All I’m saying is that nearly EVERY anti-war film made over the past decade has failed miserably. I’m sure you know this.

And OF COURSE I enjoy movies made by leftist potheads; but movies ABOUT leftist potheads just aren’t doing all that well lately. :)

Just like no one wants to watch racist, mysogonistic, homophobic Marines invading countries backed by rock n’ roll cliche soundtracks? or films of other historic atrocities?

The politics for subject matter doesn’t matter, just as long that it’s done properly. People will watch it. I have a hard time believing you don’t enjoy any sort of film coming out of “leftist, hippy, commie, pinko, liberal” Hollywood. Do you live in a bunker with posters of Gen. Patton and Toby Keith cd’s?

You sound like a caricature.

Of course, that doesn’t stop the pill-popping leftist actors in hollywood from wanting to be in such a film; they’re desperate for a purpose and by reliving a fictional account of ’60s potheads they think they’ve done something for the world.

So sad.

The issue is with Greengrass, for me, is that he does the shaky cam stuff and it is so over the top. He should stick to action flicks, coming off the Bourne films.

I really wish Spielberg would redeem himself from War Of The Worlds and Munich and make a more interesting movie, like this, with the cast it previously boasted, which included Jeff Daniels, which the /film guy failed to mention.

You know how most directors are. They always think they can bring a new element to it with their own “vision” so no matter how good one film can tell a story like this. You will always have that one guy to take a stab at it because he sees it in hiw own head a certain way.

This hobo needs to stop relying on shakey-cam to help progress his films. That shit is obnoxious. I’m sure it will have wicked camera shots and “actioney” Hollywood fluff.