jonathan nolan credited

Earlier this week, we noticed that screenwriter Jonathan Nolan was not credited on the official “Written By” credits on the Terminator Salvation website. This seemed odd considering how much director McG played up the Dark Knight screenwriter’s role in the film (even referred to Jonathan as “the lead writer of the film.”) When asked at Comic Con if Nolan would receive screenwriting credit for his work, McG responded “I don’t know how the WGA rules work but honest to goodness, we did the heaviest lifting with Jonah.” The Playlist has noticed that the official standee for the film (seen partly above) includes Nolan in the list of credits. So is he in or out?

I called the Writers Guild of America to find out, and they told me that the FINAL “Written By” credits for the film list only John Brancato and Michael Ferris, the duo that wrote Terminator 3: Rise Of The Machines and the original script for Terminator Salvation. The WGA told me that the credits are not currently in arbitration, and that Jonathan Nolan is NOT listed on the final credits.

Update: Apparently Amy from Box Office asked McG about the screenwriter credits, and the director admitted that he had “never met Michael Ferris and John D. Brancato” and credited Nolan as “the architect of the picture,” insisting that he is “certain Christian feels the same way.”

“I thought we changed the script a great deal. But Jonah did some, Shawn Ryan [The Shield] did some, Anthony Zuiker [CSI] did some and Paul Haggis [Casino Royale] did some. I guess they can only credit so many people, but it’s not like the Ferris and Brancato draft deserved that writing credit. That’s a decision of the WGA which I have no part in.”

Of course, this doesn’t mean that Nolan didn’t have a large contribution to the film. Changes in dialogue, character, mood and tone can mean the difference between a good movie and a bad movie. But WGA arbitration is a strange, often disputed and sometimes political process. It is my understanding that Nolan would have had to change 51% or more of the story to earn a credit.

  • Lpfanaddy
    All this WGA stuff sounds simply retarded.
  • Now everyone know why the writers were on strike. Because the WGA is headed by a mentally challenged person.
  • thankyoufor
    so this movie is looking more and more sketchy, McG keeps lying
  • But it still looks awesome!
  • I have a serious problem with his name. I know it is superficial but it makes me want to punch him out.

    Also the only movie of his I have watched sucked hard.
  • danceman
    yeah this is getting ridiculous I hate Hacks
    he better deliver
  • filmkid
    how is he a hack yes he direct the Charlie's Angels movie but you going to hold that against him all his life the Charlie's Angels movies meant to be campy and stuff so he delivered on that for them movies.

    also he directed a good movie called We Are Marshall but i bet you forgot that he done that movie. you should blame the WGA not McG for this situation
  • dannyboy
    dont understand why you hate his name McG its a nickname that he grow up with whats the big deal plus no point to say his lying you got to blame the whole WGA not McG
  • I don't get how McG lied. As far as we know, Jonathan Nolan rewrote a ton of the script and changed the movie drastically. Just because the stupid WGA doesn't think he did enough to warrant an official credit does not mean that McG was lying.

    Honestly, this is one of my 5 most anticipated films of the summer. Star Trek, Moon, Terminator, Transformers, and Up. Christian Bale is a very demanding star and I can honestly see that he might have demanded that Nolan come on. He worked with him on two critically acclaimed movies and the two defining movies of Bale's career. With Nolan involved in any capacity (not to mention Bale), I have no doubt that this movie will be great and will completely redeem this series after T3.
  • Aaron
    WGA rules are so backwards Nolan could have rewritten every word of the script and it still could have been credited to a different writer. The first writer often gets all the credit because they "originated the story." I wouldn't feel that bad for Nolan though, most likely he was paid handsomely for his work and insiders in the business will know how much he contributed.
  • McG didn't lie- he directs the film, but he doesn't write the credits. Blame the WGA for it.
  • Jeff L.
    Fucking Guild. If he did the work, he should get credit for it. No wonder Terry Gilliam burned his card.
  • MonkeyMafia
    Still feels like McG is trying to P.T. Barnum us into checking out this movie playing to supposed fanboy sensibilities wherever he can... "I swear it's gonna be R rated, it's got boobs, it's a lot like the Dark Knight, James Cameron wrote and directed the whole thing with Batman and Jonathan Nolan while Allan Moore gave a winking-eye thumbs up to the squid we kept in the ending"

    Major tool, no excuses.
  • brandon
    wga might be a little sketchy, but it is designed to protect the writers. In this case it is the original writers who did all the initial groundwork.
    51% is a little much though; Nolan definitely deserves credit!
  • I think the real question here is whether or not the name on the second last row of the site credits is actually Drew G. Vajina.
  • Infrafan
    It's sad that protection given by the WGA comes at this price. It's scary that to think the names of the writers of Terminator 3 are the only ones to appear.
  • JP Dyno
    They wrote T3?
    ugh... my hopes for this movie have just been flushed...
  • Seth
    Since Nolan isn't fighting the decision, you can't really blame the WGA. We don't even know what was submitted to the WGA by the producers.

    As much as is their process is bizarre, they do have a system for appealing their decisions. If Nolan doesn't care, then the WGA certainly won't.
  • That's how I'm looking at this — maybe he just doesn't want his name on it.
  • I got good money down on this being the big summer flop.
  • Final Word
    You people are idiots. This won't be a flop. It's opening Memorial Day and then has five weeks without any real compeition.

    Why are some people so fucking negative about this. This is a WGA thing. This is what they do. But then we get the same people crying about "boo hoo, the movie is going to suck, the movie is going to bomb."

    Grow up.
  • It's not financially it is going to flop. I think it is going to flop critically and ultimately amongst the populace as well.
  • Final Word
    LOL. It'll do alright chicken little. I think people will like it, except those of you who have decided that the movie sucks without ever watching.

    I think it looks good and i'm looking forward to it.
  • Bob
    HAHAHA "Drew G. Vajina"!!!

    I actually think it's Andrew G. Vajna. but Drew G. Vajina is such a better name.
  • John
    Really who gives a crap. People act surprised this happens. Shit like this happens all the time in Hollywood. Lame news
  • Why would Nolan need to prove a 51% change to the story? Isn't that kind of number usually reserved for producers trying to earn credit?
  • How the WGA sets their rules for earning credit. It has zero to do with a producer's credit or the producer's guild.
  • luke_test
    And this is what happens when you rush a film into production.

    Why didn't they let Jonah take time to write a script from scratch and then we wouldn't have these problems.
  • Nan
    EIther he did less than 51%, or, more likely, the studio simply bought him off to not stake any claim.
  • The big issue here is the matter of WGA rules... writers get paid more for residuals and all sorts of things if they have sole credit, so there's huge politics over who gets credited. This whole notion that you have to change the story by 51 percent to get credit is ridiculous. Everyone (including the credited screenwriter) acknowledges Joss Whedon rewrote basically all the dialogue for Speed, but he's not credited: and we can imagine how much of a difference that made.

    We all know a ton of writers who made huge contributions to various films, but they're not credited, yet the credits every actor who had a single line, the lead actors' assistants and stand-ins, and the assistant assistant assistant lighting tech. It's ridiculous. The WGA needs to come up with a sensible system for credit.
  • Final Word
    Thanks for making sense Rick. Unfortunately among certain Terminator "fans" making sense is not allowed because it cuts into their little whinefests.
  • BTW, with the now-confirmed PG-13 (bleah), McG's super-sketchy track record, and this BS over Jonah not being credited, my excitement over Salvation shrinks by the passing second. (In fairness, the effects in the recent commercials were quite promising. But that's not enough for me.) Now I'm not even sure it'll be any better than T3. And that's saying something.
  • terry
    are you shocked this movie was going to be PG-13 cause im not PG-13 rating does not mean the movie going to be bad plus Watchmen was sort of the cause of Terminator Salvation been a PG-13 movie. you say McG have a sketchy track record only because he did Charlie's Angels movies them movies was meant to be tongue and cheek movies if it was not McG direct them it would of been someone else you can not hold that against him all the time.
  • Skip Entro
    The contributions of Brancato and Ferris shouldn't be judged or evaluated by anyone who has not read the various script drafts side by side. McG can say that Nolan is the 'architect' all he wants -- but directors and stars don't get to decide who receives credit. They wanted to market this as "...and from the writer of The Dark Knight." Seems obvious. The credit system isn't perfect, but it protects writers from PR campaigns... exactly like what's happening here. When someone wants to put a mic in front of Brancato and Ferris and ask THEM some questions, then we might be able to get some balance.
  • Final Word
    1. It doesn't matter if Jonathon is credited or not. He did the work, it's his work. Politics is what politics is, it doesn't change what we end up seeing.

    2. T2 was practically PG-13, and save for a few F-words it probably would have been. The degrees that separate T2 and T4 will probably not be that significant. I know, I know Terminator has always been an R-rated franchise. YAWN! We've known for months that it was going to be PG-13. It's time to stop bellyaching about fucking MPAA RATINGS.

    3. Charlie's Angels succeeded in being what it was supposed to be. It's not like McG fucked the movie up. It's not like McG was given some Oscar-bait film and delivered a mess. He did his job. He made the movie as it was supposed to be.

    I really wish these fucking Terminator fans just stopped whining for ten seconds and went into the movie with an open mind. Watch it and then judge it.
  • jason B
    where is the all caps headline calling mcG a liar? there have been plenty for micheal bay, even though he specifically said he'd be misleading leading up to the film.

    gotta love objective journalism!
  • WGAmember
    Your facts are wrong about WGA arbitration. Writers only need 1/3 (33%) to get credit on a non-original script, and this was a sequel. B & F were not the first writers on the project, they received no special consideration. A panel of three objective writers read all the drafts, and unanimously agreed that no writers other than Brancato and Ferris-- not Nolan, not Haggis, not Ryan, etc.-- added more than a third of the finished script. Guild rules are not crazy-- you have to assume that B & F are the writers most responsible for the script, no matter what McG says.
  • righter
    The WGA is constantly fucking people over in arbitration. I have talked to an exec who saw it and said it was good.

    Neither of those statements mean it will be good.
  • Sounds like this is more of WGA being dicks about anything they want. Or maybe Nolan didn't do as much as McG said he did. Either way it's not like we can do anything about it now.
blog comments powered by Disqus