Superman Reboot Confirmed

Jeff Robinov confirmed to the Wall Street Journal, that Warner Bros will reboot the Superman franchise.

“Superman [Returns] didn’t quite work as a film in the way that we wanted it to,” said Robinov. “It didn’t position the character the way he needed to be positioned. Had Superman worked in 2006, we would have had a movie for Christmas of this year or 2009. But now the plan is just to reintroduce Superman without regard to a Batman and Superman movie at all.”

No word on if Bryan Singer will still be involved or not. Lets just hope George Miller isn’t involved.

Warner Bros will begin to refocus on bigger tentpole movies, hoping to release as many as eight big movies a year by 2011. Robinov hopes that two out of those eight films will be DC comic book adaptations. This basically mimics the move made by Marvel Studios. Warner Bros is expected to announce their upcoming line-up of DC movies in the next month. But for now the plan is to produce four comic book films in the next three years. This would likely include a third Batman film and the Superman reboot. The success of The Dark Knight has convinced Robinov thatt building more realistic superheroes with darker stories may be the key to box office gold.

“We’re going to try to go dark to the extent that the characters allow it,” he said.

This is a good move for some films, but I hope they take the time to assess each comic property on its own. I can certainly see a darker Superman. One of the many lessons learned from Bryan Singer’s Superman Returns is that the audiences want something different. I feel that his fan-boy like faithfulness to the Richard Donner films prevented the series from creating it’s own identity.

I suggested in my last post the possibility of hiring Jonathan Nolan to give a new spin on the character. Most comments were critical of this idea, but I still think it’s the best way to go. Superman doesn’t need to be set in the Nolanverse, but he needs a new take, and a screenwriter who will treat the character with respect, but at the same time won’t feel afraid to stray from the source material or ideas set up in the previous film adaptations. I think it might also be fun to eventually create one-off films, possibly something like Mark Millar’s Red Son.

  • Christopher Edwards
    I think a re-boot or even another film is a bad idea for Superman leave it alone for a few years, but Jonathan Nolan could get a good screenplay but would need some like Chris to help with creating the univerese.

    Try some new franchises, how many do they own
  • SCOTT DOWDY
    LOOK IT IS NOT HARD ! all these years to do this movie right . Have superman be more up to date like he is in all the comics and justice league unlimited shows, and give him a fight. People are tired of seeing lex luthor trying to turn the world into kryptonite or blow up countries with rouge nuc missles. You can have lex but put in Braniac ,Parasite,Massacare hell even Toyman would be a change instead of always having lex flippin luthor. I KNOW I AM A NERD.
  • Reason
    A gotham like Superman probably will not work, especially if it feels like Superman is out of his element. What they need is a Superman with a free storyline and a Lex Luther who's more of a genius criminal mastermind / corrupt politician and not the weak willed, island building nonsense Superman Returns graced us with.
  • JShaps
    Uh-oh...I guess they couldn't work Superman Jr. into the script at all...

    I hope Brandon Routh still does Superman. He's awesome.

    KNEEL BEFORE ZOD!
  • J.D.
    The Russians aren't going to be happy with a "Red Son" adaptation... (not that it matters).

    But hell, they got their panties in a knot about Indiana Jones fighting the Soviets in 1957.

    "We weren't in the U.S. looking for magic skulls!" etc., etc.

    On second thought, they probably would be happy to see the U.S. attacked by a commie superman.
  • andy
    I'm getting so tired of the studios just reintroducing old franchises and making them 'darker' to freshen them up. Yeah, for the most part, the movies are turning out to be decent, but it's getting so repetitive. They'd probably introduce the Three Stooges as 'three dark and edgy crack addicts', if there were a dime in it.
  • Andrew
    I hope they don't just dive head on into the "dark side of superman" just because it worked with "Dark Knight". Batman's character has always been darker which is why it worked so well. Superman's personality has always been one of a continual optimism about the world.

    That said, a hero's optimism has to be challenged to make a good story. I'd love to see a truly twisted Lex Luthor. With any luck Doomsday is being thrown around aswell.

    We'll see.
  • gryffin12345
    I liked the look and the style of superman returns, but the story was a huge fail. Krypton on Earth...booo. Anyways...a revamp would be good move. Hopefully a superman batman movie would be on the way
  • Albert Brodsky
    My guess is that they will distance themselves from Routh/Singer completely.

    I'd like to see a 40 year old superman myself, something that give homage back to the days of George Reeves.

    I'd also like to see a new vision of Krypton, maybe with just a set up for a villian. I don't want to see him grow up like in the original. Just have Superman fighting some serious stuff from the moment he appears on screen.

    What's Kerry Conran doing these days? Even if you didn't like Sky Captain, it's hard to argue that his sense of design isn't amazing and a perfect fit for Superman. I'd love to see that guy get some redemption.
  • jimbo stewart
    @ andy

    Exactly. Superman just isn't a dark character. He's everything that's good about humanity.

    If they were smart they'd go in a completely different direction that doesn't shit on the previous movies (the good ones at least). Maybe a little more stylized and a bit more like the Max Fleischer cartoons.

    Make Clark Kent into the hard-nosed reporter he was meant to be instead of the goofball dork they've portrayed him as since the Donner era.

    You know who would be perfect to adapt it?

    Bruce Timm.

    The end.
  • Mr. Comedian
    Keep the Nolans the %$#* away from Superman.

    Tired of them being worshipped as if they are somehow the reinvention of all that is cinema.

    That is all.
  • A Better Class of Criminal
    I think it's probably a good idea to re-boot the series... again. But, they could have done the same with a sequel by Singer.
    I like the idea of Nolan writing, I don't think he's a one trick pony. He could do justice to Superman. However, I don't think a Batman V. Superman movie would be a good idea. The two don't belong in the same world, and ultimately it would only be good for the box office.
  • There's just no way in hell this whole "dark" thing will work. They need to leave the Superman franchise alone. If Superman Returns told us anything it was that the world doesn't care about the Man of Steel anymore.
  • Chadwick
    YES! Red Son would be a great spin-off... what I would like to see is a Grant Morrison 'All Star Superman' spin-off/series/animated series/anything. The Nolans used Loebs 'Long Halloween' as their 'source material', Warner bros should use Loebs 'Superman for all Seasons' as their 'source material' for the new superman film? Just a suggestion...
  • Danny Bell
    to be fair, this would in fact be a good way to go.

    however, there are many story elements and visual aspects that i would love to see carried on from the richard donner films, ie the introduction of general zod and the crystalline krypton technology and setting.

    tbh, id even like to see the way clark would learn to cope with his powers within a "cardboard" world.

    but as for a story, i think jonothan nolan would be an excellent writer. his work on the dark knight was simply fantastic. but in this, i dont think it should be set in an uber-realistic environment as has been done with the batman franchise.

    ;-D
  • A Better Class of Criminal
    @ Mr. Comedian

    Why So Serious? Nolan is a great writer, especially at adapting comic-book superhero's. How is wanting him to write another adaptation "worshipping" him. If you do something good, you're going to be wanted to do more of it.

    By the Way... Batman 3 in three years? I am already getting exciited (if Nolan agees that is).
  • sideshowRaheem
    Although I'm happy to hear about the much needed reboot Superman souldn't be done dark it just doesn't jive at all with the history of the character. Ironman managed to find the happy medium between the super-fantastical world of Spiderman 3 and the dark and depressing Nolan Batman universe Superman should be done along the same lines.
  • Dr Malo
    Red Son sucks for a movie. It's a ELSEWORLD.
  • Pill
    Nolan already sucked all of the fun out of Batman, why let him do the same to Superman?
  • South Texas Terror
    What makes superman is the type of villian he faces. If the villians are weak, it is going to be a weak movie.
  • Superman
    Bring back Dean Cain!
  • Go Goya
    The one off idea is a good one, though I don't see it really taking off in the film industry. It works with comics beacuse the audiences are more prepared for that sort of thing.

    My own personal observations tell me that moviegoers are too dumb for this to work. I can just picture one of those old ladies that always talks throught he movies completely freaking out...

    "What do you mean he's a soviet? Why does his suit look different? Why doesn't Jimmy have a camera?"

    I feel like studio execs just aren't getting what it was that made The Dark Knight so relatable and that it simply isn't going to work for everything. Superman himself simply isn't a very relatable character because of how not human he is. We can only relate to him when we see his more human traits. Using "Returns" as an example: his conflict about Lois being married and having a child, that he would spend years away just trying to find a piece of his homeworld...those are things we can relate to because they reflect some part of humanity.

    A movie focusing too much on that side of the character would ultimatley fail because at the end of the day he is Superman people simply can't relate to a dude that can take a bullet to the eye or fly.
  • Jeff
    2 words. Kingdom Come.

    Too bad that doesn't leave it open for sequels, but perhaps something along those lines, the back story even.

    Personally, I DONT want to see an origins story at all. We know who he is. We know how he got there. If you have to - use the opening credits for backstory. Start off after he spent years in the fortress - involve someone other than Lex as his enemy.

    I would still love to see the ENTIRE doomsday/funeral for a friend/return of superman arc and do it with ALL the supporting cast. If they can make hobbits come alive damnit, they can make the flash. Do it in 3 movies, it would be epic.
  • Steelo
    “We’re going to try to go dark to the extent that the characters allow it,” he said."

    That statement is scary as hell.
  • 88
    Batman is a dark character. Superman is not a dark character. Making Superman dark is as stupid as making Batman light. Superman should be a rocking good time. Superman represents everything that is decent and hopeful about America and the immigrant dream. Batman is about the tragedies of post-industrial American life. This is not rocket science.

    Look to the Grant Morrison All Star Superman stories for a guide.

    HELL, GET GRANT MORRISON TO WRITE THE FREAKING THING.

    Those stories are full of drama and pathos but they don't try to darken the character.

    And don't get some scrawny soap opera actor to play Superman. Superman should be a big dude. It's too bad they can't clone Christopher Reeve.

    You know who they should get to play Superman?

    PATRICK WARBURTON.
  • REAL6
    DOOMSDAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • Jeff
    Want to see a "dark" superman? Read Speeding Bullets

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superman:_Speeding...
  • The only thing dark that should be involved in a Superman flick is a gentleman named Darkseid. A dark villain and dark stretches of jeopardy or peril for Superman makes sense. A dark Superman does not.
  • Matt
    As much as I'd like to see the Superman franchise rooted in Chris and Jon Nolan's Batman universe, I don't think anyone has the will (or the capacity) to pull it off.
    In the grim and desolate world of 'real' Metropolis, won't people immediately recognize that Superman is really Clark Kent without glasses? How would they get around that?
    I just can't see them making the jump from 'Family-Superman' to 'Dark-Superman'. I think the only reason that Batman's reboot was successful was because Batman's heroics were plausible in reality. He didn't have superpowers so moviegoers could easily judge him from a tangible standpoint.
    If they do make a 'Superman Begins' (followed by a 'The Man of Steel'), it would certainly take an effort much bigger than the Nolan brothers.
  • Guest
    So…Jeff, how about letting Spike Jonze keep Where the Wild Things Are dark?
  • 88
    Superman can easily exist in the same reality as Batman -- just keep in mind that THEY LIVE IN DIFFERENT CITIES.

    I live in Detroit. Detroit is a pretty ugly place. When I go to other cities, healthy cities (like New York, Chicago, etc.) it is a total culture shock because those towns are a totally different deal. They are not scary places. Detroit is a scary place.

    Yet Detroit exists in the same "reality" as Chicago. I realize this -- much to my disappointment -- every time I pull off I-94 coming home.

    So, think of Gotham City as a very large version of Detroit... and think of Metropolis as a fictional equivalent of Chicago or Manhattan.

    Batman is appropriate for Gotham City.

    Superman is appropriate for Metropolis.

    Again, this is not necessarily rocket science.

    Same reality, different characters, different cities, different vibes, different types of stories.
  • Brian
    How about we stop making Superman movies and/or shows. It's getting real fucking old...how many times are they going to tell the same fucking story with a different "twist"?
  • Harrison and Steve
    historic news. i cannot contain my excitement.

    pssst... warner bros.

    Kerry Conran is sitting by the phone.
  • Charles
    This is good news. Returns was Superman vs a big rock.
    I liked Jorel/Brando, I liked the music. I liked the catching the plane. not much else.

    Dark is good as long dark means taking the character seriously. Equally a 'begins' that takes the character back to 30's in style and powers, would be interesting, provided this allows the character to evolve ie become more powerful over time as he did in the comics.

    NB movies are by their nature elseworld stories - what works in the comics over many months even years as a story arc doesn't necessarily translate to a screenplay.

    Things I don't want to see
    1. Costume changes, the suit is the suit, the cape is red not maroon. How about making the stars stripes black and purple, does that work for you?
    2. Lex Luthor as the main villain. the anti-batman - a clever rich guy, doesn't work as a major threat to Superman - without giving him a technological advantage which isn't of this earth. (like a big rock) and we've done that already.
    3. Which brings me to Krypton, be that technology or General Zod type characters - why does everything from Kyrpton that isn't Kal-El have to be evil or a threat, I'm tired of bad things coming to earth from Krypton because Superman is here. It's old and again has been done already.

    The universe is a BIG place, surely some writer can imagine a worthy protagonist for the Man of Steel - Darksied, Mongul.
    Why can't we have star wars - esque style space amarda's - a real extraterrestial attack - say like 911, and Superman goes to war, like the war on terror.
  • Superman is DC's flagship character and they'll never stop trying to get it right. I think a reboot is the only option. I also think that a reboot puts Brandon Routh out on his ass, which I'm fine with. I agree that we need to see an older, more hardened Superman, probably in his late 30's or early 40's. However, I don't see how you can go dark with the Superman character in a movie and be successful. If they want to intensify the franchise and make it darker, as others have stated, it has to be done via the villain(s). Superman is the light, the ray of hope that shines eternally. He is there to save mankind from the evils that can (and will) befall it.

    Also, for the love of all that is sacred, forgo the unnecessary love interest. A strong story doesn't need it. That's a huge part of what ruined the last movie....

    Besides, a Superman reboot is necessary since we all know DC eventually wants to move ahead with a JLA movie. They have to have an answer to the upcoming Avengers movie, right?
  • Jmoney
    when i hear reboot i think origin story, and there is no way we need another Superman origin story. We all know he's the last son of krypton blah blah blah. i want to see a Superman movie with a good freaking villian, enough with Lex Luthor, he's been played to death, I want to see a villian who can actually challenged Superman's powers, Superman is no longer relatable to the public, but if they had a villain in the movie who stood a chance physically against his powers then the movie might work.


    and i agree that comment about going dark really scares me. he was bascially saying TDK did fantastic so we are going to copy the shit out of it. Superman is not dark.
  • Jeff
    I'm fine with Where the wild things are being dark, it isn't exactly a fun place to be last I read the book and can be scary for a kid - but dark to a point. Dark like Pans labyrinth is a bit excessive, dark like harry potter or even narnia (which had its moments) would be appropriate.
  • Mikey M
    Tom Welling would be great to take the Big Screen version.
    He has earned it.
    No more Origin stories. I think we know where Supes comes from by now.
  • On my blog I suggested the reboot franchise could follow-up on Smallville, with Tom Welling in the lead role. I'm sure a lot of you won't agree, but I think this could be really interesting. Also, ties with the Batman films would be awesome.
  • charles
    Shit man. Superman Returns made $200 million in the US. Fuck man, the movie was good. These fucking studios i swear.
  • I'm over Superman and reboots and remakes.
  • Jeff
    I like the idea of welling as superman but he said he doesn't want to go theatrical with it. If they ended smallville this year and continued with the story on the big screen, that would be cool.
  • Goobity
    Superman is the least 'dark character' in comics (besides Captain America perhaps). Why the hell change what has worked for 70 years just for the sake of it? It hasn't worked before, and it won't work this time. Superman should reflect humanity at it's most noble..."Truth, Justice, and all that." If you dilute this archetype, and make it dark and grim you end up with something else. You get Batman.
  • evanz
    It seems like there was window of opportunity for a big screen Smallville - not necessarily based on the current tv show, of course. I still think it would be a neat idea for a movie given the right script.
  • D.A.
    see this was the downside of the dark knight being so successful. dumbass movie studios would start to want to imitate it exactly, not knowing that the reason Nolan's Batman is so successful is because Nolan was given free reign on how to bring Batman back to the big screen. Nolan created the whole world of Batman in his garage, he wasn't pigeon holed into making it "dark" and "gritty", he made the Batman that was his vision.

    Now as for Superman. Keep him in the world that was created in the last one. Brandon Routh was great as Superman. Superman Returns was the closure we needed from the previous films, and the ending left it open for so many possibilities.

    Singer was great for Superman, bring him back and since the last one left it open ended it'll give him the freedom to give it the Xmen 2 treatment. If WB knows what worked for the last Batman movies, they are gonna realize that giving the director the freedom to execute their vision is gonna be the key to a phenomenal franchise.

    oh yea and I really hope they dont try to rush Batman 3. Nolan needs his break from it, direct one or 2 other movies that have nothing to do with Batman, then let him get back to working his magic with the Caped Crusader.
  • Jordan2099
    Can we please stop with the constant jerking off of The Dark Knight. Superman Returns was a boring and flat film, Supes doesn't need to be tweaked, and Batman is not the perfect template for every character. Superman is not a dark character, and I don't want a "realistic" take on Superman. Here's whats going to happen now thanks to Batman. Source material is going to be constantly ignored and we're going to get comic movies that will be far from the spirit of the comics.
  • Who is George Miller? Is he any relation to Peter Chen? Or a combination of George Lucas and Frank Miller? Now there's a Superman I'd pay to see.
  • gobleep
    I really liked Superman Returns. In tonality, it thrusts a goody-goody Kal-El back to an Earth he didn't leave. Singer DID Gothamize everything around Superman. The thing to do now with Superman is make him more of a political tool for Truth Justice and the American Way, just like Superman in FRANK MILLER's TDK books. Make him a total buffed out Venice Beach genetic freak with beefcake good looks, insane vanity, moral compas , cats out of trees but opens up a can of kryptonian whoop ass. tool to whoever is in the white house. depending on who that is, it gives batman a reason to own a piece of kryptonite.
  • Owend
    Why the jab at George Miller? I think the guy who arguably reinvented action films with the Mad Max movies and is a genius at casting and creating iconic characters (Mad Max, Master Blaster, Twilight Zone's John Lithgow, Babe and his Farmer). Miller's work has always been top notch--even Babe 2 and Happy Feet are dark and edgy enough to rival anything the somber Nolan Brothers could produce. Give the guy the respect he deserves. I think his take on a superhero movie would certainly not disappoint.
  • orange cinema
    -i think this is a terrible decision, but if it has to be a reboot, i'd like to hear about this 'groundbreaking superman idea' that mark millar has been dying to do. it's not 'red son', but some other trilogy idea that he has been shopping around recently.

    -jonah nolan is doing the terminator & the inevitable thrid batman - i'd prefer to see him next write a completely original script. allowing him and his brother to take breaks from the superhero genre will keep them happy and also keep their material fresh. they are NOT the answer to every hero film in existence. when raimi did nothing but spider-man, we ended up with SM3, can we not learn from past mistakes people?

    with the over saturation of comic-book/hero films, it's important that filmmakers like the nolans continue to make films outside of this genre whenever they can.
blog comments powered by Disqus