On Wednesday, I flew down to Los Angeles to attend a special screening of 20 minutes of footage from JJ AbramsStar Trek. Everyone was packed into a large theater on the Paramount lot. And by everyone, I mean EVERYONE.

Marvel head Kevin Feige was sitting behind me, Free Enterprise director Robert Burnett was a couple rows in front of me. Who knows how many other execs and filmmakers might have been in attendance. Trek stars John Cho, Zachary Quinto, Chris Pine and Bruce Greenwood were also at the presentation to see the footage.

Director JJ Abrams introduced four clips. I could recount the events second by second, but it’s the same footage that was previously screened in London and New York. Check ComingSoon for the blow by blow. I thought it would be better to post just my observations. But before I do so let me say:

This is not the Star Trek film that Trekkies are looking for,
…but that might not be a bad thing.

Much has been made of the opening sequence of the new movie trailer. A young kid jumps out of a moving car as it zooms off the edge of a cliff. The reveal is that the kid is the future Captain of the USS Enterprise, James T Kirk. The sequence is constructed to get a specific reaction: “This doesn’t look like any Star Trek movie I’ve ever seen before.” But I think many people are missing the possible metaphor. Kirk could have been driving a car from any decade in history — the 2000’s, the 1990’s, the 1980’s, or the 1970’s, but for one reason or another, Abrams chose a 1960s Corvette.

Could it be that the corvette represents something more than just a fast car? Is it just a coincidence that the car was released during the same decade that the original Star Trek television series premiered? I believe that by throwing the 1960’s era car off a cliff, Abrams was making a statement - “this is not your father’s Star Trek movie - we’re throwing all that stuff away, off a cliff no less. This is the new Star Trek.” Okay, now onto my observations.

A More Expansive Enterprise: This film will make you believe that the USS Enterprise actually exists. The majority of the show and films were shot on a Bridge set and a small series of hallways that were always reused to create different areas within the ship. In the few short sequences I screened, I was amazed at how exactly how much of the Enterprise you get to see. I would compare it to the many areas of James Cameron’s the Titanic. You travel through so many diverse sections of the ship that it not only feels authentic, but it feels HUGE. JJ Abrams said before the presentation that one of the underlying ideas was to legitimize the idea of space travel. And from what I can tell, the Enterprise feels very real.

Action Packed: One of the sequences involved Sulu, Kirk and a Red Shirt (guess what happens to him) making a space jump onto a Romulan drill, hovering above the planet Vulcan. You see a few split seconds of this jump in the trailer. Remember the sequence with the three men in uniforms are seen free falling face first through the air? Well they land on the drill and an intense fight ensues between the Enterprise crew and the Romulans. Sulu has a sword battle that is on level with some of the cooler lightsaber duels from the Star Wars prequels. The whole sequence happens on this drill platform a couple miles above the planet. I can’t describe how very cool this scene is.

Comedy: This is a much funnier film than any of the previous Star Trek movies. In one sequence, Kirk and Old Spock (Leonard Nemoy) enter a federation outpost on a snowy planet, where they find Scotty (Simon Pegg). In addition to Pegg’s trademark humor (Scotty admits that he was exiled to the location after he teleported the Admiral’s pet beagle, who was never seen from again), Scotty is joined by this Star Wars looking alien sidekick who he belittles from time to time. In another sequence, James Kirk is snuck onto the Enterprise under the guise that he is sick. McCoy has injected him with a temporary virus but Kirk has an allergic reaction, causing his hands to swell up like balloons. The scene involves Kirk running around the ship trying to warn the Captain not to warp to Vulcan, waving his huge hands in the air, while Uhura looks at him strange. McCoy gives him a shot to fix the allergic side effect, which results in another side effect where Kirk loses feeling in his mouth, causing him to slur his words, and if I remember correctly, his head also begins to swell. The introduction of such a sight gag was oft putting at first. I’m not saying it wasn’t funny, but it just wasn’t expected, especially in a Trek film. I would compare it to the scene in Transformers where Optimus Prime and crew are hiding outside Sam’s house. This scene was part of a package of scenes screened to press months before the release of the film. Many were critical of the comic direction of the film at the time, but that sequence ended up being a favorite of most of the general public.

Lens Flares: During the trailer you may have noticed a few moments when the camera lens flared up from the reflection of light. This seems to be a cinematic choice that is used throughout the film, and especially within the Enterprise itself. I’ve included a screenshot from the trailer above, which shows a lens flare across a shot of Captain Christopher Pike. I wish I could elaborate on this more, but it’s rather odd to explain. But trust me, it isn’t something that happens just a few times. It is very noticeable and consistent, and gives the film a more realistic vibe.

Joker Cam: In the old Batman television series, they use to tilt the camera sideways whenever The Joker showed up on screen in an attempt to create an off-putting visual. While this effect is thankfully not employed during the 20 minutes of Star Trek I was witness to, I did notice that Abrams likes to shoot the scenes within the enterprise with the gliding steadicam-like movements, which sometimes become unbalanced and lean to the left or the right. From what I can tell, it really gives you a feeling of being on a ship, if not a starship, at least a cruise ship.

Performances: Most of the performances were spot on. Simon Pegg and Anton Yelchin in particular, both of whom were able to employ authentic sounding accents. On the other hand, Karl Urban looked like he was doing an imitation of DeForest Kelley’s Bones, in the same way some of the supporting characters in Oliver Stone’s W. felt more like imitations rather than authentic performances. To be completely fair, he was only on screen for a few lines, so it might not be fair to judge just yet.

Leonard Nimoy: Seeing Nimoy back as Spock for the first time since 1991’s Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country was nothing short of awesome.

The Origins of the Enterprise Crew: After watching 20 minutes of this film, it has quickly become clear that the core story of the new Trek film is to show how the crew of the Starship Enterprise came together. And no, it doesn’t happen exactly how you might expect.

The Bar: In one scene, a pre-Academy James T Kirk enters an Iowa bar. Most directors would be tempted to fill the bar with lots of extras, cool looking creatures, and have all sorts of flashy looking futuristic technology spread throughout. Abrams does none of that. The bar actually doesn’t look to much different from a bar you would enter today. Sure, there is a LED wall with a changing light pattern in the background. And yes, the bar menu has animated graphics, comparable to the newspapers in the Harry Potter series. But for the most part, the bar just feels and looks like a real bar.

Inside References: During the bar sequence, a character recommends a Slusho alcoholic drink. Slusho is of course a fictional frozen drink that Abrams invented for Alias, and later used in the viral marketing for Cloverfield. And we mentioned before that the USS Kelvin is named after Abrams grandfather who famously got him interested in the art of mystery (see the “Magic Box” ted talk). I’m sure there will be a ton of other inside references, especially pointing back to Trek history, throughout.

Bottom line: I was extremely impressed with most of the footage, but I find myself a little skeptical of the use of broad comedy and sight gags. Either way, I have a feeling that mainstream audiences will probably dig it. I’m also pretty confident that the hardcore Trekkies won’t care for this movie. It is clearly a much different type of film than the franchise has ever given us before. But truth is, it might also be a much better film than they have ever gotten before. And most certainly, the most accessible Star Trek film to date. If I had to compare the footage I screened to any other film, I would say that it has shades of the better moments from Return of The Jedi mixed with new generation Battlestar Galactica.

  • Here's the rub: Trekkies/Trekkers are immediately turned off by the huge departure from established canon. Non-fans are put off because it's just another Star Trek film. This is going to end up just like "Cloverfield" in that it's hyped to death and ultimately is empty and hollow.
  • nitpicker
    It's called a dutch angle.
  • D
    i can't wait. also, i really dig lens flares. Indy movies all have the lens flare. actually thats prob why i like em.
  • Should add a great touch to the film. Def make it look more realistic
  • Not to be picky but Nimoy did have a two episode guest appearence as Spock on The Next Generation, he was in hiding on Romulus trying to broker a peace deal.
  • Lance_HBomb
    The reason why is because Star Trek is a franchise with such a huge potential- not for money mainly, but for the sake of ST itself.
  • Lance_HBomb
    But that won't stop it from being interesting.
  • Lance_HBomb
    "...Could it be that the corvette represents something more than just a fast car? Is it just a coincidence that the car was released during the same decade that the original Star Trek television series premiered? I believe that by throwing the 1960’s era car off a cliff, Abrams was making a statement - “this is not your father’s Star Trek movie - we’re throwing all that stuff away, off a cliff no less. This is the new Star Trek...”"

    I love this move, whether it was intentional or not. It's still the new Star Trek's feeling, and it's still their goal- NOT to make a Star Trek XI, but to make a NEW Star Trek, so ST fans really should not go too hardcore.
  • Josh
    I am REALLY looking forward to a Trek film for the first time in my life. I'm only 19 and it seems that reboots of old series are doing very well. I was never interested in Bond, Batman, or Trek before the reboots. Hopefully this movie is as good as the trailer was. And hopefully Eric Bana's villain isn't as bad as he looked.
  • ilves
    At 19 you really haven't had that many Trek movies to really look forward to...
  • DARSFoG
    Thank you, I am glad someone else caught that also.

    I am looking forward to this movie also, being a Trekkie myself... I have hope...
  • Never been interested in Star Trek, but after sharing your insight on it made me a little excited to see it...Looks like its gonna be cool...
  • Go Goya
    I'm not a Trekkie and and definitely not a big Star Trek fan in general...but this got me very interested in the movie. I hope Abrams sticks to the idea that he wants to create a good movie and not a good Star Trek movie. I mean, I know it's an overused comparison at this point, but look at the Dark Knight. The reason that movie was so good and did so well was because it was a good movie with a good story and it happened to be set in a Batman universe.

    You can really say the same thing about a lot of other successful movies. The story that drives the movie is what draws people to it. The setting is what gives it context. Saving Private Ryan is an awesome example of a movie that is only ostensibly about war. There's a real human story involved that people can relate to.

    As someone who didn't even stop to read for details when I first heard about a new Star Trek movie, I can now say I definitely plan on seeing this.
  • Joe Newman
    the sight gas and the "big handed" scene where the cure leads to another annoyance for Kirk sounds straight out of TOS; I can't wait for this movie it really looks like Abrams is a huge fan but is not afraid to make it his own
  • I think this film was really made for non Trekkies. The film was made by a huge fan of the series. I think Abrams loved the other movies but wanted to go out and make what he wanted in Star Trek. I was never really into Star Trek, but this new direction looks amazing. I'll agree with Peter about how the old show looks very stable and boring. Especially the Enterprise only having the bridge and a hallway. Along with the lens flares and dutch angles, this movie (and the entire series) looks like it breathes for the first time.
  • Lance_HBomb
    I am actually excited about a STAR TREK film. Come on you Trekkies, when can you remember the last time a Trek project off in the horizon was exciting, or RELEVANT, to you and actually drew in mainstream media?

    Yeah, I thought so.
  • and cloverfield was awesome
  • yeah, i am a die hard star wars fan, and i am actually going to see this. the potential to bring this universe to a broader and newer audience is very exciting for me.
  • Albert Brodsky
    Funny. I made a similar analogy about the 1960's corvette the other day on Slashfilm when the trailer was first shown.
  • dopiestghost
    Actually, I think the reason they had to go mainstream was because there aren't enough Trekkies out there to support a franchise. I'm sure every Trekkie went to see the last movie and we all remember how poorly that did. So, no, I don't think they'll make enough money to "piss out some more sequels" if just the Trekkies come out.
  • dopiestghost
    I think you, along with everyone else, is making the assumption that the story told here takes place over the course of a few days/weeks. They all graduate together, go on an adventure and Kirk becomes Captain at the end of it.. I get a completely different sense. It seems to me the story takes place over many years. We see Kirk and Spock as babies, as kids, entering the Academy, moving up the ranks, etc. Chekov isn't in Kirk's graduating class, by the time he's an ensign, Kirk has already bee out for years.
  • those Trekkie fans need to relax and shut the hell up. The movie looks good and I think I might go see it (I am not a trekkie fan)
  • man this movie looks awesome
  • "I would compare it to the scene in Transformers where Optimus Prime and crew are hiding outside Sam’s house."

    No, no, no, no, NO!

    I hope that is a one-shot deal... I disliked the Transformers movie overall, but the scene you just mentioned was one of the things I despised MOST about that movie.

    Vic
  • Like you, I was never a fan. I have no history of the Star Trek Mythology so it will be interesting to see how it unfolds to a new viewer.
  • I agree wholeheartedly. It was an "unbelievable" scene...which means I thought it was lame...how could NO ONE in the 'hood see those BIG MASSIVE FIGURES?
  • brian
    i like the car analogy. i don't know enough about trek to have made that connection
  • I never watched Star Trek...but I'm pretty damn interested in this movie, especially with Pegg in it. Unfortunately I refuse to read most of the post. I did the same thing for posts like The Dark Knight and Watchmen (although I already know the story to that, reading the comic...so a bit pointless, no?) to make sure I don't spoil anything.
  • Fuck Trekkies. They have had enough goddamn Star Trek to fill and overflow their brains with useless knowledge of 'alien civilizations' and all that crap. Bottom line is that if you tell someone you like Star Trek, they're probably gonna think you're a dweeb from outer space. Now, while there may be nothing wrong with that, its evident that Mr. JJ and company are trying to flip the switch on the stigma and bring the ST universe to a whole new audience. Im all for it.
  • Nova
    there is no stigma and you are rather rude.
  • This movie is going to be the balls. Peter, I really like your observations of the car going off the cliff. Awesome stuff.
  • Yes, but why they have to make the characters look so damn gay? They can easily fit any episode of The OC, 90210 and/or Gossip Girl.

    There's a line where "polished and sleek" turn queer.
  • I did not get to see any of the scenes with monsters
  • Solid
    This movie will be great. Star Trek fans need to get over themselves. The franchise isn't going to be tainted any more. It's already down the toilet, so what's the big deal? There's nothing sacred in Trek anymore anyway... seems that way to me...
  • Why are the blogs supporting this garbage?

    Internet was created by nerds...................many of them Star Trek fans.......................why is our invention being used to appeal to the morons of the world and hype this slap in the face?
  • Pill
    Thats alot of speculation after seeing 20 minutes of footage. I do hope its nothing like the television show, the majority of Star Trek fans are easily the most obnoxious and out-spoken melting pot of nerds I have ever witnessed.

    Also, Simon Pegg looks hideous in that picture.
  • Peter,
    One of the biggest concerns I've seen raised was how jarringly young the whole cast looks. I was wondering what your opinion on the matter was, having seen a substantial amount of footage from the movie. Did you have a hard time suspending your disbelief that such a young crew would be in command or is a suitable explanation given in the movie?
    Also, since even Abrams has admitted that this movie is not for Star Trek fans, based on what you have seen do you think it has what it takes to reach a wider audience?
  • the internet is a powerful tool that can be used for good and evil.. but being that im not a trekkie, i dont really feel your pain here.. i like sci fi, and this is just a new world to explore for me. i think a lot of people will see it that way.
  • Nice article, Peter. Thanks.
    I think Paramount is handling the promotion of Abrams' Trek flick well by holding these screenings, which in turn is introducing to the internet world what they can expect for this re-boot. Even as a fan of Abrams' I've been highly reserved in my interest for his version of Star Trek and a lot of that had to do with sentimental reasons for the shows I grew up watching. The trailer didn't wholly impress me, but gave me some time think about what kind of movie we're getting. Between this article and a couple of others I realize that if I want to enjoy this movie I'm going to have to be open minded and for better or worse see what Abrams' has to offer.
  • hb
    You would think, at least I would, that a person writing about film news would know the technical terms for cinematic techniques and not make one up based on what they saw in a 60s tv show.
  • Kirk traditionally had an interest in classic and antique things. Example, his eye glasses gift from Bones in Wrath of Kahn.
  • VegaBro
    The flare thing is interesting because if you look at a lot of episodes from Fringe (namely the beginning of The Arrival) they use that same technique. Not sure they are connected thematically, but its worth checking out.
  • The flare thing is interesting because if you look at a lot of episodes from Fringe (namely the beginning of The Arrival) they use that same technique. Not sure they are connected thematically
  • but i loved cloverfield... dont you remember how badly i defended it? i was like a clovertard.
  • Nice observations, Peter. I'm not a Trek fan at all, but my Dad is. With that said, I'm totally looking forward to this movie. I think that has a lot to do with it feeling like a fresh take on what I consider rather boring and slow paced. No offense if any of you are hardcore Trek fans!
  • Even if this DOES end up "bad like Cloverfield" (which I thought was a fun movie, not great, but fun) I think it'll be miles ahead of the past few Trek films. I'm not a Trek fan at all, but this entry actually has me interested.
  • andrew
    nice post, peter. realy insightful and cleared up many doubts i had about the film. it seems like they really know where theyre going with this one and i'm really excited to see if star trek truly does have mass appeal. jj abrams is a saint of modern entertainment
  • andrew
    btw your observation about the car ditching is very interesting... how does it work in the context of the film? does it feel natural/make sense?
  • blink182pac
    Could it be that the corvette represents something more than just a fast car? Is it just a coincidence that the car was released during the same decade that the original Star Trek television series premiered? I believe that by throwing the 1960’s era car off a cliff, Abrams was making a statement - “this is not your father’s Star Trek movie - we’re throwing all that stuff away, off a cliff no less. This is the new Star Trek.”


    that has to be the dumbest thing ive ever heard.
  • Thanks Andrew. We weren't shown the car ditching scene, so I'm not quite sure. That was just an observation I had from having watched the trailer way too many times.
blog comments powered by Disqus