Each week in Blu-or-Not I take a look at the recent Blu-ray releases. This isn’t a review column. If you’re looking for movie reviews, look out for Adam’s This Week in DVD on Tuesdays. Blu-or-Not takes a look at the extra value content — the Blu-ray difference (and yes, this does include Picture and Sound). We decide is it worth buying the Blu-ray version or the plain old DVD.

Eagle Eye
Exclusive to Blu-ray: All the content is presented in High Definition, but none of it is exclusive to the Blu-Ray release.

DVD Features in HD: :

Deleted Scenes: Four and a half-minutes worth of four deleted scenes that had no reason to be in the film in the first place, including a laughable alternative ending with Rachel’s son Sam playing Rock Band (Jerry’s gift) with his friends when the television goes all “Matrixy” and begins to instruct him with a mission. If they had included that ending on the theatrical cut, people would have been laughing out loud.
Asymmetric Warfare: The Making of Eagle Eye: A 26-minute making of documentary which opens up with one of the screenwriters/producers talking about how Steven Spielberg came up with the idea for the story ten years ago, and that if the film had been made back then, it would have been “science fiction” and that it would have been “a movie that stretches all plausibility and credibility.” I would argue that the storyline still defies plausibility, but watching this documentary makes you want to like the film and the people involved, even though you know it’s a gigantic mess.
Shall We Play a Game?: The coolest featurette on the set, a 9-minute conversation between Eagle Eye director DJ Caruso and Wargames director John Badham. I’ve always loved conversations between filmmakers, and even while this is more self-promotional than most, its still cool.
Other features include: Is My Cell Phone Spying on Me?, A 9-minute featurette exploring the film’s tech-paranoia premise, Road Trip, a too short 3-minute featurette on the film’s many shooting locations, and a Gag Reel which mostly consists of Shia LaBeouf and Billy Bob Thornton flubbing their lines and Michelle Monaghan getting the giggles one too many times.

Video: 4 out of 5
Sound:
4.5 out of 5
Blu-Ray Exclusives:
0 out of 5
Extra Features:
3 out of 5
Price: $39.99 MSRP ($27 on Amazon)

Bottom Line: Might be worth a rental but definitely not worth a purchase. None of the extras attempt to explain the convoluted plot which makes less and less sense the more you think about it, even while you’re watching the film. I’m also disappointed with the lack of an advertised audio commentary from the filmmakers/screenwriters. NOT

Serenity
Exclusive to Blu-ray:

Picture in Picture: Interviews with the cast and crew and behind the scenes footage are spread throughout the film, most of the time scene specific. This is probably the only worthwhile feature added to this edition.
Visual Commentary: This is the same commentary recorded for the collector’s edition, featuring Joss Whedon, Nathan Fillion (Mal), Adam Baldin (Jayne), Summer Glau (River), and Ron Glass (Book). But this time around you can watch Joss and the crew sitting on a couch while the joke and share their experiences working on the film. It’s a fun commentary but nothing new.
Alliance Database: A series of menus that let you explore the planets, people and history of the Verse. I’ve never really believed that people actually use these type of features. No one I know likes reading long text segments on a television screen. Too bad it isn’t supplemented with computer animated videos and documentaries.
Mr. Universe’s Compendium: Basically a version of the Alliance Database which comes up with new textual information based on the scenes you’re watching. I found it pretty much useless.

DVD Features in HD:

Deleted Scenes: 13-minutes of 9 deleted 6-minutes of 4 extended scenes, available with or without commentary from Joss Whedon. The scenes are off of an AVID output, not correctly formatted for a 16:9 television, and have time-codes at the top and the bottom of the black letterbox.
Outtakes: 6-minutes of bloopers, presented in the same non-hd condition as the Deleted Scenes.
Featurettes: Future History (4:31), What’s in a Firefly (6:32), Re-Lighting the Firefly (9:40), A Filmmaker’s Journey (19:53), Joss Whedon Introduction (3:41), Take a Walk on Serenity (4:06), The Green Clan (3:07) are all off of the Serenity Collector’s Edition Set. None of the features have been remastered for high definition presentation, and most even contain a letterbox within a letterbox.

Video: 4.5 out of 5
Sound:
5 out of 5
Blu-Ray Exclusives:
2 out of 5
Extra Features:
4 out of 5
Price: $29.99 MSRP ($20 on Amazon)

Bottom Line: I wish that Universal would have spent the extra time cleaning up the extra features for High Definition presentation. The addition of the Visual Commentary and Picture in Picture features are cool, but can’t really be played at the same time. If you play the film with both activated, the player will push you back to the visual commentary when the Picture in Picture segments end, leaving it up to you to switch back over to PinP when another segment begins. Hey, I’m lazy. Truth is this is the type of movie that either you lvoe or hate, and if you love it and have a High Definition television, its a no-brainer. BLU

More after the jump.

Ghost Town
Exclusive to Blu-ray: The Blu-ray release includes all the DVD features in High Definition, but nothing more. Actually, the menu screen was incredibly slow and sluggish on my Samsung P1500. A budget Blu-ray player, I know, but I’ve rarely seen menu issues on other discs (mostly just load time increases)

DVD Features in HD: :

Making Ghost Town: Your standard 22-minute behind the scenes featurette which is a little bit more bearable because of Ricky Gervais.
Ghostly Effects: A 2-minute look at the way the ghost effects were created for the film. Oddly, the visual demonstration isn’t even narrated by a special effects producer, and is instead set to music from the film.
Some People Can Do It: A very entertaining 6-minute blooper reel.

Video: 4 out of 5
Sound:
3.5 out of 5
Blu-Ray Exclusives:
0 out of 5
Extra Features:
1 out of 5
Price: $39.99 MSRP ($28 on Amazon)

Bottom Line: The movie is probably a rental at best, and even if you’re a huge Ricky Gervais fan, the high definition difference is minimal and probably not worth the extra money. NOT

The Duchess
Exclusive to Blu-ray: The Duchess is the extract definition of what I hate: costumed period dramas with pretentious actors/actresses, but I’m not here to judge the movie, I’m here to tell you about the extra value content. As much as I hate period dramas, I love watching how Hollywood creates the elaborate sets and costumes required for such projects. Unfortunately, Paramount has decided to include a barebones set of extras. All the content is presented in High Definition, but none of it is exclusive to the Blu-Ray release.

DVD Features in HD: : The barebones set of extras include a 23-minute “How Far She Went… Making The Duchess” documentary which somehow succeeds at being more dull than the movie itself. “Georgiana in Her Own Words” is a 7-minute look at the letters that inspired the film, a 5-minute Costume Diary, and the two theatrical trailers. Even those who love the film will probably find the featurettes on this set boring.

Video: 4.5 out of 5 - If anything else, this film looks gorgeous in 1080p
Sound:
4 out of 5
Blu-Ray Exclusives:
0 out of 5
Extra Features:
1 out of 5
Price: $39.99 MSRP ($28 on Amazon)

Bottom Line: The film looks great, but the extras are slim, and blu-ray exclusives are nonexistent. It’s hard to recommend that you spend $15 more on the High Definition release unless you really really loved the film. NOT

  • Blake
    From the moment i bought my Blu-ray player, I have only bought Blu-ray movies except for the occasional DVD for my wife. I have been spoiled by HD Cable programming, and I can't find myself enjoying standard def movies anymore. I go Blu-ray all the way from now on. The hi-def picture & sound is a no brainer for me.
  • lownwolf
    I too believe this column should say something about sight and sound. I recently watched Wall-E and The Da Vinci Code on a 52" screen in HD. The difference in picture and color quality is amazing. Comments like these should be added to your column. Every HD enthusiast should at least rent Wall-E and watch it on Blu-Ray.
    Judging whether to buy a movie in DVD or BR based on extras is ok, but in the end it seems backwards. You are purchasing the movie because you enjoy it and would like to add it to your collection, if that is not enough reason to purchase the highest quality of this movie, then why are you buying it?

    Extras are just that, extra. Let's not forget the product is the movie. Am I the only one tired of studios recording 3 lame endings to a movie, even though they know they won't be used, just so they can say, "OMG ALTERNATE ENDINGS MUST BUY!!!!!"
  • lownwolf
    on an added note. This whole, "most americans can't see the difference between HD and SD" It's bull shit.
    If you have a Blu-Ray player, then you can tell the difference enough to warrant spending that much money on a new player.
    If you own a Blu-Ray player and cannot tell the difference, then you're just burning money anyway so you might as well buy everything in BR.

    Know you're audience Peter. Your readership isn't made up of "most americans"
  • yodaboy01
    I don't know if this was said last time this column came out, but judging whether to get blu-rays based on extra content seems like a pretty silly idea to me. The point of blu-ray is the improved picture and sound quality of the film, which is the main reason why I and all my friends buy blu-ray. Extras are nice to have but their quality is not a dealbreaker on whether I buy blu or not.

    Blu-ray should ALWAYS be the recommendation and from there you can review the quality of the extra's, but I just can't imagine why you'd pretty much recommend for people to get the DVD if theres no high def extras.
  • Picture and sound are figured into the "extra value content — the Blu-ray difference" I talk about in the intro. But honestly, polls have already been done that show that most of America doesn't see a difference between DVD and HD. If you have a TV smaller than 30 inches, its hard to see much of a difference. The reason why DVD caught on was 1. ease of use (no rewinding..etc) 2. the extra features. Home theater enthusiasts will disagree, but mainstream america cant tell the difference between uncompressed 5.1 and compressed 5.1 on their store bought surround sound package. Bottom line is that some studios aren't even trying with the Blu-ray extras. In the case of the Serenity Disc, all the DVD extras aren't even formatted to fit your widescreen television. Its frustrating.
  • yodaboy01
    The extras have at least gotten a little better over blu-rays life span. All of Fox's inital realeases had zero extra content, despite there being 2 disc special editions available for them to pull the docos from. I realise I'm speaking as a home theatre person who finds the downplaying of the quality of the film in your article as 'missing the point' because to me that is the blu-ray difference, so i'll jsut accept that your writing here for people watching on smaller screens who won't notice the difference. However, maybe you could add your own opinions about the picture and sound quality for the films so you can also speak to those who are fortunate enough to have a larger television.
  • I see your point. The column is in it's early stages, and I will definitely be taking your suggestions on picture and sound into consideration. I've always taken sound and picture into consideration, in the ratings and in the Bottom line BLU or NOT rating, but I just never thought that anyone would want to read a sentence or two about me talking about black levels and over-saturation and compression. Seems rather boring.
  • Ian
    I'd be happy to hear abut it as well.
  • Mike Black
    I completely disagree. I have a large collection of DVDs, and I don't plan to replace any of those movies with Blu-rays unless there is a substantial reason to. Even when buying new discs, I'm not going to pay double if the DVD has everything I need. If Star Wars or Transformers 2 is released in Bluray, thats a given. But Ghost Town? I'll settle with the DVD version.
  • Roger
    I agree with yodaboy01. Even when I'm upconverting DVDs to 1080p through a ton of FFDshow settings on my HTPC, the picture quality still leaves a lot to be desired when compared to Blu-Ray.

    And while exclusive extras on a Blu-Ray release is nice, I'm buying the Blu-Ray for superior sight and sound.
  • Iron Monger
    yeah, but sometimes the extra $$$ doesn't warrant the Blu-Ray purchase over a cheaper DVD version. I'm betting you have a sweet home theater setup. 60 inch plasma or something right? Most people don't.
  • Boxoffice Marco
    Pete, I understand deciding whether or not to rebuy a previously owned DVD in Blu-Ray but what about new releases? If I'm a fan of a film, I ALWAYS get the Blu-Ray for picture and sound and debate double-dipping on older titles on a case by case basis. What do you think? And did Universal send you the Bourne Blu-Ray box yet? I'm curious to hear how that looks in BR. :)
  • Would you really spend tripple the purchase price to buy a recent comedy like Zack and Miri on Bluray instead of DVD just for picture quality? I don't think so. Havent seen the Bourne set yet
  • Captain Obvious
    "If you have a TV smaller than 30 inches, its hard to see much of a difference."

    I just logged in for the first time to call bullshit.
  • Most surveys show that people don't see a noticeable enough difference with a 26 inch television. Google is your friend :)
  • Survey results
    I found the survey, its "A full 18 percent of HDTV owners can't tell the difference between SD and HD, according to a survey from Leichtman Research Group, which polled over 1,300 U.S. households about what they were watching." But that is a standard, non digital television signal vs. hd programing. Now imagine what the numbers are like for DVD vs. bluray
  • Iron Monger
    WOW. Now that's scary
  • Captain Obvious.
    Two different points, Peter. One is speaking of "most" Americans, who are unfamiliar with HD media, and the other is the segment of the population buying Blu-rays. They see a difference.
  • The best selling bluray player on the market is the playstation 3. Most PS3 owners don't buy blu-ray movies however... but they do buy DVDs...
  • Joe
    For anyone looking for that Eagle Eye ending: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yy1CEUHHF10

    I lol'd
  • Boxoffice Marco
    I have a decent setup at my place (good size flatscreen and speakers) and I can tell the difference on small movies like Zack and Miri. I can usually find deals online where I pay no more than 5-7 bucks more for the BR than the DVD. To me it's worth it whether it's a small character flick like "The Wackness" or a lavish color feast like "The Fall" (which is currently spinning in my PS3). Whad'ya think?
  • If they were the same price, I'd buy Blu-ray everytime. But I care about the picture quality. I'm a film geek just like you. We have huge collections. I have a lot of friends who I would clasify as non film geeks, and most of them wouldn't care about the difference between dvd and blu-ray unless it was some huge hollywood blockbuster that would take advantage of the picture. And even then, I think cost might win out. I do however think things like the amazing WALL-E visual commentary are system sellers. I show people it and they are amazed "Bluray can do that?" they say. I don't think its the obvious answer, but I think better extras could help the adoption of the format.
  • yodaboy01
    The idea that a film has to be a Hollywood blockbuster on blu to take advantage of the picture is ridiculous and must stop. Take a look at any of the Kubrick films released on blu to see what im talking about. In fact, I bet people would notice more of a difference when they pick up amazing amount of detail on a quiet tracking shot, than they could in a modern '3 cuts in 2 seconds' current blockbuster.
  • Yes and No. I think most of America see the on demand revolution coming and don't see the need to invest in a new format for a couple years. They already get netflix on demand on their xboxs and high definition movies on demand for free with their premium cable packages. I'm not saying that Bluray isn't going to take off, I'm just saying that its not the same situation. Plus, the quality difference between VHS/standard cable and DVD is so much more noticeable to the everyday person compared to DVD to HD.
  • Boxoffice Marco
    Pete, I'm a bit confused. I don't think middle America embraces HD on demand and Netflix live the way we film geeks do. And on top of that, most middle Americans don't have HDTV's so they're not seeing the difference. Playing a BR on a standard tube TV has zero power compared to playing it on a flatscreen. When prices come down and the HD conversion takes off (resulting in more HDTV sales), I think BR might become more accepted. As always, whad'ya think? :)

    P.S. I searched EVERYWHERE on my "Wall-E" BR disc 2 for "The Pixar Story" and couldn't find it. Where is it? :(
  • We're not even talking about middle american folks. I have a lot of friends who own a PS3 and a HD tv but only buy DVDs. I know a lot of people that don't even buy DVDs anymore, all they do is watch ondemand hbo/cinemax/showtime. And Pixar Story is on the second Disc somewhere,
  • J'osh
    I just got a Blu Ray this X-mas. I will be buying Blu's using the same judgment I usse for seeing films in the theater - Action and Event Flicks I buy all others DVD's are fine.
  • conn
    " Truth is [Serenity] is the type of movie that either you lvoe or hate"

    People hate Serenity?!
blog comments powered by Disqus