After Terminator Salvation, McG will direct a big screen adaptation of the upcoming spy novel, Dead Spy Running for Warner Bros. Written by Daily Telegraph journalist Jon Stock, the novel tells the origin story of former MI5 agent Daniel Marchant.

Patrick Janson-Smith has described the new series as “John le Carré meets Jason Bourne” and claims that Stock has “reinvented the spy novel for the 21st century.” Dead Spy Running sold to Harper Collins after an intense bidding war. The 320 page book is due out in July 2009. Warner Bros is quick to point out that McG will be directing the first installment or a planned franchise. Looks like Warner beleives they might have the next James Bond.

The most interesting thing about this announcement is what isn’t said. Terminator Salvation, from what I understand, is the first film in a planned trilogy. I would expect if Salvation is the success that Warners believe it might be, that the two follow-ups will be fast tracked into production. I wouldn’t even be surprised if they shot them back to back ala The Matrix sequels. So then, why would Warner Bros sign McG up to another high profile project if they want him back to helm the sequels? Or maybe they don’t.

Before everyone starts jumping to conclusions, let me clarify that Warner Bros is giving McG another high profile potential franchise-starting film project. If they weren’t happy with the early footage from Terminator, they wouldn’t be rewarding him with this spy film. No screenwriter has been announced, so there is also the possibility that Warner Bros is planning to develop Dead Spy Running for a couple years.

source: THR

  • carg0
    am i the only one who remembers this hack directed two of the worst movies of all time? (Charlie's Angels 1&2)
  • kip
    McG is proof that their is a god and he looooovvvessss hacks.
  • drbenway
    McRatner.
  • Meli
    Whenever someone says they reinvented anything I become instantly skeptical. I'm not a fan of McG and I don't expect much from his Terminator, he could surprise us, but I'm not hopeful.
  • Guest
    If Warners could get Jonathan Nolan and Paul Haggis for Terminator, I fully expect Stephen Gaghan and Alex Proyas for this one.
  • j
    I hated The Charlies Angels, I actually kind of enjoyed We Are Marshall. I think T4 will be good but I ain't setting my hopes too high, I still dont like the fact that it is going to be PG-13...
  • Goobity
    Until he uses a big boy name, he deserves no respect.
  • Jamie
    "If they weren’t happy with the early footage from Terminator, they wouldn’t be rewarding him with this spy film."

    Eh, well, they do that sometimes in Hollywood. I think it's called a "sop." When they kick off a big name director from something important, they give them something else big to make up for it. It makes no sense, but they do it sometimes.

    However, I don't think his Terminator series in anyway would keep him from being involved in another film series. They might just want to see how the next Terminator film does. I don't think it's a guaranteed hit? Hard to say?
  • 790
    "We are Marshall", looked like a bad after school Disney movie.
    Charlies Angels, who would even see those films?

    I have no faith in this guy at all.
blog comments powered by Disqus