I don’t get to see The Curious Case of Benjamin Button until Sunday (ahead of a February 6th release in the UK) but I’ve seen all of the clips and trailers and, frankly, find it all a bit funny looking. The first thing that comes to mind is the Orville Redenbacher Popcorn commercial David Fincher directed a couple of years back - presumably as a test bed for some of the tech he went on to call upon for Button. Obviously, the passage of time and an increased budget mean Button has far better fx, but there’s still something similarly uncanny in the results.

Word got around in the last 24 hours about The Science Behind the Curious Case of Benjamin Button, a site that reveals how the many FX in the film were conceived and accomplished.

I’d guess the site has been designed and built to let members of the Academy in on these secrets (well, to an extent), the better to secure their votes. The site is password protected and, unfortunately, the password just now appears to have been locked, to stop us many non-voters using up bandwidth, perhaps. All is not lost, however, as Rope of Silicon have embedded one of the site’s videos.

The site username was sfx, the password was buttonsbuttons but, now… I’m still looking for a new set of credentials. When you beat me to them, please share into the comments. They will come to light at some point - these things always do.

The Huffington Post recently recorded a video interview Steve Preeg of Digital Domain, who handled the CG Benjamin, and he gave a very concise, clean explanation of the basic techniques employed. The clip also contains a visual demonstration not unlike those featured on the promo site.

  • the special effects are pretty amazing. Essentially they just cataloged brad pitts face. In 10 years actors will be less and less needed past the facial capture stage.
  • Actors will always be needed. This is similar to the argument that professional photographers are becoming obsolete with new video technology. Every time a new technology comes out, people freak out about a profession dying, but they never do...
  • edc
    "This is similar to the argument that professional photographers are becoming obsolete with new video technology. Every time a new technology comes out, people freak out about a profession dying, but they never do..."

    tell that to the ceo of polaroid, and give him some spare change.
  • OMGWTF!
    That's what happens when you try to fraud the American people... It wasn't because there wasn't a market for his good anymore... It's because he tried to sell good that didn't exist.
  • OMGWTF!
    "goods", that is.
  • I'm getting ohder!
  • Im saying the "star" mentality is going to die out in the future. With the exception of the 30 year old Button Brad Pitt was never on set. His voice was the only thing needed after the facial capture cataloged his face. Yes actors will be needed but for changing purposes as technology grows. When they can take 2 years of post and do it in 6 months it will be used more so than on set actors. Its like any technology, as soon as its cheaper and easier to composite a digital actor then the game is changed. Of course we are not at that point yet but we will be. Just my 2 cents tho ;) Pitt did do a great job with the voice acting in post. Everything was believable.
  • Movie technology is moving very fast these days. Still, old school filmmaking will not be leaving us for a long time. Digital will always be different from film. One is not necessarily better than the other, but there will always be subtle (and not so subtle) differences. Film and old school technique will always have its following and its reasons for being used. Still, I welcome this technology. I'm glad to see that this industry is constantly hurtling forward.
  • Astounding. It also places a lot of emphasis on how good Pitt's performance was, considering he was acting in a dark room with lights, by himself.
  • I was thinking the same thing. Amazing performance from an amazing actor. Button's facial expressions were the thing that tugged at my heart the most while watching the film, hard to believe Pitt probably wasn't even in the room for much of it. He really knows how to make those beats work, to act between the lines as opposed to only in them.
  • Amazing, I wondered how much effort was really put into the special effects of this movie. And the end results were obviously beautiful.
  • MIkeB
    One Year of Rotoscoping among 3 post houses, 2 years of multitude CG artists, and several months of composting to have it all blend seamlessly. (I just finished working at Digital Domain)
  • composting. lol.
    I know whatcha meant ;-)
  • The effects are amazing, but i've seen them use that green paint before on another film.
  • Ryan
    I believe they use it in The Incredible Hulk on Ed Norton.
  • Very impressive. I was under the impression it was all make-up.
  • So was i
  • good effects for a very mediocre-bad film.
  • Rodney
    bad film? you obviously weren't watching the same film as me! you must not like good stories and the art of film making. TCCofBB tells a great story with a great visual piece to go along with it. YOU ARE NUTS!
  • Whoa, that's wild. SOMEONE GET THE PASSWORD.
  • I second that emotion
  • Wow that looks pretty good. I was wondering when I watched the film if Brad Pitt had anything to do with it other than voice acting.
  • gah
    I hate how Pitt's best performance in Jesse james somehow was completely overlooked last year. If you haven't seen it, do yourself a huge favor and rent it. Theres no good reason why that film didnt get nominated last year.
  • Kdawg
    Maybe because that movie sucked
  • Cerisier Du Japon
    I agree. It was the best movie of 2008 and both it and Pitt deserved a nominations.
  • It was a good movie, but not amazing and somewhat slow paced. Actually, the only thing truly "amazing" about it (IMO) was the cinematography. That whole train sequence in the woods was stunning. Deakons rocks.
  • gah
    Why does "slow paced" have negative connotations today? I hate our MTV and the internet have given the whole world a bad case of A.D.D.
  • igroveman
    Jesse James is one of the best character dramas I've ever seen. It is not for anything less than very deep thinkers, but if you follow the nuances of character choices and consequences in the film, it is amazing.
  • Now that I think of it, the only thing that kept me awake during 'Button' was waiting to see Brad Pitt un-age...not saying it was a bad movie, I'm just saying it was kinda slow and kinda long...
  • Brice
    There were times in Button where I new the face was CGI, but I never new that the entire thing was. I thought certain scenes used it, but after seeing this video, pretty much everything was CGI. Very good work. It's the subtlety that really made it work. His slow movements, and skin texture is what sold it for me.
  • Roderick
    Wow, I'm impressed, I didn't read anything about the sfx of this film before, and I thought that a green mask was used in a small actor and Brad's head with make-cup was plastered on top after the fact, I didn't notice any CGI while watching the film, may be because I was unaware and I wasn't looking for it, kind of amazing.
  • "I didn't notice any CGI while watching the film"

    This is what we refer to as a good movie- when you don't notice these things. I thought Button was a decent film (not great, just decent) but the FX were astounding. If this thing doesn't take hope all the FX Oscars it'll be a crime. Speaking of crime, there is no way that Taraji P. Henson shouldn't at least get a Best Supporting Actress Nom, she was outstanding.
  • He's odd.
  • nice little behind the scenes clip you have shared with us.. always good to see what goes on behind the camera..
  • bawler
    are your pants on fire?I have been told that when giving general statements, you're usually ambiguously correct.. or just really wrong.
  • Amazing to see how they do it! I expect an indepth feature on the blu-ray release to expand on this
  • I think even his voice was modified. Oh and Technology is like matter, It cannot be created or destroyed. It just becomes the stuff you walk on to get to your local Starbucks. Like the recycled 8-tracks they used to make my shoes.
  • Larry_Chimp_Man
    Very interesting stuff, can't wait for the Blu-ray release.
  • Mike
    This is a great breakthrough for Mickey Rourke!
  • i can't wait to see this film
  • sweet! i assumed it was new tech, but it looks like the same thing they used to turn ed norton into the incredible hulk! and that brought to mind the fact that brett ratner's the last stand (i refuse to call it 'x-men'!) did this first!
  • I almost feel like this video would have the potential to hurt Pitt. I mean, I know that he still had to give a performance and part of the performance involved more than just doing it in front of the camera. But even as someone who grew up in the CGI generation I watch this and I feel like the effects just eclipse the actors. I haven't seen the film, so I can't say for sure, but it does appear from the clips I've seen that the effects are done well enough that they blend right into the story, which in my opinion is what they should strive for.
  • onethirtynine
    now i know why that movie had little to no emotional connection for me.
  • the dude
    you take tolong to get to the point
  • Pretty cool. I love how they can make all the different layers for 3d modeling.
  • ste53
    Incredable! I thought it was mostly different aged actors with a Brid Pitt look-alike make up on.
blog comments powered by Disqus