicsoup
    If Wolverine makes over $90mil then Star Trek is gonna make $130mil. I have a bet with a friend that Star Trek will at least do better than $90mil opening weekend. I don't know why he would bet against the film. Star Trek and Terminator are the only two surefire hits of the summer. I'm really hoping enough people can rally to not see Transformers, so that we can stop encouraging Michael Bay to exist. Speaking of Michael Bay, what time today is the official trailer to his shitstorm '09 supposed to drop?
  • I agree with 90 million opening weekend - I think it's going to be huge - first summer movie, no action movie out now. I don't think Star Trek's opening is going to be as big even though I know it's going to be a better movie. Most of the people I have talked to are waiting for word of mouth on Star Trek because they don't have much interest in the series. So I think Trek's second weekend will be very strong, where as Wolverine's second weekend will be a nose dive.
  • Cmmooonnnn
    I think its gonna do well. Stupid fun movies have been hitting big all year. People are depressed and bored and want escapist entertainment. I think 92 million is overly optimistic though, I would bet more on a 77 million opening.
  • Is anyone else really disappointed that there are two end credit scenes?

    I know I'm not going to be paying twice just to see the other scene I missed out on. I think this strategy more then anything is preventing me getting crazy excited about the film.
  • Lurker
    I agree with the post above. I have a strong feeling that the box office will be hurt this weekend by the Flu Scare. I don't see people wanting to be contained in a theater together with this flying around in the news. Don't get me wrong I can see a 50-55 million opening but really don't see it much above that.
  • I think Wolverine will do well this weekend, but I can't get behind a $92mil opening. If it makes $80mil I'll be surprised.
  • We had the premiere here in Arizona and it was one of the most amazing experiences...except for the actual movie. I love Hugh Jackman and he was amazing with the fans but...it just wasn't great. I liked it better than X3, probably because of Liev Schreiber, but I don't see it having good word of mouth past its opening weekend.

    And I really hope Trek just smashes it, and this is coming from someone who is a) a huge Hugh Jackman fan and b) someone who's never seen the original Star Trek.
blog comments powered by Disqus