schwartz

OC, Chuck and Gossip Girl creator Josh Schwartz has spoken to Variety about his plans for a new film adaptation of Jay McInerney’s novel Bright Lights, Big City. The novel is a hip, wry and moral tale of night-life excess, featuring a 24-year old fact checker with literary ambitions and a taste for nose candy. The 1988 film version was scripted by McInerney himself and was the last film directed by James Bridges. That pretty good pedigree did lead to a pretty good film. Can the not-so-exciting Schwartz beat the odds and deliver a better picture? Here’s hoping.

One of Schwartz’ big decisions will be to either leave the film set in the 80s or drag it up to date (or, I dunno, he might decide to set it in the 70s or 90s or 1740s, but I don’t think any such thing is likely, interesting as it might be). So far, he says, he’s undecided.

Last year, Schwartz and McInerney were jurors on the panel of the Tribeca Film Festival. This lead to an appearance by McInerney in Gossip Girl and ultimately, after the suggestion of MGM’s Mary Parent, the inception of this film project. At least we know the original creator and studio head are fully on side. Indeed, when McInerney spoke to The Telegraph earlier this year he revealed that a new film was in the works and added “thank God because the original film was terrible”.

Schwartz will apparently get to writing the screenplay when he’s done writing X-Men: First Class, losely adapted from the 2006 comic. We first heard of that teen superhero project last spring, and then in November, Peter reported on Schwartz declining the directors’ seat. This was very possibly so he could commit to Bright Lights, and I’d fully respect that - skipping on a pay day to pursue a project of passion.

The cast of the ‘88 picture included Michael J. Fox, Phoebe Cates and Kiefer Sutherland. If they have contemporary equivalents, I’m not too sure on who they might be. Perhaps the OC viewers out there will be able to fill me in via the comments section.

  • Hank
    Okay, this was not a pretty good movie. It was wretched. And the book is incredible, so I really hope this adaptation can do it justice. But why on earth would they set it out of the 80s?
  • authentic.imitation
    god, the 80s film adaptation is atrocious--and i don't mean an atrocious adaptation, it was just a shitty movie all around. i fully support the move to adapt McInerney's great novel once again. there's no way it will be worse than the mjfox version.
  • yet another remake... can't he even come up with his own damned ideas?
  • authentic.imitation
    there's nothing wrong with a remake when it has the potential to significantly improve upon the original. BLBC = case in point. but this is not the case with, say, The Taking of Pelham 123 (side note: Tony Scott is worthless)
  • what do you expect? Gossip Girl...? Chuck...? That's a poor track record if I've ever seen one.
  • lol fair enough.
  • brad
    Chuck is awesome. Fark off.
  • Mag
    he peeked with The o.c season 1
  • freemachine
    To set it in any other decade than the 80s, where cocaine use skyrocketed in the US, would make it impossible to understand the hedonistic attitude that existed at the time. People snorted lines in the executive washrooms while working their way up the corporate ladder. When was the last time you did blow with your college educated co-workers while trying to advance at a job you've dreamed about all your life?
  • The 1988 movie was on cable last night and it was terrible! Nothing wrong with the performances, but why are we supposed to care about a cokehead yuppie whining throughout the entire movie that he's bored with his yuppie job and that his supermodel wife left him spliced together with flashbacks of him living the yuppie dream of excess and self-entitlement. Booooo! lol What a great idea for a remake and to come out during this global economic recession! lol
  • Pie
    The exact same reasons I didn't like the book, or American Psycho.
  • Blasphemy. Phoebe Cates never made a bad movie.
  • The Whale
    That's pretty funny - you're right, this is an apalling time to try and markey this story.
  • freemachine
    To set it in any other decade than the 80s, where cocaine use skyrocketed in the US, would make it impossible to understand the hedonistic attitude that existed at the time. People snorted lines in the executive washrooms while working their way up the corporate ladder. When was the last time you did blow with your college educated co-workers while trying to advance at a job you've dreamed about all your life? Probably never. I just wouldn't make sense setting this during the present day.
  • Schwartz probably shold make the move to the big screen. He can't seem to avoid jumping the shark midway through season 1 of his shows so maybe he'll be better off when he only has to deliver a good 2 hours on entertainment.
  • she was the only good thing about the movie! i love her! even with her 80s short hair.
blog comments powered by Disqus