With the right material, Walter Hill can play a blinder. Very often, however, the scripts he choses just aren’t up to the job - and I suppose the same can be said of Mickey Rourke. I’m definitely rooting for him in the Oscars and, before that, tonight’s BAFTAs.

They worked together in the late 80s, before each suffered a sad commercial and artistic struggle in the 90s. That time around they gave us the undervalued Johnny Handsome, a gangster fable about redemption, revenge and plastic surgery - somewhat prophetic, I feel. This time around they’ll bring us St. Vincent - another gangster fable about redemption and revenge, though apparently not this time tackling cosmetic operations.

The declared premised for the film tells us that it’s “about an assassin who masquerades as a priest in order to finish off a high level informant, only to undergo a crisis of conscience when he takes confession from his target.”

Not a bad premise, not at all - just a tricky one to dance around without seeming daft, I imagine. The right script could see this one turning out to be another showcase for Rourke’s considerable talents. I hope folk aren’t bored of him by then. I have my suspicions that many have responded to The Wrestler in a rather short tempered manner - that is to say, they’re happy to see something that so clearly reflects Rourke’s personal history once, but will they want to see it a second time? And will they let him take on projects that don’t connect so clearly to his supposed public persona?

Screen Daily are reporting “feverish early interest from buyers in Berlin keen to see the next powerhouse performance from Rourke”.

Cameron Young has written the screenplay for St. Vincent. His previous project, Locker 13, is a series of seven short tales each interlinked by the titular locker. That one has a different director for each short - including George Huang, who made a big splash with Swimming With Sharks almost 15 years ago, and Rick (Ricky, The Ricker) Schroder. Each of the seven stories has only a three day shooting schedule… so, er… good luck to the cast and crew. And, no, as far as I can tell, it has nothing to do with RI Stine.

  • I would like to take this opportunity to point out how awesome a job Connelly is doing. /Film is better for you.

    And on topic, what isn't Rourke in anymore?
  • well hopefully he "Is" in iron man 2
  • I don't know why distributors would be scrambling. Sadly, it's not like The Wrestler made any money.
  • He is the hot property of the week. People know that he is an acclaimed actor so one could potentially sell a movie on his name. A movie that is a little more marketable because that is one thing The Wrestler isn't.
  • I'm honestly confused as to why an assassin would have to masquerade as a priest to finish of an informant. Assassins are professional killers, and I would assume- very good at their jobs.

    Even if the informant was a high profile individual, there would still have to be a million other ways to do the job...

    Going undercover seems more like an espionage/infiltration tactic. Why not just rig a bomb on his car, or shoot him, or strangle him in his sleep?
  • GoreBaby
    Another post from Connelly, another article I won't be reading. Good thing, seeing as how from the title this one seems just as pointless and full of his worthless ponderings on shit I don't give a fuck about as the last one he wrote.
  • From the TITLE seems pointless and full of worthless ponderings?

    Hahahahaha. Do you judge films by their titles too?
  • GoreBaby
    If they were written and made by you, yes. Could only imagine a cinematic piece of trash from the likes of you, drawing influence from only the finest sequences of Toy Story 2 and Across the Universe and older foreign films (to gain some street cred ofcourse)
  • Why, after reading that premise did I instantly think about the ending of 'Hitman' (the videogame, not the disgraceful film)? And the resurgence of Mickey Rourke contines, seems an interesting project. Brendan you say this is "tricky one to dance around", however I'm more optimistic, because if the script is incredibly silly and stupid, we could have 'In Bruges 2' on our hands (obviously not as intelligent or humourous, but still...)... :p
  • Jon
    I've read the script for this film and I just wanted to say that it is an absolute turd. Vincent (Rourke) becoming a priest is just as silly as it sounds and the finale of the second act involves him throwing a kid in an iron lung out a 30th story window to save him from a fire. A god damn iron lung.
  • gah
    Seriously? Thats horrible. I love Rourke and was hoping he'd make the best of this comeback but I also know that he has a terrible intuition when it comes to scripts. Turned down 48 Hours, Beverly Hills Cop and Pulp Fiction for a bunch of crap during the eighties and nineties.
  • FAYJ
    Thank God people don't pay any attention to interns.
  • BCFJ
    St Vincent won the Nicholl's screenwriting award which is considered to be the most competitive screenwriting contest out there. Despite other opinions on this board, I think it is an excellent script and the premise works very well.
  • Please don't let these stupid comments deter you. You bring sweet delicious news....
  • Rourke is such a great actor, and I hope he lands many great roles, like Viggo Mortensen after he got much acclaim due to LOTR fame.
  • A priest assassin. Some people might not like this.
blog comments powered by Disqus