bridge_in_300_years_time

Fox have option the non-fiction book The World Without Us, with the view that it will become a fictionalised, sci-fi tentpole movie. According to The Hollywood Reporter they have Mark Protosevich attached to write, and Francis Lawrence to eventually direct the film.

Alan Weisman’s original book was Time Magazine’s number-one non fiction pick for 2007, and we all know what perfect taste they have in making such lists. It deals with a simple but profound feat of imagination, exploring how Earth would “respond without the relentless pressure of human presence”. Weisman even went so far as to label Chapter 9, Polymers Are Forever, with a Read this Chapter! tag, so important are its lessons.

So… how would Protosevich and Lawrence go about churning hundreds of millions of dollars of popcorn  out of an ecological hypothesis?

From what I read in The Hollywood Reporter, they dont’t really intend to. Well, not quite.

…a fictional feature buttressed by the book’s science. It would, for example, show an event that would lead to man’s disappearance.

So, the book would form some kind of de facto sequel to another end of the world misadventure? Seems like a little bit of a lost opportunity, I’m afraid.

I know that a film without any human(oid) characters, and therefore very little perceivable narrative, would be a truly hard sell - not to mention a nightmare to conceive and execute - but I would hope some element of the book is left intact. If all we get is cross-cutting between a human less world, like some kind of bot-less Wall-E, and the all-too human idiocy that brought it about, then that’s definitely better than just two hours of the human idiocy. The opening section of Twelve Monkeys also offers hints of how this might go, but I don’t think we really want Lawrence attempting another last-man scenario.

This sounds like a genuine storytelling challenge that, providing Protosevich actually tries to take it on head first, could turn out to be a film to get excited about.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

  • They've already done a really cool and interesting BBC doc, based on this book, and it was great.

    Yeah, Goro, you got it.

    It's called "The World Without Us". Not "The World Without Everyone, Except Will Smith, Christian Bale and Megan Fox."
  • Goro
    a movie WORLD WITHOUT US that actually has US in it is just. a bad idea.
  • Michael
    this movie basically just sounds like it'll be the day after tomorrow but everyone dies and then nature takes over
  • I'm sorry but as much as I enjoyed the book (check it out whenever you get the chance) this movie has already strayed to far off by creating a "prequel" of sorts with human characters as they face impending extinction (yawn).

    Fox being behind this drops my excitement tenfold seeing as they will probably just turn it into a 90 minute movie with little to no plot development.

    There's a reason the book is called "The World Without Us" adding human characters pre-extinction throws everything the book explores out the window.
  • if Wall-E worked and was a huge hit, then I don't see why this movie won't be a hit, too. I wonder if there's a hidden message about global warming (or climatic change as others prefer to call it) for this movie.
  • Well for one, Fox would be producing and we all know how Fox loves to ruin anything they touch.
  • After reading the 2nd half of the article, I am less pumped to see this happen. I watched that show on National Geographic a few months ago about this and it was pretty awesome. But now that I think about it, it wouldn't have any characters in it other than animals scurrying away from whatever would go wrong in the absence of humans. If they went that route, they should at least get Morgan Freeman to narrate the film to make it seem more serious.

    Oh yeah, it seems that with a little brain storming, this project will probably turn into some kind of Armageddon event happening where maybe a few humans are left, maybe something like the rapture. I guess we could say that we've already seen that movie in I am Legend but oh well, who knows what will really happen.
  • After reading the 2nd half of the article, I am less pumped to see this happen. I watched that show on National Geographic a few months ago about this and it was pretty awesome. But now that I think about it, it wouldn't have any characters in it other than animals scurrying away from whatever would go wrong in the absence of humans. If they went that route, they should at least get Morgan Freeman to narrate the film to make it seem more serious.
  • Seems like it would make for a better read than a movie. How many times can we see promotional images/posters of world monuments looking decayed and/or ruined before the 'ooohhhh' effect wears thin??
  • This reminds me of a documentary I heard about on Discovery or Nat Geo called "Life after People". Now It goes to the top of my queue!
  • Hopefully this movie wont be bogged down by bad cgi. The first act of I Am Legend was great.
  • Hopefully this movie wont be bogged down by bad cgi. The first act of I Am Legen was great.
  • How can anything based on supposition of possible future events be "non-fiction?"
  • freemachine
    Some people have suggested that it be considered "speculative fiction", and I agree.
  • marz
    anybody remember that movie 'the bear' that basicaly shows the life of a little cub? that movie had almost no human dialogue...especialy at the beginning and..if i remember was an o.k. movie so..hey it might work.who woulda thought you could make a movie about someone in a phone booth the whole movie.this is hollywood...where anythings possible.
  • bobby s
    i am also reminded by a world after people, which was pretty entertaining
  • person
    they kinda already did this with I am Legend too. I'm assuming there will be no CG vampire/zombies in this one tho.
  • Joshua
    Wasn't this concept just done in 2008 with History Channel's Life After People?
  • Yeah if this movie gets made, it's just going to be a bigger budget film of what you're talking about. I guess they could market it as that and show it in 3D Imax with all those other shows about the sea and space.
  • Square
    That's what I was gonna say. I thought it was fascinating, but I wouldn't pay 9 bucks to see it in a movie theater.
  • Goobity
    Pretty much. It should have been called "Who the Hell Cares?"

    If a tree falls in the forrest...
  • looks like a nice idea!
  • I haven't read this book so I may be wrong but I don't see this working. Would it be a hypothetical documentary. Something more akin to Baraka perhaps (though a full CGI Baraka would suck sooooo bad).
blog comments powered by Disqus