I’m the type of guy who owns 3,000 DVDs, so when the two High Definition formats were announced, I used the HD wars as an excuse not to take the leap into a new format. But truth is, I don’t want to start over. And besides that, I’m pretty convinced that the future of movies is digital downloads and streaming (imagine a service where you can watch any movie released, anytime you want, for a $50 a month subscription fee… I’d pay it).

But then a couple weeks ago I found myself standing in the Virgin Megastore in downtown San Francisco debating on if I should buy WALL-E on DVD, or for a few dollars more on Blu-ray. It’s not that my home is entirely Blu-ray-less, we have a Playstation 3.I decided to pull the trigger and buy my first Blu-ray movie. And there probably aren’t many better choices than Pixar’s WALL-E. The visuals and sound are quite amazing. It would be hard to watch this film in standard DVD resolution.

After watching the film, I started watching the Cine-Explore feature with director Andrew Stanton. It’s an audio commentary track supplemented by concept art, animatics, video footage from production and various other stuff. It’s basically a visual audio commentary. I can’t begin to explain to you how cool it was to watch the movie in this new visual commentary mode. I remember watching my first audio commentary on DVD (for the movie Scream) and having the same feeling.

To me, the selling point for DVD was not the improvement in picture quality. It was the extra features. I’m not sure if that is the case with mainstream America, but most of my friends also made the jump due to the additional features. And it seems to me that the concept of extra value features is one of the reasons that America isn’t adopting the Blu-ray format as quickly as Hollywood would like.

WALL-E resulted in me buying a stand alone Blu-ray player. For me it was a reason to switch. But I have since discovered that not many of the discs are taking advantage of the extra feature capabilities of the Blu-ray format. Mainstream America doesn’t see the jump in video quality enough of a reason to buy a whole new player. And it’s tough for me not to agree, especially if you have a television below 36 inches. Hollywood needs to give mainstream America a reason to switch. And I’m sorry, the reason won’t be BD-Live features that allow you to record your own audio commentary and send it to your friends. If Hollywood expects consumers to pay double to price for Blu-Ray, they have to start putting some extra effort into creating value added content.

Blu-or-Not is a new weekly feature on /Film where I will take a look at the newest Blu-ray releases and tell you if they are worth the extra money. It is not my job to tell you if a movie is worth buying or not, for that you can read Adam’s weekly This Week in DVD feature. I’m here to tell you what your options are, and if a Blu-Ray purchase is worth the extra money. So lets get to it.

Death Race
Exclusive to Blu-ray:
Create Your Own Race allows you edit your own race scene using seven different video feeds. You switch between little video monitors on the left of the screen using your remote. The completed video can be saved or sent to your friends through BD-Live. This feature was actually a lot of fun. I’ve seen similar features on DVD releases, but they never gave you the control that you now have on the Blu-ray format.

Picture in Picture: You can watch the movie with picture in picture inclusion of scene specific behind the scenes video and interviews. While this isn’t as good as say the WALL-E Cine-Explore, I can see how this feature will improve over time. It’s quite cool to watch the action of a scene being choreographed right before the sequence plays out on the big screen. There are a lot of cool behind the scenes footage during the action sequences, and the footage during the talking sequences are extended or re-purposed from the behind the scenes featurette.
Digital Copy of the film for your computer, iPod, iPhone, etc.

DVD Features in HD:
Unrated and Rated Versions: Both versions of the film are included on one disc, but the director’s commentary track only applies on the Unrated version of the film. The Unrated version is 6 minutes longer.
Start Your Engines - The Making of Death Race and Behind the Wheel: Dissecting The Stunts: Your standard 20 minute / 8-minute Behind the Scenes Featurettes

Video: 4 out of 5
Sound:
5 out of 5
Blu-Ray Exclusives:
3 out of 5
Extra Features:
2.5 out of 5
Price: $39.99 MSRP ($30 on Amazon)

Bottom Line: The action scenes are worthy of 1080p, and the Picture in Picture feature make this one worth going Blu. Kids will enjoy the Create Your Own Race feature (heck I even enjoyed it for about 10 minutes) and the digital copy is always a plus. BLU

Burn After Reading
Exclusive to Blu-ray:
Nothing

DVD Features in HD:
Finding the Burn (5min), DC Insiders Run Amuck (12min), Welcom Back George (3min):
Standard EPK featurettes, shorter than usual and somewhat lacking.

Video: 4 out of 5
Sound:
4 out of 5
Blu-Ray Exclusives:
0 out of 5
Extra Features:
1 out of 5
Price: $39.99 MSRP ($27 on Amazon)

Bottom Line: The Blu-ray features are non existent, and even the DVD features are lacking. While I dug this film a bunch, it’s not the type of movie that requires incredible picture and sound. NOT

Polar Express Presented in 3-D
Exclusive to Blu-ray:
3D Version of the Movie is a Blu-ray exclusive, and the only special feature which is exclusive to the Blu-ray release. James Cameron has been well spoken against releasing films on home video using the old red and blue 3D glasses. He says it is a step backwards, and that it is detrimental to the public opinion of Digital 3D. While I certainly understand his point (the main thing being that mainstream American can’t tell the difference between the old technology and the new, and a lot of people still associate the two together), I must admit that watching the film in 3D on my 60 inch Sony DLP was amazing. Yes, the eyes began to strain pretty quick (something that doesn’t happen as often with the newer 3D technology) but seeing the snowflakes whizz by my head in 3D was an extremely cool experience. I can imagine how much I would have loved this if I were a kid. From what I understand, the red/blue 3D only words with some television sets. I tried the disc in a 19 inch 720p LCD television and while I could see some depth, the effect was not nearly as good. I’m not sure if this is due to the size or screen technology. I’m sure someone will set the record straight in the comments. But the bottom line is that 3D effect can vary from room to room and television to television, and even in the best environment,you will eventually suffer eye strain from the old red/blue 3D technology. One little complaint I have is that the popup menu is not formatted for 3D, so if you use it during 3D playback of the film, it becomes very jarring.

DVD Features in HD:
The disc contains a ton of different making of featurettes, which are all geared towards young children. They are hosted by the children characters from the film and are extremely annoying to watch. One of the more interesting features is the Flurry of Effects sequences which show five different sequences from the film split screened with the final film version and the motion capture sessions used to record those sequences. These segments are truly fascinating. I almost wish that Warner Bros included a whole extra version of the film where you could watch the movie using just the motion capture footage.

Video: 4 out of 5
Sound:
5 out of 5
Blu-Ray Exclusives:
5 out of 5
Extra Features:
3 out of 5
Price: $34.99 msrp ($24 on Amazon)

Bottom Line: With or without 3D, Polar Express is a movie that makes great use of the extra screen resolution. While the disc doesn’t contain any traditional Blu-ray exclusive extras, the 3D version of the film is exclusive to the Blu-ray release itself. The addition of this extra version of the movie is enough for me to recommend the Blu-ray version over the traditional DVD release. BLU

  • LOL
    ^ ^ I agree. I would never buy the new format. (1 movie for $40 ) That's just crazy.

    Fast forward. The author has 3000 DVD movies. Do the math. If he bought 3000 Blu Ray, he would have wasted 120,000. (120K nice down payment on a house. No wonder the U.S. is in a recession.)
  • If you're paying $40 for a Blu-ray you're doing it wrong.
  • Jon
    Well, no, because, if you think about it, how much did DVD cost when it was a new format? Or VHS for that matter? While BluRay is currently more expensive, as DVD fades from existence (a decade perhaps?) BluRay will become standard and cheaper. I believe that digital downloads would be popular, but impractical. Even with the size of hard drives these days, a blueray holds 50gb. How many bluray movies can you download? How many Terrabyte hard drives are you going to need to keep a decent collection? How long are you going to have to wait for that download? (I know that on my comcast connection, it would take days to download that much... oh, and then I could only download 5 movies a month before I hit my cap)
  • Mickey Blu Eyes
    As an early adopter of blu ray (purchased a PS3 in 2006) I came to the same conclusion as has this author after buying a handful of films in the new format. Most new releases aren't worth the premium, however, that said there are some films (Wall-E, Cars, Casino Royal...and others) which ARE worth the extra dime IF you have a FULL HD home theatre setup which takes advantage of the greater PQ/SQ of blu-ray. However, I don't agree with buying a 'stand alone' blu ray player since the feature rich PS3 (web browsing, importing music and photos to hard drive) trumps the plain jane blu ray players....entirely justifiying the extra $$ over the standalone players. In summation: buy your absolute favorites on blu ray and pick up the rest on standard DVD for the time being (until the price of new blu releases drops to under $20.00).
  • Generic
    I'm having deja vue with Beta vs VHS ><
  • I still can not bring myself to make the Blu ray jump.
  • Randy
    Downloads will definitely be the future, but it will take a very long time to get the same sort of picture and sound quality a Blu-ray disc supports from a download, not to mention the time it would take to download something at that high of a caliber.
  • Jones Johnson
    5th paragraph, 2nd to last line. Should be BD-Live not DB-Live... unless Sony plans on releasing a DoucheBag Live feature that I'm not aware of.
  • It's called Playstation Home ;)
  • I bought a $99 Lite-On Blu-Ray/HDDVD combo drive for my media PC just to see the difference. At that price, it was nice to have a single drive that can play DVD, HDDVD and Blu-Ray. All my other hardware and software was HDCP compliant and has been for some time. It all outputs to my Optoma projector in 1080p. There is definately a visual difference from most original DVD movies so far. I will say that so far it has been a little harder to tell on dark movies. I can definately tell an extreme increase in quality and resolution @ 102". I have noticed a better depth of sound on Blu-Ray movies watched so far. Almost like there is less compression of the audio.
  • I don't know why everyone assumes they have to go back and replace their entire DVD collection when starting out with Bluray. Those old discs will still look fine when upscaled. There are a few older films that just scream for an HD treatment, and for those I don't mind repurchasing.

    But really, the big reason you want to go to HD now is for newer releases. In many cases the Bluray disc isn't much more expensive, and the vast improvement in video quality makes it worth it for cinephiles IMO. I don't think Bluray will ever become as mainstream a success as DVD (it's probably going to fall more in line as a more popular Laserdisc), but for movie/TV geeks like us it's definitely worth it.

    I agree with Peter that streaming will eventually be the next big format change for mainstream viewers, but that still doesn't mean we shouldn't take advantage of delicious HD releases as they become available :)
  • I keep wavering on BR, but eventually i'll probably try it. I have a 42" 1080p HDTV, so I really think i'm missing out by not getting it.
  • BRian from OR
    I am all for more extra features on Blu Ray. Hopefully the studioes and film makers add more of these then just advertising "a free digital copy." Which I find pointless and to me not much of a extra feature.
  • lukeg37
    dam you pete and your 3000 dvds.... I swear one day I will have more than you, one day.
  • i have yet to make the switch too. i have a few DVDs, a pretty good selection i would say, and im honestly afraid that the DVD might not be around much longer just like the VHS was back in the 90s. it seems like blu-ray is the future but i hope they can still play DVDS 10 years from now.
  • Mark
    You realize that DVDs have a limited life expectancy anyway. In about 20 years everything is gone. But even if they would last long, think of all the fancy stuff we have in 20 years, even Blu-Ray will be gone by then. This relentless transience and constant technical progression is the major factor that kept me from building a collection.
  • So you're saying that you will never start a collection of anything because technology keeps changing? So that means you have no possessions because you feel they will become obsolete in a matter of years and it will be money wasted right?

    I honestly think that's a bad way to think. Yes DVDs will not be around eventually but its one of top forms of media right now just like CDs. I also think that the majority of the nation hasn't switched over to Blu-Ray yet and wont for another 5 to 10 years making DVDs the main media source for some time. I do agree with Peter though that digital download will be a major way to get media.
  • Armythunder
    Wow, everyone seems to be forgetting that when DVD's came out they also were about $50 each. After awhile they also came down in price to now you can get a dvd movie for $10. I'm looking to where Blueray becomes more common and they will also begin to drop. Give enough time and everything drops. Thats the way it always is.
  • Will
    I am still not convinced to jump to blue-ray.
    I have too many dvds and my upconverter dvd player makes them all look good enough on my Sony Bravie XBR 1080p LCD--And I do realize the upconverter doesn't convert it to full HD so I am not using the potential of the TV.

    I see blue ray movies every once in awhile, and while it looks amazing, it's not that much better for me to run out and drop 300 on a player and then another 25-35 on the movies. Besides, I don't watch as many movies where this TV is located and if I buy a blue ray movie I wouldn't be able to play it everywhere in my house.

    My point is that for movie geeks and tech geeks, this all good and well, but for the majority of people DVD is still going to be the dominant media. It took around ten years to make VHS (almost) obsolete. Blue ray just started it's independent run.

    And besides, I agree that the future is internet, streaming, downloading directly. It's already started to a rather surprisingly large and quick degree compared to how slow DVDs took to become the mainstream source.
  • Burn after reading was great.

    I don't have a Blue ray disc player at home, so I'mma stick to DVDs for now.
  • Starbelly
    Three words on Blu-Ray, Master and Commander. We have full surround sound and it is incredible. You can actually hear people walking around on the deck when the scenes take place below. It really feels like you're there and makes the movie that much more engaging and exciting.
  • outside of Us, the blue ray disc is Usd 50 at least in South america ( argentina 150 pesos) and a player is Usd 800 (Aprox) so it is something imposible.
  • Wow and I thought our prices were high. I think by this time next year the players and the discs should be at a reasonable price. I would really hate to have to buy one of the players for such a high price.
  • peter, im calling shenanigans on you having 3000 dvds.
    really?
  • Dusty Hulbert
    A quick heads up, the 3D version of Polar Express is not Blu-ray exclusive. I just bought it on DVD and it has both the 3D version and the SD version.
  • Jens
    Those of you who say that bluray films cost 30-40$ must find new places to buy movies. 'Cause you're being ripped off.
  • Pete, I have a copy of The Polar Express 3D in DVD sitting on the table in my family room, so it's not exclusive to Blu-Ray. Gotta say I disagree on the home 3D thing (and I've been meaning to write up a post): I don't think it's ready for prime time and I agree with Cameron - red/green glasses for home 3D looks terrible.

    Vic
  • I disagree. its not optimal, you get eye strain, but on my 60 inch dlp, the 3d effects are quite incredible. Again, I've heard that the 3D varies according to television screen technology. I've heard Tubes and LCDs don't work nearly as well. Could it be your equipment?
  • I have a Sony 60" DLP and we turned the movie off after about 5 minutes. Looked blurry and the colors looked weird as well. Part of the "instructions" are to change the color settings on the TV. As much time as it takes to dial in an HDTV I'll be damned if I'm going to fiddle with them for one movie. :-)

    Vic
  • I don't have anything that plays BluRay...so as far as Blu or Not....Not.
  • Miker
    Your comments are all quite interesting... but you REALLY NEED to be seeing these movies in film quality at a movie theater!

    Go see a quality film on a weekday matinee show, on film. No pesky crowds to tick you off; a huge room to yourself; your choice of foods... you'll love it.

    Really, 3000 DVDs. Tsk tsk tsk. When the heck are you *ever* going to be able to watch them?
  • 3,000 dvds plus i see 250 movies in theaters each year as well
  • Thanks Peter, this comes in handy!
  • The Polar Express in 3D works fine on a 19in 1080i TV, you just have to be at the perfect angle or else you start getting a head rush.
  • Wall-E was also my first Blu-ray although I haven't been able to watch it yet (PS3 for Christmas) and I now have eight. I also hid behind the format war as a reason to stick with DVD.
  • Damn these posts keep urging me to buy a BluRay pla... err, PS3.
  • if you get a PS3 you also get all those cool PS Store downloadable HD movies.
  • blue balls
    sony:

    * bad laptop batteries that catch fire
    * low quality parts
    * still clinging to $400 PS3's that are abysmally sinking in market share worldwide, outsold by the Wii by 3 to 1
    * DVD collections ARE NO LONGER COOL with a younger audience; digital downloads are the future here
    * why the heck would i shell out $30+ for a movie, when my computer monitor is hi-def and i can download the same title for 2/3 less and watch on my PC?
    * Blu-Ray is the new BOSE -- geared toward an aging audience

    i, personally, will not buy one -- no marketing in this dying genre of disk-based entertainment will sway me here. good luck on ur purchase -- enjoy!
  • 790
    Wall•E made you go out and buy a BluRay player,,,,

    Mission accomplished Pixar....
  • Marco
    Pete, did you dig the first season of Pushing Daisies on BLU?
  • I wish I could tell you you're right, but I have only seen the first two episodes (damn not having time)
blog comments powered by Disqus