This Week in DVD is a column that compiles all the latest info regarding new DVD releases, sales, and exclusive deals from stores including Target, Best Buy and Fry’s.

Please don’t take the commentary on the movies and TV shows too seriously, as they’re meant not to be reviews but rather previews that include the general thoughts and ramblings of a twice-committed DVD addict. The categories represent solely the author’s intentions towards the DVDs at hand, and are in no way meant to be a reflection on what he thinks other people should rent or buy. So if he ends up putting a movie you like in the “Skip it” section without having seen it, please keep in mind that the time you could spend leaving a spiteful but ultimately futile comment could instead be used for more pleasant things in life. Like buying DVDs.

Buy It

LET THE RIGHT ONE IN
If you’re looking for a vampire movie to help wipe away the embarrassing display of inanity that came with last year’s Twilight, look no further. This bizarre Swedish horror tale of love and revenge ranked #6 on my top ten favorite films of 2008, and I’m clearly not the only one who believes it’s deserving of such praise. It may not be the first film to offer its own unique twist on the vampire genre, but it’s easily one of the best, providing an intimate and compelling study of its two young characters while always making sure the heart-stopping moments are never too far away. Rest assured, there are scenes in this movie that will stick with you for weeks to come.
Blu-ray? Yes.
Notable Extras: Deleted scenes, a behind the scenes featurette, and a poster gallery.

BEST PRICE
Target Best Buy Fry’s
$18.99 $19.99
Amazon – $18.99

SOUTH PARK (SEASON 12)
I own every season of South Park currently available on DVD, and I don’t plan on stopping now. Even in its weaker seasons, the show remains consistently funny enough to warrant repeat viewings of just about all its episodes, and there’s almost always one or two standout episodes to help remind us how hilariously brilliant Trey Parker and Matt Stone can sometimes be. Season 12 is no different. That said, Season 12 is also by far the show’s worst season to date. Unlike past seasons, none of the episodes here are necessarily awful (such as with A Million Little Fibers in Season 10, or D-Yikes! in Season 11), but at the same time, they’re not nearly as memorable either. For me, this season’s standouts were Major Boobage, Breast Cancer Show Ever and Elementary School Musical. The rest of the batch features some truly great individual scenes (Randy’s “computer time” in Over Logging) and running gags (Indiana Jones being raped in The China Probrem), but sadly, these moments are buried within an otherwise forgettable (and oftentimes repetitive) collection of episodes. Here’s hoping Season 13 returns to the highs of previous seasons.
Blu-ray? Yes.
Notable Extras: Well, this is new! In addition to the mini commentaries from creators/writers Trey Parker and Matt Stone (which have usually been the only special feature to be offered on past seasons), Season 12 also includes uncensored episodes and 3 featurettes (Six Days to South Park – A Day-by-Day Making of South Park, Six Days to South Park – The Sixth Day (About Last Night), The Making of “Major Boobage”). I assume this is due entirely to the set also being released on Blu-ray.

BEST PRICE
Target Best Buy Fry’s
$32.99 $30.99 $29.99
Amazon – $30.99

EXCLUSIVE DEAL:
What? Free $5 Target GiftCard with either DVD or Blu-ray.
Where? Target.

EXCLUSIVE DEAL:
What? “Guide to Life” Quote Book.
Where? Best Buy.

Rent It

ROLE MODELS
I find it amusing that (due possibly to my man-crush on Paul Rudd) I seemed to be the only one defending this movie prior to its release, and now that it’s come out and just about everyone has been showering it with praise, I can’t help but feel maybe people are being a little too gracious. Don’t get me wrong, I definitely think Role Models is a solid comedy. It’s got plenty of laughs and is entertaining all the way through; but that’s all. The script replies much more on curse words and one-liners than genuine wit, and the story follows the same layout as a dozen comedies before it. The movie takes zero chances, and is wholly predictable. Basically, it’s as standard as you can possibly get without having a PG-13 rating. I’m not saying any of this is necessarily a bad thing, since, as I already stated, it’s funny, and that’s really the most important thing you can ask for in a comedy. Even so, I can’t really see myself feeling the need to add the film to my collection any time soon. Rent it, enjoy it, forget it.
Blu-ray? Yes.
Notable Extras: Both theatrical and unrated cuts are included, as well as commentary with director/co-writer David Wain, featurettes (On the Set of Role Models, Game On: Creating a Role Playing World, In-Character & Off Script), deleted scenes and alternate takes, and bloopers.

BEST PRICE
Target Best Buy Fry’s
$16.99
Amazon – $16.99

EXCLUSIVE DEAL:
What? Free $5 Best Buy Gift Card when you buy any version of Role Models with either Forgetting Sarah Marshall ($14.99) or In Bruges ($14.99).
Where? Best Buy.

MILK
While I do support their ability to draw attention to people and issues that audiences might’ve previously been unfamiliar with, I’m of the opinion that most biopics are rather unnecessary. My rule of thumb is, if the biopic wouldn’t still be interesting were it not based on a true story, then the topic is probably better suited for a documentary than a movie. I go to movies because I want to see engaging stories told in an interesting way, not to see a straightforward account of a person’s life. And while I do think Milk is an admirable and well-made effort (aided largely by Sean Penn’s excellent performance), I couldn’t help but be underwhelmed at how utterly conventional it is. On top of that, I felt that much of the supporting cast was underutilized and their characters poorly developed, leaving it solely to Penn to carry the film. Of course, I’m clearly in the minority who felt this way, so please don’t take my word for it. I will say though, even the critics would probably agree with me that there’s a better alternative.
Blu-ray? Yes.
Notable Extras: Deleted scenes and 3 featurettes (Remembering Harvey, Hollywood Comes to San Francisco, Marching for Equality).

BEST PRICE
Target Best Buy Fry’s
$16.99 $19.99
Amazon – $17.99

TRANSPORTER 3
(Available as single-disc and 2-Disc Fully Loaded Edition)
I have a soft spot for the Transporter series. What they may lack in story, intelligence, and anything resembling logic, they more than make up for in Jason Statham beating the hell out of people in a variety of outrageous and creative ways. If that’s not enough to sell you, then these aren’t the movies for you. Admittedly, I never got around to seeing Transporter 3 in theaters (the trailers didn’t look all that great, and the reviews pretty much confirmed that it’s the worst of the trilogy), but now that it’s available to rent, what’s there to lose? …You know, other than two hours of your time and a substantial amount of brain cells.
Blu-ray? Yes.
Notable Extras: The single disc includes no special features, while the 2-disc includes: audio commentary with director Olivier Megaton, “Special Delivery: An Inside Look at Modern-Day Transporters” featurette, Behind-the-Scenes Bonus Footage (featuring: Storyboards, Sets/Production Design, Special FX), “Making of Transporter 3″ featurette, and a digital copy of the film.

BEST PRICE*
Target Best Buy Fry’s
$16.99
Amazon – $16.99

*Does not include 2-Disc Edition, which costs $22.99 at each of the listed stores (including Amazon).

SYNECDOCHE, NEW YORK
How the hell do I even begin to prepare myself for this movie? As a major supporter of Charlie Kaufman’s work (to those that don’t know him, he’s the fantastic–and probably insane–Oscar-winning screenwriter behind such films as Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, Adaptation. and Being John Malkovich), I was incredibly disappointed to find the closest theater playing this film to me close to an hour drive away. But now, my wait is over. And again I ask… how do I prepare myself for this? This is a film that’s so divided amongst critics, its Rotten Tomatoes round-up results in its first review quote labeling the film “a pretentious, witless disaster”, while only a few sentences away there’s another that states it “might be the best film of 2008″. Should be an interesting experience, to say the least.
Blu-ray? Yes.
Notable Extras: Featurettes (The Story of Caden Cotard, Infectious Diseases in Cattle: Bloggers’ Round Table, NFTS/Script Factory Masterclass with Charlie Kaufman), and Screen Animations.

BEST PRICE
Target Best Buy Fry’s
$19.99
Amazon – $19.99

RACHEL GETTING MARRIED
As I already stated on the /Filmcast, Rachel Getting Married is the type of movie I can appreciate and acknowledge is a quality piece of cinema more than I can say I actually liked. I’m very aware of its merits: it offers an interesting and intimate display of family dynamics, has an uncommonly realistic stylistic approach, and features a few wonderful performances (with Anne Hathaway’s Oscar-nominated turn of course being the standout). Yet even as I recognized these things, I kept returning to the same types of questions in my head: “Why should I care about these people?”, “What is it that makes their story worth telling?”, etc. For many, the answers to these questions will be obvious, since they’ll be able to relate to the struggles of the characters. I, however, could not.
Blu-ray? Yes.
Notable Extras: Commentary with actress Rosemarie DeWitt, a second commentary with producer Neda Armian, screenwriter Jenny Lumet and editor Tim Squyres, 2 featurettes (The Wedding Band, A Look Behind the Scenes of Rachel Getting Married), deleted scenes, and a Cast and Crew Q&A at the Jacob Burns Center.

BEST PRICE
Target Best Buy Fry’s
N/A $19.99
Amazon – $19.99

HAPPY-GO-LUCKY
I don’t know what it is about this film that makes me want to see it. For many, I assume the biggest selling points are probably Sally Hawkins’ award-winning performance and the fact that the film comes from six-time Oscar-nominated writer/director Mike Leigh. (Not to mention, the reviews have been stellar.) For me though, I think it might just be that the film is an intimate indie character study that’s about, shockingly enough, someone who’s happy. How rare is that?
Blu-ray? No.
Notable Extras: A commentary by director Mike Leigh, and 2 featurettes (Behind The Wheel Of Happy-Go-Lucky, Happy-In-Character).

BEST PRICE
Target Best Buy Fry’s
N/A $19.99
Amazon – $19.99

EXCLUSIVE DEAL:
What? Save $8 when you buy Happy-Go-Lucky and The Boy in the Striped Pajamas on DVD.
Where? Best Buy.

THE BOY IN THE STRIPED PAJAMAS
While I’m sure that “Really? Another movie about the Holocaust?” is a generally frowned upon response to films dealing with the tragic horrors of World War II, I’d be lying if I said that the first thing that came to mind when finding out about The Boy in the Striped Pajamas was, “Oh, sweet! Another movie about the Holocaust!” (…Although, in retrospect, I realize that a response like that would probably be even more severely frowned upon, and for good reason.) Even so, I’m still curious to check it out, if only because it apparently contains a twist so distastefully manipulative that it single-handedly destroys all the good will the film had garnered beforehand. Consider me intrigued.
Blu-ray? No.
Notable Extras: Audio commentary by writer/director Mark Herman and author John Boyne, a featurette (Friendship Beyond The Fence), and deleted scenes.

BEST PRICE
Target Best Buy Fry’s
$19.99
Amazon – $19.99

EXCLUSIVE DEAL:
What? (Same as above.) Save $8 when you buy Happy-Go-Lucky and The Boy in the Striped Pajamas on DVD.
Where? Best Buy.

Skip It

CADILLAC RECORDS
I have a hard time believing this movie would exist if it weren’t for Dreamgirls. It’s not like there was anything particularly compelling about its trailer. In fact, after having watched Walk Hard so many times, this movie looks so generic that it’s halfway to the point of parody. Not even the mostly positive reviews are enough to help me muster the interest necessary to give this film a rent. Maybe you guys can be more persuasive in the comments. What say you? Is the film worth watching?
Blu-ray? Yes.
Notable Extras: Commentary with writer/director Darnell Martin, 2 featurettes (Playing Chess: The Making of Cadillac Records, Once Upon a Blues: Cadillac Records by Design), and deleted scenes.

BEST PRICE
Target Best Buy Fry’s
$19.99
Amazon – $19.99

Other noteworthy DVDs available this week…
Pinocchio (2-Disc 70th Anniversary Platinum Edition)Battle in SeattleBen XPrimal Fear (Hard Evidence Edition)Howard the Duck (Special Edition)Escape to Witch MountainReturn from Witch MountainGet Smart (Season 2)

The Specials
NOTE: Some deals may be in-store only.


Exclusive: DVD for Pinocchio (70th Anniversary Edition) ($16.99) includes free Pinocchio music CD on pack.


Exclusive: Free collectible 3D cup when you buy either version of Pinocchio (70th Anniversary Edition) (DVD - $16.99, Blu-ray - $25.99).

$16.99 – Pushing Daisies (Season 1), and more…
$19.99 – Entourage (Season 4), It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia (Season 3), Arrested Development (Season 2), Veronica Mars (Season 3), Birds of Prey (Complete Series), and more…
$29.99 – CSI (Season 8), CSI: Miama (Season 6), and more…

$6.99 – Clerks II (2-Disc Edition), Family Guy: Blue Harvest, and more…

  • Very good thanks for the post
  • I have to disagree with you. I believe that Role Models was one of the top comedies last year and I would love to add this to my DVD collection. Sadly, money is tight and I cannot do that.
  • Kenneth
    I am really surprised that you don't even have Pinocchio on your list at all. I didn't realize this website was exclusive to purely "adult" material.
  • He mentioned it in the other notable DVDs section. It's not a "new" movie so there's no buy/rent/skip recommendation.
  • DanKerstetter
    Actually Sally Hawkins wasn't nominated, which was another robbery at the shitty Oscars this year.
  • Eh, I think her role in that movie was just ok. Like I said about Viola Davis's role, the greatness of the character came more from the writing than from the actual actress.
  • Milk only a "Rent"! I guess I'm just biased because I usually go and buy all the big Oscar winners, and I'm a huge Gus Van Sant fan.

    Still have to see Synecdoche, NY, and like you said, there was no theater near me that was showing it.
  • Are you joking? MILK is a biopic that WAS necessary to get made and it made more people become aware of Harvey Milk. I'm sorry but I disagree with you. While most biopics are irrelevant (who cares about self destructive musicians? I dont), there are biopics about social and political figures that people need to watch, like GANDHI and MANDELA (which is coming out soon).

    I also really like CHE, which I saw 2 months ago in DC.
  • Y'know, it's okay to disagree with people. Don't need to apologize for having your own thought
  • Yeah CHE was pretty good, especially Part I. Also ADAM the movie was meant to be soley focused on Harvey Milk, thats why its called MILK, and not Harvey Milk and The Funky Bunch... But yeah not a perfect movie I think, but still really good. Also Adam do you think Schindler's List was unnecessary then? Was Gandhi?Was Born of the Fourth of July?Capote?Also yeah Synecdoche New York is awesome and a real mind fuck...
  • "thats why its called MILK, and not Harvey Milk and The Funky Bunch"

    What a lazy excuse. These people/characters were clearly included in the film because they played a large part in Harvey's life, and in many cases cases, changed him from the person he was to the person he became. Thus, if you don't properly establish those characters, their effect on his life and the story at hand is rendered completely ineffective.

    "do you think Schindler's List was unnecessary then?"
    No. See: my rule of thumb. (It's mentioned in my DVD write-up for Milk.)

    "Was Gandhi?"
    Yeah, actually. Maybe not as a history lesson, but as a movie meant to tell a heartfelt, compelling story... yes.

    "Was Born of the Fourth of July?"
    Haven't seen it, but I see it was based on a memoir, so... I'm leaning toward yes.

    "Capote?"
    Necessary? No, probably not. But as far as the narrative at the core of Capote goes, I found a lot to keep me engaged. More so than Milk.
  • James Franco's character was the only one who really ever changed who Harvey Milk was and he was pretty well developed. Forgot the rule of thumb. He was always working, would he really know those characters? I haven't see The Life and Times of Harvey Milk so I can't say whether they did, but it didn't bother me because I just found Harvey Milk more interesting. I wont excuse the movie for generic story telling though... also why haven't you seen Born on the Fourth of July? I just think your literally going out of your way to bash Milk because of the praise it is getting, which is kind of.... immature
  • The issues I have with Milk are the same that I would have regardless of whether or not it was receiving a lot of acclaim. But yes, I will admit, I am taking a more defensive stance in my response to it due to the extensive amount of praise the film has been getting. My mistake; I didn't realize taking into account the general feelings and reactions of critics/moviegoers when offering one's own critique of a film was considered immature.

    "James Franco's character was the only one who really ever changed who Harvey Milk was"

    If that's true, then what exactly was the point of Diego Luna's character?
  • I meant it was immature if you were going out of your way to put down Milk because of its praise, which it the vibe I kind of got, but since its obviously not the case then I dont think your immature.... Diego Luna at first I thought was undeveloped but then I kind of thought that Harvey Milk was never really with that character, he was really always working so it seemed like he didn't know him very well. Plus I don't think he played a big part in Harvey's life, speculating, but I think thats why he kept working after his death...
  • Agreed. I'm not usually a fan of Gus Van Sant, but Milk was great. I will say that Adam is kind of right about the minor characters being slightly underdeveloped though. But that doesn't stop Milk from being a solid film.
  • Haha
    I think that youre a 16 year old wanna be film critic that goes along with the "cool" film crowd, and defends it quite vigorously.
  • See, this is exactly the problem I have with all the praise that Milk gets.

    While I do think it's great that (and this is something I even stated in my post) the film has drawn attention to important issues, your post also highlights basically each of my main issues:
    1. People are naturally inclined to support Milk more because it has an important political message that they agree with, not because the actual film itself is anything special. This is also what guaranteed it a Best Picture nominee spot at the Oscars, and why it ended up unfairly winning in the category of Best Original Screenplay.

    2. The movie did probably help to make people more aware of Harvey Milk, but I really don't think it made even the slightest change to America's views towards gay rights (nor was it ever likely to). Everyone that previously opposed gay rights still does, and everyone that supported gay rights still does too. The only difference now is that people have Milk as a topic placeholder to help segue into discussing just *how much* they support gay rights. As far as I can tell though, people generally don't let movies affect their stance on politics.

    3. This was not bold filmmaking. The Times of Harvey Milk was made over 20 YEARS AGO. The only reason this movie got made now was because is because the issue had become relevant/topical enough (and thus, the supporters had become prominent enough) to make the endeavor profitable. Basically, Hollywood greenlit a movie that gay-rights supporters (and nobody else) would flock to see and proclaim is the best/most important movie of the year, and then proceeded to clean house at the awards ceremonies for their courageous effort. Bravo Hollywood, it was really brave of you to make this movie.

    Also, you seemed to completely miss one of my main points. Why do people NEED to watch a *biopic* about a social/political figure instead of watching a *documentary*? Or for that matter, reading a book? The answer is they don't, but they do anyway because it's more entertaining. Which hey, is fine by me, but that doesn't suddenly make the biopic necessary. (And if it does, then that's pretty sad.)

    Just to be clear, I'm not saying any of the above things are necessarily negative factors against what the movie was trying to accomplish or indicative reasons for why it shouldn't have been made. In fact, I think it's great the movie was made. With all the trash that comes out, it's good to have a movie that actually seeks to do some good for the world. But that's my point: this is a movie that succeeds because of its politics, not its storytelling.

    I watch movies for their storytelling.

    If I'm watching something for its politics, I'd rather it be a documentary.
  • Why is it important that Milk changes people's minds? I don't get how you can say a movie's flaw is not being able to change people's minds about an issue. You could call a book or documentaries forms of entertainment, they are also tools for story telling and thats exactly what movies are suppose to do- tell stories. Yes biopic films are not entirely necessary but they are no where near as unnecessary as the movies you look for and watch for shit movie of the week. I just feel like you go out of your way to put Milk in a negative light because it got oscar buzz. Whats it matter, just look at it as the film it is and why do you even care what the oscars think? I don't see Milk as a perfect movie at all, but I still think its a good movie mostly because of how great Penn is. I just don't see why you have a problem with people loving a movie, I say more power to them for finding a movie they love.
  • Apparently you completely ignored the part of my comment where I wrote, "Just to be clear, I'm not saying any of the above things are necessarily negative factors against what the movie was trying to accomplish..."

    I wasn't listing the film's inability to change people's minds as a flaw. I was simply stating it as something I believe to be true. It was intended as a response to ANGRYBROOMSTICK's comment that this film WAS necessary to raise awareness.

    And the reason it bothers me that the film received so buzz at the Oscars (which is pretty much the only film awards ceremony that's both well known and widely respected) is because people can't seem to differentiate between awarding achievements in film and awarding politics/history.

    Frost/Nixon, Milk, and The Reader were NOT achievements in film.

    "but they are no where near as unnecessary as the movies you look for and watch for shit movie of the week"

    ...do you think I'm unaware of this? Do you actually think I consider the shit movies I review to be even remotely justified additions to the world of cinema? C'mon man. The whole reason I review shit movies is to mock how horribly and hilariously *unnecessary* they actually are.
  • I understand that but what I'm saying is that why throw off a movie like Milk and other bios by labeling them not entertainment? You were basically saying that BIO's should only be for Documentaries and Books, which a lot of people were say are forms of entertainment and I would. I was getting the impression that you were going out of your way to bash it but you said you weren't, so that was my main issue... Plus fuck the oscars Adam, why bother, don't look down on a movie because it gets oscar recognition. While I agree that Frost/Nixon and especially The Reader, and even Milk, are not achievements in film, I don't change my look at a movie at all because the oscars kiss there ass... Plus a positive note on the oscars is that they draw attention to a lot of small films and draw people to seeing them.
  • SPELL CHECK
    "I was getting the impression that you were going out of your way to bash it but you said you weren't, so that was my main issue"
    ===I got the impression u were going out of your way to bash Milk, which was my main problem, but you said you weren't so thats fine.
  • Seconds Please!
    Dear Adam Quigley,

    I think you should probably stop writing articles for slashfilm. In fact, you should probably jump off of a bridge. Why? Because the vocal minority disagrees with your opinions. How dare you write a weekly article that could possibly contradict what a handful of people think? Clearly these people are far too busy to do anything but comment endlessly on subjective writing. Honestly, Adam. I am so disappointed in you. This is the internet, for God's sake. What were you thinking? I sure hope you have learned your lesson.

    Sincerely,
    Someone-who's-force-fed-opinions-and-asks-for-seconds.

    PS. You aren't by any chance related to a former knight at Medieval Times, are you?
  • I think my sarcasm meter just exploded.
  • I'm with you, Adam, I wanted a lot more out of Milk than I got. It was fine, but I don't think it's worthy of all the praise it's getting.

    I listened to Dustin Lance Black on the Creative Screenwriting Magazine podcast and in it he talked about having to cut a bunch of stuff from the script because it was too long. My impression is that he probably cut some less compelling stuff and left some of the less interesting (and in some cases I would argue, more annoying things) out in the interest of being faithful to the memory of Harvey Milk. Don't get me wrong, there's merit in that point of view, but since there's already a documentary out there--it's on Hulu and everything--that Black drew a lot of inspiration from, I don't quite see the point of making that your primary goal in the dramatic film. Biopic and historical films always fudge facts to make things more interesting...that's why they're not documentaries, it just seems to me like Black got too close to Harvey and to all the people around him to allow himself to comfortably take those kinds of liberties and I felt like the drama in the film suffered because of it.

    It's not a bad film, I found it perfectly adequate, but it did not possess the greatness I was expecting from it, especially considering how much praise people are heaping onto it.
  • "...felt like the drama in the film suffered because of it."

    Totally agree. Well said.
  • Kokushi
    HAPPY-GO-LUCKY was a good movie (7/10) and worth renting (hawkins and marsan were GREAT) and thats it, to see once and maybe see it if is on cable in in a few years and the RT rating is exagerated, better than The Bank Job, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, In Bruges, Revolutionary Road, before the devil knows, Not Even Close, the RT Community rating is more accurate.
  • Cadillac Records is worth a rental, but just for the musical performances.
  • Sally Hawkins won the Golden Globe for Best Actress in a Musical/Comedy, but she was, sadly, not nominated for an Oscar. I found it very refreshing to see such an upbeat film from Mike Leigh, whose films usually make me want to cry alone in a room for an hour.
  • Thanks for the announce
  • The Boy in Striped Pajamas is a good and sad movie with a twist one that makes you question your morality a bit. BUT...you can't watch it for a Holocaust movie, just as another movie. It is historically completely inaccurate and events in the movie are not even close to what would have happened back then in a concentration camp. Watch it for entertainment, but not because it is a holocaust movie.
  • this is a amazing list, I agree with it mostly! thanks for the recommendations
  • dagreenman18
    This is the best release week ive seen in a long time. This more than makes up for the shitty weeks to come.

    Also, Synedoche,NY is a insane and beautiful piece of work. Great drama sprikeled with some WTF black comedy. but there was one thing that drove me nuts, at it was "why is the house on fire?"
  • luper
    Synechdoche was one of the best films of 2008. I can't believe how little recognition it received. Also, make sure to read up on Cotard delusion (Hoffman's character's name is Cotard and there's a connection there).
  • the fact that south park has all those special features gives me enough reason to go out and but it, the amount of time and work those guys put into that show is ridiculous, watching them create it makes you respect it a lot more. it's smartest show on television regardless of which season you look at.
  • demoncleaner
    You've got to be kidding, D-yikes and a million little fibers are both better than any episode of season 12. Tonsil Trouble and Over logging were decent. I really really hope the new season is better. I would definitely agree that 12 has been the worst to date.
  • d-yikes was not
  • also how can Super Fun Time not be a standout episode, it's die hard in a old western village.
  • Synedoche, NY is a purchase for me. As for the house that was on fire, I thought it symbolized her going for things that weren't smart or good for her.
  • Jarryd
    So true on "Let the Right One In" I am still thinking about 4 scenes from that movie that made it awesome. As for "Happy-Go-Lucky" it was a good movie the ending felt like nothing was really resolved but I do feel Sally Hawkins should have gotten a Oscar nomination because while watching she made me feel happier and not in my pants.
  • Pete (original)
    i agree with this guy. I thought Role Models, when I saw it, outdid all of the summer comedies. but i haven't bought DVD's in a few months since I'm strapped for cash too.
  • Pete (original)
    it was decent. you shouldn't have to buy it, but yeah, check it out.
  • I'm sorry, but how can you not mention the BD release of Pinocchio? It looks fantastic.

    I've got that plus four of those listed coming via amazon.ca this week. Well probably not 'till early next week, given I'm cheap and didn't wanna pay for shipping. I forgot about Role Models being out too - I'll have to pick that one up sooner or later. It may not have had as many laugh out loud moments as Tropic Thunder or Pineapple Express, but I think it was the most consistent comedy of last year.
  • Ben
    See my problem with Bio Pics are somewhat similar to what you said. When you make them only one character is given the chance to do anything or develop. So basically you're stuck with a movie that has no other reason to exist other then being a vehicle for a star like Sean Penn to win an oscar. The story of Harvey Milk is great but I get the feeling the movie was made less to tell an original and exciting story of this great man but for Sean Penn to knock it out of the park.
  • Rob Frenay
    Good God, three of the best films of the year (Synecdoche, Milk, Rachel Getting Married) released in one week and you put them all in the Rent column. For shame!
  • Yes, God forbid people out there have differing opinions. Life would be so much more interesting if everybody in the world liked/loved/hated the same exact movies.

    And I haven't seen Synecdoche, New York yet, so how can I recommend it for a purchase?
  • Transporter 3 was absolutely atrocious... and this is coming from someone who watches the first 2 REGULARLY. I recommend everyone skip it completely.

    And Rachael Getting Married was nowhere near one of the best films fo the year!
  • I loved the 1st Transporter. Not a very good movie, but it was fun and badass and half-way respectable.


    I laughed my ass off at the 2nd film because it was so utterly ridiculous and craptacular....and not in a good way. The 2nd was a piece of crap. The whole thing with the bomb on the bottom of the car, so he goes of a ramp, flips the car and snatches it off???? That is so damn stupid. My buddies and I couldn't finish the movie.

    I refused to watch the 3rd....and it makes me sad how a potentially awesome franchise was destroyed :(
  • Honestly, the 2nd transporter was a lot of fun to me. Flying car aside, it was still a lot of fun. Transporter 3 is just nothing.. no fun, no good action, no good romance, no good villain. NOTHING.
  • ok, so i always seethe buy/rent/skip it and I was wondering if this post is written simply out of /film's good graces or if it has to do with an organic revenue model? Are the buy films promoted because of the production companies and the movie deals through advertised by their respective stores?
    im not critiquing, im simply a curious /film reader who works in advertising. just wondering
    either way i always look forward to seeing which "skip it" movies you all select
  • Sorry but Role Models was great, I'd definitely buy it. Little Negative Nancy in these reviews though...
blog comments powered by Disqus