Warner Bros Remaking Stephen King’s It

it

When I was younger, I read a lot of Stephen King books. Over the years, Hollywood has turned a lot of King’s library of work into crappy horror adaptations — The Shining and Carrie might be the two exceptions. For a writer known primarily as a horror novelist, it’s surprising that the movie adaptations of his non-horror stories, like Green Mile, Stand By Me and The Shawshank Redemption, are probably better known, and definitely more revered.

But if you asked me when I was 11-years old, what my favorite Stephen King movie was, I would quickly tell you — the 1990 television miniseries adaptation of It. It scared me, kept me up, and I loved it. I remember rewatching the VHS copy that I had recorded off of cable, over and over again. Well, guess what? Warner Bros is remaking the novel for the big screen.

They’ve hired Dave Kajganich to pen the screenplay adaptation. I’m not sure that the property could be cut down to fit into the standard 90 or 100-minute movie. The paperback is 1,104 pages, and the miniseries clocked in at 192 minutes (over 3 hours). And if the idea of a 100 minute movie doesn’t worry you, how about the fact that Kajganich’s biggest credit was the disaster that was the 2007 Invasion of the Bodysnatchers remake — The Invasion. I haven’t seen It in years, and I’m sure its one of those films that doesn’t live up to my childhood memories. Could It benefit from a redo? Probably. But as a 100-minute feature film?

The official book description follows: “They were just kids when they stumbled upon the hidden horror of their hometown. Now, as adults, none of them can withstand the force that has drawn them all back to Derry, Maine, to face the nightmare without end, and the evil without a name.” The book is availabe for around $9 on Amazon.

source: Variety

  • Slasherblue
    hey guys...i just finsihed reading IT....and i was wondering if u guys think i should hire out the 1990 film version, or was it a mini series? anyway i've heard many different oppions of good and bad so yea...because i dont really wont the film to ruin the actually story for me if it is poorly made.

    Oh and is this new remake of the movie (featured above) as certainy? if so when is the approx realese date??

    Thanks guys.
  • rapistwerewolves
    it was shown over two nights on TV...the first part of the movie with the younger kids isn't too bad, but the second half with the adults is pretty bad IMO .
  • jigsawofsoul
    Well I would think that they would make the movie at least 3 hours long to get the storyline. It would be a disaster if they cut the movie short because every detail is important and if they leave out a lot of it the movie may not make sense at all.
  • PHIL
    STOP MAKING REMAKES THE ORIGINALS ARE BETTER THEN THE REMAKES
    THEY ARE GOING TO SCREW IT UP. NO ONE CAN DO A BETTER PENNYWISE THEN TIM CURRY..

    Think of something new. i hate hollywood they have no ideas. I know bring back the orginial ones back at the movie theathers,


    your making me sick

    thanks enjoy your day
  • PHIL
    and yes It scared the shit out of me when i was a kid
  • jtb
    remake ONLY if Tim Curry is once again cast as Pennwise - no one and i repeat no one can play it any better then Tim...............
  • Bobby
    The 1st movie wasn't long enough, 2hrs or less sure as h*ll aint gonna be either. I say use Jim Carey or someone of that nature, he's very funny and has been getting a lot of practice with horror acting. I think he'd be a great pennywise.
blog comments powered by Disqus