Rumor Killer: Harry Potter Series Will NOT End Early

The Times UK published an article titled “Can Fantasy Epics Survive The Credit Crunch Chronicles” which uses Disney’s bail out of The Chronicles of Narnia to conclude that “Warner Bros was worried about the prospects for the last three [Harry Potter] films in the series, since J K Rowling is no longer driving anticipation for the titles by producing new books.” Of course, this one sentence has caused an uproar in the Harry Potter fanspace, and the bloggers have picked it up with sensational titles questioning the future of the Potter film franchise. C’mon, really?

The entertainment industry will surely see some harsh cutbacks in the coming year. Forget the fact that Warner Bros broke Sony’s 2006 yearly box office record this year. You could argue that WB’s total is a result of “The Dark Knight’s summer success, and that was before things really got bad.” Okay sure. And lets not forget that the Christmas 2008 holiday weekend was the biggest in U.S. box office history with over $173 million in total ticket sales. Yes, we know, its going to get worse… And yes, the hype from the release of new Potter books is bound to hurt the Potter film franchise, BUT to compare the situation to that of Disney’s Narnia situation is ridiculous at best. But don’t believe me, lets look at the numbers:
http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/12/28/box-office-warner-bros-reaches-174-billion-surpassing-sonys-2006-record/
http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/248077,best-christmas-box-office-ever-with-five-new-films.html

The first four Harry Potter films rank in the top 25 highest grossing films of all time worldwide. The last film to be released, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, was the second highest grossing of the series, second only to the debut film. Phoenix, which was made for $150 million, grossed over $938 million worldwide, and who knows how much on DVD and merchandising.

The problem with the Narnia films is that they were never big money makers in the first place. Prince Caspian had a budget of over $200 million and grossed only $141 million domestically. The worldwide total of $419 million means that the film barely made it into the green (remember, almost half ticket sales go to the exhibitors). And Caspian was a huge drop from Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, which took in $745 Million worldwide. It’s extremely unlikely that the Harry Potter series will see that kind of drop. And even if the last two films, Part 1 and 2 of Deathly Hallows, have a 50% drop, which isn’t likely, the film would still be considered a huge sucess. For example, WALL-E had a buget of $180+million and took in $507 million worldwide, almost half that of the last Potter film. Potter fans have nothing to fear - as long as Warner Bros can make money on the Harry Potter series, the films will still be produced. And besides, last I heard the films were going to be shot back to back and principal photography begins in February 2009. By the time Half-Blood Prince hits theaters, 40% of filming will have been completed. It is extremely unlikely that Warner Bros would pull the plug at that time and only release the first half of the last book theatrically. Actually, the suggestion of such is almost laughable.

And speaking of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, we have five new photos after the jump!

  • Not producing the last few remaining Potter films would be commercial suicide, as I and my friends are perfect examples of the audiences it reaches. I read half (might have been less or more, all I remember is I never finished it) of the first book when I was back in school and since then haven't bothered to read the rest (like my friends) and instead have just enjoyed the films when they have been released. Never-mind as you mentioned the huge Potter base still out there, I know someone who has read every book and I'm sure he saw every film at the cinema at least three or four times! I think he constitutes what we would call a 'Potter-ite'!
  • These film will continue to make money so they will continue to produce them.
  • whaaaaat?!? why in the world would wB stop making HP the films are almost like licence to print money. but the did flick us off by delaying Half Blood Prince. dose any body think that maybe losing the right's of Watchmen to fox would make them release it early?
  • Emma
    Great, this means they're keeping in some of the best parts of the book!

    Also, I don't know why anyone would think the Potter series would end early. Thanks for breaking it down the way you did.
  • Yeah, that article was dumb. I thought the idea that Harry Potter franchise would die was completely ridiculous. It's a HUGE money-maker, and the Narnia movies pale in comparison. WB wouldn't kill a guaranteed cash cow like Potter.

    One thing though, I used to work in a theater and exhibitors (the theaters) don't get much money at all from ticket sales. Sometimes they get 0% of a movie's box office take on opening weekend, and then only a slight increase on following weekends. Depending on the movie, the theater might only make a few cents per ticket sold. They make the vast majority of their money on concession sales.
  • GORT
    Potter fans remember not to watch this movie in theaters, wait for DVD to come out or watch it in $2 theater after it has been out a few months. Warner Bros must be punished for moving this movie from December of this year to next summer and showing a big fat middle finger to the fans. We must hurt warner bros where it hurts by boycotting this movie. That will teach them a lesson to not to mess with release dates of the next two potter movies.
  • Jason
    You've got to be kidding me. A mass boycott will change nothing. They know that eventually people will go and see the movie, and they can do whatever they please. They fund the movies, and just because a few diehard fans boycott it doesnt mean they will start listening to anyone else but themselves.
  • Russ Brake
    "Actually, the suggestion of such is almost laughable."

    Yep, insofar as "almost" can mean 'utterly', 'beyond' or 'please can the writer and editor's heads be lined up for megai-kicking, pleeeease".

    It's the greatest cash cow ever, and building towards actual greatness too. Woohoo!
  • Also worth pointing out is that a book JUST came out recently. Not a main entry mind you, but a Harry Potter book nonetheless. J.K. is also working on an Encyclopedia of sorts, which should come out within the time frame of the last movies. I think the fandom is still strong and we'll be waiting patiently. Thanks for not blowing this out of proportion Peter. :]
  • I think Beatle the Bard was set to release around the time of Half Blood's original theater release. Which would make sense to raise hype for the films with a "new" book sale. Of course the move of the theatrical release probably didn't help the book either. Lot's of people have not read the books, and won't read the books and sales will still be killer.
  • You have to admit that at SOME point kids are going to click that the chick grew tits and Harry's voice broke... teh appeal will wear off and WB will need to pull a switch of actors. THAT will be the beginning of the end.
  • NotACat
    Given that the characters are now 16/17 it would be rather surprising if they had not changed from when they were 11/12 at the start of the series. Switching actors now would be nonsensical, as you say, but it's not going to happen because it's entirely unnecessary.
  • Jim
    They actually mention that she grew tits in one of the movies.
  • Yeah its ridiculous to think that the Harry Potter franchise will die...ITS HARRY POTTER? i mean narnia is nothing compared to this. Keep the actors finishing the series before 2010 and find a new series to exploit...fingers crossed that twilight heads down the same way as narnia

    hehe just picked up 1-5 on blu-ray
  • Fuck Your Mother
    Fuck Harry Potter!!! I hope they do cancel the movie.
  • >L>L>L
    i reckon harry potter is heaps shit
blog comments powered by Disqus