Sundance Review: Tyson

I don’t think I’ve been awake at 8:30 in the morning more than 7 days over the course of the last year. So getting up to see a documentary with an 8:30am start time isn’t easy. Thankfully it was at the racquet club, which is only a 2 minute walk from our blogger condo. Unfortunately, it wasn’t the uncensored expose that I naively believed it might be. I realized this fact during the opening credit sequence when the name Mike Tyson came on screen, preceded by the words “Executive Producer”.

The film is a look at the life of one of the most famous fighters in Boxing History, as told through an interview with Tyson himself. And there lies the film’s main problem. Situations dealing with abuse and rape charges deserve to show the other side of the story (especially when Tyson claims they never happened). But the documentary never strays from the one on one interview with Tyson himself.

I was also surprised at the lack of additional footage from Tyson’s many years in the public spotlight. Most of the film is comprised of a talking head interview with Tyson, and some overused footage of Mike looking out into an ocean sunset. The editor also chose to sometimes split the interview footage into a shattered split screen, probably in an attempt to spice things up. As you might expect, the result is more annoying than anything else.

To his credit, Mike comes off as incredibly honest and forthcoming. And we get stories about how the boxer contracted gonorrhea from a prostitute before a championship fight and how he likes to woo strong women, CEO types, and dominate them in the bed room. We also get commentary on some of his fights, giving us a look into the skill and psychology.

And Tyson comes off like a sensitive tough guy who has seen the errors of his ways, but each and every time he falls into the same traps. And the finale comes off almost like a scripted infomercial which shouts “Look, I’m better now, I’m not a bad guys! See!” The film gives a fascinating look at a man with a serve confidence and trust issues from the point of view from that same man who now thinks he’s cured. It’s not a bad cable documentary but as a theatrical release, I can’t recommend it.

/Film Rating: 6 out 10

About the Author

Peter Sciretta is a film geek and popcultured fanboy living in Los Angeles. He created /Film in 2005.

  • Fucking Tyson! You coulda went out as the best ever, but you fuck it up by being stupid...I might see this if I was extremely bored, other than that I would pass cause Tyson is a walking disappointment...
  • I wouldnt mind seeing this, Tyson is such an interesting person and has been through quite alot, but you do need the right people to make a film about it, and by the sounds of it they failed with this one.
  • schizopolis
    Sport's ultimate tragic hero! I doubt this will be the last Mike Tyson documentary. Can't wait to see Toback's version.
  • seanovan
    It's too bad it's an unbiased movie, could have been interesting.

    As for footage, don't kid yourself, Don King owns everything.
  • seanovan
    Oops, I meant "Biased"
  • When We Were Kings = best boxing documentary ever. Makes this hard to live up to. Boxing has lost some class in recent decades. Thanks for the review, Peter.
  • starscream9289
    Ear eater!
  • I lol'd.

    To be fair he didn't eat it.
  • lol. Yeah...I only know two things about Tyson. And that whole ear thing is one of them.
  • Sometimes you have to show a little skin. This reminds boys of being naked, and then they think of sex.
  • That's the best part, "and some overused footage of Mike looking out into an ocean sunset." This movie sounds like it should be on at 4 in the morning when nothing else is on. I'd definitely watch it if it was on at that time but other than that, I won't see this.
  • Allow me to break the ice. My name is Freeze. Learn it well. For it's the chilling sound of your doom.
  • I really liked this film. It's fascinating to hear Tyson talking about his own career in such an honest and brave fashion, and parts of it are quite moving. I also think the final scenes are much more ambiguous than this review suggests.

    I met James Toback to talk about the film a few months ago, and you can read the interview here:

    http://philonfilm.blogspot.com/2008/11/interview-...
  • Steve
    I was shocked at the lies and fabrications Mike told in this movie. 1. He said he was always an addict - 2. He was always an alcoholic - 3. He always had demons - 4. Managers Jacobs and Cayton were "slave masters" and signed him when he was underage. - It is obvious that Mike's new manager, Harlan Werner, is just as devious as Robin Givens, Don King and Shelly Finkel. Mike completely ignored 1984-1988 when he was hired to do network TV commercials for Pepsi Cola, Nintendo Video and Kodak Film. Not enough - he was hired by the New York City Police Department, the FBI and the Drug Enforcement Administration to do PSA's. The Police and FBI do not usually hire addicts or those who have demons as role models. My entire correspondence with Werner, the film's producers, as well as documents and photos proving Mike's huge hero status with Cayton and Jacobs may be found at this website:
    http://www.cyberboxingzone.com/news/archives/0000...
    Steve Lott, Tyson Assistant Manager
    1985-1988
  • Tyson produced a film just so he could talk about himself. Pass.
  • Jaque
    I completely disagree with this review. Of course it is biased but as a film or documentary it does an outstanding job of getting you into the mind of Mike Tyson. I hate documentaries but this one is remarkable. It sounded more like you were reviewing Tyson the man for all his misdeeds instead of this film. 2 out of 10 for your review.
  • Steve
    Jacque,

    Mike lied again and again about his whole career. Does that mean nothing to you? In this film, if he said he discovered a cure for cancer and was responsible for bringing the hostages back from Iran , would you ignore those lies completely and just comment that the film presents a good look into the mind of Tyson?

    If Mike was your brother, as he is mine, and he said terrible lies about your parents, like he did about managers Jacobs and Cayton, you would not feel so flippant about this film.
  • Lewis
    Steve,

    Why would Tyson lie about being signed under aged?

    Like you mentioned above...
  • Steve
    Lewis,

    Good question.

    Two reasons.

    1. Mike must lie about most of his career with Jacobs and Cayton because it is a way of rationalizing the horrible mistake he made of leaving Bill Cayton for Don King. Mike figured that the contract does not exist so who will know. Or worse, Mike just feels he can lie about everything and make it look like the "white" man took advantage of him. For the street people, from which Mike came, that is a good line - "the white man conned me."

    2. Cayton and Jacobs are dead so they are not around to defend themselves. If jacobs were alive, Mike would not say anything like he did because he would be concerned about Jim confronting him about the lie. Mike would back down real quick against Jim.
  • corimica
    Tyson's life has taken a sad turn. The fight has gone out of him. His last fight in 2005 was held strictly so he could get some money to pay the bills. Just you feel like your watching the real Tyson now. He is much more sobered and at peace, a man whose demeanor reflects someone whose been thru hell and been humbled by marirea penisului.
blog comments powered by Disqus