garlund hathaway

The Weinstein Co has announced that Anne Hathaway will star as Judy Garland in the company’s stage and film adaptations of Gerald Clarke’s biography Get Happy: The Life of Judy Garland. The book charts Garland’s rise to fame and her struggle with alcohol and drugs. The story was first leaked in the Cleveland Leader, where sources claimed that, “Anne dearly wants to do a musical and this could be her chance. The big attraction is that it really will be her singing, not recordings of Judy. She is determined to do it justice.” No writer or director have been announced.

The book, which was published in 2001, features the following description:

Judy Garland. The girl with the pigtails, the symbol of innocence in The Wizard of Oz. Judy Garland. The brightest star of the Hollywood musical and an entertainer of almost magical power. Judy Garland. The woman of a half-dozen comebacks, a hundred heartbreaks, and countless thousands of headlines. Yet much of what has previously been written about her is either false or incomplete, and the Garland the world thought it knew was merely a sketch for the astonishing woman Gerald Clarke portrays in Get Happy. Here, more than thirty years after her death, is the real Judy.

To tell her story, Clarke took ten years, traveled thousands of miles across two continents, conducted hundreds of interviews, and dug through mountains of documents, many of which were unavailable to other biographers. In a Tennessee courthouse, he came across a thick packet of papers, unopened for ninety years, that laid out the previously hidden background of Judy’s beloved father, Frank Gumm. In California, he found the unpublished memoir of Dorothy Ponedel, Judy’s makeup woman and closest confidante, a memoir centered almost entirely on Judy herself. Get Happy is, however, more than the story of one woman, remarkable as she was. It is a saga of a time and a place that now seem as far away, and as clouded in myth and mystery, as Camelot-the golden age of Hollywood. Combining a novelist’s skill and a movie director’s eye, Clarke re-creates that era with cinematic urgency, bringing to vivid life the unforgettable characters who played leading roles in the unending drama of Judy Garland: Louis B. Mayer, the patriarch of the world’s greatest fantasy factory, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. Arthur Freed, the slovenly producer who revolutionized the movie musical and gave Judy her best and most enduring parts. Sexy Lana Turner, Judy’s friend and idol, who had a habit of trying to snatch away any man Judy expressed interest in.

And what men they were! Oscar Levant, the wit’s wit, whose one-liners could all but kill. Artie Shaw, whose sweet and satiny clarinet had a whole nation dancing. Handsome Tyrone Power, who caused millions of hearts to pound every time he looked out from the screen with his understanding eyes. Orson Welles, Hollywood’s boy genius and the husband of a movie goddess, Rita Hayworth. Brainy Joe Mankiewicz, who knew everything there was to know about women, but who confessed that he was baffled by Judy. Vincente Minnelli, who showed what wonders Judy could perform in front of a camera and who fathered her first child, Liza-but who also, with an act of shocking betrayal, caused her first suicide attempt. Charming, brawling Sid Luft, who gave her confidence, then took it away. And the smooth and seductive David Begelman, who stole her heart so he could steal her money.

Toward the end of her life, Garland tried to tell her own story, talking into a tape recorder for hours at a time. With access to those recordings-and to her unfinished manuscript, which offers a revelation on almost every page-Clarke is able to tell Judy’s story as she herself might have told it. “It’s going to be one hell of a great, everlastingly great book, with humor, tears, fun, emotion and love,” Judy promised of the autobiography she did not live to complete. But she might just as well have been describing Get Happy. For here at last-told with humor, tears, fun, emotion and love-is the true, unforgettable story of Judy Garland.

Read the full press release below:

ANNE HATHAWAY TO STAR AS JUDY GARLAND IN THE WEINSTEIN COMPANY‘S FILM AND STAGE ADAPTATIONS OF “GET HAPPY: THE LIFE OF JUDY GARLAND”

NEW YORK, NY (March 23, 2009) – Academy Award® nominee Anne Hathaway is attached to star as iconic performer Judy Garland in the film and stage adaptations of Gerald Clarke’s biography “GET HAPPY: THE LIFE OF JUDY GARLAND,” for which The Weinstein Company (TWC) has optioned the film and stage rights. The announcement was made today by Harvey Weinstein, co-chairman of TWC.

“GET HAPPY,” based on hundreds of interviews plus Garland’s own unfinished and unpublished autobiography, portrays the dramatic highs and lows of the cultural icon’s life– from her tumultuous early years as a child performer to her tragic last days.

“We are thrilled to have the brilliantly talented Anne Hathaway portray stage and screen legend Judy Garland. I have worked with Anne on projects in the past and have known her for many years. She will be a true class act in this challenging role,” said Harvey Weinstein. “Gerald Clarke’s biography is a fascinating and comprehensive look at Garland’s life and is particularly outstanding because of its exclusive details from her own writings. Her story is incredible subject matter for both theatre and film and we look forward to bringing it to audiences.”

“GET HAPPY: THE LIFE OF JUDY GARLAND” was first published by Delta in March 2001.

Renee Witt brought the project to TWC. Kelly Carmichael, and Ben Famiglietti will be overseeing the project on behalf of TWC. Jeff Daitch negotiated the deal on behalf of TWC. TWC optioned the rights to “GET HAPPY” from Anna Cottle and Mary Alice Kier at Cine/Lit Representation. Cottle and Kier represented Clarke in negotiations on behalf of the Helen Brann Agency.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

  • I don't think Liza will be involved. This book is really horrible and based on national enquirer type interviews. I am ok with a really good Judy movie (Little Voice) comes to mind. I just picked up the book and it really is filled with mistakes and rehash of the same old stories on MGM over and over again. I really like Anne and wish she would not do this film. Just another exploitation of Judy and none of her kids will get the $$$$ from it.
  • anonymous
    too tall maybe she pull off the acting
    Hathaway probably won't sing much Judy Garland which just have Hathaway lip-sync.
  • freemachine
    Anne looks nothing like Judy Garland. Plus, who cares about Garland except for drag queens?
  • heyred
    I felt bad for Judy Garland. As a child, making the "Wizard of Ozz", when she was tired and wanted to rest, her mother, and her agent would give her uppers to keep her going, then give her downers to get her to sleep. It is very hard to give something like that when you have been taught from childhood, this is what you do. Yeah, yeah, I know we are accountable for what we do, but only those who have kicked one thing or another can understand. Yeah, I know I am a bleeding heart, but at least I HAVE a heart. This is a child we are talking about, befor there were any child labor laws. Try to not be judgmental.
  • I just feel bad that you can't enjoy the lives of those types of people. But hey, we all have our different preferences.
  • gah
    her daughter Liza Minelli will be played by Zack Efron.
  • jude
    I don't think Liza will be involved. This book is really horrible and based on national enquirer type interviews. I am ok with a really good Judy movie (Little Voice) comes to mind. I just picked up the book and it really is filled with mistakes and rehash of the same old stories on MGM over and over again. I really like Anne and wish she would not do this film. Just another exploitation of Judy and none of her kids will get the $$$$ from it.
  • very beatutful
  • That's not what Rob is saying. Those people he mentioned did so much more in their careers and outside of them than "just" drugs. And I agree, it's why I hated the Cash movie. They didn't even include the work he did with the Native Americans. It was nothing but a cash-grab after "Ray" was so big in the box office. Hell, it was broken down the same way Ray was.

    What you're talking about is cutting off tons of biopics on tons of people who have made huge impacts even with their bouts with drugs. Their use has nothing to do with what they did contribute to society in some form.

    Che? His over 4 hour film is coming soon. Ghandi? Had a biopic in 1982 staring Ben Kingsley.
  • already saw Che, it already came out. Gandhi was good, yes. Mandela is another new film coming out this year.
  • i'll see anything with Anne Hathaway. in my opinion, she's one of the best young actresses working today.
  • I'm glad she's doing it. After her performance at the Oscars I wanted to see her do a musical. Ideally, I'd want Hugh Jackman to costar... But whatever.
  • I usually don't like Anne Hathaway but I think she did great in Rachel Getting Married and I do agree she has a very classic look that would be very appropriate for this type of movie.
    I'd give it a chance. I wonder how much baby Liza will be in it.
  • So I guess actresses aren't real people then?
    Yes, I agree that there are a SIGNIFICANT amount of people who are more important than actors and actresses, but that doesn't mean that their stories aren't worth telling. Especially when the whole world has a completely different idea of what the person's life is really like.
    And La Vie En Rose was an amazing movie, and just because the stories are sort of similar doesn't mean that Garland's isn't worth telling. You act like this is just a rip of movie and not actually SOMEONE'S LIFE.
  • and yep, La Vie En rose was good, but utterly predictable and boring. It's just another movie about another famous woman who depended on alcohol and drugs. Is there anything unique? Hardly. It's going to be same with Judy Garland... *yawn*

    NEXT!
  • actresses aren't as interesting for me, sorry, buddy. I have absolutely NO interest in people who didn't make a political or social impact on my life. I'm much more interested in historical, social/political figures. So sue my brown ass. LMAO
  • kjdfhdfijhlj
    ASSHOLE
  • She sang OK at the Oscars, no?
  • Wow, this has to be a tough gig for Anne. Wonderful coup to get the role, but mess this one up and it has the potential to break a career, no matter how hot she is right now. No doubting she has talent, but I have my doubts about her being able to pull this off. Still, I hope she does. Would be wonderful if this film was a success.
  • edog
    Anne Hathaway To Make Obvious Oscar Ploy, Movie
  • gah
    Films demographic: middle aged fat women. Trust me they'll show up in droves for this. also, this reeks of Oscar bait.
  • lol. I remember being at Caesar's Palace, and the Donnie & Marie show had just ended...and 100s of middle aged fat women just poured out haha.

    I'm sure it'll be a double take for me when I'm walking out of a movie at the same time a Garland biopic showing gets out.
  • Rena
    Hey hey Judy Garland is a talent!
  • Palmer
    Those lips...are very red.
  • Rena
    She didnt impress me as Jane Austen, and she probably wont impress with Judy Garland...I think theres a better person for Judy Garland out there somewhere.
    Does Anne Hathaway sing too?
  • I think Anne looks alot like Judy, especially in the side by side image up top.
  • Mike
    Harvey Weinstein? A pretty Young Actress? A Bio Pic about an American Film Icon?

    This has Oscar written all over it...
  • That Anne Hathaway is so hot right now.
  • oh great, not another biopic about a self destructive druggie and movie actress. how boring. News flash: we already had that, it was called LA VIE EN ROSE, about Edith Piaf.
  • Rob Frenay
    Wow, these biopics are really starting to become hilariously predictable.

    Let's have some fun by mixing these words around:

    " The book charts Garland’s rise to fame and her struggle with alcohol and drugs."

    The movie charts Ray Charles' rise to fame and his struggle with alcohol and drugs: "Ray."

    The movie charts Johnny Cash's rise to fame and his struggle with alcohol and drugs: "Walk the Line."

    The movie charts Charlie Parker's rise to fame and his struggle with alcohol and drugs: "Bird."

    It's kind of astounding how these filmmakers manage to water down these people's entire lives into a few conventional, by-the-numbers moments that make them almost indistinguishable from one another. The fact that they keep getting praised too is beyond me.
  • John
    dont forget about Dewey Cox !!!!!!!!!!!

    "The movie charts Dewey Cox'sash's rise to fame and his struggle with alcohol and drugs: " Walk Hard."
  • hahahha. that was such a great 'biopic'. that song was stuck in my head for a month.
  • exactly. I am so bloody sick of those movies about self destructive celebrities. i don't give a shit about druggies (and got no sympathy for them, either). I'm more interested in biopics about intelligent, socially or politically active figures like Harvey Milk, Che, Mandela, Gandhi, etc.
blog comments powered by Disqus