Columbia Pictures has won rights to produce a film adaptation of Isaac Asimov’s Foundation science fiction trilogy, with Roland Emmerich attached to direct. Emmerich will produce along with Michael Wimer, who was also a producer (and thus, a complicit party) in Emmerich’s own 10,000 B.C. According to Variety, Sony-owned Columbia Pictures’ win came as a surprise, as WB and Fox were originally duking it out for this one, which now appears to be their lot in life. Through the fray, Columbia’s president, Matt Tolmach, apparently saw an opportunity to acquire the rights and went for it.

While many of Asimov’s books take place in the Foundation universe, the main Foundation storyline centers around a mathematician named Hari Seldon, a psychohistorian who is able to predict large-scale events using scientific principles. When Seldon foresees the downfall of the Galactic Empire, which will precipitate a dark age lasting 30,000 years, he establishes two human oases (”Foundations”) in an effort to preserve human knowledge. Asimov’s series was considered groundbreaking and won a Hugo award in 1966.

What to say about Roland Emmerich? I still remember back when the mosntrously successful ID4 came out in the summer of 1996. There was so much excitement around the blockbuster film that managed to combine massive city destruction with Will Smith kicking alien ass. But we also wanted to know what else Roland Emmerich had in store for us in the future. How would his directorial skill mature as time went on? How would his storytelling craft become more refined throughout the years? Clearly, Emmerich’s filmography has answered all of those questions. In short, his handling of science fiction has all the subtlety of a sledgehammer to the nose.

A better question: Aside from Wall-E (and I might argue, Sunshine and The Foutain), what was the last truly great science fiction film? Even Asimov’s own I, Robot and The Positronic Man (which eventually became Bicentennial Man) didn’t survive the adaptation from book to screen particularly well. We’ve yet to see Emmerich’s upcoming 2012 but I’d be willing to wager it won’t prove he’s ready to take on the themes and subtlety of Asimov’s work. But who knows: Maybe after all this time, Emmerich, as a filmmaker is finally ready to grow up.

[Update: Brendon Connelly and /Film reader Heftybag point out Serenity and Eternal Sunshines of the Spotless Mind as other great and recent sci-fi films. Good choices!]

  • Thrillhouse
    You had me 'til "Roland..."

    Are you FUCKING serious?
  • Sauce
    Agreed. Wrong director for this series. Let Ridley Scott do it. Sigh.
  • YES. Ridley Scott would be awesome for this kind of thing.

    I thought this might be a cool idea until I saw Emmerich. Now I just think it will be lame.
  • Graham7x
    you obviously haven't seen 10,000BC
  • YOU obviously have no taste in movies
  • Not seeing 10,000 BC is something I'm quite proud of!
  • i liked the day after tomorrow by emmerich, i dont know why everyone hates it.
  • FreedomPopular
    I'm in agreement here.

    It's no ID4, but it wasn't as bad as everyone lets on

    Now 10,000 B.C., that movie was just terrible... just absolutely terrible.
  • i definitely agree with you here, that movie sucked big t ime
  • You're right. The Day After Tomorrow wasn't all that bad. I was laughing hilariously through the whole thing. Emmerich should do more comedies.
  • Maybe the last great sci-fi film, before Wall-E, was Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind.
  • That didn't really strike me as sci-fi....
  • skaught
    selectively erasing one's memory?
  • g-dubs
    "The Prestige" was more recent and better.
  • It was definitely Sci Fi, but on a grittier, simpler scale. No spaceships and shit.
  • I will wait to hear more, but I doubt this will actually be good.

    And Dave, Serenity was a good recent Sci Fi film as well.
  • REAL6
    I'm sorry but Wall-E was not all that. It was pretty cool. Maybe i just have to watch it a second time. But this movie, wrong director, Ridley would be good or maybe hmmmmmmmmm, ill have to think about that. Alfonso Cuarón? I dont know.
  • FreedomPopular
    Wow, they really had to choose Emmerich?

    Well, it could have been a great trilogy...
  • My apologies but David I really never enjoy your articles.
  • Thanks for your constructive criticism.
  • TheMarquis
    :)
  • Or lack of yours.
  • lol Tell us how you really feel.

    Dont worry David, you have at least one fan of your articles right here.
  • Your comments are pretty f*cking dull, too. Give the guy a break!
  • Dude. Give me a break for giving a sh*t.
  • Sorry let me rephrase in a less obvious and safer way of blatantly giving someone shit:
    "MY apologies but Vlatka I really never enjoy your comments."
  • : (
    : (
  • :(
    :(
  • whsmith
    this is absolutely inconceivable. this is like saying Jerry Bruckheimer and Michael Bay are getting together to make Macbeth.
  • After looking at Emmerich’s filmography, I was surprised that I actually enjoyed some of his films...They weren't masterpieces, but they didn't completely suck ass either (except '10,000 BC')...I'm sure he won't fuck this up, but I'm not sure this trilogy will be excellent either...
  • frank
    I think Columbia LOST if they are hiring Emmerich. The only thing the guy knows how to do is hire special effects people.
  • hollywood hates dick
  • Bubba Chen
    David CHEN....CHILDREN OF MEN!
  • pirxthepilot
    Thank you! Exactly what I had in mind.
  • I'm 3/4 of the way through Second Foundation at this minute (the book is on the table beside me). Not impressed with this news. I'm with Sauce, get Ridley Scott on this!
  • skaught
    he's on brave new world. don't even tap his shoulder with this.
  • thats the best one of them all so savor it while it doesn't have Roland Emmerich's clue goo all over it
  • Oi Vey
    Now i'm beginning to think that Sony/Columbia is like Fox but with a higher budget range and less micromanaging.
  • Why would anyone want to make Foundation into a movie, let alone pay many many moneys to do it.
  • Bull
    Roland Emmerich sucks. Issac Asimov rocks.

    Why did they choose this guy? His string of recent failures? The amazing story-telling present in 10,000 BC? Please. At best he will turn this story into an average movie. It is sad because in a more skilled directors hands, this could be a great movie.
  • Sauce
    Actually...Give Andrew Niccol a chance to write his own treatment of the story and take a risk with him at the helm instead. He's a great writer (Truman Show) and a fine director (Gattaca). I'm not sure Ridley still has his Sci-Fi chops.

    And have you gone back and watched Independence Day recently? I suggest you don't and stay in your happy world where you think it was actually worth while. Even as just a popcorn action flick. That movie does not age well. And do I even have to mention Godzilla or The Patriot? I don't think I do.
  • Agreed. Gattaca is an awesome movie, and even if it is from 97, I'd say it is one of the best 'recent' sci-fi movies.
  • Shamefully, I still need to see Gattaca. Might go rent it today and get it done!
  • Gattaca was great - virtually everything else Niccol has done since then? Not as great.
  • Gattaca was filmed at the Marin Civic Center, the largest building constructed by Frank Lloyd Wright, located in the S.F. Bay area.
  • J.D.
    This is a fact. Why did someone give him thumbs down?
  • I'm not that happy about the adaptation being in the hands of someone like Roland Emmerich. Having read Foundation, I would much prefer it be in the hands of a much more capable sci fi director such as Ridley Scott.

    That being said, it might not be a total loss. Emmerich does have a decent visual eye, his issues generally lie in story and plot development. If a solid screenwriter gets picked to adapt the story, it could turn out to be okay. All in all I'll be keeping an eye on the project.
  • Oh boy.

    It's going to be interesting to see how they decide to butcher the plot of these amazing and groundbreaking novels, which take place over thousands of years - - sometimes within the same book, in order to adapt them for the screen. Who will they focus on as a character? Seldon? He's a prologue in the first book... that's it! None of the other characters are around for more than a chapter or two. Whoever is writing this adaptation has a much bigger challenge ahead of him than Emmerich does....
  • dan
    Actually, they take place over 500 years or so.
  • mcgruff
    umm. hasnt anyone seen Starship Troopers: Marauders? Come on now
blog comments powered by Disqus