Warner Bros has officially announced their plans to rerelease The Dark Knight in movie theaters starting on January 23rd, 2009. No details are given to the exact amount of screens, but the rerelease guarantees the film will finally cross the $1 billion mark. The film has grossed over $996 million worldwide and $530 million domestically. The film would require $70 million to overtake Titanic as the biggest film in United States history, and currently sits at the #4 spot on the worldwide charts.

The Dark Knight hits DVD/Blu-ray hits stores this week. Preorder now on Amazon: $23.99 for the Blu-ray, $20.99 for the Two-disc DVD, or $47.99 for the super duper Blu-ray Batpod edition.

Discuss: Will you pay to see The Dark Knight again on the big screen?

Official press release after the jump.

“THE DARK KNIGHT” RETURNS TO THE BIG SCREEN ON JANUARY 23RD

THE WIDELY ACCLAIMED HIT WILL BE RE-RELEASED IN THEATRES AND IMAX.

BURBANK, CA, December 4, 2008 – Warner Bros. Pictures is bringing “The Dark Knight” back for a return engagement in theatres and IMAX on January 23, 2009, giving audiences one more chance to see the film on the big screen. The film will re-open nationwide, it was announced today by Dan Fellman, Warner Bros. Pictures President of Domestic Distribution.

In making the announcement, Fellman stated, “‘The Dark Knight’ is a crowning achievement in every sense of the word. We wanted to provide one more opportunity for moviegoers to experience it on the big screen as it was meant to be seen.”

One of the most celebrated and successful films of this or any year, “The Dark Knight” has been hailed by both critics and audiences since its original release last July. The film garnered widespread acclaim for its artistic and technical achievements, including the work of its outstanding cast and its director, Oscar®-nominated filmmaker Christopher Nolan (“Memento”).

Led by Christian Bale, reprising his role from “Batman Begins,” and Academy Award® nominee Heath Ledger (“Brokeback Mountain”), the ensemble cast also includes Academy Award® winner Michael Caine (“The Cider House Rules”), Gary Oldman (the “Harry Potter” films), Aaron Eckhart (“Thank You for Smoking”), Maggie Gyllenhaal (“Stranger than Fiction”), and Academy Award® winner Morgan Freeman (“Million Dollar Baby”).

In addition, critics and moviegoers alike applauded Nolan’s revolutionary use of IMAX cameras to film some of the most challenging action sequences ever created—a first for a major feature film.

Nolan directed “The Dark Knight” from a screenplay written by Jonathan Nolan and Christopher Nolan, story by Christopher Nolan & David S. Goyer. Charles Roven, Emma Thomas and Christopher Nolan produced the film, with Benjamin Melniker, Michael E. Uslan, Kevin De La Noy and Thomas Tull serving as executive producers.

Collaborating with Nolan behind the scenes were two-time Oscar®-nominated director of photography Wally Pfister (“The Prestige,” “Batman Begins”), Oscar®-nominated production designer Nathan Crowley (“The Prestige”), Oscar®-nominated editor Lee Smith (“Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World”) and Oscar®-winning costume designer Lindy Hemming (“Topsy-Turvy”). The music is by Oscar® winner and multiple Oscar® nominee Hans Zimmer (“The Lion King,” “Gladiator”) and seven-time Oscar® nominee James Newton Howard (“Michael Clayton,” “The Fugitive”), who previously collaborated on the score for “Batman Begins.”

Originally released on July 18, 2008, “The Dark Knight” broke virtually every possible box office record to become the top-grossing film of 2008 and the second-highest grossing movie (domestically) of all time.

Warner Bros. Pictures presents, in association with Legendary Pictures, a Syncopy Production, a Christopher Nolan film. “The Dark Knight,” is based upon characters appearing in comic books published by DC Comics. Batman was created by Bob Kane.

“The Dark Knight” is distributed worldwide in theatres and IMAX by Warner Bros. Pictures, a Warner Bros. Entertainment Company. The film has been rated PG-13 for “intense sequences of violence and some menace.”

  • Elissa
    I can't wait to see it again. And I'm telling all of my friends (all two of them, LOL) who haven't seen it yet to hold off on watching the DVD and go to the theatre in January.

    I'm a huge fan of Titanic, but I won't be crushed if it loses its crown.
  • Eric R.
    I not so sure if I'll see it again. I already have a 55" LCD tv and surround sound ready for next week when it comes out on DVD, and since I have a PS3 I can buy the Blu Ray. I just don't understand why they took it out of the theater just to bring it back months later. If the studios would have left the movie in theaters longer I'm sure it would have made more money. Remember the days when movies used to stay in theaters for months? E.T. when it came out was in theaters for almost a whole year! These days they stay in theaters a few weeks then rush order the DVD for market sale. As much as I hated the movie Titanic (how the hell is the band going to stay and play while the boat is sinking?!? Where they retarded or something??) and would love to see its record overtaken, I don't see that happening now.
  • No.
  • FUCK. YES. Thank you Jesus (Christopher Nolan).
  • I'll just stay home and watch it over and over.
  • David1225
    Of course people will go to the theater to see it again. Although I think the movie is hugely overrated -- basically a good performance by Heath Ledger surrounded by a bunch of half-baked philosophizing and Christian Bale's ridiculous low voice -- it looks great on a big screen. So, anyone who likes the thing stands a good chance of dropping the dough.
  • Alfred Hitchcock
    Who pissed in your cake batter?
  • A.J.
    Will it leave theaters completely? Or will it remain in at least one theater until then? If it does stay somewhere this will be a re-expansion and it will still be its first run at the box office, making its take much more impressive.
  • Brooks L
    Well I think it has a great possibility to beat out Titanic, but if Dark Knight does I don't think they should be able to claim #1 Box Office. I say we go back to the old way and do tickets sold. Such as Gone With the Wind and films in the late 70's to late 80's. This would accurately count re-watch ability. With inflation and rising ticket prices it makes it alomst impossible to compare anything with in the last five years. Reverse the stakes. If Titanic were now, then it would for sure make more than Dark Knight and the gap would be much narrower than 70 million because of inflation alone.

    This is a cheap move to overtake the #1 spot in my opinion. I think Titanic is a great movie to be sitting at #1 spot.
  • Ron
    If you did it the old way Titanic wouldn't be close to #1 either. Gone With The Wind would be far and away the most attended movie of all time. It just doesn't work to do that anymore becuae going to the movies is so different now. TDK's box office run is much more impressive than Titanics if you really think about it, in todays day and age of DVD's coming out only 5 months after the movie many people never go see it just say "oh I'll wait for the dvd", also all the illegal copies on the internet and black market copies being sold on internet and at flea markets and street corners in large cities everywhere. 530 million in 2008 is much more impressive than 600 million in 1996 because of all these things. Also remember Titanic was out at the movie for almost if not more than 10 months. If TDK was out that long it would have lasted til at least May of next year and never have started rolling it back so quickly. They would have let it run it's course, it would still be playing on at least 1500-1600 screens and pulling in 5-6 million a week more than likely.
  • boo yah
    the movie was taken out of the theaters to early due to other summer blockbusters coming out. the imax experience is the best way to go with the movie, and once its out of imax again its gone forrrrevver. And believe me and everyone else that this movie is the sh*t in imax
  • just because you are blind doesnt mean we cant see this sinking the titanic. i think most people who love the theater experience, and didnt get to see it the first time will definitely go, and the rest of the fans will go a few more times as well. especially after how much coverage it has and all the praise. i think you are just sad that your precious boat movies can be sunk
  • and then touch it inappropriately.
  • billy the dickrider
    because it is re-releasing in imax. That is a big deal since this was a groundbreaking movie in that field. its a rare occurence to rerelease a movie in imax and this time the people that missed out last time due to every show nearly being sold out will get to experience it.
  • mine too, i had to pee like 9 times, and the fat guy next to me had asshole breath
  • i will go again to catch in in imax. this movie is amazing, and i want the experience of seeing it in imax.
  • I wanna go watch it in IMAX...the movie should be good on the LCD, but its better on the big big screen...
  • Memento Mori Tiny
    I would certainly pay to see it again. It felt great to share that midnight IMAX experience with a bunch of friends and strangers the first time around. I'm down to for another go around.
  • Gentlemen
    yes, hell yes.
  • Jeff
    I doubt it will make $70m to overtake Titanic, but if it does, Titanic fangirls/fanboys will complain that it isn't fair.
  • Yes, I will. Can't wait. This has to beat Titanic.
  • If it's showing around where I live, I'm definitely down.
  • maverick
    imax?
  • Ryan
    Did they feel like it didn't make enough money or something?
  • Delta Assault
    Yea, I'm definitely going for an IMAX showing, went twice to the regular multiplex.
  • Thrillhouse77
    Let's SINK THE TITANIC!!!
  • The OG
    I'm going to see it again. Hell yeah!
  • Bobby
    I wouldn't pay to see it again nor do I see the majority of Americans who paid to see it at theaters paying to see it again eiter especially when it would hev been out on DVD and Blu Ray for over a month. The only people I see going to see this is TDK fanboys and dickriders. I definatley don't see it overtaking Titanic and even if it does it'll still be in 4th place behind Titanic, LoTR: RToTK and Pirates 2 in unadjusted gross. And in adjusted gross it'll be like in what the top 25?
  • Bruce Wayne (Bross)
    I will definitly go see it again just for the experience. Seeing that movie in theateres is well worth the 9bucks. I already own the DVD but nothing beats the theatre experience
  • /ambient
    You had me at re-release.

    Hey Peter,
    How about a overview article of the DVD/BluRay Exclusives?
    I need you to decide which one I should buy.

    -The Best Buy Joker/Batman mask replica
    -Circuit City's alternate cover sleeve w journal
    -FYE's Steelbook case
    -Futureshop's bluray steelbook case
    -Walmart's coin and comic book with single disc edition combo

    Which one?


    No matter what I buy, I'm seeing it again in January.
  • A dickrider
    I'll bet you're the life of the party.
  • I would totally see the Imax version again.
  • without a doubt i am paying another 500 dollars seening it again.
  • Bobby
    LOL your name says it all. I'm just tired of all this TDK dickriding. Regardless even if the fanboys go see the film every single day the only film it may pass WW unadjusted is Pirates 2 so it'll be lucky to be #3 WW. TDK will probably stay at #2 US and #4 WW mainly because as I said why would the majority of Americans who saw the film in theaters who aren't dickriders go see it again when they probably would have already brought it on DVD or Blu Ray?

    Face it TDK may become #3 WW and that's about it. I don't see how it would really make 70 million at the US box office to put it over Titanic when as said most people probably would have brought it on home video by then. Either way it'll still be lucky to crack the top 25 WW adjusted because as it stands right now it's 27.
  • kentonsam
    OVERTHROW THE TITANIC WITH THE BAT POD!!! i'll pay to see it again in theaters hopefully in Imax since everybody tells me its better
  • Jack
    really?

    i know its years later but i never hear Titanic mentioned as being great. its never brought up at all. for all the money it made it doesn't seem like anyone really loved it.
  • Ron
    I sure didn't, just not a very good movie to be honest. One of the most overrated of all time...remember somehow it actually won the oscar for best picture
  • Yes, I will for sure see it again in theaters...
  • Weyland_Yutani
    I'll be buying an Imax ticket as soon as they are available. It's worth every penny.
  • Craig M.
    If I have the time and money to see it again in theater, sure. I'd love to see Titanic get knocked off its perch.
  • vader182
    oh, I'm using my christmas money on multiple showings on imax. Hopefully two or three. The midnight imax showing was one of the greatest experiences of my life. Also, Peter, I'd also like to know /ambients question!
  • I guess I'll be making a trek down to San Francisco if they rerelease it on IMAX.
  • knock it down and make it cry
  • I'll only pay to see it again if I can see it IMAX.
  • id like to make it an even 5
  • If I lived in America, then I'd totally see it again.
    While it's true that the film will be available on home video (hows that for a 90s phrase?) I still think people would prefer to see it on the big screen, enough to push it over the $1 billion mark anyway.
  • I can't believe releasing Dark Knight (or any other film) after the spending boom that is the Christmas season -- especially in the current economy -- is going to prove to be a huge financial boon.

    It's still in second run theaters (read: cheap admission) and most people will probably be getting new electronics (or at the very least, just the Dark Knight DVD) for the holidays.

    I could see the IMAX screens doing pretty well in the re-release but as far as regular theaters go, I can't say I expect it to do very much business. For reference: only one of the Star Wars re-releases made over $70 million and that was a movie that showed on over 2100 screens and had not been in theaters for 20 years... Dark Knight is still in over 300 theaters (and it's not like it had a limited release before this) and logic points to this re-release not being nearly as wide as what Star Wars saw.

    I completely did not expect fans to care as much about box office figures as they did starting July 18, 2008.
  • A lot of people don't buy DVDs and even less buy BluRays so there is a large share of the market that would still see it. Combine that with the fact that most people don't have 60" plasmas and surround sound.. they and I would like to go see it on IMAX or at a regular theater. Until people start putting movie theater screens and thousand dollar sound systems in their home.. people will still want to go to the movies.
  • Do Titanic fanboys(girls) even exist? The film is old enough to be the age of it's target audience by now.
  • titanic fans are really just LEO fans.
    leo was good and all in the Departed, but come on. Anyone can play someone that drowns to death in a sinkin ship...LEO just sucked soo bad it took 3 hours to do it.
blog comments powered by Disqus