I just got out of the David Fincher tribute (which I will write about at length later) but for now I want to share my first impressions on the 20 minutes of footage from Fincher’s new film The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, which was screened at the event. First off, I want to say that I’m a die hard Fincher fan. I’ve loved everyone of his film, with the slight exception of Panic Room, which I still enjoyed. Fight Club is in my top 10 all time favorite films. Like many others, I was amazed at the trailer for Benjamin Button. It was probably the best dramatic trailer I’ve seen in years. So to say that I’m excited about Benjamin Button would be an understatement.

Then rumors began to circulate about a three hour plus long movie, and an angry studio which was battling with Fincher to turn in a shorter film. And then Paramount dropped Fincher’s Heavy Metal, which was set up at the studio. The official reason given was that Fincher’s vision of the project was too dark and sexy for the studio. But if one were to connect the dots, you see a connection to the supposed feud behind the scenes over the Ben Button running time. Last I heard, the film was cut down to around two hours and forty five minutes, and rumor had it that the studio was still unhappy with the length. Again, this is all hearsay. Nothing confirmed, just things you hear around Hollywood.

I’m all for conserving the director’s artistic vision, and I’ve enjoyed most of Fincher’s work, even if Zodiac could have been 30 minutes shorter on the back end. So when I first heard rumors of the studio pushing Fincher to cut back, my first response was to write it off as another movie studio exec that just didn’t get it. But could they be right?

The footage I screened tonight was met with disappointment and concern. There are moments of magic and wonder, but interrupted and surrounded by moments which had me questioning, “Is this really the best footage he has?” The 20-minute package contained bits and pieces of scenes which spanned from the beginning of the film, probably past the half way mark. It was made clear that the film is bookmarked with Cate Blanchett’s character as an an older lady in a hospital bed being read the life story of Benjamin Button by a younger woman, presumably her daughter. But the whole framing device seemed rather confusing. Why is she being read the story of Ben button’s life? It’s hard to understand without context. Again, we’re only seeing pieces of scenes.

We see how Benjamin’s mother died during childbirth, and how his father ran away with the newborn and left him on the steps of a house, for a black couple to discover. A young black woman decides to take Benjamin in, giving him his name. A doctor explains that the child is going through overall body failure, similar to that of an 80-year-old man. This doesn’t scare Queenie off, as she believes he is a miracle. Benjamin is brought to one of those traveling churches with a tent set-up and a preacher who claims to cure people through faith. A 7-year-old Button is brought on stage to be healed. The Preacher gets him to rise up from his wheel chair and walk. But instead, Button slams face first into the floor, prompting a weird moment of laughter from the audience at Telluride. There are many of these moments of comedy that abruptly interferes with the dramatic flow of the scenes exhibited.

Years later, Benjamin is now working on a boat, when his Captain asks him if he has ever been with a Woman, which he had not. So he is brought to a whorehouse and shown the power of a regular income. The moments that really didn’t work for me involved Benjamin’s romantic relationships with the characters played by Cate Blanchett and Tilda Swinton. And sure, it might have helped to have seen these films in a better context, but the way they were presented, I felt myself becoming uninvolved with the story every time either one of them appeared on screen. I have a strong feeling that if the romantic relationships in this film don’t work, the film might not work. There is even a scene later on where Benjamin watches Cate dance sexily for him in the moonlight. It was one of those sequences which has you wondering, where is this going, when is it going to end, hasn’t it gone on long enough, hoping for the next scene to begin sooner rather than later. I talked to a bunch of festival-goers after the screening, and they seemed to agree that there were quite a few elongated uninteresting moments which might benefit from some trimming.

The cinematography was beautiful yet subdued from Fincher’s usual flash. Brad Pitt delivers a performance that will make you forget that he’s behind the make-up. The transformation will make you believe that a man can age backwards. I’m still excited to see the finished product, I’m just a little disappointed. It was good but not great.  Could it be that the film wasn’t what I expected, or maybe not what I wanted?

  • MrBabyMan
    Tribute to David Fincher!?! Jealous.
    Also I love adding video to what could just have been a plain text review. Keep it up!
  • Bill
    i'm kinda thinking that if they just showed the first 20 minutes of the movie, people would be disappointed because you wouldn't see the age progression of ben button -- which is the most fascinating thing about the movie. and besides the fact that it stars Brad Pitt, this fantasy element is what is gonna get people to want to see it in theaters.
  • Steven
    "If those were the best parts of the movie then I'm scared." Calm down. Step back from the ledge. Whether this movie is good or bad will be of no consequence.
  • Christopher Edwards
    I think that Benjamin Button is going to be a good film but could be better if fincher cuts it back abit and dont think that to much of everything film is enough.
  • Captain Awesome
    Sounds good so far. Wonder what it will resemble when it hits theatres.
  • Dan
    Die-hard Fincher fan??? What's next, a die-hard Uwe Boll fan?
  • Steelo
    I liked Panic Room and I'm still going to watch this. At the end of the day it's more a question of the scope of the man's work vs. the particulars to me.

    I'm sure I'll have my criticisms, but at the end of the day I wasn't the one who had the balls to actually make it. That said I'm still intrigued and look forward to an interesting experience when it drops.
  • Stoned One
    This somewhat alarms me about the movie, but I haven't really been disappointed by Fincher, even with Panic Room. I will wait till I see Button to judge.

    I hope someone throws the tribute up on youtube... I am so jealous of Peter seeing that.
  • Jon
    I don't know about you, Peter, but I wouldn't be thinking "when is this going to end" if I had to watch Cate dance sexily in the moonlight. ;)
  • Jon: I should clarify. It was Ballot dancing, and it wasn't "that sexy" this is a period piece after all. Plus almost everyone I spoke to after the screening pointed to that same scene as being too long and boring. So it wasn't just me :P
  • Dustin
    Personally, I have no desire to watch clips out of context from a film that I'm legitimately interested in seeing, seems like a good way to mess the movie up for yourself.
  • Dustin: agreed. I would have much rather watched the first 20 minutes, like they did last year with There Wil Be Blood, but I think either Fincher or Paramount thought it was important to show you Pitt's transformation instead.
  • Captain Awesome
    Peter,

    I think that's the real issue here. It seems a movie like this would be at best done horribly if it's broken into segmented pieces thrown at the viewer. There are films it can work for, but there are others it can't.

    Imagine watching something like Fear & Loathing in Las Vegas in the same way for the first time?
  • Captain Awesome: Yes, I agree as well. I think this led to much confusion throughout, some of which I addressed in the post above. But I can tell you that some scenes just didn't work, particularly some of the romance stuff. I know we don't have the full context, but we did see scenes that should have worked on their own, and they didn't. I advise anyone who is skeptical of my reaction to read the reactions over at Jeff Wells blog. I have not come across one person who wasn't disappointed. And yes, you could say this could just be the result of the way they presented the 20 minutes worth of footage, but it was their choice to display those scenes. I've been to many presentations where a director presents clips throughout a film. Ratatouille is one film that comes to mind. And yes, it does work better with some movies over others. But as a whole, each scene should work on it's own. The context should elevate the emotional stakes and involvement.
  • a d first time
    to mr. peter. I hope you dont mind by me asking this. How was mr Pitt acting ability from viewing this 20 min footage. tnx!
  • Captain Awesome
    Hmm, I guess I really need to see it for myself it seems. But I can see what you mean.

    I guess we can hope that the scenes that didn't make sense are setup up correctly in terms of the context. Fincher has been great with most of the material he's tackled fully.
  • diesel
    "How was mr Pitt acting ability from viewing this 20 min footage."

    yeah I'm curious to know this as well. is it academy award material? I for one like pitt and fincher to get an award. I think they both deserve it.

    that said, I can't wait to see this, regardless of well's, sciretta's opinions on it. FIncher has yet to disapoint me.

    Oh, great work on the videos Peter. This site really has become one of the best movie blogs out there. Kudos.
  • diesel
    "I hope you dont mind by me asking this. How was mr Pitt acting ability from viewing this 20 min footage."

    I was curious to know this as well. Is it academy award worthy? I do feel that both FIncher and Pitt deserve an award.

    Oh, and this site is really coming together, one of the best movie blogs out there by far. Kudos.
  • 790
    I don't get this film at all.
    Everyone seems to be really interested in it...
    I saw the full trailer with Hulk, and it was horrible. I didn't feel anything but disgust watching it.
    ?
  • Sean
    It seems weird to break it up like that. Maybe if it was like a 7 minute extended trailer it would work but 20 minutes of scenes that don't even follow eachother? That's just a horrible idea. I understand they probably just wanted to give you something that sort of felt like a pre-screening without actually being one but eventually someone should have said either pre-screen it or wait til something else to have it ready.
  • orange cinema
    i'm still there opening night, and i like how alex stuck to his guns "prove to me fincher can do wrong..." excellent point, as so far fincher hasn't. panic room is a great film, and nobody's been specific why they don't like it, so i can't really get into that one - but i will say that the theater i was in was at the edge of their seats dead silent anticipation, or screaming at the screen when the chase/thrills were coming.
  • John
    Here's a positive take on the footage:

    http://blog.spout.com/2008/08/30/the-curious-ca...
  • Kevin Hall
    I'm going to reiterate what I said in the David FIncher Trubute update. I attended this same tribute, Peter. To review such brief clips and random points in this movie without understanding its whole is completely ridiculous. Some of these clips were 30 seconds long and FAR from complete. To give a grade to such a montage is lame.

    PLEASE WAIT FOR A FINISHED VERSION.
  • Kevin, I kept reminding the readers that it was not a complete film, admitting in some sequences that the context would probably help clarify things. I'm not sure what you mean by "not done" because from what I've heard, Fincher turned in his original final cut a month or two ago. Of course, hes been forced to cut more from the film since then. Studios don't premiere footage with the expectation that press cant write about the experience. This is exactly what they want. Comic Con is all about that. The reason the 20 minutes of Button was here this year was because the 20 minutes of There Will Be Blood which was screened at last year's fest started the buzz on the film. I'm not reviewing the film, I reviewed the footage screened. Why? because people want to hear an opinion.
  • Captain Awesome
    790,

    Seriously, the concept is very creative and awesome

    "Based on the short story by F. Scott Fitzgerald, the movie features Benjamin Button, played by Brad Pitt, as old man who physically ages backward. He is born an old man and ages in reverse until he becomes a baby and then finally vanishes from the earth. At age 50, he falls in love with a 30-year-old woman, Blanchett. And then must come to terms with the relationship as they literally grow in opposite directions."

    This is something thats right up Fincher's alley.
  • nick
    Thanks Peter.
  • 790
    Captain Awesome,,,

    That's a twisted plot, heavy on relationships,,, hmmm, I'm still not into it, but ill look forward to reading more on this..... :-) thanks for that plot synopsis.
  • gocitizen
    I guess he should take a shot at something like this, but I prefer Fincher in "darker waters." He does certain things very well, but based on what I know, I'm not so certain that Ben Button allows for it.
  • Wall-E Plays Pong
    Oh Noes! I really want this film be great. These types of "wonderment" movies are too few and far between for me, so I really look forward to them when they come out. If it was just time/editing concerns it wouldn't be so concerning, but awkward comedy too? Hopefully it all smooths out by release, or at release for that matter.
blog comments powered by Disqus