Movie Review: X-Men Origins: Wolverine

what_did_you_think_of_the_film

Much as I went into The Fellowship of the Ring caring more about Peter Jackson and Ian McKellen than I ever could about JRR Tolkien, my interest in X-Men Origins: Wolverine stems from the involvement of Gavin Hood and Hugh Jackman, and not from the legacy of X-Men comic books. Having said that, I rather liked Singer’s X-Men, loved X2 and probably thought more of The Last Stand than most people, so I do have a context in which I have invested in Wolverine-slash-Logan before.

Have Gavin Hood and his collaborators fashioned a film that can make me invest again, or dare I hope it, even make me invest more?

The opening scene kept me guessing as to how successful the film would ultimately be. It serves as a super-quick introduction to Logan’s rage and guilt, which are given as some kind of inner drive for him and visualised in the form of a howling motif we will see again and again. In the sequence, we see James Logan as a young child in the 19th Century, sharing a bedroom with his brother, later to become Vincent Creed and be played by Liev Schreiber (the separate surnames issue is not entirely clear, but I’m sure you will make an educated guess as to how it might be resolved). A man who appears to be their father rouses the children before another man arrives and violence erupts. The events of this brief, fairly well presented and mostly exciting sequence are designed to provide some depth and motivation to the characters, and particularly in respect of the two brothers’ relationship, but it could honestly have benefited from running longer, opening out more and allowing a more meaningful relationship to form between the children and the adults. Nonetheless, what the scene does achieve would be greatly missed had the scene been skipped.

On the subject of the cast, I think it is worth noting that Schreiber and Danny Huston offer more in terms of a general cool factor and credibility than on a scene by scene basis with their performances - the film isn’t really structured in such a way that they have to do any heavy lifting with their characters.

Subsequent to this comes another sequence that strives very sincerely to establish the complexities of the film’s central sibling rivalry. Set into the titles, and stylized to play half like a flowing motion picture, half like a set of title cards, this sequence is a montage of wars, with the chronological presentation of Logan and Creed fighting, growing, changing and interrelating through a string of historic conflicts. There is likely to be some comparison made between this sequence and the opening titles of Watchmen. Both skip through time, both provide tone, context and some establishing character information and both are pretty successful – though this is likely to receive less enduring love from fans, devoid as it is of pop music, pop iconography or popping stylization.

Indeed, by this point, the film seems to be building quickly towards and ever elaborate drama between the two brothers. It’s an arc that continues to sweep through most of the film, only occasionally getting knotted or falling off desperately. It wouldn’t be hard to have issues with how the brothers’ relationship changes through the last act – but, as you’ll see, it isn’t hard to have any number of issues with the last act in any way.

A better structure would have allowed the first half of the film to expand and become more elaborate until it took up at least 85% of the narrative. This is where the most interesting stuff lies, and the stuff that could stand to be fleshed out considerably. The further past the halfway mark we go, while there are still many things to enjoy and appreciate, the higher the stack of problems rises.

The film runs for a good time (my best guess is twenty minutes) before any material surfaces from the draft of the script I had previously read and, frankly, despised. Much of the business from that iteration to survive to the screen has been changed so much, either by context or through the tweaking of crucial details, that most of my misgivings about the screenplay no longer apply. Sadly, there is plenty of new material that has faults of its own. The easy assumption is that much of this new material needs what the old material got – a good, thoughtful rewrite or three. I’d be interested to know who contributed to the screenplay other than the credited David Benioff and Skip Woods, and quite what they brought to the pages.

There are a small handful of interesting lines of dialogue that belong in the same school as the best of X-Men or X2, expressing a political or social observation rooted in the whole mutant metaphor, or in Wolverine’s character and worldview.

Gavin Hood definitely has an eye for a cool, crisp and often geometric or symmetrical image. His collaboration with Donald McAlpine here has yielded probably the most ‘natural’ looking of all of his films, for better and for worse. Some scenes do suffer from slightly confused coverage and assembly. Some of these speed bumps in the screen geography can be accounted for by Hood’s propensity to film a fair amount of his material in compositions staged with the actors either in parallel to the screen or perpendicular to it. These right-angled shot selections are not the easiest to mesh, particularly with eye line matches. Overall, though, Hood stages a good number of scenes wonderfully and the film always recovers quite quickly from its visual missteps.

There’s a large number of compositions that present some popular and well known “claw poses”, and I dare say each of them will raise the heartbeat of fans a little. I found them fun, and was also impressed at how organically each was arrived at in the flow of the staging.

There’s a clear ambition here to make a film that has depth and subtlety, and enough moments when this comes to the screen for me to recommend the film.  It stands alongside Iron Man, at the very least, as a superhero star vehicle that digs beneath surface for as long as it can, until – in both cases, unfortunately – the tunnel pretty much collapses.

I haven’t been trawling message boards and forums for reviews of the leaked workprint, but I am surprised to have not come across one particular observation somewhere. Wolverine seems to be set up to seed the First Class film, and may even be introducing us to a number of that project’s cast. One CG-assisted cameo from a stalwart of the X-Men series is like so many of the other good things in the film: fun enough, definitely interesting, but in need of more context, more breathing space and more set-up.

With more confidence on the part of whoever was reining this film in (Tom Rothman, most would assume), Wolverine could have ranked very easily amongst the best of the comic book superhero adaptations. As it is, Jackman and Hood get to walk away with their dignity intact and no tarnishes on their reputations, but also without fully realizing the smarts-and-heart tentpole they so clearly wanted to deliver.

6.5/10

Oh, and…

…for those of you patient enough to hang about after the credits you will see a little button scene and I can confirm, yes, indeed, the one I saw wasn’t the one I’d read about elsewhere so there does seem to be more than one in circulation.

[Editor's Note: Don't read if you don't want to know what happens]

In mine, Logan was sitting in a bar in Japan – yep, go crazy!! now – and speaking to the barmaid, in subtitled Japanese. She asks if he is drinking to forget, he tells her that he’s drinking to remember. If the rumors are right and this scene was indeed filmed just last week, it certainly didn’t seem rushed and was nicely set dressed, lit and (as far as one can tell from a couple of cuts) edited.

About the Author

  • vva
    Nice review.

    Did Stan Lee end up making a cameo? I remember Hugh Jackman mentioning last year he was going to try to fit him in.
  • [A]
    Why would Stan Lee make a cameo? He didn't creat Wolverine.
  • justin
    stan lee only appears in comic movies of characters he created. He didn't create Wolverine
  • No, the Japanese bar scene was in the version of the bootleg/leak I viewed over two weeks ago.
  • thats what i thought
  • [A]
    yes, you're right--I think we're supposed to buy that the guys here at /film HAVEN'T seen the leak. yeah, right
  • I haven't.
  • same here
  • That review seems about right! I found the movie alright but nothing spectacular. I don't think I have to tell you that it was 10 times better than X3 though!
  • LOL X3 is such a low bar that anything would be better than it
    so... 10 times 0 is still 0
  • LOL X3 is such a low bar that anything would be better than it
    so... 10 * 0 is still 0
  • cyclops
    hey i don think so.. X3 is by far the best production ever.
  • bobdisgea
    that scene after the credits was in the workprint. so yeah thats old
  • bkey
    Good review. I can assure you that the scene in Japan wasn't just filmed last week, as I saw it several weeks ago.
  • Interesting. Thanks for filling me in - and the rest of you who mentioned it too.
  • Brendon, were there any scenes during the credits?
  • Just one with Stryker but it was of almost no consequence.
  • Cross the Streams
    This was a forkin' review?

    Mr. Connelly, please, not all of us worked in production.

    Write like you're interested! Write less on the inside.
  • dindin
    good point - it was a good "technical" review but was devoid of "life" and "heart" (for want of better words)
  • If Stan Lee IS in there, I didn't see him. I'm 99% sure that he isn't.
  • I am interested!
  • nelson
    wasn't much of a review talks about the director a bit too much LOL
  • Brad
    BC, I greatly appreciate a literate film review, but you write like you are trying to show off how much you know about making movies. It comes off a little bit douche-y.
  • You should sound informed and smart when you review a film, and not like some average yahoo who knows shit about films. BC's reviews are always professional and it comes off like he knows films, which is how a review should be. So your complaints of his reviews are actually his strong points.
  • CONNELLY_FAN
    I'm kind of with Brad on this one.
  • nelson
    the new deadpool ending wasn't even filmed last week if last week means January LOL
  • lol
    6.5/10

    is this a joke?
  • [A]
    more like a solid 5 : P
  • Bupkis
    Meaning it should be higher or lower?

    That is probably the highest I would ever give a Wolverine movie as long as Wolverine is played by a 6'2" fairy.
  • I read all of the review, and while good, I still don't completely understand if you liked it or not for what it was. Sure, I might appreciate the technical aspects of the film, but was it a good movie for being a Wolverine film? I'm not trying to take anything away from the review, but just saying it doesn't seem like it would help people make up their minds if they should see it in the theaters or not.

    I, too, saw the movie. I thought it was horribly weak, so much so that it reminded me of "Elektra." And that movie sucked. Even though I'm a fan of comic book movies, I cannot recommend this to anyone. Some effects were sloppy, acting was sloppy and the story wasn't cohesive; it kind of all fell apart on itself. And such a shame, too, since Wolverine is Marvel's most recognized and popular character behind Spider-Man.
  • That ending scene was attached to the workprint version I saw which has been about a month ago.
  • I disagree about the movie digging beneath the surface. I don't think it did that at all. All of the relationships seemed so rushed and had no depth to them. While Schrieber was good by himself I didn't feel any chemistry between him and Jackman. Also the supporting characters are pretty much useless as well as a botched up Deadpool just didn't do it for me. 5/10
  • Geist
    It doesn't seem like you actually paid attention to the film much. I mean the intro scene obviously shows Logan's dad saying VICTOR'S (not Vincent) dad has been drinking again when he comes rapping at the door in the middle of the night.
  • Huh? That wouldn't change a thing.
  • Geist
    I agree, but how can I even continue to read a review where you couldn't even grasp that concept or name in the first 10 mins of the film, I guess I'm trying to say?
  • Dave Chen uses this movie as a masturbatory aid.
  • edccantbebothered
    no, he uses yo mama as a masturbatory aid!
  • ----
    This movie was awful.
  • Woo, you put a */10! Thanks Brendon!
  • Glad to hear this film sounds decent. Can't wait to check it out.
  • Considering what people have been saying in the Slashfilm comments, I was really surprised to see the first 5 reviewers on Rotten Tomatoes give it a perfect 100%, when I thought it would be a lot more mixed starting out.
  • I think this movie might make money because it is a summer blockbuster type of movie to go and watch and enjoy. Most of the comments you read are most likely fans of the comics or character and realize this movie makes a mockery of the source material. The movie really isn't that bad but it does have it's downers. To me personally, it's a coin flip between this and X3 to see which is better. I'm thinking if you cared at all for X3, you might like this one.
  • Jeff W.
    Nice review but the reality is that most of us watched this film 3 weeks ago and it's kind of old news at this point.
  • gah
    6.5? Really? wow, dude did we watch the same movie?
  • I don't think Brendon watched the work print.
  • No I did not.
  • 6.5 is about right. it had it's good and bad moments.
  • Yup...6.5 is pretty much right on I'd say.
  • Shwa
    In terms of the start of the film with James and Vincent being brothers. The idea is that they didn't know they were brothers. Vincent was thought to be the son of the caretaker and James the son of the Howletts...Thats what I thought anyways...And that is kind of how it was in the comics (although it is never really confirmed that his "brother" called Dog in the comics was sabertooth...they just really looked alike.)
  • dissapointed/fan
    While the review of the technical aspects of this film are pretty accurate, it's terribly sad and a little frustrating to have someone who clearly has little to no familiarity with these characters to begin with doing a review on this film. Story and respect for the source material are just as important to a film as how symmetrical or asymmetrical a director is in his shot selection. B.C. has seemed to have forgotten this fact or perhaps has such little respect for what is one of Marvel Comic's most famous characters that he simply doesn't care. Schreiber's character is Victor Creed, not Vincent. Also nowhere does it say that Wolverine's last name is Logan. His name is James Howlett, and his choice to start using the name Logan is one that is completely missed in this film. This film bastardizes so many of the details of Wolverine's history that it's tragic that many unfamiliar movie-goers will actually assume that this abortion of a story is actually Wolverine's origin. I mean, what possible reasoning or gain could there have been for setting the Weapon X project in America as opposed to Canada? That may seem trivial but had Peter Jackson decided to set LOTR in any place other than Middle Earth, I feel your review of that film wouldn't be so lenient. I love reading /film and you guys usually do a great job. Maybe one of you will have read a comic or two in time to review the Avengers movie in 2011.
blog comments powered by Disqus