In the year 2029, the asteroid Apophis (270 meters in length) is scheduled to pass by Earth, significantly within the moon’s orbit. While the vast majority of us have probably already either taken the attitude of a) Resigning ourselves to an asteroidal death, or b) Completely disregarding the possibility that anything catyclismic could ever originate from outer space, a select few of the best and brightest of us entered the Move an Asteroid Competition, which evaluated technical papers on how to deflect an asteroid or comet from colliding with Earth.

The Register reports that Mary D’Souza recently won the competition for the paper entitled “A Body Solar Sail Concept for the Deflection of 99942 Apophis.” D’Souza’s plan calls for wrapping the asteroid with mylar film, which will cause solar radiation pressure to move the asteroid off of its path.

As I read this news, I realized that I had heard an extremely similar plan long ago: It was one of the solutions presented for the asteroid that threatened to destroy us in Michael Bay’s Armageddon.

For those of you who don’t have 100% recall of that film, remember that before they hire Bruce Willis’ character to sweep in and save Earth, Billy Bob Thornton at NASA entertained a wide variety of solutions to dealing with the asteroid. Here is the exact line from the movie, delivered by one of NASA’s scientists:

Some of us have got this idea: We want to land a craft, deploy solar sails. You’ll have a great big canopy. Solar winds will be caught by these mylar sails!

This outlandish and ridiculous plan draws an extremely pissed off response by Billy Bob Thornton:

C’mon guys! We’ve gotta come up with something realistic here!

That’s of course the point at which someone comes up with the genius idea to bring in Willis and his ex-convict/roided up colleagues and shoot them into space to drill a hole in the asteroid and then drop a nuke into it. To even the most casual scientific observer, this plan was obviously superior and more plausible than the mylar sails…until now.

That being said, it’s interesting that Armageddon writer Jonathan Hensleigh is now batting two for two in coming up with scenarios that have frightening real-world implications; Hensleigh fans will remember that he was detained by the FBI after writing Die Hard With a Vengeance because they determined that that movie’s plan to rob the Federal Reserve was actually possible.

  • Konrad
    It was rejected in the movie because it takes YEARS for that plan to work.
    That said, it was more realistic than what they used to divert the asteroid...
  • skaught
    it was rejected because nobody wants to watch scientists sow a fucking blanket for two hours
  • fracaso089
    it was rejected because Michael Bay said, "screw realism! i want some explosions bitch!". But remember, Michael Bay isn't a director, just a little kid who was giving a hell of a lot of explosives, a few cameras and a chair.
  • fabescore
    let me guess, second place entry was simply, "ben Affleck" scribbled on a mcdonalds receipt.
  • Patrick O'Riley
    @skaught... That would Gus Van Sant's version of Armageddon.
  • A Better Class of Criminal
    In Bay's defense... excuse me I have to go throw up on a stray cat.... in his defense, movies aren't about realism their about suspending your belief to enjoy the incredibly unreal. It's escapism.

    Unfortunately Mr. Bay is a crappy film director. So it wasn't good anyway.
  • Hensleigh clearly roots his stories in reality, which is what worries me.

    Guys... Hensleigh wrote Jumanji. I must advise you to not play any mysterious wooden boardgame you may find. Please. For your family's sake.
  • Hunter Stephenson
    @ Patrick

    Haha. Nice.
  • somesister27
    hahahah this story is hilarious. this writer is my hero...
  • orange cinema
    how do they land and attach it? fucking wild stuff.

    i hope bay and all our directors continue to be big kids - they have the greatest jobs in the world where imagination and energy are needed to succeed. yeah i realize that sounds a bit cheesy, fuck it - i'd be a kid too.
  • Chris
    So is anyone surprised Armageddon has crappy science? Anyone?
  • Jimmy Weber
    This is a good piece David, but I'm thinking JJ Abrams came up with this brilliant idea. Why? Because JJ Abrams is awesome.
  • Across
    I have 100% recall of Armaggeddon.
  • evergreen
    Whatever Bay says no to will obviously be the key to saving us all.

    I guess that makes sense.
  • Rob
    You are going to go by a movie that had the logic that a nuclear bomb would split the asteriod in two if you drill a hole 80 feet deep, but it wouldn't work if you only drilled 79 feet deep. Because no way would the nuclear blast push through that extra foot of rock.

    The fact that they put the fate of the world in Ben Affleck's hands tells me they weren't going for realism.
  • Eve
    Dude, AWESOME F'N CATCH, you smart bastard. I wonder how much hate mail you'll get from this.
  • Greyson
    evergreen said:

    "Whatever Bay says no to will obviously be the key to saving us all.

    I guess that makes sense."

    Wow, truer words were never spoken.
  • LP
    Ummm, the solar sails idea in Armageddon along with most of the ideas was thought up in part by NASA and they used it in the movie.
  • moulie
    Carl Sagan once discussed a derivative of this same idea and argued AGAINST it because the same device could be used alternatively as a doomsday device, in order to divert an asteroid into a collision course with Earth instead of away from it. I agree with him. The only way then would be to destroy the asteroid altogether.
  • Jon
    This was an absolutely fantastic article! Thank you!
  • Hendo
    "That being said, it’s interesting that Armageddon writer Jonathan Hensleigh is now batting two for two in coming up with scenarios that have frightening real-world implications" check out the website badastronomey. The land, drill, blow up theory isn't a hit. It's more like 3 strickes all on its own lol
  • Jamie
    When the time comes that an asteroid is threatening the Earth we'll launch 100 nukes at the thing.

    Not because that will work but because, in general, people like to blow shit up.
  • This is one of the best articles ever written on /film.

    "You are going to go by a movie that had the logic that a nuclear bomb would split the asteriod in two if you drill a hole 80 feet deep, but it wouldn’t work if you only drilled 79 feet deep. Because no way would the nuclear blast push through that extra foot of rock. "

    "it was rejected because nobody wants to watch scientists sow a fucking blanket for two hours"

    These 2 comments win.
blog comments powered by Disqus