Movie Review: Valkyrie - The Redemption of Tom Cruise?

As I sat down to write my review of Bryan Singer’s Valkyrie, I was struck by how many questions this film is expected to answer upon its release. Can Singer still deliver a big-budget success, after the lackluster performance of Superman Returns? Can Tom Cruise bounce back from his self-inflicted public image problems? Can an exciting and suspenseful film be made about a story that virtually everybody knows the ending to? Read on, curious inquirers…

Valkyrie tells the story of the July 20 (1944) plot by the German Resistance to assassinate Adolf Hitler. Led by Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg (Cruise), the resistance conceives of Operation Valkyrie, which, after the assassination of Hitler, would incapacitate the German government and set up a new shadow government in its place. Cruise is joined in his mission by fellow dissenters such as Major General Tresckow (Kenneth Branagh), General Friedrich Olbricht (Bill Nighy), General Ludwig Beck (Terrence Stamp) and General Erich Fellgiebel (Eddie Izzard).

Only viewers with virtually no familiarity with world history will fail to realize from the outset that Operation Valkyrie was a failure. Thus, Singer’s biggest challenge was to make the movie thrilling, despite the audience’s foreknowledge. In this regard, I can say confidently that he succeeds. I saw Valkyrie in a packed theater and there is a certain magic that when you are watching a movie with an audience that is completely engrossed with the onscreen proceedings. As the details of Operation Valkyrie slowly unraveled, I could feel the gears turning as everyone began to grasp the mechanics and implications of the plot. And when the ultimate moment finally arrived, I felt the audience collectively held their breath, wondering whether or not the assassination plan would actually work. It was a unique and exciting experience, and I came away with a great respect for what Singer accomplished here.

But like many historical films, this one coasts completely on the strength of its story and plot. The characters here are virtual ciphers; we’re really given no information about anyone’s motivation and the movie just assumes that you’ll put the pieces together yourself (not that you can’t). The only person you’re given any backstory for is Col. Stauffenberg, and that’s only from a few lines of voiceover at the beginning of the film.

In any other movie, the lack of character development would be a strong mark against it but what prevents that from happening in Valkyrie is the uniform excellence of its cast. Some of the performances on display here are truly marvelous. While Nighy, Wilkinson, and Stamp turn in characteristically fine turns, I really want to direct attention to two actors that most American audiences probably don’t know too much about: Christian Berkel (who plays Col. Quirnheim) and Thomas Kretschmann (who plays Major Remer). Interestingly, both of them played Nazis in Oliver Hirschbiegel’s German film, Downfall, as well, but their brief turns here prove them worthy in English-speaking roles too. Quirnheim’s single-mindedness in accomplishing the mission makes him one of the more sympathetic supporting characters in the film, and  Major Remer manages to provide some of the film’s rare humorous moments (plus his physical shiver when he hears that voice is one of my favorite movie moments of 2008).

But what of Tom Cruise, whose eye-patched depiction of Stauffenberg has helped to create the immutable and negative buzz surrounding Valkyrie? In general, I suppose I am a Cruise apologist. I think if you try and ignore his couch-jumping antics, you’ll find a man who still tries his damndest for every single movie he appears in. He might not always succeed, but he always manages to show at least a hint of why he got to where he is in the first place.

Cruise’s performance in Valkyrie is thoroughly competent, and not nearly as bad as some of the trailers might lead you to believe. His use of an American accent can occasionally be jarring, and the infamous “Heil Hitler!” scene did strike me as mildly silly. But all the other elements of Stauffenberg’s character are rendered skillfully. He’s a loving father, an injured veteran, and a citizen determined to restore honor back to Germany. Make no mistake: the biggest challenge for for this film is the audience’s willingness to separate Cruise’s public persona from his onscreen portrayal of Stauffenberg. If you can do this, you’ll find that while Cruise doesn’t deliver an Oscar-worthy performance, he doesn’t come close to sinking the movie as some would have you believe.

Overall, in order to enjoy Valkyrie, there is a lot that you, the viewer, needs to be willing to do. You have to accept that the movie, despite being set in Nazi Germany, forces all of the actors to sport English or American accents. You need to be willing to ignore all the poisonous hype and give Tom Cruise another chance in a dramatic role. And for a couple of hours, you need to believe that a few determined men in Nazi Germany had the potential to end one of the most infamous political regimes in human history. Do all of these things, and you’ll find a movie that serves as a fine testament to the determination of the German resistance and a fascinating look at how close they really came.

/Film Rating: 8 out of 10

David Chen can be reached at davechensemail(AT)gmail.com. You can also follow him on Twitter.

About the Author

David Chen currently does research and writing for a university in the Boston area. He can be reached at davechensemail(AT)gmail(DOT)com.

  • Excellent to hear. I feel confident with seeing the movie now. Thanks David!
  • That is a great review. I look forward in watching the movie.
  • rob
    doesnt everyone hate him because he is a scientologist? if so, then valkyrie doesnt change much


    but good review...les grossman>any tom cruise character in my mind
  • if they hate him because of Scientology, they are fucking idiots and need to get over it. I don't care what he believes in, I enjoy his movies and I like him.
  • Barneyfife
    Fucking idiots? It's a matter of principle, something you apparently lack. Scientology kills. Scientology harasses its critics, abuses the legal system, blackmailed the Federal Government. If someone else supports that, I won't support that person. Fuck off.
  • Catholicism is ten times worse than Scientology on their best day. Homophobic, sexist, and anti-choice. That said, who gives a fuck
  • Pistol Pete
    Maybe in the 12th Century there Vega, get a clue.
  • yeah, we're all far beyond issues such as abortion, gay marriages and exclusively male ordained ministers. But thats not the point. The point is: Who. Gives. A...Fuck
  • Paul
    VegaBro: No Scientology is much worse than the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church never blackmailed the IRS to get tax deductions no other organisation (even if religious) has. The Catholic Church doesn't require "mandatory donations" of hundreds of thousands of dollars to read some of their texts (you can read the bible and go to church without tithing). The founder of Scientology, L. Ron Hubbard, wrote people in a group that he included gays in "should be disposed of quietly and without sorrow". Hubbard wrote in one of his books "Scientology is not a religion" before removing it from later versions after they cloaked Scientology in the terminology of religion. Real human rights abuses are happening now because of the Church of Scientology. The Catholic Church's wrongdoings don't mitigate Scientology's. I give a fuck because this movie supports an organisation that has a written order stating that opponents "May be deprived of property or injured by any means by any Scientologist without any discipline of the Scientologist. May be tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed".
  • Clint Barton
    When Ghandi was once asked about what he thought of Christianity, he replied,"I think it is a marvelous idea, I just wish someone would try it."
    For a religion that preaches love thy neighbor and tho shall not kill, Christians have done little of the first and more than any other group on the plant in the latter.
    I just hope you stick to your convictions Paul and ban all films and/or actors that are Christian too. That way you don't seem hippocratic. Make sure you include the whole Judo-Christian-Islam religions, since they do all have the same god.
  • Jack
    there is a difference between calling for a boycott of a product that will directly support a criminal organization, and banning a film.
  • Clint Barton
    Well then never shop at Wal-Mart again... Not only do they support sweatshops, they also practice corporate salvery...
  • Clint Barton
    Just cause a film has Tom Cruise in it, doesn't mean it supports Scientology.
    Who (from production of the film) said this film supports Scientology? And please post a link for proof.
  • xenu
    your money money->film
    Film money->Tom
    Tom money->Scientology
    Scientology money->intergalactic warlords
  • Dave
    Going out to buy an eighty ball of coke now - because that doesn't support murder by drug cartels.
  • ...this movie supports an organization that ha--hahahahahaha
  • Saint Donkey Kong
    the Scientology crap is old if tom Cruise wants to join a religion run by Curious George I really could care less. If he does his job well the movie will be decent. Anyone who chooses to believe as a religious doctrine something orchestrated by a Science Fiction author ummm, well they may be a little short quantity wise in there basket of apples. But really people we are talking about a person who's job it is to play pretend convincingly enough that a pretty wide swath of the public will believe or at least find entertaining.
  • Excellent review Mr. Chen. I really want to see this movie, I have faith in Tom Cruise to deliver a great performance and it sounds like he has according to the review. I'm pretty sure I'll be able to get past his personal life antics long enough to sit in a theater and enjoy this film.

    I think that I might have had a problem with the american sounding accents before but if it works and the move flows seemlessly and I wouldn't care either way over the accents.
  • Excellent review Mr. Chen. I really want to see this movie, I have faith in Tom Cruise to deliver a great performance and it sounds like he has according to the review. I'm pretty sure I'll be able to get past his personal life antics long enough to sit in a theater and enjoy this film.

    I think that I might have had a problem with the American sounding accents before but if it works and the move flows seamlessly and I wouldn't care either way over the accents.
  • I am so fucking sick of all this Tom Cruise bashing, and I agree with you, I think his performance should be good in this movie.
  • Rupert
    I won't bother with reading this, because Tom Cruise is in no need of redemption. As an actor, he hasn't been anything but good in a long time. Even when the film was bad aka Lions for Lambs, he was still a strong presence in the film. So screw this idea that Tom Cruise has something to prove.
  • Good review, movie looks great.
  • Kokushi
    People dont remember facking Collateral 4 years ago? He was amazing in that movie. Great review, cant wait to see the movie.
  • Hell yeah, his performance was amazing. I even dare to say that Vincent is the coolest hitman i have ever seen on screen.
  • pmharrell
    Watch "The Professional" :)
  • I watched Léon and i love the film but i'm still saying that Vincent is the most bad ass hitman i have ever seen on screen.

    Léon is a great character but not as a hitman.
  • garyoldman
    seconded
  • Good to hear this film actually delivers. I am the farthest thing from a Tom Cruise fan and if this were any other film I wouldn't be watching it, but considering the rest of the cast and crew as well as the subject matter, I will no doubt be seeing this in theaters.
  • Very excellent review. Not a hint of bias in it, just the way reviews should be. It's posts like this that are the reason why I frequent slashfilm.
  • I like Cruise as an actor. Don't give a shit about his personal life. I love movies of this genre and Singer is a pretty good director so I'll definitely be seeing this.
  • bob
    I don't think I'd be able to watch this and not be constantly reminded of the fact that Mr Cruise believes that Psychiatry is responsible for the holocaust. no wonder the son of the real Stauffenberg didn't want him any where near the roll.
  • "Overall, in order to enjoy Valkyrie, there is a lot that you, the viewer, needs to be willing to do."

    While I king of agree, I think a film should be judged on its merits by itself - if it is a truly good work, the audience shouldn't have to do anything except view it with some suspension of disbelief.
  • By that standard, any movie can seem enjoyable if you disregard a lot of bad elements. I'll probably just catch this one on the ole DVD.
  • kboyace
    I think it'll be very hard to take Tom Cruise seriously again. Of course his offscreen public image is going to effect my judgment of his performance. I really want to see this movie, but I just hope Cruise's acting doesn't contain the standard elements of 'always running-Tom Cruise'.
  • /filmluvsmaverick
    i'll be seeing it. i think Cruise is a wacko, but he's one of my fav actors, when he's actually acting.
  • Good, solid review. Tom Cruise isn't that bad, it's true, and the movie isn't that bad, but it's not good either and whoa, that rating is waaaaay too high.
  • I still find it funny that Cruise went from being one of the most painfully boring actors in Hollywood to bat shit crazy. Such a dramatic change over the years.
  • I will see this movie and support Tom Cruise.
  • austinanon1
    because your a puppet
  • scot
    or are you the puppet who jumps in the tom cruise hate band wagon.
  • i think I am the only one that doesn't like the review? I think is too cautious.
    I love TC and it is time he gets some recognition of ihs amazing talent. Maybe he is not robert Deniro, or Edward Norton but he certainly is one of the best actors in last 20 years. I can't wait to see this movie! Generally I don't like war movies but I'll make an exception this time.
    As per Tom's personal life I can just say that being scientologist to me is the same as being catholic or muslim. Its all BS (to me) But I respect people's right to choose whatever religion/believes as they see fit!
  • Hank
    The worst movie I saw this year bar none. You're right, you're an apologist. $9 for that piece of trivial revisionist bullshite?
  • box office
    I don't believe your review based on all the others that say Tom Cruise is "Distractingly bad" and is the downfall of the entire film.

    The original test audience is reported to have fallen asleep. The movie was over budget the studio is scared and doubling up on the money to advertise this piece of dung that cruise is worried will kill what is left of his career.
  • What are you, nuts?! Just based on the advertizing for this stink bomb it's without question a movie to avoid. But what's really at issue is the fact that the notoriously criminal Scientology Corporation gets money from every ticket sold to see this stink bomb. That's money that the crime syndicate will use to commit its well known human rights and racketeering crimes against society.

    Cruise has never been a good actor. The fact that the frothingly insane shill for organized crime is trying to rebuild his "United Artist" company and his own lame career is obvious, and just as obvious this horrible movie is the insane crook's last dieing gasp.
  • Sam
    I like that you are willing to appreciate it, and I don't like that "scientology crooks" is promoting the kind of bias you say prevents people from enjoying the film.

    Films started as the cinema of attractions. Literally, a movie was a shot of an approaching train. That's it.

    We have lost the ability to separate our cynicism from our senses. Why not just drop our preconceived notions and baggage and all that and just enjoy the film, as Chen says.

    Happy Holidays!
  • Beginning of the End
    Hmmm, I don't know about that film for film's sake, separate from those who made it when they go international media outlets for YEARS and promote things like the "Second Chance" drug rehab program in New Mexico which tried to sneak out prisoners in the dark of night on Christmas Eve (last night) in order to avoid police investigators. No, this is not a lie. Scientologists posing as an alternative program to prison rented a jail from a town and said they were doing rehab (which doesn't work). They had somewhere between 40 and 50 people registered for the program, yet last night 8 disappeared out of the county in a van driven west out of the jurisdiction, while another forty people who have not been identified were release directly from this "prison" and taken to homeless shelters.

    Gee, I dunno. Separate the actor from the fantasy he public promotes with all his hearth like a demagogue on crack cocaine? "You don't know about psychiatry! I DO!" Any idea how many people went off much needed medications as a result of this idiot's criminal insanity?

    Separate all you want, but the happiest Christmas present that would bring good will toward men would be to boycott this movie for the piece of revisionist trash that it is, and for the EVERYWHERE ELSE reported mediocre performance of it's culty star.
  • Clint Barton
    You can bring up all the bad the Scientology has done, and that's fine. I think that they are a bad organization and religion myself. I also believe that Scientology should be examined by the government and held accountable for what they have done.
    On that though, I believe the same about the Judo-Christian-Islamic religions too. Scientology is a new religion, so your more prone to pick on their wrong doings. But have you forgot about all the bad those three main religions have done as well? Have you forgot about the billions that have died in the name of their Lord? Do you remember the Spanish Inquisition that started in 1478? Or how about all the people (mainly women) that died in America with the Salem Witch Trials? Or we can go with the Crusades. These religions are much older and have their wrong doings spread across a larger time scale.
    So with the logic of banning an actor/actress or a film based on its ties to Scientology, you should ban all films that involve any actor/actress that have any religious affiliation.
    QUICK QUESTION?: Have you banned Mel Gibson films yet? He did yell anti-Semetic remarks while driving drunk. That's two big strikes.
    OR:
    Have you banned Jane Fonda and all of her films yet? Do you go on websites and protest her films? I mean, she is a traitor to her country; she refused to give American POWs (Prisioner(s) Of War) an opportunity to get a message back home so that their families could know that they were alive. Even going so far as to turn the letter over to the Vietnamese while degrading the US servicemen and calling them baby killers.
    So before you start a tirade about Tom Cruise and/or Scientology. Just remember that other religions and/or actors have done far worse than Scientology has done or has yet to do.
  • A Watcher
    This is the argument of someone who was too damn lazy to do some basic research on the COS.

    This is NOT about forgetting the atrocities committed by those who claim to act in the name of God. something needs to be made VERY clear. The COS IS NOT A RELIGION. It has 'religious recognition' in eight or nine countries in the world. Out of what, 200+? In Israel, they aren't recognized as a religion. Just the opposite; they push themselves as a secular self-improvement, tax-paying business. If Scientology were a bona fida religion, don't you think they would present themselves as such? This alone should raise eyebrows.

    exscientologykids.com is FULL of stories from people who grew up and escaped Scientology. Since you clearly don't believe Scientology is any worse than other 'religions, I'd like to post this story that was written by someone who escaped the cult. Her name is Mellisa Miller and this is her story.


    I was about 13 years old when my parents’ marriage seemed to be falling apart. A friend talked with them about Scientology. One day, one of my parents left home, then returned after being away for weeks. Then almost immediately after that parent’s return, the other parent left and did not return until months later. It was a very confusing time. My siblings and I did our best to maintain a normal schedule with school, homework, chores, etc. It was also unnerving not knowing where our missing parent was or what was happening.

    After the second parent reappeared back at home, we were told that said parent had supposedly found what they had been looking for all of their life. We were then told that this parent would be moving away for an indefinite amount of time. We were very confused by all of this. Our family life was radically changed forever.

    Before the parent left, one of my siblings asked to go along. The request was granted. I chose to stay behind as I was doing well in school and had friends I did not want to leave behind. As it turned out, the family of mine that remained behind, and I, suffered a dysfunctional existence.

    It was difficult for me, at 13 years old, to try to hold down the fort for the remaining parent. I did my best but it obviously was not enough. I would help my siblings get off to school before I left for school myself. I would help them with their homework, make dinners, pack lunches, walk to the store to buy food, clean the house, and do the laundry. I would make sure they had their baths. I had assumed the role of a parent while still being a child myself.

    One day when I got home after school, my sibling who had left with the absent parent was at home. The remaining parent told me that we were going to leave with that sibling the next day to go live with the absent parent (without the parent who had remained at home). I was devastated. I did not want to leave my school or friends.

    The move was horrible; by this time the absent parent, whom I will now refer to as SciParent (my version of an SP), was deeply involved with Scientology. My siblings and I were taken to a house in the downtown area of a fair sized city. This house was owned by a Scientologist and was more or less sectioned off into one apartment, a bunch of rooms for boarders, a bathroom, and a kitchen.

    SciParent rented the apartment but we kids had to live in one of the other rooms. We were to share the communal kitchen (which really used to be a bedroom) and the communal bathroom. This house had probably about eight other Scientologists (besides my family) living there. They were all adults with the exception of me and my siblings, and all but one were male. I must also mention that my SciParent rarely slept at the house, choosing to sleep at the homes of Scientologists of the opposite gender.

    My SciParent was ALWAYS at the org, either on course or receiving auditing. We children were abandoned and left to fend for ourselves. We were not in school. We did not have food in the house. We had to find ways to earn some money so we could have some food and pay our rent. The ones of us who were old enough would babysit. After a while, one of my siblings got a full time job at the org, a good position, too – especially for someone under the age of 18.
  • A Watcher
    (Continued from above)

    It was very strange; this sibling was in a trusted position. I would babysit all day, for Scientologists of course. At dinnertime, I would walk across town to
    the org and go to work there until I was told I could go home. Some nights this was not until well after midnight. Weekends would put me at the org, too. I did everything from going out on the streets to hand out free personality test coupons to answering the org’s phones. I was required to write letters to people who had shown even a smidgeon of interest in Scientology. I had my stats to keep up, too. I think the most I got for a week’s work (nights and weekends) was around $5.00.

    There were many times when I so wanted to see and speak with my SciParent. I would ask to do so at the org and I was ALWAYS refused. My parent could not be disturbed for any reason. It was horrible. I had no parental influence, love and guidance.

    One evening I wanted to go see a movie. I saw my parent coming into the org. I asked to be taken to the movie (I was still about 13 years old). My parent saw a man standing nearby, pointed at him and told me to ask him to take me. The man heard the exchange between my parent and me. He offered to take me to the movie and of course, I had to pay for my ticket. After that, he would not leave me alone. He followed me home. I would come home from the org some nights and he would be sitting in my room. He pretty much stalked me. Then one night when my siblings and parent were not at the house, he raped me.

    I was still a virgin at the time and did not know what was happening. All I know is that it hurt and I cried. When he was done, he slapped me and called me a whore. Being the weirdo he was, he then told me he loved me and wanted to marry me. He was somewhere around 23 years old.

    The next evening, while I was working at the org, a man who I often worked with could tell that something was wrong. I told him what had happened. I knew that I could do nothing about it, as the policy of Scientology is to handle things internally. Even though I was not a full fledged, course taking Scientologist, my parent was. I could not go to the police. If I were to do anything, it would be to report it to the Ethics Officer, who would then handle things.

    I must add that by this time I had read a great number of the books and learned the churches policies. Still, I was a child. I was scared and ashamed. I felt that it was my fault as the “church” claims that bad things happen because a person has done something to “pull it in”. Back to my trusted friend: He instructed me to have the rapist at my house the next night, which was not an issue because I could not get him to leave the house.

    (Continued below)
  • A Watcher
    (Continued from above)

    The next night came. I was at the house with my rapist and two others. I cannot recall who they were. There was a knock at the door. It was my trusted confidant from the org and he had about three or four other men with him.
    They came in and asked my rapist to step outside where they could talk. He did not want to go but after a few words were exchanged, he left. I never saw him again.

    During my time working at the org, my siblings and I were being hounded to join the Sea Org. I was 14 years old by this time. I remember holding the Sea Org contract in my hands and thinking it was ludicrous to even propose a billion year contract, especially to a minor. I remember signing it while wondering, “What the heck am I doing?”

    My siblings and I had eventually had enough of the neglect and forced labor. We saved up enough money for bus tickets and skipped out on the rent and went back home. Our lives there were not a whole lot better but we were back in school and around friends; and we did not have to pay our own rent.

    Shortly after our return home, one parent filed divorced. For some reason, the SciParent decided to move back just after the filing. Shortly after the divorce was final and the assets divided, SciParent decided to move to another city to pursue Scientology in a different org.

    This was another catastrophe. Again, we were put in a house with a bunch of adult Scientologists. Again, SciParent was absent most of the time. I again babysat for Scientologists during the day. I did not go work at the org. I felt I deserved more money for my time than the previous org had given me and I was not going to get into doing that again. Although I would hang out at the org, so I had someone to talk with and maybe could see my SciParent occasionally. I was uncomfortable being at the house without my SciParent, too.

    One evening, I fell asleep on the couch in the communal living room of our house. In the middle of the night, one of our housemates raped me. There was an 18 or more year difference in our ages and I was still underage. I once again said nothing. I knew my SciParent would do nothing being that they were both Scientologists. The most that would happen is an Ethics Officer’s intervention and I would have to get auditing, which I did not want under any circumstances.

    I then realized I was pregnant. I was devastated. I had been looking forward to being a mother some day but there was no way in hell I was going to have the child of a Scientologist rapist. The most difficult thing I have ever done was abort that pregnancy.

    A few years after, I was being badgered by my SciParent and other Scientologists to “get on course” and join the Sea Org, reading the books wasn’t enough to appease them anymore So to get them off my back, I signed up for I believe it was the Communications Course. I think it was the second night of classes, when I just got up and walked out of the course room. Naturally, the Course Super followed me out. He kept telling me that I had a “misunderstood”. I told him that I understood completely well what I had been reading and it was a bunch of bullshit. He claimed that the only reason I would not agree to what I was reading was due to a “misunderstood”.

    We argued briefly. I finally told him that the issue was his, as his MU (misunderstood) was clearly the fact that he could not recognize bullshit when he saw it. I honestly feel that I had just reached my fill with Scientologists and Scientology. I had seen enough of what it was REALLY doing to people. I was sitting on the sidelines being neglected and raped. There were long stretches of time when all I had to eat was peanut butter (no bread), or pancake mix, which I would have to mix with water only. I had to wash out our clothes with a bar of body soap in the bathtub. No one cared because all that mattered was “the greatest good for the greatest number” which was the success of Scientology.

    (Final part below)
blog comments powered by Disqus